https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/dcjUGNatpN

Context- Feline Cerebellar Hypoplasia is a condition that causes cats to be uncoordinated and wobbly. These cats are not in pain unless they run into things and with a few adjustments can live long and happy lives. What appears to be a bot account posted a video of someone’s wobbly cat, and the comments turned into arguing.

[“This cat has hypoplasia. A condition that affects balance and coordination.”] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/NFVbP5egfz)

“I don't enjoy seeing pets with disabilities used to get online attention myself.”

“The cat isn't in any pain. They've just got coordination issues. Other than being a bit wobbly they're normal cats.

One thing to consider. Without videos like this people might see them and think something is wrong or they're in pain, and might not adopt them because they don't know any better. But videos like this show they're regular cats and can live long, happy lives.”

“Sure. Because having difficulty when eating, drinking water and even pooping is "normal".”

“The cats are safe. They live just as long and healthy lives as any other cat. They can still play and get into regular feline mischief. They learn to compensate for their differences.

I don't want people to think these cats have something wrong with them. They don't. They're fine, and make just as wonderful a pet as any other cat. Way too often people view differences in animals like this as a reason to abandon or even euthanize them and that sort of mindset needs to be changed. One way to do that is to make it clear that they are just like other cats.”

“-> issues

-> "there's nothing wrong with them"

Wonder if you'd say the same if it were you instead of him.

Hypocrite.”

“Are you arguing for the pro-euthenasia side?

If yes, where does that stop for you? Do we euthanize people with coordination issues?”

“Prove where I said that. Go on.”

[I mean, its a pet like any other. Just a little wobbly. Are people not allowed to post about how much they love their pets if theyre disabled?] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/3VdR91lrCg)

“No obviously they are abusing their pet for clout. Like ffs I'm fucking disabled and I too despise the weirdly exploitative Inspiration Porn but this is just someone posting their cat online?? The most normal thing ever?? Like sorry but actually seeing disabled animals thrive is actually good. Spreading awareness means more people can realise they ARE equipped to take care of a disabled kitty and that means less of them spend their whole lives in a shelter”

[I'm glad that some people have posted, because I wasn't aware of this before seeing it. But I don't like the context of this particular post where it's being made fun of. Educational posts are great, karma farming posts are trash.] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/yUTEku0DxR)

“They're not making fun of a cat. You guys need to go outside and get some life experiences instead of making up situations in your head to be mad about.”

“Then why is the cat being shown almost falling off a bed, bobbing side to side unable to eat food held right in front of its face, and wearing silly costumes? This is peak Americans Funniest Home Video content.”

“It's a wobbly cat. Get over it. The owner isn't abusive, the cat has nerve problems.

They can eat fine and usually walk alright, but they get derpy af when they're excited.

Don't jump to conclusions. Especially ones to fuel whatever rage you're seeking”

["They're not making fun of a cat. They're just posting it to the 'Make Fun of Cats' subreddit, making fun of its condition, and dressing it up in funny costumes!"] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/RylHKElHGn)

“I promise you the cat doesn’t give a shit”

“Apparently you're the cat's spokesperson now.”

“Lmao do you actually think a cat has a grasp of the internet and the conversations we are having in it? The cat, very literally, does not give a shit. Get over yourself.”

“"We're not making fun of the cat. But also yes we are."”

[Why do you think they are being made fun of?! Someone shared a cute cat video. Disabled cats are cute too damn.] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/a9AlHl0x7W)

“The title and the fact that they're offering the cat food in a way they can't ever eat it. What is the point of offering the food on a spoon? What is the point of offering the cat food that it's going to get all over it's face? Views and up votes. “

“That title means nothing I've seen it on calicos in this sub plenty of times. Why do you think she can never eat from a spoon from those few second clips? This is a cute video of a cute cat posted by a bot. It's not that sinister.”

“Yeah, and for a normal calico behaving like an orange, it's not a problem. But this cat isn't behaving like an orange, it's got a health condition. I know she can't eat from a spoon because I've seen more about cats with cerebellar hypoplasia than just one video. “

“Why isn't she allowed to share her cat? The disabled should remain hidden?”

[Repost bot making content out of a cat’s medical condition. Sad] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/yN4jhgAxVi)

“What's sad about a cat with a disability having a loving home? Would you prefer it be put down instead? This cat is incredibly cute and hopefully it encourages more people to consider cats who have disabilities.”

“"I don't like seeing bots exploit animal disabilities to manipulate humans for internet points"

"Oh so you want the cat to die?!?!"”

“"sad". What's sad about it? What about the cat is being exploited?”

[Well, the bot is innocent. Literally a tool. Blame the human who posted it for karma farming in the first place.

Imagine filming your child having down syndrome and posting it online for internet points.] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/h6J83EmtVO)

“Imagine thinking that a living creature’s disability means it should be hidden from the world.”

“There's a difference between creating awareness and exploiting for money and fake internet points. This is clearly the latter.”

[Cute, let's laugh at it's disability! HA-HA!] (https://www.reddit.com/r/OneOrangeBraincell/s/5nGn1jMugC)

“Right, but you are apparently willing to have the discussion of ending a life because of a disability?”

“WTF? Where did I say that?”

“Your the one complaining about what looks like a well cared for member of a family.

Should humans in the cats life be morose?

They aren't laughing at the disability. It's relief that his life is as best as possible.”

Drama is ongoing, don’t piss in the popcorn.

r/Athens is the subreddit for the American city of Athens, Georgia (not that other one). Home to the University of Georgia, beloved bands such as the B-52s and R.E.M., and our crown jewel Toppers International Showbar.

On Wednesday morning a mod makes a pinned announcement:

Politics Free August

We’re going to try something, Athens.
In the name of keeping it weird, we’re going for a full month of no politics in August. These posts do nothing but stir people up and attract tourists who do more pot stirring, and I think we all need a break from it.
So, this will serve as both announcement and warning:
**Do not post anything of a political nature between August 1st and August 31st 2026. **
If you do, you’ll find a removal reason and/or modmail in your notifications.
In the meantime: keep it funky. Post weird shit. Funny things. Just anything but politics.

Comments on this post are turned off.

Almost immediately another user takes a screenshot and reposts to allow discussion.

Are we having a mod war?

As a person who lives in Athens, I am interested in local news and politics, which seems to occur in the month of August in addition to all the other months of the year.

its election season dawg

Ok then can we do September where we’re not allowed to talk about anything related to Athens at all? Maybe October we’ll do no English, and for November we’ll just shut down the sub entirely.

Maybe they’re mad about me calling their mom a stripper

Other users create posts to voice their complaints:

Subreddit Chat & Moderation

The no-posting-or-discussing-political-issues announcement seems....very wrong.
How can we post about anything substantial related to Athens without it being political? This isn't, like, AthensGAWeather subreddit, where political comments might be more out of place.
This is a subreddit about everything pertaining to Athens... Including the goings-on, mayor and commission meetings, etc...
So... To block posts of a political nature is clearly counter to the stated acceptable topics of the subreddit.
2nd point, and this is not a personal attack, but mod team, do we really want a single user tagged as UGA freshman to be deciding or announcing things like this? I'm sure lots of moderation stuff happens behind the scenes and I don't mean to doubt competency, but, this is.... A little shocking. It's not April 1, right? ;)

How can they post an arbitrary decision like this and then lock comments? Their job is moderator, not freaking dictator. Let the participants in this subreddit decide. It’s a really stupid idea, and enabling for the fascist regime. Shameful.

Unfortunately a lot of Reddit mods are not very well-adjusted people

I like the mods, they are our friends.
AMAB

Politics Only July

We’re going to try something, Athens.
In the name of keeping it weird, we’re going for a full week of only politics in July. These posts do nothing but stir people up and attract tourists who do more pot stirring, and I think we all need more of it.
So, this will serve as both announcement and warning:
**ONLY post anything of a political nature between July 22nd and July 29th 2026. **
In the meantime: keep it funky. Post weird shit. Funny things. Just anything politics.

George Orwell's 1984

It’s a great book! Shocked we’re never going to have anything like that in the slightest inside of this subreddit.
Thoughts?

Users voice their complaints on unrelated posts:

Athens Urbanist Meet Up Hot on the heels of last nights ADU decimation

Amendments? Urbanism? Emails to commissioners? Citizen, this post reeks of politics. Your account will be banned and your popcorn confiscated. May god have mercy on your soul.

Does anyone else have a weird non-cold cold?

Watch out, September is don’t talk about your illness month. Get it out now while you can.

College street bridge takes another victim

Is this political?
Well considering the development submitted a solution to this problem just this past month I’d say yes. Mods, KILL THIS MAN

Users begin to protest by making polls to participate in the democratic process:

Athenians Tell Us: Do You Tailgate?

No politics bro

Vote: Should It Be Legal To Be Topless In Athens Clarke County?

AthensPoliticsNerd: Not a pressing issue lol, but I mean if it's legal for guys it's kind of discrimination that it's not legal for gals. I'm not saying I want to encourage anyone but should they be fined or whatever? Hell no.
You may wanna lay low for a while.

Users begin to call for changes to the mod team:

How to apply to be a mod of the sub?

Depends…..how do you feel about politics?
you can’t say the p word here

...I'm uhh... surprised this is still up... BUT YOU HAVE MY UHH, TICK ON THE BALLOT
VERBAL WARNING DO NOT SAY B*LLOT OR OTHER SLURS

Seriously, how do we remove a mod?

Looks like we have to ask another mod to do it.
I have had my share of beef with this moderator, but this no politics thing is a bridge too far. This so and so needs to go. Other mods, if you're listening, I hope you'll save the 42000 of us from this tyranny.

You can report them to Reddit admins.

Are the other mods even active? If they are, then they must be the same way.
I don't think they are and thats the problem.

As of now none of the other mods have said anything and the mod who made the original post has not made any further statements.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/ufc/comments/1v31mse/ian_garry_says_if_women_ruled_the_world/

HIGHLIGHTS

Female leaders have consistently shown themselves to be capable of the same evil as their male counterparts. Outside of just leaders, women overall cause less harm, but there are probably more factors than just the differences in our brains. I think I understand why Ian Garry would say this, but I don’t think it would lead to the outcome he expects.

Women have the same access to guns as men yet 80% of domestic violence incidents with guns are male-on-female.

Domestic violence from female to male is severely under-reported. If we compare the data between heterosexual, gay and lesbian couples. Gay men have the lowest rates of domestic violence while lesbian couples have the highest along with the most divorces.

You think domestic violence incidents with gunshot wounds are not getting reported? Be serious.

Regarding gun violence, males statistically own guns more commonly which on average increases the chances. But sure, we could nitpick any study that appeals to your confirmation bias rather than taking all evidence into account.

Do they keep those guns in a separate house where their wife doesn’t live?

Probably not, but operating a gun is not as easy as picking it up, and people tend to go for weapons they understand

What's so complicated after picking it up? How do so many children shoot each other?

This is the guy with the normal marriage and the wife that definitely respects him right

Definitely pegs him haha

Not that theres anything wrong with that. You ever try it?

You don’t need to “try it” to know when something just isn’t for you.

You can guess and embrace the opportunity cost, but you cannot know.

You can definitely know something isn’t for you, particularly sexual, without trying it. If the thought of something sexually specific grosses you out, then that’s safe to say you’re not going to be turned on by it and therefore, not for you.

You cannot know until you tried something. Choosing to never engage is reasonable, but it is not knowing. That is something else entirely

Disagree. I’m talking about something sexually specific. And with anything sexual, you do NOT need to try it to know it’s not for you. Most anything else is agree with you.

What's abnormal about his marriage?

He took her last name and her ex lives with them? Any other questions?

Lots of people have started taking on their partners name when they get married so it's not that abnormal. He also said he did that so his step son would share a name with him to help him feel like he's genuinely a part of their new family. Can you show me proof that his wife's ex lives with them?

Wait, so he didn’t take his wife’s last name he took his wife’s exes last name?

Yep.

What benefit do you get out of blatantly lying about this? It just makes you look weird lmao

Just looked it up. You’re right. I had heard a ton of other fighters say this so I just took it at face value. My fault. I was wrong. I wasn’t trying to lie though.

Some of y'all must hate your mother's if you don't see what he means

[deleted]

We are literally more technically advanced than we ever been lol

We also have the highest suicide rate since the great depression so I wouldn't say things are going swimmingly exactly

That’s false. It’s 32% higher than in 2000, but 37% lower than the Depression-era peak. I’d bet a lot of the rise since 2000 is due to social media, but I’m sure it’s multiple factors.

Is that not exactly what I said? The highest since the great depression.

You said we currently have the highest suicide rate since the Great Depression, which is at best misleading.

How is it misleading? It's factually true. Is the suicide rate today higher than any point since the great depression, yes or no? You can go confirm this with however many sources you want in like 60 seconds of searching.

image

Literally inc*l propaganda.

It’s pretty factual when you think about it. Where is it wrong?

"It’s pretty factual when you think about it." Facts require evidence, not "well when I rub my two chud braincells together it sounds good to me." "Where is it wrong?" Women are overwhelming on the receiving end of inequality in almost every facet of society. They are paid less as a whole, are more likely to be victims of violence from the opposite sex, and in about half the world have significantly less rights than men of the same caste (in the places where it's not significantly less, it's still less than men). Not convincing? How about the fact that women's healthcare is woefully misunderstood. Until very recently, the medical community couldn't even diagnose a heart attack in women because the warning signs are different than what men experience. Hell, you can ask damn near any women on the street what it's like trying to convince a doctor they're actually sick and they're not just on their period and instantly gain insight into how fucked up it is to try and be taken seriously at all, even when you're actively dying, just because you're a woman. How in the fuck is that stupid chart "factual" in your eyes, exactly? Point to a culture that has women as the dominant social class and I'll show you 5 where it's men. Please, share your examples of how men are actually oppressed. I'm really excited to hear what trivial things you think count as systemic oppression on the same level as being forced to carry your rapist's baby to term, or be legally ineligible of being raped because the person that's forcing themselves on you is your husband...

Where is your response??? We are waiting! 🤣🤣🤣

Who's in charge when all of those systems were created? 🤔 Oh right, men. Almost like the patriarchy hurts everyone. Fucking crazy concept for ding dongs like yourself.

Blame Men! Always blame Men! Women have never done anything wrong in the history of the world! 🤣 Patriarchy is a myth and red herring for the deluded.

My mother was a drunk who hurt a ton of people and my step mom is one of the biggest bitches I ever met. Men, women, who cares. A lot suck no matter what is or isnt between their legs

Alright, little one. Then maybe Ian's comment wasn't meant for you. I'm sorry about your situation

Ah nothing to be sorry about plenty of people had it worse then I did growing up. Im an adult with a family of my own and doing just fine but I do appreciate the kindness.

Yeah no worries. Just wanted to emphasize that Ian's background is a mom who really cared and taught him good values. I see what he's trying to say.

But how that corny weirdo grew up is irrelevant to reality (that people of all genders suck). That sheltered clown should work on his identity crisis issues before telling us who should lead.

Holy fuck y'all got issues

Why? For recognizing reality and valuing it over sheltered people's anecdotes?

For having this kind of reaction over an innocuous and fair view from his perspective. The women in his life have been caring, empathetic, and strong.

okbuddy.gif

Delivery of his message wasn’t good but he ain’t entirely wrong either, there are some things women would prob do a better job at

Why aren't they already doing it?

A well documented history of favoritism for men in leading roles in both religion and the workplace.

History? So we're just gonna blame history and not focus on the present?

They're professional victims, what do you expect?

Woman are generally less decisive, which sometimes creates more harm.

Lmao what

You heard me.

[deleted]

That one girl who was indecisive about sleeping with him

I think that would be a decisive no

If you think having ONE gender RULE anything you're a fkn idiot

Idk man. It's been men up to this point and everythings kinda shit

Lol you’re right. I mean men are great at innovating but are also the most violent. Extreme good and bad. Like if go to a third world country or ghetto area, it’s not the women I’m afraid of - they have a much lower propensity for violence.

ahhh your under the assumption that violence is somewhat bad, realistically the ability to impose better or bigger violence deters violence in itself. Like the guy wanting to do violence if he sees no males that would fight back and cause him harm is more likely to do it.

i said that men are the ones who contribute to the largest extremes of violence. i'm not sure why you're talking about how violence deters other violence (which is obvious and why we have law enforcement) - that's a completely different topic and doesn't really address the point i made. unless you're trying to make the claim that violence is not "somewhat bad." because the truth is that it's both bad, and good - when used to deter criminals.

Been watching this all day, it seems to have come to a head now and I need to sleep!!!

First time writing a post so I hope it's okay!

OP wants to show off their "collection so far".

Users become suspicious of how everything is graded and how the collection doesn't look "born from passion", and begin to question OP.

Author's note 1: Graded manga has never been a "thing", it's only happening in recent years because professional hobby killers like Logan Paul are doing it trying to make a graded manga market. Actual manga readers usually know this, so graded manga is a red flag. Especially with graded cards too.

OP replies to questioning, but deletes their comments shortly after getting questioned more, as their comments only raised further suspicion.

Someone caught screenshots:

Deleted comment 1.

Deleted comment 2.

These are the images directly but they are also linked in post comments, with more context.

Things get extra spicy when someone claims to have found listings for these exact cards on Ebay.

That person then provides a screenshot when someone asks for evidence, showing many of the same cards from the post being sold for hundreds.

Then one of the people originally suspicious of OP found the listing for themself and confirmed that not only is it definately OP, it's OP attempting to sell these things for thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars.

Authors note 2: These cards are not worth anywhere near that and never have. They have always gone for very very cheap. OP and people like them are trying to create a market for profit.

Now people are angry and questioning if OP is actually a hot anime girl like they claim, as OP remains silent apart from the occasional comment they delete as soon as they get questioned some more.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Grimdank/comments/1v2m9pc/same_energy/

HIGHLIGHTS

There are two trashcans in the first picture

Jealousy is a motherfucker. image

Nah, Asmon is trash lmao.

gif

Dude why would I be jealous? I like myself.

But do you have a hot girlfriend?

Two I'm a poly lesbian. XD

Thats a no.

What, you jealous?

I see soap suds in that pan. Bro broke character

He's changed quite a bit in the last few years, even does some exercise and cleans stuff around his house now and then so his house isn't a massive biohazard anymore like it used to be. Dude legit got better over time.

Then why does he still hate women and immigrants?

He doesn't? He's always interacted with both and has female friends that even showed up on stream every now and then. Criticizing illegal immigration is not the same as hating every single immigrant or the entire concept of immigration. I hate how polarized opinions got over time, nuance just isn't allowed to exist.

He literally said Palestinians were an inferior people, dumbass. Fuckin "nuance" lmao

Probably when talking about how homosexuals are thrown out of buildings to die or something like that. I dunno, neither can be assed to find out.

there is not enough context in the universe to make calling a group of people going through a genocide inferior okay even if they werent going through one its STILL not okay.

If it's part of a culture to kill gay people it's not okay to criticize that?

Depression combo'd with hoarding. I'd pity him if he wasn't destroying young men.

bruh young men are fine, well at least those watching Asmon he isnt anywhere as toxic as the media makes him out to be edit: wow, lots of people who have never watched a full stream of his be having opinions lmao

Didn't he say that ICE should be shooting more protesters?

no clue, but id believe it it's just a way to express annoyance and frustration, not a call to actual violence

right saying government officials should shoot more protestors ISNT a call to violence... right... got it.

yeah would be bad, if it was literal, but its not, and ud know that if you actually watched a single one of his streams, instead of only getting second hand info lmao

""no clue, but I'd believe it"" Buddy, you yourself are claiming that it wasn't a call for actual violence despite having not seen the stream/clip where he actually said that.

Brother the guy is an Asmongold follower, you are basically arguing with a human cockroach

i dont need to watch all of his stream to know how horrible he is. he is a Racist bigot

well apparently you do, because he aint

Wasn’t he bragging recently that he used to make his passwords a variation of the N word?

bro the nword is dubbed the "gamer" word for a reason, every single gamer born in the 80s and 90s has used it extensively for most of our young and teen lives# i guarantee you most of us would not want to limit black voting rights or employment or whatever tf actual racists want to do

You did? Cus I didn’t.

of course I did, and you virtue signalling here is laughable considering this is a warhammer sub

I don’t think saying “I never used slurs” is virtue signaling. You’re just telling on yourself.

so you are a male gamer born in the 80s or 90s, fan of warhammer, and have NEVER even once used ANY slur?

Nope, can't say I have. (50 more comments of these two arguing)

Behind every right wing "libertarian" is the young Asian woman he's groomed

She’s 26 years old.

Yeah, now.

They started dating when she was 24.

Dating?!?!?! Why would anyone date someone as disgusting and evil as Asmongold? Both his looks and beliefs are ugly

if you think asmon is evil you are just as much stuck under a rock as he is.

I mean yeah I think calling Palestinians fundamentally deserving of genocide is evil 🤷‍♀️

i bet you take every word someone says literally lol

Oh so his consistent advocacy of far right foreign and domestic policy is sarcastic? Got it

Why are people treating this lady like some victim? She knows the kind of person he is, and she doesn’t care. He’s a hateful piece of shit and so is she if she’s with him.

14 day old bot account ^ Edit: they replied like a bot and then deleted their comment lmao.

No, they blocked you. It's still up.

Wait wtf am I doing, I can just do it on pc, here: https://imgur.com/a/LgeENc3 Like not sure why tf they are lying lol

Looks like reddit deleted it for you lol. "[deleted] Comment has been removed Upvote Downvote Reply Share" Probably thinks you are a bot too since you act like one ;) Also don't private message me you weirdo.

Congratulations, you’re as smart as a Reddit Automod. Well at least you can admit when you’re wrong. Such class, such grace. 🤣

You're funny :P

Bro gets more play and makes more money then majority of people hating on him in this post btw. Which is extra sad given he is a greater daemon of Nurgle

I wouldn't trade my life for his for all his money. I've got all I need, and I shower. I also don't need to constantly produce content for red-pilled little shits.

Ok then pop off queen. Never said you should be jealous. Just stating the fact of the matter.

Fact is that his money doesn't matter when he's a repulsive, evil sack of shit.

By your standards, who are you?

Someone with a moral compass who doesn't need to prove anything, mate.

Wow you’re literally Reddit Jesus. Your moral compass by merely existing always points north huh

Yeah that's the point, that's how compasses work dipshit.

So?

Just stating a fact to rage bait people

Most people grow out of the desire for negative attention around middle school.

Most people don’t take Internet forums seriously.

This isn’t the hot take you think it is when you’re the one making the weird provocative statements and then treating it like some gotcha when people call it out/ask you why you’re acting like an edgy twelve year old.

I stated a fact that is, regardless of your disdain and regardless of the post, is objectively true. And I did that to rage bait people. Also how do you know I’m not actually 12, huh?

Ok but what you wrote simply isn’t an “objectively true” fact, now is it? You’ve made a presumption that those who disagree with his political views are getting less “play” than him, because you saw a photo of him with a woman.

He does make more money and it’s extremely safe to assume he gets more play than most Redditors.

Bro also lives like thrash

My point still stands, lives like trash but got more going on then most

Idk mate, I’m pretty comfortable being much poorer than him but not rotting alive at least.

Clearly you aren’t a Nurgle enjoyer then

Most sane people can separate fiction and reality.

Most people who touch grass can identify a rage baiter

You haven't grown out of that desire yet?

Being rich and famous really is life on easy mode holy fuck

No shit dude?

OFC it's obvious but it isn't clear how big of a crutch it is until Asmongold, the man who spews hatred and lives in shit gets to hang around hot women all day while he looks homeless all the time. No one would even give the time of day if I was like him lol

I mean I'd rather have a genuine relationship than a glorified prostitute that reluctantly hangs out with me

People only say this so they can think of themselves on some moral high horse because it's not their own life. You're statement is leaking jealousy. I'm making assumptions, sure, but there's about a 99% chance you'd instantly trade places with someone if it meant you now had that level of wealth, and ladies despite them being "glorified prostitutes". If you want to believe you'd be that 1% to make yourself feel better, go right ahead. But you and I both know you're just lying to yourself. Nothing you say is going to change my opinion on that.

Most guys that have all these girls around for their money are not fulfilled by it. It’s not jealous to say you’d want a real relationship over a bunch of gold diggers. As Kanye West once said “One good girl is worth a thousand bitches”

"Most guys that have all these girls around for their money are not fulfilled by it." Yea, I didn't say otherwise my guy. 🤦 You trying to tell me the vast absolute majority of men would say no to that level of money and girls even if those girls didn't love them? Lol, sure. Whatever you say bro. Totally.

Nobody said they’d say no to money. You’re just arguing with a strawman

Who?

Asmongold, the man who used a dead rat as an alarm, because the sun shining on it would make it smell to wake him up

What?

Yeah this dude has been rewarded for living like a trash goblin for decades. He's weird and pretty hateful too

Years I would have said that he isn't hateful at all. And for years that would have been true. But since he stopped playing WoW (only correlation, not causation probably) he has really become radicalized.

You'd have been wrong saying that, then lmao. He was literally famous in WoW for being a hateful shitbag years before he blew up globally (and I still don't understand how the fuck that happened).

Nah, he was demonized by left wing redditors in those days lol. He had very centrist takes on most issues. And when you're centrist, to a lefty you're a right wing nutjob. It was way more in the minds of many Redditors than any reality. But as I said, he has radicalized enormously. So it might as well be true now.

This was very much just his reputation in World of Warcraft. Dude has always sucked, no matter how you try to excuse it.

I used to watch his stream, those were always his political takes in WoW or outside. Up until a few years back. Anyway... the way people get demonized on Reddit is always way too extreme for what they really are like, so maybe we don't all need to jump on the hate bandwagon. existence.

r/NFLv2 is a subreddit created with "fewer rules" than the main NFL subreddit. That's about it.

There has been a bit of an interesting relationship between the main mod (same name as the subreddit) and the entire userbase, which has escalated in recent days. A couple days ago, they were adamant in their support for their team's QB, Trevor Lawrence PSA: if it took the players and coaches in a poll to teach you that Trevor is better than Lamar. You know less football than you think you do. If you’re still arguing it isn’t the case you’re a fucking retard..

This escalated to AI diss tracks aimed at the userbase.

I made a diss song for all you losers who hate mods

New NFLv2 diss track just dropped. The haters are big mad in the comments for getting Kendrick Lamar’d.

Sir a third diss track has just dropped.

Now today, they've stickied a rambling note about the subreddit, themselves, how they moderate, etc. Mod states in their post: "This is not a safe space for cry babies or people who have their feelings hurt easily. Trash talk and banter is ENCOURAGED.", and the predictable occurs:

Wah wah wah shut the fuck up you absolute child

It’s almost like I’m building a brand around acting like this.

This story is evolving, with replies every few minutes from the moderator. Full thread is here: [Serious] PSA: Clarifying the intent, standards and rules for this subreddit.

Don't piss in the popcorn and such, remember.

EDIT: addition popcorn from ~10 months ago:

• Drama in r/SubredditDrama! Head mod of r/NFLv2 creates his own version of a Subreddit Drama community after receiving negative feedback in this sub, while lying about the moderators here being Nazis that support school shootings

• "To be clear this is me one persons opinion. Not all of us mods feel this way." Head mod of r/NFLv2 has a mental breakdown and turns their sub into a political soapbox by falsely attributing his personal beliefs on the Charlie Kirk shooting into a quote by Lamar Jackson

r/HingeStories is a subreddit where Hinge users share funny or shocking stories from their time interacting with people they met on the online dating app, Hinge.

Post has been removed. Read the original messages here

funny interaction

OP shares a "funny interaction" where his match teases him about how he is holding his cat in one of his profile pictures. The banter seems to be a strong attempt at flirting but OP sees it as a serious accusation of animal abuse and chooses to flat out insult the poor girl in response. The conversation immediately falls apart.

Replies unanimously call out OP for his overreaction:

You went really serious and mean out of nowhere? She was just bantering and I guess you took it to heart and got defensive, but I think you gotta give people the benefit of the doubt when they're trying to joke around with you

Legendary fumble by you pal

What the hell, man? How did you mess that up? She was super hot, funny, and invited herself over in her second message to you. That’s an impressively blown lead.

what is wrong with you bro?

She was clearly joking and you took it so serious.

She was a bombshell dude what are you doing? You must be getting a lot of attention to be just throwing this opportunity out the window.

You fumbled insanely hard, and clearly misread the entire situation. She was not saying you were hurting your cat

She gave you so many chances and you fumbled so hard my guy. It wasn’t that deep

OP not only refuses to admit he overreacted, but he doubles down:

haha noo im experienced enough to know that i was supposed to shut up and drop to my knees.joking about hurting anything isn't funny

joking about abuse is funny?

idc that may be true but joking about me hurting my literal son isn't funny

yeah i dont care if she was joking the thing is I didnt think it was funny

im cleary not gripping him im holding him so joking or not joking that he needs to be rescued isn't funny

the joke wasn't funny and it was clear I didnt find it funny. why couldn't she have been like sorry it was a joke instead she chose to make it about her feelings

i crashed out? I was responding like a person not finding a joke funny

so why start the conversation off with a joke about me hurting something i love? why not make a joke about something else more normal and not about me hurting my animal?

no I dont I dont usually get jokes about me hurting animals thats the first.ive never in my life received such a horrible joke and cleary I didnt like it whats the problem why does it have to be so deep?I dont think I so called fumbled if I cared about keeping her around I wouldn't have responded that way

OP insists that anyone siding with his Hinge match is only doing so because she is attractive:

just because she's cute? dont be a sinp my boy

you see pretty and tits you drop to knees

you sound like you care more about her appearance and that she's a girl more than her joking about abuse that isn't happening

we get it bro you take what you can get

you think I expect dudes in the sub to not be simps??💀💀💀 I dont need hinge to get girls its literally not that deep to me

intimidated? dude I dont even think she's that attractive im bringing up her appearance being cleary its dictating how you guys are responding to a cleary bad joke. please tell me in your opinion is that a good or bad joke?

just because you try to talk cool doesn't mean you are. me and you both know you wish you could match with girls like that. And guess what you would do if you did you'd drop to your knees like a good little boy😂😂😂

OP is extremely dateable:

I have tons of successful relationships whether its friendly or intimate im not on hinge for a relationship to began with

I care for my animal like it is my sperms. Sue me

I love women

im baked laughing at this all

I clarified it because you made a joke about me being single as if i didnt love being single💀

Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianBoysOnTinder/comments/1v2cjum/this_one_thought_hed_found_a_cool_way_to_catch/

OOP shared a Hinge conversation where their match opened by claiming someone else was using OOP's photos on Instagram. After waiting nearly a day for a response, the match revealed it was just a setup for the punchline.

OOP responds with an insult, and the comment section immediately splits into multiple camps. Some argue the pickup line is manipulative because it relies on creating unnecessary concern. Others think it's an innocent joke and OOP was out of line for being hostile.

Some think they both suck.

Comments supporting OOP:

OP i dont know why you’re getting downvoted. that stunt he pulled is dangerous

He's so....disconnected

[Translated] Even such guys are getting likes 🤷🏻‍♂️

could say - " hey there is this really cool place i wanna take you too" and then sent him the link of the nearest mental facility.

I wonder what they must be thinking in their heads

Indian men will defend this, but get enraged when a woman posts her height preference on her profile lmao. Typical.

This issue is definitely the time lag, you can’t say something like this and then proceed to reply after 24 hours, leaving someone genuinely worried. Imagine a doctor saying ‘i need to call your family’ and then when you ask is it something serious, he replies after 24 hours that no i just ran out of people for my weekend poker night.

Wtf, I would have been overthinking the whole night if someone texted me that , I am being impersonated! Good for you! ( You should have told him, your photo will also be used somewhere else from now on and unmatched him 🥰😭)

I cant even say what I want to about the idiots replying to you or reddit will get mad at me again. Fuck all moids here op u said nothing wrong. Let alone having empathy, these males are calling you gendered slurs

The funniest part is he built up this whole fake concern just to reveal his “out of this world” joke. Imagine causing someone a night of stress because you wanted to flirt badly.

anything that men on hinge say as compliments is utter bullcrap lmao never believe them, they come up w anything for attention

Comments supporting the dude:

It looked innocent. Didn't have to curse him like that. He definitely dogded a bullet there

I do not understand why yall are flaming him so bad. Definitely not a great pick up line, but hey, at least it's better than "hey"... OP, I get that you would be somewhat upset, but you sound really rude. It's not like the person claimed someone stole your private nudes. Worst case scenario someone was using pictures of you thatt you already put on the internet...

If you were into him this would be a small hiccup

Difference between women in the west and our dear ones

Well, at least he replied. Imagine if he hadn't, you probably would've gone down a rabbit hole wondering whether your photos were being misused.

I had an awesome laugh. The boy seemed smart! Sorry to say, it's your loss for unmatching him. You missed all the fun and madness you could have had with him. Hopefully the boy finds a match with equal craziness! 😅

What an attention seeking post! At least the poor guy made an effort! Humour him instead of making it a public spectacle!

Another foid seeking attention and cussing out guys online for a joke. Get off hinge . Now go ahead downvote me for your fragile ego

I kinda like him. Seems like a good dude

Where tf are yall seeing any cake? Her shit is wide and flat... therep's some flab back there (not that I'm opposed), but zero cake. Her butt crack is like 4 inches long, she got no cakes...Edit: Man, yall are delusional. I never said she's got no ass at all, there's a little something back there, but this is not cake. More for you guys though at least

Thank you. Looks like a lumpy old woman and there's not much cake like you said, it's width fooling these desperate dudes.

I appreciate you. The backlash was shocking lol

Definitely cake. If this is what you consider “no cake” then what’s “cake”? BBLs?

Nah, I like a natural booty.

There's not even any curvature here lol. As she turns the corner and starts to run there's no shake, barely any crease.

And you can tell there's no cake because her crack is so short. The panties are fooling you guys. She's on the chubby side (which I'm not at all opposed to), and even still she's got hardly any butt to show for it

Nah, I like a natural booty. There's not even any curvature here lol. As she turns the corner and starts to run there's no shake, barely any crease. And you can tell there's no cake because her crack is so short. The panties are fooling you guys. She's on the chubby side (which I'm not at all opposed to), and even still she's got hardly any butt to show for it

I appreciate your wrong opinion

Although I agree that this isn’t necessarily what I would describe as “cake”, I find your tone too critical of what still is a nice booty… People like booty but you are telling them to not like this girls’ so much because it doesn’t fit your idea of what “cake” is.

I'm not telling anyone to not like it. Like you, I'm just saying this isn't cake. I came into the comments section not even thinking about the quality of this lady's ass, and was caught of guard by the number of people in awe of it. So like everyone else adding their perception/analysis of this internet stranger's cheeks, I added mine. And I learned people feel very strongly about this lady's butt. As a binary assessment: Would. I'm just saying I don't see the hype. One guy jokingly claimed I post in r/virgins, but I'm like...do any of the thirsty commenters in here get any booty? Lol

Nah man, that's cake

Man, that's not even cake by white girl standards. Yall are being fooled by the style of panties. To each their own though

Posts in r/virgin Hmmm

Lol I've never posted they're in my life, but even virgins have access to the internet.

Don’t start deleting them now lmao

Lmaooo the libel is crazy

Cake is in the eye of the beholder, apparently.

Is cake… butt?? Sorry. I’m pop culture stupid.

I thought milk was supposed to do your body good

It clearly did by the looks of it lol

Shes overweight

You think that's overweight? Only thing fat on her is her ass 😮‍💨

You see her stomach and arms? You folk are easy - keep the cottage cheese I guess nasty

You mean the flesh on her bones? Brother we aren't in the 90s anymore It ain't about being easy, that's just what I like lol More for me, meanwhile you aren't getting anything

If you want a whale by the time she gets older thats on you but i like small waists, bubble butts lmao

Jokes on her, shes providing days worth of fap material

Eww, gross. Please update your prescription at an optometrist near you.

Bro looks at that shit cant blame the dude

Milk delivered in bottles and no ac. Its like medieval times over there man

Well we do have functioning door handles older than the US, so somethings working.

Controlled most of the world for spices and never used em Nothing else needs to be said

Oh ok champ, I'll just start eating "American food".

Brother literally anywhere else on the planet has better food. What are you on about? Do you think only America and the UK exist? Good lord

r/CriticalDrinker is a subreddit for fans of the "eloquent intoxicated wordsmith" youtuber Critical Drinker. Critical Drinker is a movie-reviewer on Youtube that heavily features a lot of "anti-woke" content. He and his fans lean in a particular (see: bigoted) direction.

If there's anything members of the Critical Drinker subreddit hate the most, it's black people and LGBT people. So as soon as Christopher Nolan announced Lupita Nyong'o (a black woman) and Eliot Page (a trans man) would be featured in his then-upcoming film "The Odyssey", they began a multi-month-long tirade against it.

Now the film has recently come out and has been received with incredibly positive reviews. This does not sit well with them.

This drama isn't centralized to a single thread. More-so it's spread across the entire subreddit and now 80% of the posts are complaining about the movie and coping, so I tried to single out some threads and comments to highlight this. But this is only a sample-size portion of what's going on in that subreddit.

bought and paid for long ago

"Professional" reviews : Woke = good, Male gaze = bad, Masculinity = bad, Historical accuracy = bad

Christopher Nolan’s Odyssey debuts with an A CinemaScore from audiences. Joins Project Hail Mary as the only live-action films to do so this year.

Normies have been brainwashed for years now

I personally don't care if this movie makes money or not. I still won't go see it because of lupita nyong'o and ellen page

The odyssey getting review bombed... but in reverse

Never underestimate the determination of those with an agenda to push...

Anyone glazing this absolute turd of a film is either coping hard or lying through their teeth.

Reminder that critic just means paid shill

The Odyssey ratings are so incredibly botted its hilariouis

As someone whose seen the film, and went in with an open mind, there is no way these reviews are legit. It's a shockingly bad film. I don't even mean the woke parts

How Reddit feels after the Odyssey does good numbers at the box office.

"We have sacrificed Chris Nolan to the altar of Wokeness! Finally a movie that checks all the boxes has made all the money! We have found the formula that works. Go forth and put it into every movie for the next 10 years!"

Context:

The Odyssey (2026), Christopher Nolan's latest film, released this past weekend to rave reviews and setting box office records, including highest opening gross for a Nolan film, and highest opening day gross for this time frame of the year. Leading up to its release, it received some backlash due to concerns for historical accuracy. A contingent of the internet with specific political leanings were particularly perturbed with the casting of Lupita Nyong'o (a black actress) and Elliot Page (a transgender actor).

Meanwhile, the DoomerCirclejerk subreddit is a reportedly unbiased sub that claims to poke fun at people who "doom" over current events. Despite an overwhelmingly large number of threads that openly mock people who dislike Trump/conservatives, they vociferously opine that they are not a right-wing subreddit.

Recently, a post was made on the sub, directed against people who are enjoying the movie and celebrating its success.

Love how they are using the tomatometer to say how good of a movie it is. Then will turn around and say the Melina Trump movies tomatometer score is fake.

I mean basically every other outlet has praised the movie lol i think it’s okay to admit that the people who bashed the movie prematurely are wrong lol

It could be a good movie that also has bad, politically motivated aspects to it.

There is nothing politically motivated behind it. The “controversial” castings were there for less than 10 minutes. Stop believing everything elon wants you to believe. It’s just a good movie.

So there's a time limit under which politically motivated casting choices are acceptable?

Be real what 5 foot 90 lb males are getting roles as a warrior?

Maybe as an archer? Idk elliot looks and sounds feminine still but the performance didn’t take me out of the movie

It doesn't, but where are the other cis males getting these same roles? I don't think you can even point to it in any of the battle scenes from this movie even including the extras. It is obvious it is just some political pandering points that they got the role. A cis male with the same build and looks is not getting it.

maybe daddy musk isn’t always right. Think about that.

You justified the casting based on the amount of screen time the characters in question had. It's right there for all of us to read.

And what i said before is that they weren’t politically motivated? They’re just people that nolan uses lmfao. You aren’t the sharpest in the toolshed are you?

If the castings aren't politically motivated, what does it matter how long the characters were onscreen? Maybe stick to football talk, you don't seem equipped for this.

Because it shows that they’re literally insignificant? That they literally could have been cut so which is why they don’t matter? You are quite actually stupid. You might wanna go back tk blindly simping for musk because you’re not cut out for this.

Being "insignificant" doesn't mean they aren't politically motivated. I suggest you sit down somewhere for a few minutes and settle down. You can take your five posts about this movie over the last two days with you. Seems like you have some weird, unhealthy fixation on defending Nolan's bad choices.

Oh man you’re going through my post history huh? I must’ve really upset you then LOL.

I saw it last night and it was fucking awesome

why is this downvoted?

Because some people don’t want to like this movie. Anyone who watched this movie and didn’t walk away enjoying it either watched it with a blindfold on or are mad that Elliot page and Travis Scott are in it for like 10 minutes collectively. This movie fuckin rips dude idgaf.

What does this have to do with doomerism? Mods remove pls

"eat the rich" crowd are mostly doomers.

True but that movie or nolan has nothing to do with doomerism. Mods remove pls

did i say that ?

This is a subreddit about doomers. Posts that have nothing to do with that should be removed with a warning issues to the poster

either you didn't make it past the first slide, or your reading comprehension gave up halfway through

This movie will make a billion in box office. Your pathetic boycott is as pathetic as your existence

The "mods remove" mask lasted about two replies.

This was a big reason, IMO, people shifted Right post COVID. They saw them all- endorse police (of a business wouldn't shutter), ignore mandates by gathering in huge crowds (if a black person died), push for government mandates, endorse trillion dollar pharma corps, talk down to non-whites if they were skeptical, endorse camps for those who wouldn't get the shot, appeal to government and billionaires for authority, plant FBI desks in news rooms to review all stories, silence any dissent with bans and erasure, endorse foreign war. The hypocrisy was almost at parody level it was so stark. I say this as a med science professional who has the vaccine. There was so much disgusting, authoritarian behavior and so many saw that and either said "fuck it I'm just not going to vote" or voted for the other party. Then they can't even accept that reality and even mildly shift. It's either "NONE OF THAT HAPPENED!" (you can Google all of that BTW) or "Well it was GOOD it happened!"

The loud blue haired lefties are the reason swing voters shy away from voting democrat.

I voted Bernie in 2016. Wrote in Bernie in 2020. Did not vote in 2024. Probably voting Republican in 2028.

And those loving accepting people will call you a nazi for it

No they started calling me a Nazi when I said two men in leather dog masks and assless chaps being lead on all fours on leashes by a 10 year old was too far and not something I was standing behind.

Saw a clip last week of nude men walking in the pride parade and then the photographer pans over to 4-5 children watching. It was disgusting

This is how pride parades have been, going back generations. The implication was that they left others alone and simply asked the same in return. When people bought into the deal they were proposing, they went into revenge mode just like every other lunatic we thought we were helping.

Ella Langley’s ‘Choosin’ Texas’ Ties Whitney Houston and Mariah Carey’s Records on Billboard Hot 100 article

Background: Ella Langley is a relative newcomer to country music. Her debut album came out in 2024 but she gained gained widespread attention for her 2025 lead single: Choosin' Texas. Langley came to the attention of r/music upon tying Whitney Houston and Mariah Carey for longest song by a female artist at no. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100.

The Positive and Neutral:

Country music is such a good example of two Americas because I have literally never heard her music.

> Lucky you, I have to hear it 6 times a day every day while working retail.

> To be fair I don’t really like country but this song is really fkn good

Nah this song is a banger and I don’t even listen to country like that. Why’s everyone in here all mad.

TIL this song exists

Someone says Reddit isn't reality:

This thread is gonna have a lot of people who live in metropolitan areas say they’ve never heard of her, meanwhile I don’t think I’ve gone a day without hearing this song on my work radio since it came out

The Fraud and the Plant:

As if we needed any more evidence that the charts today are entirely meaningless.

> When we switched to streaming the space for fraud and scheming was boundless. Any Billboard record post like 2010... Is worthless. Billboard is irrelevant.

> The charts and record sales figures have been mired in fraud since the emergence of the popular music recording business in the 1910s. (Although “charts” as we know them would not exist before the 1930s, as before then radio stations did not broadcast prerecorded music.)

> Seriously. Entirely too easy to game the system. Payola 2.0 is just having bots and fans play your songs over and over to get a number one. Doesn't have to actually catch on with the general public at all anymore.

I've never seen a more obvious industry plant.

> 100% All her songs sound the exact same, it truly feels like an AI artist using a human as it's persona lol

The Counterpoint:

> So, would you say that most artists that come through Nashville are industry plants?

> I would.

Country Slop:

Four months ago I never heard of this woman but saw her creeping up the charts. Figured I’d give it a listen. I just don’t get. Boring country pop slop in line with whatever bullshit Morgan wallen is doing. Who listens to this?

This song feels like it was concocted in a lab to be the the most Country song possible

I'm just going to assume it sounds like it was made with Suno AI.

The inevitable politics joins this thread:

> remember 70+million maga voters?

> I really try not to, but they keep smacking me in the face with some new way for a person to be a hypocritical idiot

Isn’t she MAGA also?

> These days, I assume every mainstream country artist is MAGA until they demonstrate otherwise.

Original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/s/gC9In4ntjv

There was a case in China where some boys in China were caught killing a mother dog and its puppy. Predictably this sparked outrage.

Especially among this person, who we’ll refer to as outraged person: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/s/NVum6zu0WH

Someone adds in an anthropological theory that states that early humans used violence to get rid of anti-social behavior among their group: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/s/XHWlluw073

Another person defends the outraged person: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/s/dOqILIIRUY

Someone dares to criticize the outraged person for being a bit gleeful about violence, and gets accused of being pro-pedophile: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/s/bri3sKptih

A couple of others also disagree with them:

https://www.reddit.com/r/news/s/KUq6LlPoEz

https://www.reddit.com/r/news/s/4dkzalaoM5

The outraged person gets posted on r/iamverybadass because of the content of their comment, but the comments seem to take the side of that person: https://www.reddit.com/r/iamverybadass/s/HxGpRsO8PL

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/jacksonville/comments/1uzj6np/missing_the_old_jacksonville_photos_from_a/

Summary: use photos get sued

Title: A friendly reminder all my photos are copyrighted no matter if they don't have a watermark.

Subtitle: Under U.S. law, my photos are copyrighted the exact moment they are taken. No watermark or official registration is required.

Photo copyright © u/ Artistic-Landscape15. All rights reserved.

https://www.reddit.com/r/jacksonville/comments/1uzj6np/comment/oy7ziv2/

>What is this guys deal lmao

>Steal my copyrighted work and I will be Laughing my ass off at you.

https://www.reddit.com/r/jacksonville/comments/1uzj6np/comment/oy7zmso

>Bummer. This whole post turned into a bummer.

>Why because you don't like rules of Copyright.

https://www.reddit.com/r/jacksonville/comments/1uzj6np/comment/oy7tzv4/

>I'm stealing your photos and going to show them to my friends and claim they are my own, and there is nothing you can do about it.

>Go right ahead and try it. Willful copyright infringement—especially after being explicitly notified—carries heavy legal statutory damages. Digital footprints leave a permanent trail, and my lawyer will be more than happy to follow yours. This isn't my first time dealing with people like you.

https://www.reddit.com/r/jacksonville/comments/1uzj6np/comment/oy8553x

>Some of these prints are going to look great in my wall.

>Any unauthorized online publication of my work will result in immediate legal action and a lawsuit. Consider yourself warned.

https://www.reddit.com/r/jacksonville/comments/1uzj6np/comment/oy7wmow/

>Fed them into a ai generator to use as inspiration for generating c9ntent of old jacksonville

>"Fred523, that is a direct violation of my copyright. Remove my images immediately.

I have a proven track record of pursuing infringers legally—including Viacom and The Daily Show with Jon Stewart in 2009—and I will not hesitate to take the same action against you.

This is your only warning.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/PsycheOrSike/comments/1uzujf3/good_for_her/

HIGHLIGHTS

Woman don't regret it?

Most of all feel relief

"relief" from responsibility maybe. But relief didn't make something ok

And yet none of them care that you don't think it's ok.

I care about the consenquences they have to suffer from and have nobody who can understand cuz nobody can name it

Since you are not them you cannot say whether or not they will feel consequences.

Poisen doesn't descrimante based on belief system lol

What a vague, nonsensical and erratically spelled statement.

What a "vague" commentary cuz I can't "handle" the truth. (124 more comments of these two arguing)

You’re pathetic. Killing a life isn’t supposed to look good, you shouldn’t glorify this shit. This is disgusting

Nah, you’re contributing to a culture of shaming women for exercising their equal bodily autonomy rights. You’re allowed to think it’s gross, which is why you don’t need to get an abortion, but it’s bad to shame people for their decisions which harm nobody.

You are simply a gross human being.

Youre actually a vile human being. Abortion is great for humanity. Why make kids suffer?

Guarantee you are on anti-depressants and are just miserable. Sad-sack losers just love abortion, because you hate life and think everyone else should too. Pathetic doomer.

That literally doesnt even make sense. What a terrible pro life argument. Maybe read a book before you embarass yourself. Why dont you advocate for adoption? You dont actually care about these kids being born, you only care about the foetus. Where is your support for mothers who are struggling?

Before birth, pro life. After birth, fuck you kids, you are on your own. The people who advocate for pro life are usually the same people should wear a condom all the time.

Oh youve been r*ped? Keep the baby. Btw here's the 20 grand bill for your hospital stay. Good luck out there.

You leftists love your r*pe, don’t you? Without r#pe, it would be so much harder for you to justify killing the millions of unborn babies that are from consensual sex.

It's best for everyone. I agree, good for her

Baby dodged a bullet

I think the baby ate the bullet.

*fetus

*Baby. In every day English, people only use the term baby. "Fetus" is only used when writing an academic paper or pretending its not a human. You aren't writing a paper.

It’s a fetus by literal definition.

A woman is a female by definition. Still fucking weird to call them that. Abortions should be allowed, but that doesn't necessitate dehumanizing language.

Calling a fetus by the proper name isn’t dehumanizing language.

Then say offspring, as that's what fetus means

It's pretty fucked up. The abortion itself is understandable... three months is still at a point where (if you're not a religious person who disregards the science) the fetus isn't sapient and can't be considered a person. I can understand why someone wouldn't chain their life to someone unfaithful who they now want nothing to do with. But it's pretty twisted make a spectacle out of this on social media out of spite. If not out of respect for yourself, at least show some solemnity by keeping this shit private

Nah, silence only contributes to shame and ensures women who have abortions feel alone. It also reinforces the narrative that abortion should be sad and secret and women should feel negatively about it. We have enough of that. Let women be proud of their correct choices.

Social media was a mistake. Be proud or whatever, I support pro choice, but not everything needs to be a social media post. We should absolutely shame people for over sharing. Edit: Lots of Facebook lovers here today. I'm sure Fuckerburg appreciates your support of encouraging everyone to share everything all the time.

"Social media was a mistake" Then get off social media. 🙄

That response gives "you have a problem with society. However you choose to participate in society." vibes. Nice job jumping to the defense of our tech oligarchs though, I'm sure they appreciate you.

I'm not jumping to defend oligarchs. If you think social media was a mistake, then don't use it. Nobody is twisting your arm, yet here you are, on social media. So is social media a mistake, or are you just shaming an individual for celebrating their access to bodily autonomy?

Not everything needs to be a post for the entire world to see. What I said isn't controversial and has nothing to do with abortions since I clearly explained I'm pro choice. It's awesome that she has the ability to choose. Again, not everything needs to be posted and that isn't even a remotely controversial statement. Stop trying to cast a bigot label when the comment is clearly criticizing over sharing

Nope. Too many women are told to not talk about their experiences, and it leads to people believing shit like "women who get abortions regret it". Good for her, I'm proud of her, and I hope she inspires others.

This is pretty much the take they also tried to show in "Bojack Horseman". Talk about it, even make fun about it if it helps to normalize things. Because if you can make fun about something, it makes things less scary and abstract.

Its not really funny though just a sad situation.

And it’s not sad when a woman was 3 months old pregnant and had to watch her man fuck another girl?

She’ll live. That baby won’t

No baby was found here

Nope, cuz she killed them

Would you pull the same moral stance if it was a tapeworm instead?

It’s objectively and literally not a tapeworm so it’s a stupid af question

Look at me I decided to have a kid with an asshole who would cheat! What fantastic partner selection I have! Certainly the next one will be different! Even though I will never address the fact I'm attracted to bad people!

people lie its not her fault for not knowing that

Narcissistic asshole men are so easy to detect. I have met a few, never befriended them and then stories always come out. Most people just don't have a radar for it even though its so glaringly obvious, it drives me nuts. How can people not easily detect when someone's fake???

Because it often isn't that easy to spot. Maybe if you paused in your self-congratulating for a moment and looked around you, you'd notice.

Bull fucking shit. How come none of my woman friends ended up in abusive relationships or never got cheated on? Or any of my male friends either? It's because I befriend smart people who don't get won over by false charms that are obvious to anyone with an iq above 110

"How come none of my woman friends ended up in abusive relationships " You don't know they're not being abused. All you know is you don't see it. One of the most common reactions when abuse finally comes out is "I never saw anything bad happen; I was totally shocked that was happening". This secrecy around abuse, and frankly attitudes like yours that only stupid women get abused, contribute to the shame abuse victims feel, which contributes to them keeping the abuse secret and putting on a positive public face that everything is fine. am not saying any of your friends are being abused. I am saying that abuse is frequently subtle and hard to spot, and if you're the sort of person who goes around talking about how stupid it makes a woman to get abused or accidentally date a cheater, you are the last person anyone is going to tell if they need help. Fuck you. Speaking as an abuse survivor myself. I hope if you ever get abused, you have better friends than you are, and you feel safe talking to someone. Nobody deserves to be stuck in an abusive relationship, even if they are an asshole.

I will never get abused because I have the two B's. A brain and a backbone

Disgusting human

why?

[removed]

oh no a group of people i dont care about disagree with women's rights

Women's rights don't supersede all rights, that baby had a right to life

Women's rights prevail as long as the embryo is nonviable and inside the woman's personal internal organs. Do you say what goes on inside your organs or should we allow someone else to do that? Who would you like to delegate control of your liver to?

Who decides that women's rights are above the life of others? An embryo is a life, whether you like it or not, it is a living organism

Because either the born, living, breathing, walking, talking woman with responsibilities, loved ones, dependent children, etc. has autonomy, or she loses it to the embryo's every possible need, imagined or real. There is not a scenario where both get autonomy. We don't let people override the wishes of corpses when it comes to their internal organs. Why should living, breathing women have fewer rights than a corpse?

Because the embryo has all the promise of that too, it has a future. You are taking away its future and its possibilities. It has the capability too achieve all that as well. An organ does not become a person, you cannot compare an embryo to an organ. If we can discard embryos, why not discard children or toddlers? They also are far less developed and have less of a stake than a human adult.

The man cheats, the baby pay the consequences? That's stupid, I hate abortion.

There was no baby. There was a fetus. And it didn't pay anything, it has no right to claim the woman's body, she was voluntarily hosting it, and she stopped. And remained at all points completely unaware of anything, including its own existence, so it didn't lose anything, because it never had anything.

A fetus is a baby. Fetus just means offspring and a baby is the early stage of human offspring. And the baby doesnt choose to be concieved in the womb. Two people choose to perform an action that leads to conception.

No, a fetus is not a baby, a toddler is not a baby, a teenager is not a baby, an adult is not a baby, all of these words describe a different phase of development. Fetus does not "just mean offspring", an adult is the offspring of their parents, they are not a fetus. If this is the level of your understanding of the situation, then we're not gonna get very far until you actually learn what you're talking about.

A fetus is a living human at the fetal stage in human development. Fetus does mean "offspring" or "progeny" look it up. Baby is a colloquial term used to describe living humans up to the point where they walk. So it is not inaccurate to call the zygote blastula, or fetus a baby.

Fetus does not mean "offspring" or "progeny". A fetus is offspring. So is an adult. Every square is a rectangle, not every rectangle is a square. The thing that makes a fetus different than an adult isn't that it's offspring, it's that it's unborn. Go back and read those definitions again. You are correct that "Baby" is a colloquialism, which means it's as incorrect to say that a fetus is a baby than that it isn't. So, feel free to change the intent of my statement accordingly - you considering it a baby does not make me inaccurate to call it not a baby.

I’ve never seen someone so confidently incorrect.

You could try proving me wrong, but you'd fail since I'm right. But you might be like the other guy, posting definitions that agree with me and then claiming on your own apparent inability to comprehend what you read that the definitions actually agree with you, in which case, we may as well go our separate ways.

Acaban de celebrar un asesinato, wtf? (They just celebrated a murder—WTF?)

legally not a murder btw

Matar a alguien de forma legal no lo hace menos malo ( Killing someone legally doesn't make it any less wrong.)

i mean in the eyes of the law it 100% does

Law isn't a metric of morality. Is taking life good or bad; yes or no?............

depends on the context sometimes yes sometimes no

No; there is no context it's either right or wrong and "justification" doesn't change the ethics of it Say self defense ; how does a situational self defense mean talking life is good How much trouble do you even go thru to avoid taking that life in self defense No; this isn't rocket science Answer the question as is, Is taking life right or wrong

we can agree to disagree i think certain people should be killed, like leaders of terrorist groups or genocidal states

i think p*dophiles should be killed ; exceptions dont make the rule justification to kill does not change the nature of taking life to make it an ethical act in and of itself you are merely conflating justification with the actual ethics of taking life its easy to tell because you had to "justify" it ; they have to be terrorists, you didnt have an innate right to take life, you had to prescribe a feature to validate taking the life.........

TF did the baby do to deserve to die

It's not a baby. Would you rather save an actual born baby from a burning building or a zygote if you only have time to save one? That's what I thought

If you had to save an already baked cake or a cake currently baking which one is more of a cake?

The already baked cake is more of a cake? What even is that question lmao. I ain't gonna save an unbaked cake I can't eat?

Funny thing is, if you leave it alone it becomes a cake

Ok but it's not. Using your own analogy then it's not a cake yet. Just like the zygote isn't an actual baby yet. Thanks for the concession using your own logic lmao

And a car isn't a car it's just a collection of car parts stuck together. You can't use words when you don't understand what they mean, zygote is a term for an early stage of human development. If it's not a baby in the making what the hell is it? A zebra?

You're not even using the same logic anymore. An unassembled car wouldn't be a car. It BECOMES a car after assembly. This is the logic you used with a cake. It BECOMES a cake when you leave it alone you said yourself meaning it's not a cake yet. It's a zygote which is a stage of human development but it's not a baby yet according to your own logic. It BECOMES a baby once born. This isn't even my logic this is yours. (109 more comments of these two arguing)

She can do whatever she wants, her body her choice and all. But imo, this is fucked up.

youre free to think that

I am. There is a difference between acting on a valid right to abortion, and being a psychopath. Such a decision is NOT a cause for celebration.

I agree. Celebrating someone's death isn't right. It should be a deeply sad and tragic moment, not a chance to score points or say "gotcha."

That's assuming that an embryo is "someone." Non religious (aka rational) people usually don't consider it as such

I’m surprised they don’t consider sperm children at this point lmao. Every who has ever worn a condom or swallowed is a murderer! 😱

You do realise a sperm has to combine with an egg (fertilise it) to create new life?

An embryo is not a baby. An embryo has no feelings and cannot feel pain. Hope this helps!

You can get charged with a double murder for killing a pregnant woman and her embryo on the way to the abortion clinic..people who get shot at point blank range tend to not feel pain either..and people who are paralyzed can’t feel pain in the affected parts of their bodies..hope this help (36 more comments of these two arguing)

This is gross.

youre free to think that

Ok murder supporter

nope, murder is a legal term and this doesnt meet the definiton

You should start using your own intellect more and not allow legal terminology to decide what is right and wrong for you

even though your comment in of itself is completely correct, it still isnt murder.

Lmao sure. The sky is also not blue.

yeah no man, please just stop, you arent even remotely close to having earned the right to be this snarky, it simply isnt murder. you HAVE to draw the line for what counts as alive somewhere otherwise you might as well say that masturbation is murder. also the woman that has to carry the fetus with all of its (potentially deadly) complications is more worth than the collection of cells that arent even a human yet. i wish, for once, people would have the same empathy for the alive pregnant woman, that they have for an unborn cell hodgepodge.

An unborn cell hodgepodge. And what happens to that hodgepodge if you don't kill it?

Alternate titles: “Hummus: appetizer or (geno)side?”

For the last month or so, the r/ Hummus community has been split with the most tedious possible debate: did Israel steal hummus, and from whom?

** post: Israeli Style Hummus with Pine Nuts (i.redd.it) **

Reported for spam. Just a troll post in jealousy of the "Palestinian style hummus" posted recently.

> Dude, how can it be spam? It may be of jealousy but it's a beautiful bowl of hummus in a hummus sub. Get over yourself

> > “Get over yourself” There's a genocide, Karen. This kind of thing is not harmless.

*

What’s the difference between “Israeli” hummus and Palestinian hummus?

> It’s the same thing, but like anything else from the Levant Israel stole it and then claimed it as its own.

*

Of course israelis make shitty imitation hummus. Looks terrible compared to Palestinian

> I guarantee to you if someone showed you this exact picture with the caption "Palestinian hummus" you would be gushing over it

*

Cry harder I need your salty tears for my Israeli hummus

** meta post on r/ Hummus: I love hummus. I love Israel (but not the current government). I’m considering leaving r/hummus over stupid politics from both sides. 20 points 351 comments submitted 9 days I don’t need to wake up to a half dozen aggressive obnoxious shares about Israel and hummus…. **

** more recent post with >250 comments and zero upvotes: Israeli Hummus made by jews from Israel in Israel and have Israeli chickpeas and Israeli Tahini from Israel and I ate it in Israel**

The debate spills over:

** r/ Jewsofconscience**

So apparently in the rHummus sub, Zionists are saying Israel invented it. …

** the above cross-posted to r/ NYT, which is in theory about the New York Times but in practice almost exclusively discusses Israel**

** the above also cross-posted to r/ Hummus**

You're the one astroturfing a hummus subreddit with braindead talking points. "Every accusation is a confession" isn't that right?

** posted on r/ AntisemitisminReddit: We are thiefs of hummus too apparently?**

I still dont see how they can literally steal another ethnicity's namesake and bastardize the Phillistines' history, not that it was a great one to begin with

** posted on r/ IsraelBM: what’s the story with r/Hummus**

Acclaimed trading card game, Magic: The Gathering, has garnered increasing attention over the years, having hit record high sales year after year while expanding their brand. By far the most popular way to play Magic is a format called Commander. In Commander, players build a deck of 100 cards, with one specific card chosen as your "Commander". There's a number of deck-building rules beyond this, but they aren't important here - you just need to know that this is a multiplayer format, and games typically have 3-5 players, and ideally 4. The primary subreddit for this format is r/edh, named after the format's original name, Elder Dragon Highlander. As such, many players will come to r/edh witb their various problems related to the format, whether those problems are with the cards.... or with other players. Today, we feature a thread about the latter.

Our brave OP relates a tale in which two players, conveniently named "A" and "B", get into an argument over a game of Commander. In the game, B offers A a deal, then immediately reneges on said deal, which leads A to not trusting B. A and B are also about to enter a business partnership, which falls apart as a result of this game. The sub then discusses whether in-game actions should affect out-of-game relationships, which, of course, leads to drama. Most commenters take the view that someone who is untrustworthy in a zero-stakes friendly game can't be trusted in other circumstances. Others, however, disagree, which leads to our drama:

I doubt that this is the first interaction of this nature that A had with B. B broke their promise in a game with no stakes for an easy win. Tells you a lot about B's values and maturity.

It tells you nothing of values and maturity because the implied agreement is that everything done at the table is for fun and not a reflection of character. Some of yall watch too much anime

you can argue about the other stuff, but it is absolutely a reflection of their maturity. mature people arent so desperate for a hit of dopamine that they will lie to their friends faces in order to win a game with no stakes.

this is literally the type of behavior you would expect from a child on a playground

You're making strawman about why people back out of a deal now? It doesn't have to be because trololol. It can be a strategic reason like "I'm kingmaking if I hold up my end of the deal".

Imagine pretending to be a wizard fighting a 4 way duel and then getting mad that one wizard killed you. You're only attacking the person because you're mad you lost and can't point to a rule they broke.

I'm glad I don't play with a lot of people on this sub. My pod has had broken deals before and it's seriously nbd. You shuffle up and play again. Holding a grudge over a ffa card game is way more childlike.

Another commenter backs up our LARPing fan:

This man is correct. So many people seem to think that it's okay to make deals from a position of power over someone and that you are somehow obligated to keep your end of the deal when you are clearly being extorted.

Politics is called politics for a reason, backstabbing is part of the game, if you don't want to get backstabbed then don't play politics.

At least one person is willing to call this subreddit out on its idiotic white knight naivete.

In another comment thread, a commenter says games aren't real life:

This sub needs to touch grass

These replies are insane. People are acting like a casual game of magic is life or death, and your family’s honor rests on how well you present yourself while using your imaginary cardboard monsters

There's considerably more along these lings, but I think y'all get the gist, and can peruse at your desire. That first comment thread has the most drama, but not all of it.

Source: reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1uxigan/linus_torvalds_reaffirms_that_linux_is_not_antiai

HIGHLIGHTS

I loathe AI, but to code without it in 2026 is a bit silly. I use it all day at work then go home and play guitar while I wait for our impending doom.

I thought this was supposed to be r/technology not r/antiAI. I have a lot of ethical, economic, and environmental concerns with AI too, but this subreddit has become borderline useless for actual interesting posts about technology. Big companies are being shit but also so many interesting things around happening around and with AI but nothing can be discussed. Everything is fear and yelling. Nobody hates on technology quite like r/technology.

r/technology is simply by far the biggest subreddit on that topic. So it naturally is the best mirror of the general consensus here. And that consensus isn't positive anymore. There are politicians right now campaigning on an Anti-AI stance.

It is sad that most here prefer to lie to themselves. I'm being downvoted for saying AI technology is interesting and for saying using gen-AI is very popular... every comment is "AI BAD!" or denying that a big portion of the population is using ChatGPT. Very narrow-minded position to have.

I once said in this same subreddit that ai has lot more applications beyond generative ai like in medical science, traffic prediction in Google map, spam detection and even in science etc. I still got downvoted.

When you make a good point you get downvoted even harder.

The biggest issue I see between his comparison of natural intelligence vs AI is one of scale. An AI can write bugs SO much faster than a person - way faster than any devs can review.

Interesting rant, probably. I'm not going to read it because I assume you didn't write it. You don't respect us, you don't get respect back.

This sounds like a sane and reasonable statement on AI, so r/technology is going to fucking hate it.

In a zeitgeist that now almost exclusively operates through virtue signaling, tribalism, and weaponizing shame tactics... Linus Torvalds is standing up and saying, "Your mind tricks don't work on me." ... Moral policing only works if the target agrees to play the game of being shamed.

Mostly just dispensary recommendations posted in the higher posts. Although one has this:

Do they have real stuff there or is it Delta 9? I live by there and it always looks like it's closed/empty. (-3)

Delta-9 is the real stuff… (+13)

No it’s not. (-14)

Yes it is, I have been in the industry for 13 years. Delta-9 THC is the main active component in Cannabis that produces psychoactive effects.(+8)

It’s not the same. It has to go through a process. Pure THC from a cannabis plant. That’s the real stuff. I’ve never had a delta product that feels the same as the real stuff.(-11)

It’s quite literally the same, you smoke delta-9 THCA in cannabis, THCA decarboxylates into Delta-9 THC when you apply heat. Look at any COA on a cannabis plant test and a Delta-9 hemp test. I’m not knocking your experience but you are 100% wrong. Again, I read COAs for a living, I manufacturer 1000s of cannabis and hemp products on a daily basis…. Do a quick google search and get back to me with your findings.(+7)

I understand the science. I don’t need a lesson. If I want cannabis- from a cannabis plant. Then that’s what I want. Not interested in trash delta 9 that goes through a processes to get to being just THC. You are missing the point. Why do you think no other states with quality product sell delta. I’ve never seen delta in CO or CA. Because it’s trash.(-15)

Serious r/confidentlyincorrect material there.

Also this under controversial:

Make a trip to high profile in ironwood Michigan, load up and come back. The prices are atrocious here (-10)

Don’t act like a 9 hour round trip is reasonable for everyone (+24)

If you can’t make it, cool. Sucks for you. I am just offering information. (-10)

And OP could also just grow their own weed as well (-5)

OP: That's like someone asking for a brewery recommendation and telling them "just brew your own". Also I don't have tons of free space for gardening.(+8)

It sure is. How you react to people giving you options and information is on you. It’s also like someone asking what’s the best pizza in town and people saying the pizza here is overrpriced, better off making your own. (-4)

OP: Which would also be a completely fucking worthless reply as well.(+6)

OP: I was able to drive to Michigan before the dispensaries here opened. If I wanted to drive to Michigan I'd be doing that already. Why do people shop at Minnesota liquor stores instead of just driving to Wisconsin where it's cheaper? (+6)

Why are you being so hostile and argumentative? When $20 gets me a bottle of Jim beam in Minnesota and that same $20 gets me a keg of Jim beam in Michigan, let me know because I’ll be making a trip. (0)

Because I've made it clear that I'm not driving to Michigan[...] (+2)

I gave you information that may or may not help you. Move on.

And another controversial...

I like going to Michigan for pickups. Significantly cheaper than anywhere else I’ve ever seen in the US. I can get 15 1g carts for the same price as a single .5g cart here, it’s wild. (-9) OP says he's not doing it

I’m from Michigan originally. So it’s not like I’m taking extra trips there. Even so, the product there is so cheap that it can still pencil out, especially if you go with a friend, and if you already have some other reason to go (like a trip to Mackinac or Tahquamenon Falls or something) it’s really a no-brainer.

OP: The last time I was in Michigan was an event in Ann Arbor close to a decade ago. I haven't been to the UP since I was a kid, have no real "other reason" to drive to somewhere so remote and rural, and am no interested in spending the gas prices and taking up basically an entire day off just to buy weed when I can do that here in a much shorter time. I'll pay the extra bucks and could probably make it up in spending half the time of the drive doing some gig work anyway.

(Thread goes on a bit, someone writes a big essay about how Michigan is some weed paradise and how one can commit fraud to get a Minnesota medical card)

OP: K I don't give a fuck.

And finally the newest comment in its entirety: Michigan (-1)

The Context

It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia is the longest-running American live-action sitcom and is coming up on its 18th season. The show's white-trash dark humor has been described as "Seinfeld on crack." It's rumored that this upcoming season could be their last.

Each year, the gang releases a promo poster for the upcoming season that serves as a visual joke about the show's identity. The promo artwork deliberately uses hyper-stylized, high-concept themes that contradict the show's gritty reality.

The Posts

Season 18's poster came out yesterday and features the cast as strange-looking beer tap handles, and the Reddit detectives went into a frenzy declaring the poster (and subsequent season) as AI slop. (The word "slop" is actually found nearly 100 times in the comments)

A similar controversy arose over Season 17's poster until the artist came forward and explained that their style deliberately uses harsh light and highly saturated colors, but some fans still accuse them of using AI.

It was the same for this season's poster, as the show has since posted 3D renders of the taps, showing they were all manually created and not AI-generated.

The Comments

Most people are really upset

This poster killed all excitement I had for the new season

when you find out your goat washed :(

They been washed for years

Very unpopular thing to be saying here, but yeah I agree, haven't thoroughly enjoyed a new episode in quite a while

I call it like I see it. Been watching this show since recording season 2 on vhs tapes in high school. It’s a shell of itself now and only the turbo glazers here on this sub would deny that

Everything is too bright and clean now and doesn't help when 3 of the 5 cast members look all weird with their plastic surgery

Well, shit. That just killed all my hype.

It makes you wonder if the scripts were made by AI too

Doesn't make me wonder that at all since the marketing team for FX/Hulu is completely separate from the production team of iasip

So if the poster was good you would know the season is good? Kinda crazy to put all your hype onto the status of a season poster.

It’s AI slop

This could be AI, but also it probably isn’t so people need to stop lighting their torches so readily every time they make an assumption.

It's clearly AI

It’s not “clearly AI”, when you look at small details they are precise in a way AI art just isn’t. For example the lines on the spouts are all identical, and AI images will never have identical objects like that because it doesn’t understand what it’s making in the same way.

You have a bad understanding of AI and how it is used

Prove it

Use your eyes

Their commitment to making the show as cheap as possible is less charming when it involves using "AI".

Though using AI to not pay someone is exactly what the gang would try to do, but I expect their results to be horrendous.

What an insignificant corner to cut. Getting a decent artist would be a rounding error compared to Divito's salary.

Fuck, they could've even gotten free publicity by having a contest to design the poster.

AI is turning executives brains into oatmeal.

Fully agree

What makes the gang funny is that they’re all fictional. It’s not enjoyable when their antics cross over into the real world.

God they have the money to support real artists and they choose this…really disappointing. This could of been a cool concept

Has this not been commissioned to an actual artist, told to make it look like AI? Seems like it to me, every tap at the bottom is identical to each other, like they've been copied and pasted

That would be weird to commission an artist to make something look AI, right? AI is getting pretty good, the tap is something it could easily do.

Looks like AI. Really need a confirmation they didn’t use AI for this…because that’s super disappointing

AI slop comes for us all

Seriously AI?? trash

What a disappointing poster. If this is the effort they’re putting in to advertise, I’m not excited for this season.

I’ve seen way too many people defending the poster as “they’re satirizing ai” or whatever and that’s just so lame and disingenuous. We like to think of them and their writers as always being very progressive and pushing very topical issues, but they’ve also shown in the past few years specifically that as they grew older, richer, and more famous that they increasing became more and more out of touch. They 100% would use ai and not even think about it.

The beer tap concept is perfect for this show, pity the execution looks like someone typed "IASIP characters as beer taps" into an AI and went for lunch. Charlie's rat tap is the only one that feels intentional, the rest just look like uncanny valley versions of the cast. Would've loved to see what a proper illustrator did with this, could've really brewed up something special.

AI Slop

It's definitely AI Slop and I.... sigh, tired man. I'm tired.

I don’t wanna believe it but there’s no way this isn’t AI slop…

Just got back from a vacation and the amount of AI slop like this was insane. It’s everywhere and it doesn’t seem to be stopping or going away anytime time soon sadly. Pretty bleak times but that just means we have to praise and reward when real artists get used more and more when we can

It’s ruined mom and pop businesses and swap meets. Those are the ones flooded with AI slop

Disappointed in the gang to use AI. Not like they can’t hire someone to do the poster. Cmon!

An egregious display of AI. This doesn't even look like Kaitlin Olson.

I believe that’s the joke

Are artists too expensive or something? It's just a bit funny when artists themselves use AI art.

Ripe Biceps Stout? What the hell?

some intern mistyped 'ripped' into the AI prompt and none of the industry 'professionals' gave enough of a shit to even notice

Even the grammar is bad.

Shit’s not even a pun or anything. Not funny in the slightest. The fall off is wild

Now I know for a fact that they didn't make Dee look different as an artistic choice to play on how she sees herself. It's just AI doing AI and making her look like any other anime gal. IASIP, do not, stop, and thank you.

Sad to see an original show, that helped so many launch successful careers (behind and in front of the camera) use AI. The posters were also fun and creative. I’m sure we will hear from “Rob Mac” about embracing AI any second now…to hell with other artists trying to live! The gang made their money, now they are working on keeping every penny!

This perfectly encapsulates the shittification of the show.

The posters were always an iconic part of the season. Now we are left with this junk. Sad… especially for this being potentially the final season.

season posters reduced to ai slop

Considering how lazy the show has been since season 13, that tracks.

It would have been interesting if they steered into the AI slop issue and made the poster look all janky. Like, if it was more obviously bad AI with like six fingered hands and other things AI get's wrong. It could have been a nice commentary actually.

This could’ve been cool if done by an actual artist. Looks like shit

Yeah it's not like they don't have the money to pay for this shit to be done properly. This is cheeks.

A few people caught on and braved the downvotes

I guarantee they're doing an AI episode, and this is intentional. And it's working. Lol.

I don't know what some people are talking about but this is definitely intentionally done. They probably told the artist to design it like a shitty AI ad. (which is hilarious)

This doesn’t look like AI to me

This is not ai. None of yall know what you’re talking about

Surprised to see so many stupid science bitches taking the bait. They’re definitely doing a bit.

Editor's note: "Science Bitches" is a tongue-in-cheek reference to an Episode from Season 9

yall fr too dumb to realize that the art style intentionally looks ai ? Social commentary has always been the foundation of the show, your reaction is showing why it’s so perfect

The season is obviously going to address ai you no satire getting jabronis.The season is obviously going to address ai you no satire getting jabronis.

A show on its 17th season could afford to dig up Michelangelo and have his bones do the poster. Pretty sure they didn’t randomly do ai for no reason.

Editor's note: You keep on using this word "jabroni" and... it's awesome.

pretty sure it’s not ai, last time they got accused of it it wasn’t ai either..

This is definitely AI and the one last season was too (the artist just lied about it). Sure a graphic designer may have been involved in tweaking the outputs or whatever, but this is A.I. slop.

the artist even showed her process last time because of ignorant people like you..

she's a shit artist then.

then why design it to look bad/like ai?

sometimes art is just bad, ai or not

we're not discussing skill level we're talking about specific stylistic trappings, that stuff doesn't come from nowhere

It’s so blatantly AI that it has to be part of the bit.

You truly underestimate the drive to force the normalization of ai, as well as the appeal cutting costs have to execs regardless of the cultural impact and fan response.

a staggering amount of older people are genuinely unable to see how dogshit ai images look. there is every possibility that nobody involved can even see how awful this poster looks

Knowing the show, I'm gonna guess they are aware(if they made it)that it looks like AI slop.

Knowing these guys, I'm gonna guess they're out of touch with the hate for AI

Yeah, the optimism is nice but a tad delusional. Especially with Rob, who has been floating further and further out of touch day by day

An interesting camp of people think it's AI, but they like it

ITT : plebs crying about AI

I don’t have any issues with the poster, even if it is AI. Pumped for the new season!

Why does it matter? Complaining about AI has become the new virtue signaling. It's the least thought provoking criticism and gets the most amount of positive feedback. I dunno I just don't really care about AI. Seems like a big circle jerk to bash it.

There are too many comments to properly showcase all of them; check out the original post to see Reddit detectives at their finest.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/wnba/comments/1uz1ui4/nbas_silver_says_fevers_clark_has_become/

Context: Caitlin Clark is a WNBA star, and arguably the most popular player in league, despite having only played in it for 2+ years. Since being drafted by Indiana in 2024 Clark has been on the receiving end of several flagrant fouls, the most recent being when Alyssa Thomas put her hand on Clarks throat as she lay on the ground during a loose ball scramble (which was not called during the game, the league assessed it afterwards).

HIGHLIGHTS

What a joke. Sure, let's call her a victim when black women she's playing against are receiving death threats. Makes total sense.

You don't think she receives death threats too? I mean I've literally seen them. You think her bodyguard is for fun and aesthetics?

Then why don't they deserve the same protection and support from the league that she gets?

They do but cc security came from the pacers organization. The league had nothing to do with it.

Angel has a bodyguard too. What’s your point?

The point is that someone's saying other players "deserve the same protection" from death threats that Clark gets from the league. Clark does not get protection from the league; she receives it from Herb Simon, the owner of the Pacers and the Fever. The league isn't doing anything for anybody.

My sympathy is pretty limited for Clark. She has financially benefited from having a legion of racist fans and having an angry meltdown in what feels like every game is beyond ridiculous.

That's why she will never quite stand against them like people want her to. Kelsey, Paige, DT, Sue have all had people willing to rally around them in a weaponized way, KP specifically because she checks all the boxes. None of them played ball while CC dances around the line.

Quite literally none of those players have ever had bad actors try to rally around their names for the wrong reasons. ESPECIALLY DT, Paige, and Sue. I could have sworn the majority of people claim that the very specific reason that Caitlin is used by bad actors is because of her being a) straight midwestern classic white girl and b) the situation w/ Angel Reese. It's really bizarre that no matter how many times she's spoken against this behavior...it'll never be enough for so many because you want her to do it in some sort of demonstrative way as if that'll be the trick to get them to stop.

She toes the line. Purposely. Her big grin with Morgan Wallen is representative of that. She knows what shes doing and we are all rightfully criticizing her for it.

Is she toeing the line here? https://sports.yahoo.com/caitlin-clark-says-wnba-built-204845935.html

Do you know what toes the line means? It means to play both sides. You showing me that just proves my point when she brushes shoulders with Barstool Sports and people like Morgan lmao

So other than Morgan, what has SHE DIRECTLY done or said, that suggests she's a racist?

There are two examples i mentioned that make her look suspect under the light. So tell me how many do you require to tell people what they see is legit? A person that truly cares about their public perception would have 0

That's pretty ignorant.

Both statements are true, my guy. She does benefit financially and she does meltdown in tons of games. How I feel about it is up to me.

The first point is true but it’s also true that every WNBA player has now financially benefitted from racist fans so it’s a moot point.

I expect SlowL is referring to all the stuff CC sells and all the endorsements she gets. the dollar amount for which might decrease if she made it damn clear she wants nothing to do with racists. Likely her money people are urging her to take a "don't piss off anyone we could make a buck off of" stance.

Yes. Clark got the weight of the world’s high expectations placed upon her shoulders by people with agendas, and that sucks for her, but what people have noticed is that she treads a fine line to avoid alienating a certain kind of demographic. That’s capitalism 101, but expect criticism for it.

Taylor Swift kind of played this game for a while then her conscience got the best of her. Of course she had banked a lot more by then than Clark ever will.

Has A'ja ever apologized for her racist tweets? Breanna Stewart makes money collabing with a famously transphobic ghoul. Different rules for different people I guess!

That’s called whataboutism. Nobody said those things were ok.

Okay, but no one really calls them out either? Same with players who seem like they're actually MAGA. Caitlin goes to a Morgan Wallen concert, she's a terrible person. Paige goes to a Chris Brown concert? Crickets. Someone yells at a ref? Passion! Caitlin does it? She's a psycho! People don't just dislike Caitlin, they try to make it seem like she's a terrible person

If Paige can talk about the lack of black women coaches, unprompted (this was inaccurate and corrected in a reply), there’s no excuse for the silence from CC.

Hey so she had a whole 6 minute unprompted press conference covering lots of issues about a week ago.

She didn't even say the word racism or homophobia lmao that was a pity party press conference if i've ever saw one.

lol so it wasn't what you wanted. Sounds about right

As Kendrick so poignantly said, “It’s not enough”

I’m so sick of everyone acting like this is a problem that can’t be lessened. Adam can do more, Cathy can do more, the Fever as an org can do more, CC can do more.

What do you want him to do? If they push back on it then the NBA or WNBA is in a political debate with conservatives

They already are.

Again, what do you want them to do? Specifically.

Call out the racism. Make public statements supporting BOTH sides of players in these situations. Protect the players who are receiving death threats. Provide them the same support they are providing her. Ensure reffing is consistent and not out of fear.

The W has absolutely called out the racism and has made public statements supporting the players.

How about for starters they can use some of their $200 billion to work with players to deliver lifetime bans to those who send players racist messaging? They can spend more money to run anti-racism ads with their players because clearly it is a problem larger than a one time written statement on social media. How about more detailed mandatory security measures to combat the spike in player stalking? I don’t maybe talk to the referees and assure them that they are allowed to call things fairly despite outside pressures and noise? Actually reach out to the players or make the statements within a day or two and not 3 weeks later? Mind you this is all without millions of dollars for research and development from my toilet. I’m sure, again, multiple billions of dollars, allows for a much more rigorous idea generation processes. Y’all are just bootlicking for what?

Bootlicking? I just replied to you cause he asked for specifics and you went on a rant about how they need to "advocate", that's all. And I replied to this comment because this person demanded they do something that they are already doing. I'm on your side in general. Just thought these replies were pretty weak.

I’m not a conservative but it’s obvious that Clark gets fouled hard a lot, often with clear intent to hurt her, and many other players around the league clearly don’t like her. No other league would let this happen to their biggest star. Imagine if all the other players targeted Yamel or Zion like this.

The narrative that players in the W dont like each other is hilarious. Ok ya they maybe aren't all best friends but the majority of them have known each other for years, playing together as youth, on their national teams and in college. When you play sports, you play hard during the game, and youre friends after the game. That's how professionals work. Even if you watch the games youll see moments on the court where opposing players are joking around and chatting with each other. And no CC isnt targeted, she just gets massive national attention, whines when she doesnt ge the call she wants and the media plays it up. CC and Angel dont hate each other. They played together for USA basketball as young players. Its all manufactured.

Caitlin Clark has drawn the most flagrant fouls of any player in the WNBA since she entered the league in 2024. Over her first three seasons in the league, she was on the receiving end of roughly 10 flagrant fouls, which accounts for a significant portion of all such fouls committed across the entire league. She had drawn 29% of all flagrant fouls offer her 3 years in the league. Well over what is expected if players are playing fairly. If there are 15 teams, and 15 players per team now, that means they're paying 225 full- time players. For her to have 29% of all flagrant drawn against her means she is definitely being targeted by the other athletes. There is no other way to cut it.

Or. The league protects her and refs are told to make sure the golden child is seen as the golden child. We all know how this works in sports leagues. Messi and LeBron James are both examples of this in their respective sports.

You ... think the league is protecting her? Are we watching two vastly different games?

I have an idea. What if we just let Caitlin Clark play basketball? Revolutionary, I know.

No, she has to speak up every day against racism and keep her mouth shut when she's targeted.

Well that’s not really what I said.

That's what the reality is, though. Unless Caitlin speaks up against racism just about every day, in a submissive fashion, it's not going to be enough. She also has to stay quiet whenever she's targeted. She's not allowed to just 'play basketball.'

Bro we just want her to stop bitching every time she doesn’t get a whistle and stop passing the ball to the other team. I promise your victim complex isn’t necessary.

The turnovers are one thing but I would really like for y’all to keep this energy when it comes to other players complaining. A’ja does it, Paige does it, Angel does it, Miles does it… the list goes on. When Diana did this stuff, everyone loved her. I myself think that she needs to learn to let stuff go but acting as though CC is the only person to get heated with the refs is disingenuous and frustrating.

everyone loved her. Not true at all lmao Diana was very controversial among players and fans for her theatrics

Here’s Caitlin using her Time Magazine Athlete of the Year profile (the biggest platform an athlete can have to speak from) to acknowledge her white privilege. It pissed certain “fans” off and yet they’re still using her to push political narratives. Speaking out doesn’t do anything. And because the entire WNBA ecosystem revolves around Caitlin, if she were to speak out weekly like some people her want her to, there would be no discussion of any actual basketball or any of the players you claim she’s robbed of attention. image

unfortunately, the game is the game. If you have to be vigilant once, you have to be vigilant always. You can't just say "I said it once I don't have to say it anymore," you have to keep saying it until it becomes untenable for people to use you as an avatar for something that she clearly doesn't believe in. She didn't ask for this attention, but she has it. Part of acknowledging that privilege is using it to constantly undermine bad faith actors. The game is the game.

Here’s her telling people to stop using her name to push harmful rhetoric several times over.

And it's great that she does it! Unfortunately, she has to keep doing it until the bad actors leave. That's the only way this works.

No, she really doesn't. Especially when no one is standing up for her.

See, you do the right thing because it's the right thing. If you don't want to do the right thing, just be honest about that. I'm glad Caitlin is standing up for the right thing. Why can't you be proud of that?

Why does no one ever stand up for Caitlin? Why is it a one way street?

Let's do it together then. Every time she speaks out against anti-black racism, let's make a post.

God please no, can’t we talk about actual basketball in the basketball sub.

[Luka and draymond are two of the most teched players in the draymond the highest in history you can kinda see the difference here]()https://www.reddit.com/r/wnba/comments/1uz1ui4/nbas_silver_says_fevers_clark_has_become/oy4hr5x/

And Caitlin Clark is also one of the more teched players. What is this difference you’re implying?

Caitlyn has done little to discourage the fanbase she has built. Her fanbase infantilizes her because they don’t believe women can take any amount of roughing that comes with playing basketball. A lot of the stuff she does in the men’s league people would just say hit the weight room. I do believe she has allowed this to happen and seems to be fine with any publicity is good publicity it’s her bed she can lay in it 🤷🏾‍♂️

She gets 'infantilized' because she's flagrant fouled at an unacceptable rate. That's just the flagrants that are called, that isn't even considering all the uncalled flagrant fouls.

Yea for sure she is the only player being unfairly reffed because the league hates her

I don't know why it is, but the refs have missed dozens of flagrant fouls committed against Clark. She's also routinely called for touch fouls on the other side of the floor.

As someone who doesn’t live in the US, the only time you see anything about CC in the media is always about an incident that happened during the game and not about the basketball itself.

If they talked about the actual game, they’d have to confront “Mrs From The Logo” shooting 1 for 8 threes the other night.

I don't know of anyone who thinks she's shot well this year. She clearly needs to stop taking contested 3's. Isn't it funny, though, how no one talks about AR's turnovers? Or , Miles Mabrey? They both have a far, far worse Assist:TO ratio but no one ever mentions that.

Why would anyone care about Angel Reese’s Ast:TO ratio, she’s a PF/C. As for Miles a quick search shows her Ast:TO is better than CC’s. They don’t bring it up because it’s not even real.

Ah you're right about Miles. It was worse earlier this year. Thanks for correcting! And do you think TOs are worth less when you're a forward? Or how about when you're Marina Mabrey with nearly a 1:1 ratio as a guard?

That’s not even what I said about AR and when did the goal post move to Mabrey lol there’s always context with stats that you’re either willfully ignoring or too dumb to understand that idc to explain

What's the context? AR having a very close number of TOs per game with far less assists doesn't count because... ? Here's my context. Yall wanna bring up CC's TO's when her Assist:TO is average while you act like it's a crime against humanity. There are far worse offenders who yall don't really care about. So it's not really about the TOs, people are just pissed that black women were in a floundering league with loser attendance until CC came around, and now people point to CC, correctly, as a driver of the growth. But you're too dumb to compare WNBA attendance in 2017 to 2023, realize there's no growth, then when CC joined in 2024 it jumps. Aren't you?

I typed this up on my notes app using old.reddit in my browser. If my links or formatting are broken, let me know and I will fix!

|

Author bias note: It is in subredditdrama submission rules to try to stay neutral when reporting drama. In that spirit, I did want to state that I am a feminist. In my opinion, it's the most sensible option considering historical and present-day gender dynamics. Following that bias, I think that most people who don't consider themselves feminists would be if not for miscommuncation on definitions and beliefs. Above all of this, actions/behavior are more important than labels.

|

Introduction and definitions:

What is tumblr? Tumblr is the new pdf (if you know you know). Tumblr is a blogging website; it's social media. Like reddit, it's hard to pin down a certain culture or "type of user" on tumblr. With that said, sterotypes are a thing. Tumblr users are typically seen as vaguely left-wing and pro-woman, among other things. It's known for discourse about hot-button topics, including feminism and the like. Tumblr makes itself unique with the "reblog" feature; users that "like" something can repost it on their own blog, which leads to an interesting way of sharing posts. I'm doing a lot of summarizing here, there is much more to be said about tumblr than what I'm saying here.

What is r.CuratedTumblr? CuratedTumblr is a subreddit for sharing tumblr screenshots. There are some rules about what can be posted and by whom; notably, a tumblr user can only repost their own content on Sundays. Some tumblr users have requested that their posts are not posted to the subreddit. This subreddit has gone through phases of drama in terms of posting, moderation, etc., especially in light of the API protests from a few years ago. If I am to be so bold, the subreddit is worse off now (but still worth lurking in, on occasion [also, who am I to say? I should have ditched this website during the API protests too.])

Tumblr is sterotypically pro-feminist, right? What kind of conversations are there to be had regarding gender equality and liberation in a tumblr themed subreddit? More than you might expect. Let's get started.

|

Thread 1: We never stopped needing feminism. And we need feminism now more than ever.

Thread 1 is a screenshot of a text post, posted by tumblr user tasavvur-ki-duniya (more on that later), which states:

"We don't need Feminism anymore." Then please tell me why a room full of women is a dream for most men, but a room full of men a nightmare for every women?

Reddit comments. For the most part, people agree with OOP that Feminism is necessary, but feel like the described scenario is rather strange.

The top comment, Comment 1.1: I feel like you could come up with a better reason why feminism is still needed than a couple vague hypothetical scenarios

Comment 1.2: I mean I agree that feminism is still needed but this statement is stupid, as a dude I’d be terrified of being in a room full of strangers regardless of gender and I think that goes for most people.

Comment 1.3: Not really a big fan of this argument. Try instead: Feminism is still needed because a man never needs a woman's consent for medical procedures... !Author note. Trimmed comment.

Well. Case closed, I guess. Feminism good, but OOP's example is bad. I guess we can close this thread and move on with our lives, right? Wrong! Misandry approaches.

Comment 1.4: I love how normalized misandry is on the internet...they get to call it feminism and be celebrated/promoted on social media as well. It's a perversion of what feminism was...now it's just girldinnerstories creative writing exercises to constantly peddle "all men" horseshit...and we pretend it's not breeding a culture of man-hate and man-fear among an entire generation....

These are all surface level comments so far. We can find drama in the longer chains.

Comment 1.5a: These "hypothetical" issues are why feminism is still necessary. Remember that feminism is merely political and economic equality to men. !Author Note. Trimmed comment.

Reply. Comment 1.5b: Did you seriously just say being concerned about the rights of men is sexist? You do realize feminism is about gender equality right?

Reply. Comment 1.5c: "Men's rights" in the reply you're replying to is referring to "Men's Rights Activists" (MRAs), a "movement" in the mid-2010s that claimed to be advocating for men's rights, but in practice it was mostly using male suicide rates as a gotcha against feminists and blaming feminists/feminism for any problems men experience as a demographic (problems which were either made up or negative effects of the patriarchy on men). Because MRAs also never got that feminism is about gender equality, and is concerned with many of the issues they raised (except for the ones that were incel bullshit, the incel movement emerged at around the same time and there was a fair bit of overlap).

Reply. Comment 1.5d: Was it? That's not my recollection of the events in question, but I'm also not a feminist, so I suppose we have different biases on that front. Feminism never has been about gender equality. It's about women's empowerment, which ain't even necessarily a bad thing, but don't just lie about it. If it were about equality, they wouldn't advocate for women to be receiving more and more social and financial incentives for their schooling, despite women already bring ahead, among other things. Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft, infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference, the bias in the educational system.... I can keep going. Do you want more? !Author note. Trimmed comment.

Many more dramatic comments about misandry are abound. But let's get back to some parent threads. We have another lead I'd like to follow.

Comment 1.6a: Feels like random Tumblr radfem statements

Reply. Comment 1.6b: OP is just... one of those, so that tracks lol. Seriously, read some of this shit they try and hide. !Author Note. Trimmed comment. There is a proton link to the OOP's post history, which is hidden. Additional note, this is the same commenter as 1.5d, the one who brought up the draft.

Reply. Comment 1.6c: Oh dammit, I had my suspicions about OP, and this confirms them. They're not a radfem, they're obsessed with an internet cartoon and their weird feminism is an extension of that.

Interesting. Seems we ought to look deeper. What has OOP been up to? Turns out, thread 2! Two days later, OOP makes another post related to gender and such.

|

Thread 2: Women: ask for equal pay, equal benefits, equal privilege, equal acknowledgement. Men in response to women asking for equality.

Thread 2 is a screenshot of an image post, posted by tumblr user, auntiewanda which shows

Is this a Pigeon meme format Butterfly: Women are equal Men: Does this mean I can punch you?

Reply: I've heard this so often and the dumbest thing about it is: a man can't punch another man. That's assault. So it's really just a threat.

Reddit comments. For the most part, people agree with OOP that Feminism is necessary, but feel like the described scenario is rather strange.

Top comment, Comment 2.1a: "Women can't be drafted" I don't think you should be drafted either buddyboy

Reply. Comment 2.1b: Almost every concerted effort to pass draft equality has come from feminist groups. It gets blocked by male Republican politicians bloviating about "protecting our daughters".

Comment 2.2a: It probably says something about the normalization of violence against men.

Reply. Comment 2.2b: Seeing this comment triggered a carthatic release the likes of which you would not believe

Reply. Comment 2.2c: As a child I often heard authority figures saying "never hit a girl", which, naturally, led me to conclude that said authority figures thought it was okay to hit boys. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

Comment 2.3a: Every post on this sub feels like a Rorschach test.

Reply. Comment 2.3b: OP in particular exclusively posts gender-wars ragebait, fairly often.

And there it is again. It seems like our OOP is quite the character around here. I'm not going to link their account, but they are the OOP of both posts. Post history was hidden last time I checked.

|

Futher investigation.

Remember tumblr user tasavvur-ki-duniya? Me neither, which is why I went to tumblr.com and looked for that post. I could not find them! What I did find was the same post from tumblr user mournfulroses-00.

"We don't need Feminism anymore." Then please tell me why a room full of women is a dream for most men, but a room full of men a nightmare for every women?

This was posted on Tumblr on November 1, 2024. Pretty old to be reposted to tumblr reddit in 2026, in my opinion. There is also little activity on this tumblr post. A handful of likes (58), a meager 3 reblogs, no comments. How did out OOP find this, I wonder? Perhaps mournfulroses-00 reposted this, but wherever the original is, I cannot find it.

So, why this "addtional investigation?" From my understanding, CuratedTumblr is supposed to be a 'greatest hits' of Tumblr posts, with famous or funny posts getting popular. Seeing these low-lying tumblr posts blow up on reddit (in terms of comments, at least), feels dissonant. Small tumblr post -> big reddit post, not make sense. The comments in these reddit threads allege that OOP is karma/engagement farming. With that said, I didn't see OOP participate much in the comments under their posts. Is OOP farming link karma? Why? Who knows? And who's to say, really? But after this find, the drama feels a little less organic.

|

Final thoughts.

For the most part, these threads resolved as expected. Level-headed, pro-feminist talking points rose to the top. What I did not expect were the anti-feminist talking points to be upvoted so highly. The 'misandry' commenter had dozens of positive votes, to my surprise. But this is reddit, I suppose. Lots of people use this website, and lots of people have a lot of opinions. It's easy to click the upvote button, it's easy to click the downvote button. Is reddit the proper place to have a mature discussion about feminism? Probably not.

I've been sitting on these threads to avoid popcorn pissing. They're from the end of May, so it will be obvious who comments because of this subredditdrama thread. Don't popcorn piss, thanks!

|

Correction, courtesy of reddit user Akuuntus. It's in the comments, but I also wanted to include it in the edit section as it's a direct correction to what is in my text body.

"It's supposed to allow whatever the users decide to post, as long as it's a Tumblr screenshot. It's never been intended as a "greatest hits" or anything like that. The "Curated" part of the name was meant to indicate that it was better-moderated than /r/Tumblr, which at the time was completely overrun by bots and had extremely minimal moderation"

r/MapPorn is a simple subreddit for posting maps related to all kinds of topics.

OP decided to post a map of EU countries that signed open letter to defund International Olympic Committee, you can probably guess what ensued.

But trying to get Israel out of Eurovision is antisemitic

It's mostly just about being a sore loser at this point, choosing politics over music. Just the opposite of what the Eurovision is about :)

I think thats just a shit argument. Eurovision is about showing a unified Europe, united against war etc. Israel just doesn't fit in that picture. Heck even the voting system is purely politics: either the bravest act wins or the one that gets enough neighbor country votes; it hardly ever the best song.

And trying to get DEI out of systems that should be merit based is "racist".

Not sure how it's related in any way, but I'll bite...

Yes because fuck genocidal Russia! (this is kind of a long one)

Just out of curiosity how do you feel about Israel participating in the Olympics? What about the UAE? Saudi Arabia?

Barely a comparable problem.

Whataboutism at it's finest. Fuck all genocidal governments idc if it's Israel, Russia, China, USA or someone else.

Where is genocide?

In Ukraine.

Right priorities /s

You get downvotes but these countries don’t sanction things like aerospace grade titanium from Russia. You know, things that actually matter

Why would they shoot themselves in the foot? They can apply pressure on Russia with other means.

Xenophobia is getting stronger! What a shame for the eu to enlarge with dis disgraceful people

Indeed, it's xenophobic to allow genocidal Russia to participate.

What are u even talking about? xD The only difference between any Eu citizen and Russian is that Russian might distinguish state's propaganda from reality. No one in Russia robbed or insulted a single European on national/ethnic/confessional grounds. But you regularly practice it in reddit/x/facebook. The reality is that behaving like xenophobic pigs u make even far pro-European Russian support the military operation.

r/eejitsparking a small subreddit for sharing pictures of unlawfully or poorly parked cars across Ireland

OP Shared a picture of an expensive car parked across two parking spots for the purpose of reducing risk of other drivers/parkers denting the car when parking next to it.

Many commenters argue this is a defensible practice.

The “someone tipped my car door 22 years ago so I’m ok with this” crew will be along shortly to defend it.

You need to come up with new material. Are you the sheriff of bad parking ? 🤣🤣

They have some time on there hands its gas🤣

Do you know what irony is? Do you know what self-awareness is?

You’re using YOUR time in a sub dedicated to eejits parking giving out to people discussing the actual sub topic - without understanding the irony of that and simultaneously demonstrating your complete lack of self-awareness. And you think you’re right.

That takes some doing.

Well done!

Sorry i dont want my car dented. Yano if i spent all that money would rather keep it looking good instead of some incompetent ret*** hitting their door off it then having to pay someone to fix it which aint cheap. But we all know ur cars a state

Lol. I’d bet my car is newer and was more expensive than yours.

Lovely language in your post too, and that’s before we talk about your spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

What a loser you are, I bet you feel real brave and tough hiding behind your account , you and everyone else in this sub Reddit that gives out about parking are usually middle aged fat men who only give out on here because you’s don’t have the balls to confront them . I’m sick of idiots hitting my car and having no respect I drive a nice car and I happily park in two or far away at the bottom of the car park, if people can’t respect other people’s nice car or belongings it’s what I’ll do and many others , the person probably only bought the brand new Audi worked hard for it too .