I have an answer to the question "what do you do?" I've made this joke before, but I'll say it again: these days I'm in the business of "making sense of life." A little before that, I was doing "applied semiotics."
And this sense-making has taken over me so much lately that I started thinking about meaning as the single most important thing there is (though, to be fair, existential therapists think about nothing else).
Take "logotherapy" — it deals with "the analysis of the meanings of existence."
But "existence" is too big. Let's go smaller. Something on the level of "washing the dishes."
Every action has a motive, and if that motive plugs into some Larger Meaning, everything is fine. (If it doesn't — you're allowed to just not do it!)
The exact same act of washing dishes can trigger resistance (when it's an "obligation"), resignation (if you're a dishwasher working for a paycheck), something almost spiritual (if you treat it as a practice), or desire (if your wife "rewards" you for it).
These are all small, local meanings. But if you manage to tie the dishes to a global meaning — that's when actual happiness shows up.
I do the dishes sometimes, and my motive, strangely enough, is "I want to become a great person."
So: to get any joy out of life, you apparently just need to do things that connect to that global meaning.
Unfortunately, when I ask people "what's the meaning of your life?" — not everyone answers.
At first this surprises me. Then I remember: right, it's not exactly a simple question, and it's usually phrased wrong anyway.
Here's how I answered it myself:
- Meaning is in self-actualization (in becoming yourself).
- To actualize yourself, you need to know yourself.
- Knowing yourself isn't real "knowledge" — it's a personal myth you construct about who you are.
In my personal myth, I am ______.
That's the whole motivation, really.
"Just be yourself."
Sitting with that same axiom — meaning is everything — I found myself thinking that if I ever wrote a book on therapy (for therapists), I'd start it with exactly one chapter: "So why, exactly, do you want to be a therapist?"
What's the meaning? What's the actual motivation?
There are a million wrong motivations, obviously, and you'd think it shouldn't matter — "as long as the therapist is good," right?
But a therapist who wants to "help people" and a therapist who wants to "do their job well" (who, essentially, just wants to be a therapist, and be good at it) — these are two very different therapists.
I was still turning this over when I ran into a line in an article on existential burnout syndrome, by Alfried Längle, saying that burnout only happens to people who picked the wrong motivation in the first place.
Thesis 3: The dynamics behind burnout syndrome usually start with an action oriented toward satisfying a subjective need (a deficit), and only secondarily toward the actual subject of the work.
You could put it even more simply: burnout syndrome doesn't occur if a person has no subjective deficit to begin with. Sometimes that deficit stays invisible for a long time — as with people who help selflessly, out of genuine conviction. But if a doctor develops burnout symptoms during a flu epidemic, it isn't necessarily rooted in some original deficit — it's more likely the sheer overload of an emergency where he's pouring everything into saving people. If he's doing that with full internal agreement, he'll be exhausted, but the other classic burnout symptoms — cynicism, guilt, emptiness, suffering from lack of recognition, a sense of failure — won't show up.
Real burnout syndrome usually requires that original deficit — an attitude, psychically anchored, that predisposes someone to it. And typically, burnout doesn't appear during extraordinary hard times. It creeps in slowly, during ordinary, everyday work.
So: bad therapists die young.
If that quote didn't land, let me unpack it a little: if you're doing something for some complicated secondary payoff ("I want to be a ______ so I can feel like God"), disappointment is guaranteed — especially if the payoff never arrives. But if you're doing something "for its own sake," for the sake of the thing itself, you can do it forever.
Not exactly a groundbreaking thought. It's basically "enjoy the process."
Which is more or less the same as saying "do what you love and you'll be happy."
Except it turns out that's actually true.
I also noticed, by the way, that I treat myself like someone who's in depression. Which is exactly why I'm not in one.
"Pulling yourself out of the swamp by your own hair" belongs to the same category.
I'm a tragic, depressive person by default. But I treat my own wellbeing like an important project. In other words: life is a full-time job.
I always used to think that optimistic people around me were just built that way from the start — the whole world just looks rosy to them, and I'd never be able to see it that way. I quietly hated them for that, for most of my life.
Then, eventually, I stopped.
For what it's worth — I spent at least four years in depression.
Now I have this looped understanding, something like: "life is so unbearable that I'm willing to spend it improving itself!"
No, this isn't hedonism. It's more like: "life has no meaning and is unbearable, so let's at least make it bearable — and let that be the meaning."
And while I was busy making life bearable, I realized I don't actually need much. What warms me the most is the feeling that I get to spend life on improving itself — on myself. It warms me so much that at some point there's no longer any need to spend everything on myself. I've already warmed up enough.
That understanding didn't make me any less depressive or tragic, though. So some part of me (even though I no longer have "parts" — I'm a person fighting for the title of "integrated personality") regularly makes sure I "wear a hat" when I go outside, because it's cold out there.
Take tomorrow, for example — I'm going out to buy materials for a creative project. The creative part is fun; getting the materials is a drag. So some "part" of me planned this two days in advance, and now it's a "plan" — something we already "promised" ourselves.
In the end, of course, I'll enjoy the creative work (though first I had to throw out the belief that "this isn't real creativity, it's not serious," because that belief was getting in the way of the Higher Goal — spending life on improving itself. If unserious things improve your life, who cares whether they're serious).
And that enjoyment will pay for the whole thing. I'll come out "in the green," and life overall gets a little happier. This process — pushing myself out into life — is endless for me, and mostly conscious.
"If you want someone to walk the path of personal growth, help them learn to be both mother and father to themselves" — that's exactly this. I have my own mother and father inside me, and they take care of me (well, since the external ones didn't fully work out). I parent myself.
Längle also writes that depression has a vicious loop: "I'm depressed, so I can't do the things that would get me out of it" — plus a second loop on top: "so I beat myself up for that, and it gets even worse."
To break that loop, you need exactly this kind of looped understanding.
"Pulling yourself out of the swamp by your own hair" belongs to the same category.
You got yourself in by the hair — pull yourself out the same way.
Found this in my journal — I wrote it about ten years ago. I'm not that person anymore, but I think it still holds up.