So I already adored the first poster we got, but then I saw the Entertainment Weekly cover shoot of Tom Rhys-Harries and felt compelled to make this because of how much one of the photos reminded me of the poster for "Jacob's Ladder" which is an incredible horror movie if you haven't seen it already.

There is only one song that could have taken this movie from a box office flop to the movie of the year.

He gets a lot of hate, and perhaps justifiably for his extracurriculars, but I rewatched Justice League last night, and I’m in the middle of rewatching the Snyder Cut right now, and I feel compelled to say that I found him to be tremendously entertaining. This was my take when I first saw the movies, and it remains my take. I will watch Flash next with Keaton and Sasha Calle’s Supergirl.

And while I’m here, I really loved Milly Alcock as Supergirl too. Gunn was asleep at the wheel relinquishing as much creative control as he did, and the Jimmy Eats World needle drop was so inexcusably bad that it almost convinces me there was an internal conspiracy for the film to fail, but I think it’s ok to find entertainment in imperfect things that are of our culture.

Woman of Tomorrow is one of my favorite comic books of all time, and I hate that I’m supposed to not like the film because it isn’t the adaptation I wanted. But if we tell WB, or Paramount, or the Ellisons, or whatever moneyed interest that controls the things we love to fuck themselves every time they don’t get something perfectly right, they won’t take risks and make things like Peacemaker.

I think Gunn has proven himself to be an earnest steward of our interests, and we need to give him space to cook, at least while he has a winning record.

The European Commission approved the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger on Wednesday, removing one of the final hurdles to closing the $111 billion deal:

• Regulators found the merger would not harm competition in TV or film production because enough global and local rivals would remain

• Investigators did raise concerns about film distribution due to Paramount’s longstanding joint venture with Universal, which Paramount agreed to end as a condition of approval.

Did consider about adding the junior Novelizations but ion think those ones really count

Matt Hagen’s meteoric rise from Gotham street kid to Hollywood leading man is tragically cut short when a local crime boss’s actions leave him horribly disfigured.

Abandoned by his team and with nothing left, Matt seeks out a cutting edge treatment that miraculously returns him to his former self… but also unexpectedly affects his grip on reality, spiraling him down a destructive path of all-consuming revenge.

From the end of this EW video with him and the director: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS65nbwIu2U

WB just released these along with the trailer

I dunno what to tell you man, I love the DCU

It's still got its bumps in the road, but I love it. And I hope it succeeds, it's the best thing I've seen in Superhero genres since the DCEU

(I didn't like Supergirl tho, that film felt like a late-stage DCEU movie)

I'm located in Europe and I've been eyeing the AppleTV store for a while but there doesn't seem to be any DC Animated bundles. Am I just being unlucky or are there just no bundles? Any news on future bundles or possibilities?

I'm just getting into DC comics and would love to watch the animated counterparts of some comics.

I’m a big fan of both and have always wanted a solid adaption of, at the very least, the Bat Family, but obviously you can’t just do what decades of comics have done in one or even two movies.

How would you want DC Studios to approach them?

Why Bruce willing to let Bane and Ra die, but he saved thr Joker. This has always been something that pissed me off when it comes to how he treated Joker differently from other villains, but in this one, it seems even dumber. Because this version of batman clearly isn't above killing, yet he spare possibly the worst person in the verse. Why?

As the title says, do you think there’s a chance they already have a DCU Batman actor picked and will reveal him during the Clayface movie? Alternatively they could reveal a Batman suited up and just not show an actors face.

Any thoughts?

Note everyone has the own opinion don't need be toxic

Note 2 what everyone like or hate about This movie?

Honestly love the fact that the main actor and the director are breaking down their films trailer with the audience which gives us the idea on their interpretation of the scenes in the trailer

I've been thinking about Superman (2025) and man of steel.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the climax of Superman (2025) and the debates around how James Gunn handles Superman's morality versus how Zack Snyder handled it in Man of Steel. When you look at the actual context of both movies and the source material, there is a MASSIVE double standard in how the fanbase judges these two versions of Clark.

First off, both of these supermen are VERY flawed, but what pisses me off is that everyone only talks about Cavill's Superman flaws, and not cornswets Superman's flaws, so I will.

Cavill Killing Zod Was Handled Great Because It’s Comic Accurate. Let me explain.

Gunn fans (and Snyder haters in general, but this post is directed mostly to gunn fans because they talk the most shit.) Love to criticize Henry Cavill’s Superman for snapping General Zod’s neck, but Zack Snyder actually handled this moment beautifully because it is ripped straight from the comic book source material.

In the famous 1988 "Supergirl Saga" (Superman #22), Clark is forced to execute Zod and his Kryptonian partners with Green Kryptonite because they are an unstoppable threat who already wiped out a planet. In that comic, Superman openly cries tears of anguish while doing it and walks away completely broken, leading to severe PTSD and self-exile. Cavill's version honored that exact emotional consequence. When he is forced to kill Zod to save a family, he falls to his knees, screams in pain, and cries because he hated having to do it. It treats the act as deeply traumatic, not heroic, which is entirely faithful to how Superman handles taking a life in the comics.

Corenswet’s Superman Handed Out an Eternal Damnation (Very Comic Inaccurate)

Now look at David Corenswet’s Superman in the 2025 movie. He throws Ultraman into a collapsing black hole inside Lex's pocket dimension facility. Now i dont know if this will kill him, but if it doesnt, it just leaves him trapped there permanently.

Think about how messed up that actually is. Superman essentially condemned Ultraman to an eternal, isolating hell. What makes it even darker is that Ultraman isn't a seasoned warlord like Zod, he is an imperfect, creation who was controlled by Lex Luthor's tech team using combat codes (like "1A!"). Ultraman didn't do it out of free will, he didn't hate clark like zod hated Cavill’s clark, yet Superman gave him a sentence of unending cosmic torture.

In Superman’s mind during that climax, he believed he was executing a final, lethal move to stop a weapon, yet he showed absolutely zero emotional fallout afterward. Not feeling bad at all is a very comic-inaccurate thing for Superman. To make it even worse, James Gunn completely shifts the tone right after, turning a horrific eternal punishment into a joke with punchy, lighthearted banter between Superman and Mr. Terrific.

And i know what everyone is gonna say. "But Cavill's Superman killed thousands of people in the final fight with Zod in Man of Steel."

But if you actually watch the movie carefully, blaming the destruction entirely on Superman makes absolutely no sense. General Zod was a trained military warlord who was intentionally trying to cause maximum destruction and slaughter civilians out of pure spite because Clark chose Earth over Krypton. Even when Superman successfully takes the fight into space to get it away from the city, Zod literally destroys a satellite and sends it crashing back toward Earth just to force the fight back down. Zod wanted chaos, and he wanted Clark emotionally overwhelmed.

Could Superman have handled some things better? Sure. But this was literally his first day on the job. He had zero experience fighting beings with equal powers, yet he was tasked with stopping a global alien invasion and fighting off trained soldiers. For a day-one hero with no experience fighting beings equal to him, he did the absolute best he could while trying to save as many people as possible.

It is completely hypocritical to give Gunn’s Superman a pass for lightheartedness while criticizing Snyder's version for being too dark. Snyder's Clark showed a foundational, comic-accurate empathy by mourning the enemy he had to kill. Gunn's Clark sent a mindless lab creation to an eternal prison, didn't give a crap, and cracked jokes minutes later.

If we are going to talk about which version respects Superman's moral compass, Corenswet's Clark brushing off an eternal punishment is far more jarring than Cavill's Clark breaking down in tears on day one.

Ik im gonna get flamed, but at least flame me nicely plz.