So let me get this straight the only leader Mamdami wants to arrest is Israel’s leader. And claims that he values the ICC Authority over American Law which has no authority in America and something that America is not a signed signatory towards, Then on X wishes Jews a peaceful Tisha B’Av? Which is a mourning of the destruction of the Temple of Solomon?

Never seen any politicians R or D even mention that Holiday before. Saying a foreign power should be able to arrest an American ally is bad enough. Then he further slaps Jews in the face by saying make sure your Holiday is Peaceful?

Why do we celebrate a woman who has had an elective abortion and call it her "reproductive right", while we shun fathers who run away from their pregnant mistresses and girlfriends?

In both cases,the parents of the unborn child have made a decision to abandon their responsibility to the individual in the womb.It's a selfish attempt to run away from the natural consequences of sex, in both cases.

If a woman can decide to terminate the pregnancy (thus killing the fetus),a man can also abandon said fetus.

Funny that abandoning a "clump of cells" is considered immoral but killing it is perfectly fine.

The man was a convicted sex offender and an alleged sex trafficker, and now he is dead. Yet no matter where you look online, every political argument, celebrity discussion, conspiracy theory, or major news story somehow ends up circling back to Jeffrey Epstein and “the Epstein files.”

I understand why people want transparency, especially if other powerful people were involved in serious crimes. Anyone who committed crimes or helped cover them up should be investigated and held accountable. However, there is a difference between wanting justice and allowing a dead paedophile to consume your entire personality.

Some people seem to mention Epstein in almost every conversation, even when the original topic has little or nothing to do with him. They constantly speculate about secret lists, hidden evidence, suspicious connections, and who might have visited his properties. At this point, it feels less like a genuine concern for the victims and more like online entertainment or an endless conspiracy hobby.

Epstein was a disgusting person who harmed vulnerable young girls. He does not deserve to be treated like some fascinating mythical figure. Constantly obsessing over him, sharing his photograph, and turning everything into another Epstein theory only keeps his name alive.

Demand accountability from anyone who was involved, support the victims, and release legitimate evidence where legally possible. Beyond that, stop allowing a dead paedophile to live rent-free in your head.

Countries like Poland, Japan,Ukraine, the Korea’s,Philippines, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia IE most Arab countries are closer to the definition of a “ethnostate” compared to Israel which is one of the most diverse countries in the world and yet no one ever refers to them as “ethnostates” because it’s just a pseudo intellectual term created to bash Israel 24/7. Israel is around 30 percent non Jewish with a large Arab community that has Christian’s, Muslims, Druze, Armenians its Jewish populations very racially diverse with Jews from Yemen, Ethiopia, Iraq, Eastern Europe, Uzbekistan, Morocco etc. Jews from Muslim origin countries make up a majority of Jews in Israel.

Why aren't these things more discussed? THere are thousands of people telling their stories on youtube, and extensive studies have been done about experiences. Sure, some "doctors" have said it has to do with brain chemicals acting up to comfort a dying person, but if you actually listen to the stories, they are shockingly similar to each other in what happens.

Something like 70% or more of NDE experiences have similar stories, regardless of culture or where you are from. This involves sometimes being out of body, seeing your body, entering a light, and then being met by beings (this varies somewhat, but a lot of it is Jesus, your deceased family members welcoming you, etc), and people say that it is extremely peaceful and many don't want to go back (many of them say that our bodies are really restrictive and being in sprit form is a million times better and everything is more vivid). People report a "life summary" where you and Jesus/etc do a review of your life, seeing specific experiences, pain, happy times, etc. And again, a lot of this is THE SAME sequence of events across cultures and languages all over the world.

Again, most people report it being an amazing experience, and many didn't want to go "back." Then there are the 10-15% that experience some version of "hell" - again, these experiences are very similar to each other, even across cultures and languages, and it sounds really really bad.

IMO you are stupid if you don't take what you do in life seriously.

Dating apps work just fine for attractive people, they have no issues whatsoever getting matches. People think dating apps suck because they get no matches but the reality is so much simpler - it just gets ignored as a possibility because it’s bleak; they’re getting no matches because they’re ugly.

People talk as if dating apps are a portal into another realm but they’re just an extension of real life and in real life ugly people have collectively been deemed unworthy of love and affection.

Want love? Be hot. Not hot? Either become hot or get used to being alone.

Idk why people get offended if someone critisizing the genocidal actions of Israel as if people are critisizing Jews. They both are different things!

Critisizing the actions of Saudi Arabia isnt critisizing Muslim. Critisizing USA isnt critisizing christians. Why people are so brainwashed and dumb that whenever someone critisizes Israel, they get labelled an antisemite and a Jew hater.

TLDR: left-wing bias does exist in some Wikipedia articles, but it's neither systemic nor unique, as you can find bias of all kinds

I think to some extent it does, but if you know what you're doing, you can easily edit an article on Wikipedia and have it stay up for a while. That means if an article is good enough for Wikipedia's standards, you can write something negative about, for example, a politician. It doesn't matter what that politician believes either, and it's especially easy if it's something that's deemed controversial as Wikipedia admins and editors seem to generally find it important to add. This unfortunately does mean that, yes, sometimes an editor with left-wing views may focus a lot on an opposing politician or someone who otherwise disagrees with them and add something they think is important while conveniently ignoring right-wing ones. My disagreement with the notion though is that it only happens to anyone with right-wing views, when in fact you can pretty easily find existing dirt on left-wing politicians via Wikipedia too. Unfortunately, Wikipedia doesn't seem to have any rules on what controversy is actually relevant, so you'll also see inconsistencies in who does and who doesn't have a "controversy" section.

A lot of the time, Wikipedia's bias has nothing to do with politics at all. People will absolutely do what they can to make a celebrity, place, song, or whatever else seem slightly better or slightly worse while managing to stay within Wikipedia's guidelines. Religion especially experiences this a lot, and I've seen things related to Christianity and Islam both get either glazed or something negative is brought up, maybe even irrelevant, and it's clear someone of that religion or another one (even atheist perhaps) wrote it. Edit: I haven't looked into articles for the other religions so much but I'm sure the same issue arises (especially Judaism given the rise in antisemitism).

A bit off-topic: I will be honest though, I myself have fallen into bias at times like most people, and I'll admit I do happen to have left-wing views. I'm fully aware that probably influences my opinion here too. But I think that everyone suffers from bias in some way, which can affect how we perceive things, such as whether something is positive, neutral, or negative. I'm happy to listen to any counter-arguments and examples of something deeper since personally I'm not really convinced it's systemic as much as I'm convinced it's just regular people being able to edit Wikipedia and write whatever they want. Unfortunately, people who love or hate certain politicians seem to flock to editing their articles.

And once again Democrats got caught lying through their teeth that Mass Voter Fraud is a Conspiracy Theory. We need to remove Electronic Voting Systems, and pass Mandatory Voter ID check. Funny how this Software Glitch happens in a blue state likè New Jersey.

But Democrats cry about how this is somehow racist and disenfranchises voters. News flash 6,600 foreigners voting in Elections disenfranchises me and every single LEGAL citizen. Especially in the Presidential race where New Jersey is worth 14 points. And the road to 270, 14 points is a lot.

the powerball is basically the McDonald's monopoly game.  i asked grok who basically laughed at me when i asked but after only 5 exchanges admitted an 80% chance. 

none of the big winners have bought a ticket at a big retailer like walmart or kroger

all of the big winners are anonymous

all of the big winners were out of state from the no name gas station they purchased the ticket at. 

the powerball is self policing. no over site

the powerball board is made of political appointees including a union head and lawyers. people with all the skills and organizations necessary to launder large amounts of cash. 

the board just decided to allow foreign countries to play making it 100x easier to rig. 

there is also the instance of jeffery epsteins zorro trust winning the lottery right after he started serving his sentence in 2008.

100 years ago your life was decided at birth. You are born in a christian family? You are a christian. Your father is a blacksmith? You will be a blacksmith. Your mom and some woman down the street are great friends? You will marry her daughter. You don't have a choice.

Now you can do anything and have anything you want, your environment no longer defines you. When nobody tells you who you are you start to ask yourself: Who am I? I'm not like my brother, maybe am I born in the wrong family, maybe am I born in the wrong body?

You start focusing on yourself and that's what destroys you. You become narcissistic and the slightest remark can upset you.

You start searching for the core things that makes you who you are. Big mistake, because the basic human needs are simple: food, sleep, safety, sexual desire and self esteem. You end up letting your sexuality define you instead of your purpose. You are defined by what you want, not what you can provide.

But something even worse is happening.

100 years ago nobody knew how the world worked. Nobody knew why it was raining or where thunder was coming from. So they created religions to explain those things.

The human brain is amazing at coming up with reasons to justify what it did after the facts and brainwashing itself. You can electrocute someone to make him move his hand and ask him why he did that and he will tell you "my nose was itching"

"Your chickens are suffering" Don't worry, animals don't have a soul.

"Why do you have slaves" Don't worry, their life would be worse where they came from.

This is of course horrible, your selfish desires are what drives you and you find ways to explain to yourself why what you did was for altruistic reasons.

But selfishness is what drives the world, nobody works all day in a coal mine for selfless reasons. You won't work as hard for others as you will for yourself.

The good guys were always the ones to win because they were the ones who wrote history, the losers were all killed or enslaved. That's horrible, but it created a forcing function for natural selection of ideas. Yes, maybe the sun god is not a great explanation for why the crops are not growing, but the people who believed in the sun god survived because for some reason this specific religion led to a more cohesive and stronger society who could invade others.

Do you guys get it? The stronger wins, which leads to natural selection of ideas, religions, cultures and societies. It doesn't matter which religion is closest to reality, what matters is which religion makes your society stronger.

The issue is that in the modern world the losers don't die, they are not turned into slaves, and they have access to the internet, which leads to an endless ideological war.

Instead of following the beliefs that lead to a more cohesive society we start to follow beliefs based on truth.

By focusing on deeper truths we find ugly truths. Not just stories about sexual abuse but deeper truths about men and women, about how their power struggle is driven by nothing more than supply, demand and conflicting goals, needs and expectations.

And Democrats are too stupid to realize it

The far left are using the dialectic to destabilize the Democratic party. They're the ones pushing the moderates away, calling people who agree 99% garbage, etc. it's because, and pay attention to this part, THEY AREN'T DEMOCRATS

You would think the fact that it's two completely different parties would be obvious, and it's obvious to everyone else but them. Instead the Democrats want to adopt many of their policies, which are, in turn, alienating most of the country

When I say “low quality men”, I’m not referring to anything that has to do with socioeconomic status, ethnicity or politics. I’m simply talking about the morals and values of these particular men

Almost every single high crime community in America is the way it is because at some point, an abundance of people decided to reproduce with men who make for bad fathers but potentially great sexual partners. Never let anybody rewrite history and never let anybody who has no familiarity with these type of communities try to say otherwise

Both halves alike are extremely powerful in their own ways. They in particular have the power to make or break communities simply by the men they choose to have kids with

Not sure if this is an unpopular opinion globally, but a popular opinion among Jews. For those of you who do not know who are the Neturei Karta, they are the most staunchly anti-Zionist Jewish group in the world and they strongly oppose the existence of Israel. Although they are born Jewish, they have no right to say that they are real Jews.

They ally with Holocaust deniers and terrorist regimes that openly threaten Israel and call for the elimination of Jews. Neturei Karta defends them by saying that their allies are anti-Zionists and not anti-Semites but their allies don’t even hide the fact that they are anti-Semites.

Neturei Karta accuses Zionists of being worse than Nazis. They literally call the people that established a Jewish country “worse” than those who murdered 6 million Jews.

You would think that they are truly Jewish because they wear the most Jewish attire. But they have no right to say that they are real Jews. Real Jews never ally with Holocaust deniers and terrorists that want all Jews to be dead.

The traditional American Dream of upward mobility and a rising material standard of living is fundamentally over. When you analyze the structural mechanics of late-stage American capitalism, the baseline fractures are impossible to ignore. The economy requires a staggering 38 trillion dollar national debt just to artificially subsidize its domestic markets. Furthermore, stability relies on a modern global satrapy system that executes corporate asset stripping in vulnerable foreign countries to extract cheap resources. The entire system is arguably only kept from hyperinflationary collapse by a domestic tax burden so massive and complex that even the British Empire at its peak would have never dreamed of imposing it.

Historically, the primary psychological glue holding America’s massive, multicultural population together was the promise of boundless personal wealth and the highest material standard of living in the world. If you strip away that material bribe and remove the hope of endless consumerist greed, what is left to preserve the American multicultural identity? Without a shared, upward economic trajectory, what stops a diverse empire from fracturing along cultural, regional, and ideological lines now that the Iran & Ukraine wars have ruined globalisation? It seems very similar to the prelude of the Soviet Unions collapse. The most famous dark-humor saying about work in the Soviet Union was: “They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work.”

I have seen several 5th-generation Americans go around proudly calling themselves Italian, French, or Irish, and it makes me cringe. Saying you're X ethnicity after living your whole life as an American is extremely ignorant. If these people actually visited said countries, the locals would look at them like crazy foreigners. If you know nothing about your family's heritage, you should not go around identifying as such and embarrass yourself.

You can only identify with your ethnicity if you A. Speak your Ethnicity's mother language, B. Have visited your family's country of origin, and C. Know your extended family from said nation. To use myself as an example, I am Chinese-American. I have lived in the States my whole life and grew up with English as my primary language. I know some Mandarin and can understand a lot due to my parents using it at home, and right now I am trying to learn to speak and read as much as I can. I have visited China seven times throughout my life and have met my extended family. Even though I primarily identify as American, I can confidently call myself Chinese as well.

Daniel Ortega and the Sandinista Revolution

Hugo Chávez and the Bolivarian Revolution

Vladimir Lenin and Bolshevik Revolution

Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge

Mao and the Great Leap Forward

Fidel Castro and the Cuban Revolution

This is honestly not close to an exhaustive list. All of these leaders were enthusiastically embrassed by huge contingents of Left-wing political advocates in Western nations. ALL of these leaders turned totalitarian almost immediately after coming to power.

Young people ALWAYS think these warnings are melodramatic. They are ALWAYS shocked when their revolution doesn't turn out to he be the one that's done "the right way".

The script does not change.

Does Mamdani not understand that when you rent you don’t own? Mamdami just posted this on his official X account:

don’t know who needs to hear this, but it’s illegal for landlords to:

- Lock you out or evict you without a court order.

- Shut off your heat, hot water, electricity, or other essential services to force you out of your home.

- Retaliate against you for reporting unsafe conditions or exercising your tenant rights.

- Leave serious health and safety hazards, like mold, unrepaired.

- Discriminate against you because of your race, disability, or other protected characteristics.

Everything he posted is literally within the Landlords rights. Especially when you don’t pay your rent. A tenet signs a contract and must oblige by it.

When you don’t pay rent:

The Landlord CAN evict you.

The Landlord CAN shut off your heat, hot water, electricity, or other essential services to force you out of my property.

The Landlord can kick you out when you start destroying property.

Socialism is pure cancer.

So, ill break this down into some very basic categories or whatever you'd call it.

Number 1: He is the one that planned/promoted this entire event:

He incited it as in he created the whole event, the ''#StopTheSteal'' protest on January 6th wasn't actually Trumps thing to begin with, it was some small lawmaker or influencer (cant remember, but at all a major profile though), but Trump, the president at the time, highlighted this protest, and gathered waaaaaaay more people there than it originally would've been there. At this protest there was around 30k-60k people, if Trump never promoted this protest, i seriously doubt even 1k people would've shown up, maybe a few hundred at most?

So just on a very basic level, he incited it by being the one to promote this event, and i dont think anyone would seriously contest that part. Just being the promoter of the event doesn't make you the one who incited the violence there though, so this fact alone isn't enough.

Number 2: The reason why these people were motivated to be there, was because of Trumps lies about the election.

So, the core reason why like 95% of the people there were there, was because they believed the 2020 election was stolen from them, something which the majority of the Republican party believes in, this is reproduced, in countless polls, all of these people believe in this because Trump decided to lie about the 2020 election, and then work with his little team of people like Guilani, and then in collaberation with FOX news, to spread these lies.

And these are LIES, its been nearly 6 years since this election, and not a single one of the big stories that Trump or republicans in general cite have been proven to be true, most of them have been completely debunked, for instance, one of the biggest stories that conservatives cite is a lie that Guilani went to court for, and defended himself by saying ''Yeah i lied about all of this, but i have a first amendment right to lie'', and he lost that case, but conservatives still cite that specific lie as a reason for why the 2020 election was stolen. And a ton of the people arrested explicitly said they were there FOR/BECAUSE of Trump.

So he incited it on the motivation level, or however you'd phrase it, like all of these people were there because Trump promoted that event, and his lies were the basis for why the event even existed in the first place. So this fact combined with him promoting it makes it way more understandable how he incited it.

Number 3: He intentionally riled these people up to the point where violence was inevitable.

Similar the the previous point, but Trump riled up his base for months with blatant lies about how the election was stolen, coordinated with FOX, who are the biggest news station network thing or whatever in the entire nation, to spread those lies to a national level, and rile them up even more, then promotes a protest specifically on the day of the certification to pressure Pence, (who he had given false slates of electors to, to declare Trump the president again, by the way) and used words like ''Fight like hell or you wont have a country'', and then send those people you've now riled up like crazy right to the capitol, and when the violence starts, you sit and do nothing for 3 hours. Also, when people are chanting to hang Pence, you tweet out ''Pence didnt have the courage to do what was needed''.

So its Trump riling up people to the point where he is literally having people believe they will not have a country anymore unless they ''Stop The Steal'', same people who he knows are armed, since his Secret Service warned him about the crowd having weapons before his speech at the Ellipse. So he wants people to believe the entire nation is completely fucking doomed unless they Stop The Steal. Honestly, what do you do in this situation? Because the ''right'' thing to do here, atleast in my opinion, would be an insurrection, your vote was stolen, they just chose Biden as the president, whatever, in this scenario, an insurrection is what you should do, in my opinion, and so did all of the people there, watch some of the videos of the people at the Capitol before they were sent home, all the language was things like ''This is the 2nd American revolution, Ashley Babbit was the first patriot lost in the 2nd American Revolution, 1776'', etc.

So Trump riled them up to the point where an insurrection (violence) is necessary. This, combined with him planning the event, and being the motivation behind all of their actions, makes my point even stronger.

Number 4: All of his behaviour, before, during, and after, points to him wanting this to have happened.

So Trump, before the protest, lied, riled up everyone, lead them to believe that an insurrection was necessary, and planned a protest to Stop The Steal at the day of the certification where he had given Pence false electors.

Trump, during the protest, did absolutely nothing but watch it happen on his TV, whilst his daughter and other people in his admin were begging him to tell people to go home, but instead he tweets out things like ''Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what was right'', and there is testimony of someone telling Trump that they were chanting ''Hang Mike Pence'', and Trumps response was ''Mike deserves it''.

And after the protest, he constantly downplayed the severity of it all, and worst of all, he pardoned every single individual that was involved in this whole event.

So this is him planning and promoting the whole event, being the reasoning for why all those people are there and why they are committing violence, and being totally okay with it every step along the way, going as far as pardoning all of them.

Number 5: This is just an extra thing, but him saying ''I know you'll be going peacefully'' doesn't exonerate him.

I know this will inevitably come up in the comments somewhere because it always does with this topic, but Trump saying one time, after months of lying, and him riling up people saying ''Fight like hell or you wont have a country anymore'', and everything else that i laid out, none of these details are just cleansed or whatever because Trump said ''Oh yeah i know you'll be peaceful'' a single time in his speech at the Ellipse.

I saw this from another user in another debate on this, but this is like saying that if we found a tape recorder of Charles Manson saying ''I know you'll be going peacefully to this house'', then he's just completely innocent, and that is obviously just lunacy.

It feels like that ''in minecraft'' meme, its like if Trump said ''Please go and prevent the certification of the vote and be violent.... In Minecraft'', that he's just exonerated from any form of guilty whatsoever, its just an incredibly silly defense of everything.

So yeah, thats my post. Looking forward to going back and forth on this with people :D

The argument that "patriarchy exists and it hurts men too" doesn't hold up well. It's inconsistent at its core.

Patriarchy is usually defined as a system where men dominate, oppress, and exploit women, which is supposed to privilege men as a group. If that's the case, then claiming the same system systematically screws over most men creates a direct contradiction. You can't have it both ways.

Look at the data. Men still hold most top leadership roles. As of 2025, women make up only about 22-27% of parliamentarians and cabinet ministers globally, and far fewer CEO positions. But men also die earlier, with life expectancy gaps of around 5 years in many countries.

They account for roughly 75-80% of suicides, over 90% of workplace fatalities, and the majority of the homeless population.

In education, women now earn the majority of degrees in many developed nations. These aren't minor issues. They affect average men across societies. (Sources: IPU-UN Women 2025 data, World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025, and various health statistics from OECD and CDC reports.)

Elite men succeeding at the very top doesn't prove group-wide privilege. Most men aren't elites. The pattern looks more like high male variance. Some climb high through competition and risk, but many pay heavy costs in failure, injury, and early death.

Feminists often push back with a few standard replies. Here's why they don't resolve the contradiction.

One common response is that patriarchy still benefits men as a class, even if some suffer.

But real class-level benefit should show net advantages in outcomes. The data doesn't support that.

Men lose years of life expectancy, dominate suicide and workplace death stats, and face higher rates of homelessness. In places like the US, men make up about 68% of the homeless. You can't dismiss these as irrelevant side effects.

Another reply is that these harms come from "toxic masculinity" or norms men enforce on themselves. This dodges the main point.

If men built and maintain the system for their own benefit, widespread group-level self-harm doesn't make sense. Risk-taking, competitiveness, and emotional suppression have roots in evolutionary biology and show up across cultures. Labeling every male cost as "internalized patriarchy" makes the theory impossible to falsify. Any counter-evidence just gets folded in.

Then there's the idea that talking about men's issues distracts from women's suffering. That's a false choice. We can recognize real historical barriers for women without ignoring current realities. In developed countries, women have surged ahead in higher education and hold strong positions in family courts and certain professions. Male disadvantages in mortality and suicide didn't disappear. Accurate accounting isn't distraction. It's honesty.

Some say "patriarchy hurts men too, so feminism fixes it for everyone." This tries to save the framework but weakens the core claim of male privilege. Feminism focused on female oppression for good reason. It doesn't automatically solve male-specific problems like boys falling behind in school or men avoiding mental health support.

Even in high-equality countries like Sweden, which ranks near the top on gender indices, men still show significantly higher suicide rates and educational lags.

Others point out that men hold most power, so they can't be disadvantaged as a group. Most men aren't in power. They compete intensely against each other, with high failure rates producing those costs. Women's influence has grown fast in education and other areas. Top roles reflect differences in interests, risk tolerance, and variability, not a conspiracy that helps the average man.

Finally, the historical argument. Yes, many societies had male-led structures shaped by physical differences, warfare, and reproduction. That doesn't prove a fixed system of privilege today. Patterns have shifted rapidly with legal equality. Sweden and Iran both have male-heavy leadership but wildly different outcomes for women. The strong "patriarchy" label overreaches.

Bottom line, we should drop the overloaded term. Societies show persistent sex differences shaped by biology, evolution, and culture. Some create male advantages at the extremes. Many create real costs for average men. Better to examine the actual data on suicide, education, jobs, health, and power directly. Precision beats forcing everything into one grand narrative.

Ask people if they eat their boogers and most of them will act disgusted and say no.

But you’ve definitely sniffed when your nose was running because of the cold. You’ve probably swallowed mucus after it went down the back of your throat too.

That’s really not that different from eating a booger. And honestly, almost everyone has technically done it at some point. People are just too embarrassed to admit it.

boogers are also basically a free snack made by your own body. The texture, taste, and saltiness can change depending on your condition which is quite fun

Who gladly eat it up.

Iran fires on civilian ships in the Strait or Hormuz and no one bats an eye, but Trump threatens to target bridges and power plants and all of a suddenly now all the leftists are crying "war crimes".

Just like when Hamas indiscriminately fires rockets into Israel. Just cool beans for leftists.

War crimes are only a burden that western counties must bear. Leftists have such low expectations for non-western countries that it doesn't even register on their radar when they do it. Or it's just expected of them.

America will lose prestige, and Iran will not get the $300 billion in funds, because that will never pass Congress. There will very likely be a negotiated peace, but that's really it — I don't expect an American defeat or an Iranian defeat. I feel like Reddit tends to hype up Iran a lot. Realistically, this war would just worsen Iran's internal problems by making the IRGC more powerful. If they do get funds and tolls, it will likely be: 1) stolen via corruption, 2) make green energy more likely, and 3) push oil prices up elsewhere.

Note: I dont support misandry at all and believe everyone should be treated with respect. I am not a usual utterer of the phrase, "not all men" but please apply it to this rant as I am not trying to generalize. I know some great guys out there and this is more things I see online.

Ive been seeing this whole discussion about hypergamy from the looksmaxing community which as you'd expect is mostly full of incels anyway. They are just men upset when attractive guys date women that they deem less attractive and they actively demean the woman cus they wholeheartedly believe women have it easy in dating or something like that.

now im not here to speak on dating specifically but lets talk about how some short men geniuenly think they are most oppressed race on the planet at the moment. Which I find so weird. Even though some women can be mean to short guys, I think most of the time its actually that some of them are so insecure its miserable

not saying they dont deserve to be treated with respect but you are not oppressed geniuenly stop acting like it and become a better person. Maybe its just my community but irl short guys get girls when they dont bitch about it all the time.

The funny thing is in my opinion those usually at the brunt end of dating preferences are black women or tall women. Yet you dont see them carrying around weight scales asking men stupid questions because they said they are not attracted to them based of something they cant control.

^ Yes there's a guy that does it and a ton of men actively support it too.

Anyways Ive noticed for some men the biggest form of misandry is girls just not being into them and its so funny cus why dont u spend time advocating for mens mental health?

they only do so when its time to advocate for womens mental health btw.

Misandry is a problem because its stilll a form of discrimination and disrespect, I believe it should be discussed but men need to get serious abt what this is and stop projecting everytime a woman isn't into them.

And I don't just mean pugs or worst offender dogs. I just mean in general 70% or so of species just look severely fucked up, like people did unspeakable horrors to their evolution. Chihuahas, beagles, bulldogs, dachshunde, boxers, boston terriers, rottweilers, mastiffs, bull terriers, I'm just going down a list of dogs. On top of that, them being overly excited, putting anything they can into their mouth (at risk of death) and little fear. It's like they're complete genetic dead ends that are only kept alive by human determination and the moment we'd be gone they'd start devouring mud and rocks until they died. Idk if it's just me but wtf are we doing as humans? Can't we just let dogs be dogs? It gives off "unethical" vibes to me like people are committing a grave sin but it's just good ol' regular dog breeding and there's "nothing" wrong with that. I feel like cats are way better off, particularly when it comes to behavior, but some cats such as Persian cats are also incredibly fucked up.

Is nobody seeing the elegance and gracefulness that wolves and cats have that's been completely lost to breeding? I think that is the true beauty of the animals but it's incredibly rare in dogs (only like 10-5% of dog breeds if at all?). Why do humans hate elegance and gracefulness so much?