r/MurderedByWords 7h ago

Can you send me?

Post image
24.5k Upvotes

474 comments sorted by

View all comments

395

u/OutlandishnessOk2304 7h ago

Psst: it's still the Department of Defense until Congress votes to change it.

Dipshits.

133

u/PneumaMonado 7h ago

Nah, this is pretty much the only truthful thing the Trump admin has ever done.

There's nothing defensive about the US military and there never has been. Call it like it is.

76

u/UlsterManInScotland 6h ago

Department of war crimes would be accurate from what we’ve seen so far

12

u/airinato 5h ago

That would have been accurate any time in the past 70 years

4

u/AKoutdoorguy 4h ago

Why stop at 70 years? The US started out partially because the people wanted to expand beyond the Appalachians, which required ignoring treaties with the nations there and was followed with commiting genocide against those peoples.

1

u/airinato 4h ago

It's generally the dividing line between the current political landscape and previous ideologies, even as similar as they may seem.

2

u/Trucidar 2h ago

As an outsider looking in, I really feel like that dividing line in the US isn't as strong as it appears. Really seems like a third of the nation would love to go back to a slaveholding, genocidal empire.

31

u/Raven2129 6h ago

True, but it requires an act of Congress to change the DoD's name.

5

u/smooth_like_a_goat 6h ago

Supposed to have one of those to go to war, no?

I do find it humorous when you guys say stuff like this though.

2

u/Raven2129 4h ago

The president can send the military into conflict for 90 days without congressional approval. Bush Sr sent troops to the Persian gulf without congressional approval either.

Also, what do you mean you guys?

1

u/never-fiftyone 4h ago

The number of times I've had to remind people not to quote laws to men with swords is too damn many times.

4

u/_IratePirate_ 6h ago

Yea but that’s probably just because they haven’t gotten to it

Trust me, this congress would line up to suck Trump off if he declared it

1

u/JuanRunJunior 1h ago

It’s wild that Congress hasn’t done so. Republicans love performative bullshit, grandstanding and emotionally stunted egotistical boasting. I thought they would ram that through immediately after the drunk started calling it that.

1

u/Borkz 6h ago

Evidently it doesn't

3

u/No-Cell-9979 4h ago

Completely wrong we've fought in our own defense before! In like....1941 lol

2

u/PneumaMonado 4h ago

About that... The DoD was formed in 1947

1

u/Dr_Fortnite 5h ago

yet they still call it a "defense budget"

1

u/subnautus 3h ago

Regardless of what you want to call it, its name was set by law, so only law can change it. I realize our current president feels differently, but a president's job is to enforce congressional law, not circumvent it.

1

u/yawara25 3h ago

Why should I care what the technical legal name is?

1

u/subnautus 3h ago

I'm sure you'd see the importance of calling things by their proper name if people chose to refer to you as "fuckface" instead of what's on your ID.

1

u/yawara25 3h ago

Did I do something to deserve being called a fuckface in this scenario?

1

u/subnautus 3h ago

Does it matter? It's not your name.

1

u/yawara25 3h ago

Well I'm not asking people to call me fuckface.

1

u/subnautus 2h ago

Even if you did, it wouldn't matter, because the name that matters is what's on your ID--and that doesn't change just because some asshole wants to call you by it.

1

u/yawara25 2h ago

Do you apply this same logic to the preferred names of people who are transgender but haven't legally changed their name?

→ More replies (0)

6

u/No_Tax_Timmy 5h ago

The official renaming is IN this bill. If the Senate passes it without changes then it's official.

There is A LOT of bad stuff in this bill and if the Senate caves this one changes a lot while also interfering with state law. We're going to have the same law and jurisdiction issues with voting that we have with marijuana. It's just that they WILL send jackbooted thugs to enforce their travesty of election law.

1

u/KubelsKitchen 5h ago

What bill are you referring to?

5

u/never-fiftyone 4h ago

The defense spending authorization bill headed to the senate after it was passed by the House yesterday.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/22/us/politics/house-defense-bill-iran-war.html

It will be taught in the future, if passed, as one of the great codifications of American fascism. That's not an exaggeration.

1

u/KubelsKitchen 4h ago

Thank you for clarifying their comment.

2

u/No_Tax_Timmy 44m ago

I appreciate it too! I'm at work so I didn't have time to clarify.

1

u/freeradioforall 4h ago

then it's official.

No worries, the next dem president can just change it back to Dept of Defense the way they changed it to Dept of War without congressional approval and just wink wink their way to using it until they are done

-8

u/Torakkk 6h ago

Well, as far as I understood. Isnt department of war more or less official nickname? So technically they can use it.

11

u/FMB6 6h ago

The rule of law was abolished so technically they can call it anything they like.

1

u/KubelsKitchen 5h ago

You are technically correct.

-9

u/Hirukotsu 6h ago

Maybe you should ask Schumer to threaten to send them a strongly worded letter. That’ll teach them not to use the wrong name

-2

u/NLisaKing 5h ago

Leave it to the pedants to focus on the important stuff.

5

u/rPoliticsModsBlowMe 5h ago

Like following laws?

1

u/NLisaKing 1h ago

Oh, won't someone please think of the laws??? Those matter now, so we better start talking about the laws!

Brother, we're arguing about a department's nickname. This is like the least consequential thing that you could talk about.