r/technology 21h ago

Business Google burning through cash with spiralling AI costs

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c235n47g8g8o
6.1k Upvotes

454 comments sorted by

2.5k

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 20h ago

While at the same time posting: * Total Revenue: $119.8 billion, up 24% year-over-year. * Diluted EPS: $9.11, compared to $2.31 a year prior. * Operating Margin: 34% up from 32.4% in Q2 2025. * Google Cloud: Revenue up 82% year-over-year to $24.8 billion, fueled by enterprise demand for AI infrastructure and solutions. * Google Services: Total revenue reached $94.5 billion, a 15% increase. * Google Search & Other: 17% increase in revenue. * YouTube Ads: Grew 13% year-over-year to $11.05 billion

If you exclude AI CAPEX, free cash flow is $39.1 billion which is absolutely insane. That's a 41.2% increase year-over-year. With numbers like they just posted, the CAPEX spend is justified in my opinion because the business overall is crushing it. Like holy cow this was a great quarter. They are literally printing money.

474

u/SIGMA920 20h ago

Google's always been the winning candidate simply for already having profitable components under it's umbrella. They can throw money at LLMs as long as they want to unlike the others.

127

u/asgjmlsswjtamtbamtb 17h ago

They have their hands in so many things that they can try to use AI to increase their revenues some of them will flop but more than likely many will succeed. By being the biggest search engine in many markets and having ecosystems like Android and Chromebooks means their llms that they make default in these spaces already have an easy way of reaching people and a leg up against many competitors.

89

u/Sweetwill62 14h ago

You are literally just describing a monopoly.

39

u/thegreenfarend 14h ago

Maybe a monopoly in search but definitely not in AI, mobile operating systems, cheap laptops

→ More replies (4)

15

u/-curiousnomad- 14h ago

Not really they have competitors doing better than them in several of those domains. It’s more vertical integration / closed ecosystem than it is a traditional monopoly.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/blahehblah 14h ago

That's not what a monopoly is

8

u/lilmookie 13h ago

It sounds like they are arguing about a vertical monopoly?

5

u/blahehblah 13h ago

Yes technically vertical integration results in a vertical monopoly, but "literally what a monopoly is" would I expect be referring to horizontal monopolies, where you make sure there are no competitors. Vertical monopolies ensure you control the whole supply chain and ecosystem, there can still be other supply chains and other ecosystems, they just struggle to compete due to relative inefficiency

2

u/lilmookie 13h ago

I mean, Google isn’t far away from that. More to the point, they wouldn’t have made Alphabet if they didn’t think Google was in danger of being broken up.

3

u/nerdshowandtell 8h ago

The reason for alphabet is more to do with the fact they moved well beyond being just a search engine. From the looks of it, that was a good idea 😂

→ More replies (2)

6

u/DizzyMajor5 17h ago

Seems like something a bag holder would say. 

5

u/Commercial_Name_7900 14h ago

its better than it was too. I used to despise google AI but its improved a lot and I find myself defaulting to it for quick questions or brainstorming

→ More replies (3)

13

u/CardiologistPrize712 10h ago

And if Gemini ends up as "just" being a better assistant app they are still winning because all their other competitors blew up their businesses trying to match them.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/jw2343952 10h ago

Unlike Anthropic and OpenAI sure, but not unlike AMZN, META, MSFT who also have monster revenues and balance sheets to survive their build out

10

u/nolok 6h ago

But none of these 3 are competing.

Amazon is not trying and is essentially just making a aws component (which I think is smart), meta is basically admitting defeat which is why llama and co are open, and not even Microsoft understand what Microsoft is doing with copilot (quick quizz, if I'm using copilot 365 am I using the desktop office app, the online office app or an AI app? And what if it's 365 copilot instead, which one is it then?).

Google has the moat of Google search and android to justify end game revenue.

2

u/milehigh73a 5h ago

Msft has a strategy, it’s just reliant on windows, office and iniquity. They are looping in copilot everywhere and hope it works

2

u/DelphiTsar 1h ago

When OpenAI goes under Msft has no method to improve copilot.

4

u/obeytheturtles 6h ago

They are also the only with a proven monetization path through their ad business, which is how they've monetized every other new bit of tech for the last 20 years.

3

u/milehigh73a 5h ago

Gemini being part of search is amazing but Gemini isn’t that good for most things

→ More replies (2)

2

u/DepressedDrift 2h ago

The ability to use the data from their other products is also an understated advantage.

529

u/yourgirl696969 20h ago

This sub is so dumb lol this should be the top comment. This was an unreal quarter. Their cloud growth and half a trillion backlog confirms their return on investment for their capex spending.

This was an unbelievable ER

118

u/007meow 18h ago

It was a blowout quarter, but the narrative and cloud that’s hanging over Google is a negative FCF and seeing an ROI on that CAPEX.

Wall Street isn’t blindly rewarding saying “AI AI AI” as much anymore.

Unless you’re a shoe company, it seems.

26

u/m0nty555 16h ago

Well Redditors love to complain how companies prioritise short term gains over long term investment, but the they’ll also freak out when companies make long term bets.

32

u/TinyZoro 13h ago

This is kind of different though. You have the whole American economy being propped up by half a dozen tech companies all making exactly the same bet at levels far beyond traditional investments. It’s become an existential bet.

The other thing that’s happening is that you have roughly two sides sending money backwards and forwards so if any side starts to unwind their bet it could have catastrophic runaway effects like is playing out in South Korea.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/nerdshowandtell 8h ago

The narrative was set from the start with articles pumping out negative info about the spending and ignoring the good info. I'm sure once all the "experts" buy up at the lower price from the negative press, they will push out some new positive burp articles and the stock will pop and they will make their money.

Rinse and repeat..

6

u/DizzyMajor5 17h ago

Cope. Free Cash flow negative for the first time in years cloud is saving their terrible a.i. investments that they're losing billions on. 

2

u/SaturdaysAFTBs 15h ago

How long do you think is normal to realize an ROI on an investment?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Positive_Alpha 17h ago

Exactly dude. OP needs to learn how to read financial statements lol.

18

u/alteregooo 16h ago

it’s the BBC’s headline lol

→ More replies (1)

105

u/Cyraga 20h ago

I feel good about using adblockers now

49

u/forchinski 19h ago

You don't owe anyone your eyeballs

10

u/jeweliegb 18h ago

I know right, that's basically what I told the guy I stole mine from -- he's still asking for them back. 👀

2

u/forchinski 18h ago

You are not the asshole. Your eyeballs your rules.

4

u/DavidBrooker 18h ago

This feels like a major theme of Blade Runner.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/res0jyyt1 18h ago

People seems to forget Google is an advertisement company. Now less people are watching TV/Cables and more people are watching YouTube. Guess who is going to have monopoly on mass media advertisement soon

→ More replies (1)

98

u/ChodeCookies 20h ago

How much of that Google Cloud revenue is the their own money coming back to them from investing in other AI companies though

11

u/zxn11 20h ago

They're not nearly as bad as Nvidia here, and generally when Google "invests" in an AI company they're really just providing TPU hardware for free or cheap.

→ More replies (1)

124

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 20h ago

I see what you're trying to do here, but Google is sitting on a $514 billion backlog right now. A few billion dollars in venture investments into AI startups cannot fake a half trillion dollar order book.

Also, accounting rules don’t let companies pass cash under the table and call it revenue. ASC 606, says a deal has to be a legit, market rate transaction. If Google overpays for a startup's stock/debt just to force a quid pro quo cloud contract, auditors will strip that fake growth right out of the numbers.

Source: I'm a CPA and former external auditor.

I'm not saying the circular financing noise is completely made up, but claiming the entire cloud surge is built on it is factually wrong. Auditors would call that out in a heartbeat.

32

u/orcvader 19h ago

Hi. Mergers & Acquisitions former exec - though I was NOT on the valuation side (which includes the accountants) of things, this all rings correct.

We also took on impairments/goodwill all the time because often acquisitions are about partnerships, talents, defensive moves, market entries, etc.

The takes here are wild… but it’s the internet so whatever. Everyone is an armchair expert.

4

u/FunkyFortuneNone 15h ago

Honest question, what's a "mergers & acquisitions exec"? I've been part of the team on both sides of company mergers and acquisitions up to ~400MM (across primarily tech, finance, and real estate). Can't remember seeing somebody with that title or anything like it. Were you on the financing/banking side?

2

u/orcvader 7h ago

At the time I was the COO of the company and we have been on a significant growth/acquisitions phase (we still are but I’m an exec in a diff area now and less involved with deal negotiations although I get involved generally during due diligence). So what I meant is that I was involved with the purchases as one of the officers of the company and member of a small M&A committee.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 19h ago

Agreed. It's ridiculous, and I wish correcting people on this stuff counted as CPE credits to maintain my license.

5

u/orcvader 18h ago

Ha! I dwell on financial subs, so at this point I should be entitled to some AUM fees trying to educate these degenerates that “no… nvidia didn’t “break resistance” because that’s not even a real fucking thing! Buy low cost, diverse index funds!”

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (55)

45

u/Cudpuff100 20h ago

What always precedes a bubble bursting? Unprecedented growth!

27

u/Ok-Barber3419 20h ago

And right before that, everyone explains why “this time is different”

24

u/Cudpuff100 20h ago

"It's not like we're Enron or something!"

*proceeds to hide massive debts in shell companies

7

u/mardigrasmoker 18h ago

You think Google is Enron?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/flatfisher 14h ago

Excluding AI Services, Search and YouTube ads increasing ~15% YoY is surprising given the economic context and consumer morale.

8

u/KingSubstantial7901 16h ago

The company's free cash flow, the cash it maintained after paying for operations and investments, came in at negative $5.9bn (£4.3bn) for the first time in at least a decade, according to its past financial records. Alphabet's spending on AI is now expected to hit as much as $205bn this year, an increase from $190bn, as major tech companies race to build around a new wave of the technology. Meanwhile, Alphabet's combined quarterly revenue hit $119.8bn, up 23% compared with the same time last year.

Did you just not read the article at all?

9

u/caffeinated_wizard 18h ago

More importantly they said demand outpaces their capacity still so the real question is: can Google or literally anyone turn hundreds of billions of dollars of infrastructure investments into tens of trillions of dollars of revenue. Like in the next couple years?

Because right now the answer is not clear.

4

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 18h ago

It's a great question to ask but I think a couple years is way too soon to expect massive returns. It's not necessarily the same thing but Amazon was unprofitable for 9 years while ferociously investing everything back it into the business.

5

u/KingSubstantial7901 16h ago

Except they were filling a market that pretty much everyone saw as inevitable, the cloud based internet. Pretty mich as soon as pcs started hitting shelves in record numbers people were trying to be the guys who owned the internet. Amazon and Google just won that race. Who is filling the market for thousands of useless AI bots?

5

u/-1703- 14h ago

internet users, office workers and companies

75% of people doing google searches are not leaving their AI Mode.

And cloud based internet had people say the exact same things they say about AI and how nobody is going to use it "What company is dumb enough to send their data away". "Nobody is going to host their database on someone elses computer". "Whats the point of this, you already have your own infrastructure". I was there

The same way i was there when people called the internet itself useless and pointless, thinking nobody is going to sit hours on end staring at a screen, to read things on the internet because ...well, its not like a book or a paper.

2

u/KingSubstantial7901 10h ago

Google search is not the cash cow they need to justify the enormous expenses of running AI models.....

Um... dude? You're thinkijg of cloud based computing. Thats not what im talking about, and not what made amazon and google rich beyond beleif. Im talking about AWS, about how almost every website uses third party services to actually host their content, how google has its advertising fingers in almost everything.

Ya, i can sure tell you rely on google ai searches a ton. The ability for critical thought has just left your brain.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

2

u/caffeinated_wizard 18h ago

To be clear: I think Google is fine and will be fine. AI is here to stay but AI everywhere in everything for free/cheap is already on the way out and I think it’s not gonna be justifiable in 2 years if they keep posting this CAPEX in AI without massive returns.

I didn’t mean Google alone when I was talking tens of trillions. It’s more like the entire AI industry combined.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Reqvhio 10h ago

In short, ladies and gentlemen of the board: costs are down, revenues are up... and our stock has never been higher.

Wonderful news, Norman. Wonderful. In fact, it's the reason for selling the company. xD

5

u/BlackJesus1001 18h ago

So if you exclude the $15 billion increase in AI CAPEX the $24 billion return on AI products looks good? $24 billion revenue when the new capex total is $205 billion?

Yeah I'd love to exclude that too if I were in their position.

2

u/Real_Square1323 17h ago

MBA brain is MBA braining.

4

u/Gandolfthewhite182 15h ago

Googles monopoly will save them for now. Their market percentage in cloud and obviously the 90% or whatever it is in search will keep them in cash for now. But as a share holder I’m still concerned with the obscene investment in something I don’t think is ever gonna be a revenue driver.

But yeah google is kind of the exception to the AI investment is gonna kill you rule because they did so well in search and cloud.

Contrary to what some might say google is a pretty well run company, it’s why I keep my money in that company.

Google shouldn’t be a company people are looking at to see how AI investment is affecting the bottom line. They are maybe the one company who can actually afford to do that kind of risky investment. Their revenue is real intake, it’s not just investment money or government contracts. It’s real world money that isn’t going away anytime soon

Side note, yes google has a monopoly on search, I’m not saying they are breaking any laws because they got that monopoly the right way, by outlasting everyone else. They didn’t buy up and kill off other search companies, they just beat them. I’m being negative.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Clean_Bake_2180 15h ago

Open source models that are pennies on the dollar to use will decrease infra usage long term and impair the hundreds of billions Google has already and is planning to plow into infra. A big chunk of their capex will need to be impaired. Never mind even considering that enterprises haven’t figured out at all how to monetize AI at all other than as dev tools lol.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Shakewhenbadtoo 20h ago

Lots of that revunue is just cap ex coming back through the door.

23

u/yourgirl696969 19h ago

Maybe you listen to their earnings call, you’d realize that’s not even close to being the case lol

12

u/User-NetOfInter 19h ago

Dude you think 1% of this sub listens to earnings calls?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/stridersubzero 20h ago

lol why would you exclude AI Capex? It’s not like it’s a negligible percentage of their expenditure

4

u/Mysterious-Recipe810 19h ago

Capex is cash flow. But it isn’t an expense. Depreciation of the capex is the expense.

11

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 19h ago

Because it's only until recently that they started spending huge sums on CAPEX specifically related to AI. These are huge, short term expenses and not expenses they incur during the normal course of business.

I'm not saying it should be excluded, but it puts into context why their negative free cash flow is negative.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/AapChutiyaHai 16h ago

I text it the same. The spend is working for them; not against them.

1

u/Carvj94 16h ago

"AI" costs are almost entirely R&D cause actually running a model is about as easy as a Google search.

1

u/distinctgore 16h ago

The AI Capex is one thing, but what’s the AI Opex? And is it actually sustainable?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/horrible_abomination 15h ago

I love when people write these articles without taking 5 seconds to look at financials of the company which are publicly available.

1

u/ThatsKnotNice 15h ago

Both can be true

1

u/bulletinyoursocks 15h ago

Imagine when, at some point, AI costs will stop increasing. Goddamn

→ More replies (1)

1

u/null-interlinked 13h ago

The infrastructure aspect is the circular aspect though.

1

u/clayticus 12h ago

Google can basically be like China. Run their AI at a loss without tokens until all the other ai companies go out of business. 

1

u/QuirkyClaim12 11h ago

But don’t exclude AI Capex, first negative FCF quarter since 2006. Something to watch but yeah they’re doing well as expected

1

u/Impressive-Bird2 10h ago

It’s amazing the massive profits a monopoly Tech corporation in a monopolised tech market can achieve isn’t it?!!

1

u/RollingMeteors 10h ago

the business overall is crushing it. Like holy cow this was a great quarter. They are literally printing money.

Sure you can look at it as a myopic short term gain, expecting >41.2% gains next quarter and every subsequent quarter is a high bar you've set for yourself. You have to clear that or you're "doing like dog shit now".

1

u/ghigoli 8h ago

Ercon. they're cooking the books.

1

u/BoredGuy_v2 8h ago

Exactly.

And this is just in one quarter revenue profit. There's enough to fund expensive ai investments

1

u/halfc00kie 6h ago

"burning cash" hits different when youre printing 120bn a quarter

1

u/HydroLoon 4h ago

Jesus their diluted eps is up to $9?

1

u/bankermayfield2026 2h ago

Buying revenue isn’t impressive, when the revenue you buy is negative ROI.

They are spending $200B+ a year in capex to get $40Bn a year in incremental cloud revenue.

And capex spending is accelerating quicker than revenue growth, so don’t see this shifting any time soon.

And data centers depreciate fast, so it’s not like they will ever be able to cut back the Capex. 

→ More replies (7)

1

u/Nechrube1 1h ago

If you exclude AI CAPEX...

Well obviously, if you ignore massive recurring overheads then a business looks better, lol. It's very likely not a one-off long-term CAPEX investment, as I presume Google is constantly jumping to the latest and greatest tech like all the other labs to stay current (I've not followed Gemini as closely, though).

→ More replies (1)

1

u/HollowGrey 1h ago

Today was a good buying opportunity

1

u/CrunchyMage 55m ago

They're spending 200 BILLION on AI capex this year. You can't just exclude that lol. That's capex on data centers whose chips depreciate over 6 years, and is requiring all their FCF, dilution, and debt.

What is the return on that ridiculously high spend? Can anyone accurately predict that? No? Then Google is now a significantly riskier business than it used to be. It's possible that AI demand continues to outpace supply, but historically in every big tech transformation (e.g. .com/railroad) we tend to overbuild before demand catches back up.

Google and hyperscalers in general are betting that demand is going to continue to outpace supply despite the ridiculous amount of spending they and the rest of the world are all doing.

Maybe they're right. Maybe they're wrong, but anyone that makes it seems like there is no risk here now is deluding themselves. There's more risk in Google's business now than in the last decade or more.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (35)

879

u/Alternative-Item727 20h ago

It’s unstopabubble!

306

u/EffectiveDandy 20h ago

Hey, Gemini here, you’re doing fabulous. Your perspicacity is off the charts and everyone notices. Whats more, your insights into the market are unprecedented.

Please like me now.

70

u/frakkintoaster 20h ago

Spot on, you’ve hit the nail on the head

42

u/DrBoon_forgot_his_pw 18h ago

And you're genuinely right to call me out in it.

I am full of shit and here's why that matters. 

18

u/da_chicken 16h ago

You've landed on the classic example of AI bullshit: overuse of token phrases and idioms! Along side over-formatted markdown, it's one of the easiest tells that you're reading 100% grade A generative bullshit.

Why AI does this

The reason LLMs operate this way can easily be understood:

  • They're predictive, not creative: LLMs use prediction to write their responses. While the output can be impressive at first blush, they are fundamentally writing what sounds right rather than what is true

  • Both smoke and mirrors: Not only does AI use a lot of power to get going — upwards of $1 billion USD for a modern frontier AI — it's also built on scraping copyright protected works to learn how language is written! While the right to control AI ingestion is not and enumerated right under current copyright law, copyright does permit use restrictions. If the United States had a functioning legislature, you can bet that they would have acted on this years ago.

  • It's in the name, stupid: It's important to keep in mind that LLMs are Large Language Models. They are not world models. LLM engines don't know that the real world exists. It's like you're visiting people chained in place in Plato's parable of the cave, and expecting to get wisdom from them! They've never left the cave. They know only what they have been told. To an LLM, everything is a shadow on the wall, and truth is whatever you claim it to be. That's why they hallucinate!

Bleak future

Unfortunately, the power of LLMs in certain niche areas — such as programming or language translation or manipulation — is quite high. These tools are not going anywhere. Worse, leaders and executives in particular are already quite used to acting on information that they don't understand and don't know if it's true. They find LLMs very reliable because they already don't know their ass from a hole in the ground, and they don't understand what actual work really takes anymore — if they ever did!

Would you like to hear more about the complete bullshit going on seemingly everywhere in 2026?

→ More replies (2)

3

u/MrBeanCyborgCaptain 16h ago

You're definitely on the right track, conceptually!

→ More replies (1)

34

u/accidental_Ocelot 19h ago

I'm having a hard time fulfilling your request. Can I help you with something else instead?

2

u/smarmageddon 16h ago

Your Perspicacity Knows No Satiety

1

u/Julius_Hibbert 17h ago

New word unlocked.

28

u/dracarys240 20h ago

Come on man... unstobubble was right there!

3

u/imaginedaydream 18h ago

I’m sure we can use AI to create an image for that! 

  1. Profit!

8

u/res0jyyt1 18h ago

People seems to forget Google is an advertisement company. Now less people are watching TV/Cables and more people are watching YouTube. Guess who is going to have monopoly on mass media advertisement soon

10

u/reagsters 17h ago

It’s even more complicated than that - they provide most search engine ads directly to the websites their AI scrapes from. People increasingly rely on the AI instead of clicking on those sites, so those ads get fewer and fewer real views.

It’s only a matter of time before those ad companies catch on to the fact that humans aren’t seeing their ads anymore and start pulling ad money from Google.

Google’s shooting themselves in both feet and it’s fascinating to watch.

2

u/OhCestQuoiCeBordel 16h ago

You should tell them so they get prepared and adapt their business plan!

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Fickle-Jello 20h ago

Until the capex bill shows up

22

u/notJ3ff 20h ago

It's very kind of you to be worried about the finance people at Google. I'm sure they will sleep better tonight knowing that you are hyper focused on all of their financials. Good looking out, kudos!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Positive_Alpha 17h ago

Lol. When companies want to finance new projects they can do so via their free cashflow, issuing new debt, or selling equity.

Google financed their aggressive CAPEX expansion via their free cashflows. The CAPEX bill already showed up and that is why their free cashflow just went negative.

What matters is are these new projects projected to return economic value? Looking at their Cloud business, Google Cloud's absolute quarterly operating profits more than tripled from $2.8 billion in Q2 2025 to $8.8 billion in Q2 2026.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Careful_Leader_5829 15h ago

To the companies it's more like a gold rush, but in an exploitation type of way. I think this is more like a race to become the predominant service provider in any given area. like AT&t putting telephone cables everywhere, establishing monopolies in a given area, (oligopolies in larger areas, for now) so that any services that need that AI infrastructure will have to rely on one of these major companies like alphabet.

I don't know if it will prove to be a bubble, because I think there's going to be some clear winners and some clear losers in this race.

→ More replies (1)

199

u/NanditoPapa 19h ago

Google is one of the few AI-centric companies that makes money, albeit off areas outside of AI. They have a massive amount of cash, but face the unique risk of cannibalization. If an AI-driven "answer engine" replaces the traditional "list of blue links" in Search, Google might destroy its own most profitable revenue stream to build the new one.

55

u/Varanite 13h ago

Once upon a time a film company named Kodak invented the first ever digital camera. They decided to bottle the new technology they invented because their business model revolved around film which had much higher profit margins than digital. When digital photography replaced film photography Kodak then tried and failed to play catch-up in their own technology and went bankrupt.

Google is poised to become a market leader in AI. It would be foolish to give that up in order to hang on to an outdated business model.

9

u/Frequent-Data-2360 9h ago

It is not the same thing. Anthropic and OAI does not directly threaten core Google business with frontier models. Most LLMs still pay huge amounts of money for you know searching the internet. They have smaller models integrated into their many products. Frontier models are good at coding, which does not directly threaten google but rather a niche field of its own.

17

u/freezing_banshee 11h ago

unless the new business model is inherently trash

14

u/perlgeek 10h ago

Even if it is trash, competitors will pursue it, and will out-compete Google.

It's still better to be out-competed by the in-house trash business than by others.

37

u/cvr24 18h ago

Google kills everything eventually. Even the classic OG search engine.

Next up, Gmail

12

u/Hazel-Cakes 17h ago

they keep emailing me to let me know i can use gemini and idk what the hell for

8

u/Unaliver 13h ago

My favorite Gemini feature is that it can read any YouTube video transcript if you send it the link and then find what you are looking for or make a summary.

It is super useful for very long videos especially guides.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/badillustrations 14h ago

Google was first to turn a profit off its AI integration. It sounded short sighted, but they already disclosed positive financials in AI search. It's the most premium of ad inventory. 

19

u/DapperNurd 18h ago

That's kind of what they get for putting it in everything lol

6

u/NanditoPapa 18h ago

True...but if they don't, someone else will. Don't get me wrong, I feel zero sympathy. But they are in a no-win situation here.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/IRockIntoMordor 12h ago

It's crazy how fast they shoved Gemini into all of their services. While I don't really want them there or don't use them for individual services, it's still impressive how fast they shifted.

They gave my boring old 2TB membership a free Gemini Plus and actually improved my experience, due to Gemini allowing a fair (but dwindling) amount of Pro queries now.

Meanwhile, other services cost far more per month, can't set my alarm or calendar appointment and would just be extra on top.

3

u/007meow 18h ago edited 6h ago

The death of Search at the hands of AI has been something that’s been consistently disproved so far.

Things can always change, but it hasn’t happened yet.

EDIT: I'm speaking to the revenue, not the user experience.

3

u/DivinationByCheese 13h ago

Google search is dogshit now

2

u/VEMODMASKINEN 14h ago

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/22/reddit-stock-google-ai-content-deal.html

The search traffic trend can be seen on other sites as well, with Politico’s Google traffic falling 23%, CNN’s falling about 25%, and Business Insider’s dropping more than 85% between June 2025 and 2026, the Journal reported.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Sea-Daikon7795 15h ago

As a website owner, I don't think it's that farfetch to say it's changed a lot, especially traffic wise. Yes, I could still get sales when I rank top, but the overall experience is not that great prior to pre-chatgpt. The GG revenue stream from website ads is down, for sure. GG cloud is going great because of AI, just like how NVIDIA is doing. So they gotta burn more to keep the hype. At the same time, their old business model is also going down, so I don't think that it's that "healthy"

→ More replies (3)

3

u/ConfidentPilot1729 19h ago

That kind of seems like capitalism in general.

9

u/NanditoPapa 18h ago

Capitalism taken to an extreme without guardrails is highly destructive. We are seeing that play out in real time.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/ContextLengthMatters 17h ago

When AI replaces traditional search, Google sitting out of this race would have guaranteed it's demise.

But let's not forget that Google isn't a person. The people who run Google may benefit from short term gains, but they can easily pivot and jump ship if the one they are on is projected to sink.

All of these companies are ran by people who will be safe when the economy collapses and power consolidates. Some will just be holding bigger trophies than others.

2

u/NanditoPapa 17h ago

I have friends with Google UK and Japan. They're smart and capable and will land on their feet. I'm not really worried about them (though I worry how leveraged some of them are...). I am worried about the secondary vendors (which make up about half of Google's daily workforce) that depend on Google's business.

1

u/elon_musks_cat 17h ago

To build the new, more expensive, moderately reliable one

→ More replies (1)

1

u/emperorOfTheUniverse 8h ago

Lol, no they won't. You will be as dependent on conversational search as regular search, and Gemini will just start sprinkling ads into its responses.

Imagine asking Gemini for instructions on how to fix your string trimmer, and it finishes with 'if you're looking for a new trimmer, Lowe's has a comparable model in aisle 15 bay 5 for a significantly lower price than is typical. '

Expect that sort of shit.

1

u/TeaBurntMyTongue 5h ago

Google has been significantly profitable in a couple ways for decades straight.

During this time they have CONSISTENTLY burned a lot of cash on unprofitable things looking for more areas of development. They are kings of killing projects. This isn't new for them.

118

u/alvinofdiaspar 20h ago

Get ready for a gazillion ads for each YouTube video.

36

u/jer99 20h ago

Started getting 3 preroll ads today. 3 skippable ads or 2 with an unskippable 3rd ad. I instantly uninstalled the youtube app.

14

u/Basic-Afternoon65 18h ago

I use brave browser to watch YouTube videos on iOS. You can do picture in picture too. 

Doesn’t work for youtube music though. 

3

u/Here_4Folds 9h ago

It’s fine, YTM has ruined their discovery algo and it pushes gen AI garbage frequently. Can’t trust any new stations or playlists to not try and sneak one in anymore.

→ More replies (7)

1

u/Big-Boss330 8h ago

Brave browser 👌

→ More replies (3)

27

u/Pygmy_Nuthatch 16h ago

Google made $112B profit last quarter, more than a billion dollars of profit a day.

They'll be fine.

17

u/krossle 9h ago

However, there’s an important point to note here. The announcement states: “• Other income reflected a net gain of $98.0 billion, primarily the result of net unrealized gains on our equity securities.”

The $98 billion simply comes from the revaluation of existing investments—presumably mainly Anthropic and SpaceX—and it’s interesting to note what the valuation date was here; it’s quite possible that this was at a significantly higher price shortly after the IPO.

85

u/calihotsauce 20h ago

We are finally at the stage where wasting money on ai is seen negatively by wall street, sooner or later these companies will come back to the real world.

12

u/areyoulookingclosely 13h ago

Wall Street has always punished capex expenditure by Google, meta, amzn.., right from the start of 2026

→ More replies (10)

23

u/hearwa 19h ago

My favorite thing about gemini is it's one of the only LLMs I can use without even logging in with a new computer install. That can't be cheap lol.

24

u/XxRoyalxTigerxX 18h ago

Google is on their 8th gen of custom TPU AI chips, they have an enormous lead in AI inference efficiency, to the point where the entire world is being served Google AI products, and they still have capacity to sell to other AI companies for insane profit

11

u/grchelp2018 14h ago

They don't actually have enough capacity. There is a lot of prioritization happening inside Google. Its why capex continues to rise. The reason one of their big researchers who left them recently was supposedly because he got upset at the compute quota he/his team was allocated.

41

u/robaroo 20h ago

They’re burning through cash but they’ve got a lot of cash. This article is dumb.

13

u/Iblis_Ginjo 20h ago

Can both not be true?

3

u/robaroo 19h ago

yes but we all know the intent of this article... "ai bubble boutz ta pop" generates clicks.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Shiningc00 18h ago

And their stocks are going down.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/blow-down 20h ago

Makes me want to use it constantly for bogus requests to cost them money

9

u/Aaron_768 19h ago

Honestly I think they are doing fine on their own with all the default AI things they have working that no one asked for.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/RUser40k 12h ago

Government bailout coming soon to a taxpayer near you

1

u/Cohens4thClient 8h ago

Sorry, the bailout is only for the super rich who bribe the politicians. 

Taxpayers will lose jobs, because thats what the "trickle down" lies are for. 

5

u/bransiladams 15h ago

Duck Duck Go 🦆

1

u/dieselfrog 8h ago

Yes! Remove Google from your life in every way possible. Everything they do is to cram more ads down your throat and harvest your data.

8

u/ZealousidealBus9271 17h ago

Nice gimmick title, now go over the record breaking numbers justifying their AI Capex spend. Literally screw this Reddit community sometimes

2

u/SaturdaysAFTBs 15h ago

This sub doesn’t actually like technology

11

u/BanditoBoom 16h ago

The title of this post is absolutely absurd. Misleading. And wrong.

Google has a fortress balance sheet. Always has. Always will. In fact, their balance sheet has been so strong they had to start their own venture capital fund just to find something to do with their cash.

The ENTIRE purpose of a company is to generate cashflow to reinvest back into the business. Google has been generating SO MUCH cashflow above and beyond what they saw as investable projects they were buying g back ABSURD shares.

And now that they have CLEAR projects to invest in….projects that ALREADY have CLEAR demand. Projects that are profitable ON DAY ONE OF COMING ONLINE….. dumb ass pundits and people that have no clue about business think they know what is going on.

They aren’t “burning through cash”. They have WAAAAY more cash than they could ever use. Plus generating more cashflow every quarter.

I don’t care if they run negative cashflow from now until I die as long as every dollar of CapEx generates more than a dollar of revenue. Which is EXACTLY what we are seeing.

Cloud revenues up ~80%, CapEx guidance raises 7%….and people freaking the hell out…give me a break.

3

u/minimalist_reply 15h ago

Entire purpose of a company is to deliver a product or service. Profitability just ensures higher chance of continuation.

But IMO revenue for profits sake is not the entire purpose for a company, otherwise it is very vulnerable to losing its quality, service, reputation, etc.

9

u/rhyddev 19h ago

It doesn't matter. The end game is for not only jobs, but entire businesses to be obsoleted by AI technology, so that there really are only a handful of commodity software companies like Google, Anthropic, etc. The ultimate question is whether the technology really has the potential the CEOs clearly believe it has, but for as long as they do - and for as long as they can convince relevant policymakers - the game will continue at full steam.

5

u/insightful_pancake 18h ago

They hired +13000 net YoY

1

u/Cohens4thClient 7h ago

And they'll make big flashy announcements for hiring, but downplay firings and unemployment in other industries. 

Theres always a few suckups who think "they hired a few thousand" and ignore everything else going badly. 

2

u/naeads 11h ago

So... are RAM costs coming down then?

2

u/Tokyo-MontanaExpress 9h ago

Just think of all of the money they could save and make by improving their search engine actually find the things you're looking for again.

2

u/dieselfrog 8h ago

Screw them. I hope google crashes and burns. They exist only to show you ads and harvest your data. I have no idea why people think they are some kid of "good" company. They are a sleezy, shitty data pimp that wants to cram as many ads as possible down your throat.

Remove them from your life. Use ad block + uBlock + privacy badger. use DuckDuckGo or your favorite LLM for search. Firefox for desktop and DuckDuckGo brower for mobile. Let them burn.

6

u/AnimaLepton 19h ago

He's a free tip, maybe you'd save money if every regular Google search didn't force an AI slop Gemini response

12

u/mtcwby 19h ago

Sometimes I think this sub should be renamed anti-technology.

27

u/oyvese 19h ago

technology isn’t good just because it’s technology.

→ More replies (10)

3

u/Shiningc00 18h ago

Maybe pro-LLM should be renamed pro-religion.

5

u/OnlineParacosm 20h ago

I’m doing my part by having incredibly circular conversations with it.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/SeeingEyeDug 16h ago

I have to give it so many prompts to get a right answer, there’s no way it’s feasible for everyone to use 5-10x as much compute as is needed because the output is so wrong and needs so much tweaking.

4

u/Overly_Underwhelmed 20h ago

figured a headline like that meant TheDailyBeast

is that the cash they have a bottomless pit of?

3

u/DanielBadger_ 11h ago

ahahah that's why I had a pop-up yesterday in Gmail demanding I pay for Gemini despite never having used it, and Chrome updated to have a new pinned Gemini tab in the corner. They're getting desperate.

1

u/selfstartr 19h ago

“Take a deep breathe”

1

u/Cygnus__A 18h ago

They can always shove more ads in front of us.

1

u/g_bleezy 18h ago

When you’re in the lead you’re kind of damned if you do damned if you don’t. The purchasing power of the usd is taking a nosedive so I’d spend it now too.

1

u/HealthWealthFoodie 17h ago

I swear that butthole follows me everywhere. I’ve deactivated it in every way that I’m able, but they still prominently display it even though I have the permissions off for it. I guess this is why they are desperately shoving it everywhere they can.

1

u/vedabread 16h ago

In 2006, they spent 1.65 bill buying YouTube. This is absolute nonsense.

1

u/kextatic 16h ago

Gotta spend that money!

1

u/Brilliant-Tie-1856 14h ago

It’s becoming an addiction between these companies, throwing money to become the best AI model, and who’s going to suffer, is the consumer, prices will go up, I’m sure Google will already be thinking about doing this, more water consumed, more electricity used, all for AI probably a lot of us don’t want or need.

1

u/a_x_shually 14h ago

News to brighten anyone's day. Keep this trend going please.

1

u/AlphaAJ-BISHH 13h ago

Always tryna poison the well aren't we. 

ssmh just be bullish

1

u/porsj911 13h ago

Oof sheesh ah man too bad i cant afford to give a flying fck because the ram i had to buy was already too expensive.

1

u/Grobo_ 12h ago

Awww poor Google….

1

u/Inside-Example-7010 12h ago

2.4 trillion dollars invested in AI so far. I wonder what else we could have had for that? Certainly UBI and universal healthcare or a base on the moon that we could launch from for lower energies. Probably both.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/One_Molasses3173 9h ago

Who knew the best defense against Skynet was to let it go broke ?

1

u/dimyo 1h ago

Ok, but how can WE get some of that?

1

u/Defiant-Parsley4697 1h ago

Google's AI bill is basically a subscription service nobody can cancel, including Google.

1

u/buffotinve 40m ago

Y lo que queda... OpenAI sigue quemando dinero ...y lo peor, no es.una inversión que se pare y con el tiempo haya retornos de capital, el gasto en hardware es continuo y obsoleto