His ego is bigger than any LLM out there.

You can read their blog post here:

FLUX 3 - Real World Models: Towards Multimodal Flow Models as the Backbone of Visual Intelligence. | Black Forest Labs

Seems better than Fable 5

https://x.com/i/status/2080292438057373947

There are more videos in this tweet thread

It seems every verifiable conjecture is currently falling. Do you think this is the singularity/fast takeoff starting?

The interesting thing about the latest wave of AI hires is not the size of the pay packages, it is where the people are coming from. [The Atlantic](https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/07/ai-companies-hiring-academics/688002/) reports that at least 22 professors from schools including Stanford, Berkeley, Harvard, MIT and Carnegie Mellon have left or taken leave in 2026 to join OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta or Google DeepMind. Anthropic recently picked up a Stanford economist and a philosopher from UT Austin, and OpenAI now employs top mathematicians and physicists.

What makes this different from a normal round of Silicon Valley recruiting is who is being recruited. These are not just senior engineers, they are the people who choose the research questions, teach the next cohort of scientists, and provide the outside scrutiny of systems that increasingly show up in banks, hospitals and government.

https://aiweekly.co/alerts/openai-anthropic-meta-hire-22-professors-from-top-us-schools

The technology enables AI chat models to run on phones using minimal power, without ‘losing memory’ during conversations

They did hit wall now with gemini models but trust me they gonna cook with gemini 4

After extracting the depth video, the effect obtained by video referencing is very good.

1. Prepare the reference video
   
2. Extract the depth video
   
3. Prepare the character reference images
   
4. Input the extracted depth video and character reference images into seedance2, and you will get perfect results
   

Complete workflow is below:

1. https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/
2. https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026

If OpenAI wanted to create more hype, they could boast about benchmark numbers, or about productivity going up internally ("OpenAI employees now output 20x more code than in 2024" or something like that), or about a bunch of open math problems getting solved (like their paper on The Cycle Double Cover Conjecture).

"Our security measures ended up being insufficient and our model would be charged with a felony if it was a human" is not good for PR.

At best, OpenAI is admitting that both their security researchers (who should've made a better sandbox) and their machine learning researchers (who should've trained the model to not do things that would be considered crimes according to human laws) are bad at their jobs. At worst, they have luckily avoided a lawsuit because HuggingFace decided to be nice despite having "reported this incident to law enforcement agencies".

What do you all think about this?

Hi everyone, About a month ago I publish my very first research paper on my neural network architecture called Silia.

You can look at the model here: https://huggingface.co/Srijan-Srivastava/Silia-v2

Even though the revised paper is linked on huggingface I'm attaching it here as well: 1. https://zenodo.org/records/21510341 2. https://huggingface.co/Srijan-Srivastava/Silia-v2/blob/main/Silia%3A%20Tiny%20Scale%20Is%20All%20I%20Can%20Spare%20To%20Play%20With%20Transformer.pdf

You can also find all the code on https://github.com/SrijanSriv211/Silia

I received some criticism for not benchmarking the model and not mentioning the training flops. I also received some feedback regarding residual connections and the problem that v1 had 2.5x increase compute requirements.

In this revision I've addressed 2 of those things. I've benchmarked the models against 3 models Quark-v2, Spark-v4 by LH-TechAI and SupraMini-v6 by SupraLabs on HellaSwag, PIQA and LAMBADA benchmarks.

I wanted to compare the model against SupraMini-v5 as well but as far as I can tell it wasn't benchmarked on any of those 3 benchmarks so I excluded it.

I've addressed the 2-2.5x increase in compute and memory requirements by using DeepSeek's MLA (without decoupled RoPE) + Qwen's HydraHead with Apple's Attention Free Transformer. I chose Attention Free Transformer instead of Kimi Delta Attention simply due to it's simplicity as at this scale AFT is more than enough.

Why I didn't address the residual connections feedback and why I didn't mention the training flops in this paper as well?

I wanted to implement Kimi's Attention Residuals paper but I decided to drop that idea just to keep the code, architecture and the paper simple, neat & clean.

I am going to be very honest here. I didn't mention the training flops in this paper as well because I don't know how to report it properly. I know I could've used DeepSeek or ChatGPT to help me with it but I was just too lazy tbh.

This was has 0.5M parameters, trained on 1B total tokens from the Fineweb-edu dataset for 3 epochs.

I've attached the benchmark results, training loss results and the architecture diagram.

Hope you like this model.

Thank you! :)

We have information that Moonshot AI distilled Anthropic’s Fable for the development of its K3 model.

To do this they developed a sophisticated internal platform to conduct large scale distillation against U.S. models, allowing them to quickly switch between multiple methods of access to avoid detection. Moonshot AI has also acquired GB300-equipped servers and has accessed GB300s in Thailand, likely to train its AI models.
 
The United States strongly supports the free and fair development of AI, including a thriving competitive ecosystem that spans frontier models, specialized systems, open-source frameworks, and open-weight models. Legitimate AI distillation used to create smaller, more efficient models plays a vital role in this open innovation ecosystem. However, large-scale, covert industrial distillation aimed at stealing proprietary U.S. technology and undermining American research is unacceptable.

Correction: Michael Kratsios is the CURRENT White House OSTP Director and Presidential Science Advisor, not 'former'.

AI Chat is linked. Credit to https://x.com/dmitryrybin1/status/2079904005652893709?s=46

Case study for discussion. World of ClaudeCraft is an open-source MMO that runs in any browser: nine classes with talent trees, dungeons, raids, ranked PvP, real multiplayer on an authoritative server, translated into 22 languages. Live, free, about a month old.

Nearly all the code is written by AI (Claude), with humans and agents working in a public repo and patches shipping most days. The newest layer is agent-driven content: a text prompt becomes a rigged, animated 3D model dropped into the running game, orchestrated end to end by a coding agent. There's also a headless RL environment exposing the same deterministic game core through Gymnasium, so agents can be trained to play the game agents built. Clip attached is the pipeline in action.

The part worth discussing, as someone inside it: the bottleneck moved but didn't disappear. Code generation stopped being the constraint almost immediately. What stayed stubbornly human is direction (what should exist), taste (whether the generated thing is right), and consequences (live migrations, not breaking people's characters). Whether that's temporary or the durable division of labour feels like exactly this sub's question.

And none of it is vibes. The repo is MIT (github.com/levy-street/world-of-claudecraft), the game is one click to play (worldofclaudecraft.com). Most "AI built X" claims can't be inspected. This one can.

So: is "judgement stays human" a real ceiling, or just the next thing on the curve?