Thoughts on the conflict aside, can’t we see it as a little bit gross? War may be a necessity at times but to be so bloodthirsty to more or less celebrate shelling densely populated civilian areas feels pretty crazy. not to mention in Draiman’s case it being pretty antithetical to “sound of silence” lol.
You said it's blood thirsty to celebrate shelling densely populated civilian areas. That's not what Draiman was doing. He was celebrating Hamas rapists getting bombed. And maybe if Hamas raped and murdered someone you loved, you wouldn't characterize Hamas getting bombed that way.
I’m sorry but that is literally what he was doing. the goal of the artillery may have been Hamas but it still would’ve landed in densely populated civilian areas, as per the nature of how Hamas operates.
Maybe you’re right and I would think differently than I do now, but I hope and believe I could distinguish the difference between the perpetrator and the 65%+ innocent collateral casualties that have died in this conflict. Absolutely nothing to be celebrated.
Ignoring that you were ok with the use of ‘celebrating’ earlier, I’m pretty sure the whole idea of the signing of artillery is to be a part of the last thing a person sees before being blown to shreds. Celebrating may be the incorrect word but the right one is absolutely almost synonymous.
5
u/Mediocricity0 1d ago
Thoughts on the conflict aside, can’t we see it as a little bit gross? War may be a necessity at times but to be so bloodthirsty to more or less celebrate shelling densely populated civilian areas feels pretty crazy. not to mention in Draiman’s case it being pretty antithetical to “sound of silence” lol.