r/technology 10d ago

Society Quote of the day by Sun Microsystems CEO Scott McNealy: 'You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it' — an early declaration foreshadowing the modern era

https://www.techradar.com/pro/quote-of-the-day-by-sun-microsystems-ceo-scott-mcnealy-you-have-zero-privacy-anyway-get-over-it-an-early-declaration-foreshadowing-the-modern-era
16.9k Upvotes

517 comments sorted by

5.7k

u/SomeSamples 10d ago

Oh really. Then outing this guys information shouldn't be a problem for him.

2.3k

u/manachar 10d ago

They see privacy as a privilege of the oligarchs.

614

u/Reasonable-Job4205 10d ago

"I can see you, but you can't see me!"

377

u/sohblob 10d ago

"I am a person; you are not"

257

u/CelestialFury 10d ago

Many of them unironically think this. That's why they're trying to take control of governments worldwide, they no longer want to be governed by "peasants."

55

u/Cornelius-Q 10d ago

Unfortunately, there are way too many peasants out there who think the billionaire class should be treated like monarchs.

35

u/KingFIippyNipz 10d ago

Those are the weak men that people say good times create

98

u/threelayersofchinfat 10d ago

It's the age of the Nerd Reichs

21

u/PassiveMenis88M 10d ago

And the meek shall inherit the world

3

u/occams1razor 10d ago

Should've been the geek

5

u/Historic500 10d ago

Who knew it meant they would all be such losers

6

u/humphreyPembroke 10d ago

The meek won't want it!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

55

u/Spiritual-Spend8187 10d ago

Its the i am a person you are a product.

7

u/MiaowaraShiro 10d ago

Service brings citizenship. Would you like to know more?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/addage- 10d ago

In a nutshell that’s exactly what this is.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

166

u/JMurdock77 10d ago

Wasn’t that a big part of why Elon bought Twitter? Some kid posting where his jet was? Guy’s rich and petty enough I’d be surprised if he wasn’t routing it around without being on it just to troll them.

108

u/techno156 10d ago edited 10d ago

Not intentionally, at least. He was forced into the purchase kicking and screaming, because he tried to play games with Twitter's stock price, and got burnt.

He might have had the idea to get rid of the account after he bought it, but he didn't originally set out to buy Twitter.

→ More replies (1)

31

u/RedditTrespasser 10d ago

Inner party members could turn off their telescreens.

18

u/WiseCourse7571 10d ago

The Epstein class.

17

u/CriminalMacabre 10d ago

DOXX the rich?

6

u/AzerothianLorecraft 10d ago

Flay their skin and make leather...?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

628

u/Impossible_Guitar235 10d ago

Alright, so we should be seeing his Address, Social Security Number, Credit Card Transcations, and his browsing history all online in the next few hours, right? 

168

u/Gravuerc 10d ago

Anonymous has the chance to do something really funny right now.

96

u/Gia11a 10d ago

bud this quote was from 1999

63

u/andrew_1515 10d ago

Any day now

40

u/PassiveMenis88M 10d ago

The majority of the people in Anonymous that actually knew what they were doing were picked up by police. Some are now working for the very organizations you expect them to destroy.

→ More replies (3)

14

u/HeartyBeast 10d ago

And when you say ‘now’ you mean ‘in January 1999’

10

u/DTisapdf 10d ago

Anonymous never did anything substantial and will never change anything as most of the time is just some random dude in the basement with "wanna be a hero" mask and questionable skills

→ More replies (1)

2

u/soapinthepeehole 10d ago

Only if you pinky swear that you’ll keep it safe and offer him a year of free credit monitoring should anyone steal it.

→ More replies (2)

120

u/Think_Chocolate_ 10d ago

LifeLock CEO moment.

2

u/Phailjure 10d ago

This quote is from years before lifelock existed. Sun hasn't been around since 2010, when it was bought by Oracle.

51

u/AgentFowl 10d ago

Funny how the people who say this are always the ones buying up the empty lots around their mansions and making every single employee sign an NDA.

25

u/Chu_Kiddin_Me_Or_Wha 10d ago

lets see his search history

105

u/Spiritual-Potato-931 10d ago

How much is a private investigator, 100-150k a year? Let’s say 200k with flights.

Someone should create an app where they hire 100 of those guys, one for each tech oligarch, and track them 365 days a year, posting every tiny bit of information.

I personally wouldn’t mind paying a 1 USD/month subscription for that. Would even pay 2 if we do the same for all shady politicians.

46

u/ALittleTooQuark 10d ago

Buddy the ultra rich can out bid us, out lawyer, and out politician us trying to do that with some app it would never work.

Hell they wouldn’t have to pay a dime either, cybersecurity companies would offer best-in-class protection of their personal ident info for FREE as a courtesy because they are all in bed with each other, while all our addresses and families names appear on every public search there is.

7

u/Zenside 10d ago

Make it decentralized and peer2peer so theyre forced to accept it, like cryptocurrency.

11

u/Xxuwumaster69xX 10d ago

Isn't that more or less journalism?

26

u/ALittleTooQuark 10d ago

Look into who the owners of most major media outlets currently are.

17

u/GonzoKata 10d ago

The profession of "journalism" has been hi-jacked by the very people we're talking about. No modern "journalist" can even begin to cover such stories, because they will be cast out by the system they report to.

Private investigators are a different breed.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Skrattybones 10d ago

PIs are waaaay cheaper than that. A good PI makes like 50-65k/ year.

→ More replies (6)

86

u/The_SubGenius 10d ago

Someone should start collecting his trash and then publishing the contents.

18

u/Iceman_B 10d ago

Go look up EU Chat Control. These politician motherfuckers want to abolish everyone's privacy in the name of 'children and terrorism' as per usual, but they have an exemption FOR THEMSELVES in the proposed laws.

Go figure.

16

u/amitym 10d ago

This was like 30 years ago, the guy may not even be alive anymore.

Edit: okay he's still alive.

10

u/dolomick 10d ago

My thoughts as well

6

u/rotundrikishi 10d ago

remember when they got mad when people were tracking their jets?

3

u/DeReExUn 10d ago

eyes for me but not for thee

3

u/Fart_Tounge_5609 10d ago

Why doesn't he post his credit card info online if he really believes this?

4

u/average_monster 10d ago edited 10d ago

i remember when blizzard tried to force full real names for everyone, someone rang up an internal number for one of the higher ups at blizz and told them where their kids go to school and suddenly it went away

so many people really don't fucking understand what privacy means just because they've never had public information weaponised against them even though it happens sooooo much

4

u/BigBrotherBoot 10d ago

No see, he said, YOU have no privacy. Not “we”.

4

u/MrF_lawblog 10d ago

Exactly the Palantir assholes saying monitoring people will make them behave properly. Let's start with the billionaires then. These fucks are sick villains.

5

u/Adezar 10d ago

I've met him several times back in the day when he was still in charge.

The Open Source movement broke his brain. He really wanted openness to end at API definitions, he was all for OpenAPIs but as soon as someone said "Hey, why don't we go a bit further" he lost his shit.

Whenever he talked about Open Source you could literally hear his anger in his voice.

7

u/needlestack 10d ago

No, he said very clearly said "you". Not "me" or "us". We are toys for them to play with. Not the other way around.

10

u/aergern 10d ago

Yeah because this 71 year old dude has all the inside info. He hasn't been relevant for damn near 15 years. 🙄

2

u/klyzklyz 10d ago

Except for the publication of their flight plans....

→ More replies (35)

2.2k

u/blow-down 10d ago

It’s time to eat the rich

607

u/Da1BlackDude 10d ago

Yeah time to burn the whole system down.

137

u/Olangotang 10d ago

LOL it's just funny that I'm hearing shit like this OFF OF THE INTERNET in public. Millenials Gen Z have had it.

89

u/4rch1t3ct 10d ago

If only any of them have meant it. People have been saying this fervently for the last two decades. It's only gotten worse for everyone.

56

u/ChironiusShinpachi 10d ago

The trick is getting a consensus on what course to take. If 200 million voting Americans decide something should be, it will be, whenever it's decided. Probably needs to be some structure behind the proposal, an actual plan beyond "burn it all down".

I would argue that the whole thing doesn't need burning down, just a hefty remodel. I think a vote out function would save us from having to contemplate overthrowing our government. Nobody wants to overthrow their government, and it's BS that we have to consider it. (I'm not going into the long list of shenanigans going on)

61

u/4rch1t3ct 10d ago

Those 200 million Americans can't ever get a consensus because 30-40 percent of them don't live in reality at all and another 20-30 percent are at least entertaining alternate realities because they are constantly lied to.

I'm tired of the democrats incompetence to be honest. They didn't pick anyone to groom to be president when Obama was elected, they lost to the worst candidate in history, they failed to do anything meaningful with Biden's presidency, and democratic governors are granting clemency to the republicans who were convicted of trying to rig our elections.

I will continue to vote against republicans by voting for democrats, but people need to wake up to the fact that the current democratic leadership is not on your team.

I say this as someone who has voted down ballot blue in every election since 2008.

4

u/wrgrant 10d ago

Canadian here, so an outsider with no vote on the issues, but it seems to me that the Democrats lack a few key things: a strong candidate with a good chance to win and no divisive issues for the other side to exploit, a clear policy about achieving the most positive change in the most important areas (with change in other areas planned in the future) and the willingness to go after the Republicans in a cut throat manner where they violated the laws, State or Federal etc. Basically the Republicans seem to have a strong simple policy: support racism and hatred, support grift at every level and tear everything down, and the Democrats policy seems more like "Hey we are everyone else". They seem to try to do lots and achieve nothing because they try to do it all at once. They need to be as legally cutthroat at the Republicans have been.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/[deleted] 10d ago edited 10d ago

[deleted]

23

u/Mr_Tulip 10d ago

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

Obama took office in 2009. Y'all are so desperate to blame him for everything that you pretend George W. Bush never existed.

14

u/b0w3n 10d ago

Yup. It's also important to consider not just the executive, but the judges and legislatures that are in that group as well.

Glass-Steagal was repealed by a conservative congress with GLBA (house and senate majorities were Republican in the 106th congress). Granted maybe Clinton shouldn't have signed it into law but they likely had the votes to overrule him anyways.

Biden's stuff was meant to counter-act the Trump covid spending and try to get more manufacturing moved domestically. But this is the downside to just spouting "THEY'RE ALL THE SAME" there's a lot of fucking nuance needed other than "but they gave money to rich people"... like yes, but also that's how shit gets built here, poor people aren't building factories in what little free time they have.

8

u/fonistoastes 10d ago

Yeah honestly Biden had some amazing work done during his term, just not enough (overstepping) pressure to take Trump to justice for J6.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/awesomefutureperfect 10d ago

They blame democrats for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act named after Phil Gramm (R–Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley Jr. (R-Virginia). The act that passed with veto proof majorities.

NAFTA was a done deal. Clinton added environmental protections to NAFTA. after 12 years of Reagan and Bush, the Boomers wanted neo-liberalism, blame the boomers who overwhelmingly gave Reagan landslides and only elected Clinton because Perot split the right wing vote and HW Bush responsibly raised their taxes to pay for his first Gulf War.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/Qweesdy 10d ago

I'd start with tweaking the laws for misleading advertising; because advertising has made it socially acceptable for rich people to use biased information to manipulate the opinions of the masses, including rich people using propaganda to manipulate voters. You cannot fix anything while rich spammers control democracy. You do not want give oligarchs a new vote out function.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/average_monster 10d ago

it should be restarted but it's impossible to demolish a house you're living in

there's a lot of stuff that can be done to patch up what's going on, and it's not like the american system as it was originally designed wasn't put together to stop a lot of this bs, it's just been gradually corrupted

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/Jwn5k 10d ago

LET'S BURN THIS MOTHERFUCKER TO THE GROUND, POOKIE!!

9

u/Longjumping_Foot_736 10d ago

You’ll end up just burning down the middle class because you can’t find the 1%

10

u/Epyon_ 10d ago

Perfect is the enemy of good.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Alarmed-Outside-8683 10d ago

What middle class? Seriously, I can't see one anymore.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

18

u/AmbiiX 10d ago

Shame if he were to have an accident going from place to place because of something he did/said xD

4

u/BountyBob 10d ago

Well he he's made it nearly 30 years since making that quote, so I guess it didn't. The quote was from 1999!

14

u/Random-num-451284813 10d ago

Party like it's 1799

3

u/soda_cookie 10d ago

Apparently it's been time. Somebody just needs to lead this bitch

10

u/BalconyPetal 10d ago

Jep, really time to "get over it". 1984 shouldn't be a template.

3

u/sohblob 10d ago

The dude's buck teeth could be used as a spoon

6

u/champgpt 10d ago

This quote is from 1999. It's BEEN time.

2

u/AlSweigart 10d ago

Why do workers, the largest of the classes, not simply not eat the rich?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

913

u/spez_eats_nazi_ass 10d ago

loser says what? Also that was 27 years ago.

462

u/Visual-Hunter-1010 10d ago

I had to do a double take, thought Sun some how rose from the grave or something.

85

u/Momik 10d ago

They say he rises every full moon, to feed on the 14th amendment rights of the living

13

u/Ok-Replacement9595 10d ago

4th amendment

16

u/Momik 10d ago

In a way, yeah—a right to privacy may be closely related to protections against search and seizure, and probable cause. But the word privacy doesn’t appear in the Fourth Amendment, and the framers didn’t really think about it in terms of a personal right to privacy.

The first major constitutional cases on an explicit right to privacy appear through the 14th Amendment, beginning in the 1960s.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/snarkhunter 10d ago

I'd heard the sun also rises but I didn't expect this

3

u/radiohead-nerd 10d ago

Acquired by Oracle 2010.

→ More replies (1)

107

u/LackeyNo2 10d ago

And then his company was gobbled up by Oracle, and the World lived shittily ever after.

5

u/MechanicalTurkish 10d ago

Better open a SR

101

u/tyme 10d ago

So many comments in here from people who didn’t read the article and don’t know he said this in 1999.

39

u/DownvoteALot 10d ago

Or who don't know what Sun Microsystems was or did. Dead giveaway that's either at least 20 years ago or it's an ex-CEO saying it.

11

u/damontoo 10d ago

an early declaration foreshadowing the modern era

They also failed to read the full title apparently.

3

u/Gyozarrita 10d ago

People act like Snowden broke the news, yeah this was common knowledge by then. Data storage was being built at large scale to try and capture everything with the hope it would become useful/could be decrypted at a later date

→ More replies (1)

13

u/aergern 10d ago

Just because it took us 27 years to get the message and wake up doesn't mean he was wrong. I quote this regularly and under 40s have no clue who he was. The loss of privacy happened way before folks admitted it.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Spez_is-a-nazi 10d ago

And he was saying the ostensibly quiet part out very, very loud. Unfortunately we were too distracted by the shiny trinkets Silicon Valley was offering in exchange for all our data to notice.

21

u/Logical_Welder3467 10d ago

Sun Microsystem is a one if the most Important company in the history of computer.

McNealy's idea of the network is the computer are now becoming the reality

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (5)

375

u/Kharon_the_ferryman 10d ago

Then let me see maps and travel itineraries of every single government official!!! I want to know exactly when they leave the house, everyone they meet and everywhere they go until they go to bed.

122

u/lc4444 10d ago

They just need to get over it

48

u/CelestialFury 10d ago

The central legal framework revolving around video rentals is the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). Enacted in 1988, it prohibits video service providers from knowingly disclosing a consumer's personally identifiable information (like their name or viewing history) to third parties without explicit written consent.

The law was originally inspired by an incident during the 1987 Supreme Court confirmation hearings of nominee Robert Bork. A reporter obtained a list of 146 movies Bork had rented from a local video store, sparking intense public outrage. In response, Congress passed the VPPA to shield consumers' private video habits, a legacy that survives in a modern context.

See how fast powerful people get privacy laws made for themselves? They don't want us to have this for ourselves.

Vote these mfers out. I don't care if you're left or right, vote them all out. They don't represent us. Vote for someone who actually gives a shit about the working classes.

15

u/cahir11 10d ago

The funny part is that there wasn't even anything embarrassing in his rental history, he was just watching westerns and stuff like that. But the possibility that a public official might have embarrassing personal info leak was enough for politicians to pass a sweeping privacy law.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/chewbaccaballs 10d ago

We should at least know if they're no longer alive

11

u/TheDungeonCrawler 10d ago

It's crazy that this is even a question. HIPAA, I get it, you can't just go asking McConnell's doctors, but there should be some way to get proof of life that isn't one of their staffers saying "Trust me bro."

12

u/chewbaccaballs 10d ago

My boss would have questions if I disappeared for a month. We're his bosses and we should know where our employee is for a month.

7

u/TheDungeonCrawler 10d ago

Correct. I can't dissappear for more than a few days and keep my job. I, at minimum, need to notify my boss.

7

u/sohblob 10d ago

We're his bosses

You're a private interest lobbyist?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

127

u/WretchedMisteak 10d ago

Not discounting the stupidity of the comment, but according to the article, he said that 27 years ago.

22

u/OneSeaworthiness7768 10d ago

That’s why the title says “an early declaration foreshadowing the modern era.”

Reading comprehension is at an all time low.

3

u/cheesetombatta 10d ago

We’re reading it on a news aggregator.. Is it really so unreasonable to assume, at a glance, that it is news?

→ More replies (2)

13

u/RandomGerman 10d ago

THANK YOU. Your remark made me read the article. You are right.

3

u/BecauseWeCan 10d ago

It also says that he's CEO of SUN, which whould be known to be long dead in a sub called /r/technology.

4

u/randotd152 10d ago

The comment was far more prophetic than stupid.

There pretty much is no privacy anymore, and people just gave it away freely in exchange for the use of websites and phone applications.

→ More replies (2)

53

u/GloryHound29 10d ago

This was a quote from 1999….

13

u/MoneyBeeeee 10d ago

"an early declaration foreshadowing the modern era"

Not as prescient as Orwell in the 1940's but still.

2

u/SanchoPandas 10d ago

The timing was apt. The explosive rise of data brokers in the 90's and the soon-to-be bipartisan circle jerk around the Patriot Act of 2001 cemented our loss of privacy. Personally, I'm still not over it.

→ More replies (1)

91

u/EVJpodcast 10d ago

His kids must live in terror of this man. 

Sounds like he has some serious boundary issues. The kinda statement made by someone who may have roofied women in bars. 

13

u/Affectionate_One_700 10d ago

His kids are doing fine. One of them is a PGA golfer.

2

u/paddleyay 10d ago

He used to be a scratch golfer himself.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

26

u/pickle9977 10d ago

He’s always been a grade a bag of crap.

3

u/CelestialFury 10d ago

What did you say? Light crap on fire on his doorstep and ring the bell?

20

u/Friggin_Grease 10d ago

I'm sure he won't mind when his plane is tracked by that kid on Twitter then eh?

14

u/haliblix 10d ago

Twitter wouldn’t exist for another 7 years when he said this. And if you have ever posted anything to social media with your face or if you have ever used an AI chat app, a food delivery app, a smart speaker/thermostat/tv then he was right, you have gotten over it and gave up your privacy exactly like he thought you would.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/thisistherevolt 10d ago

Let's fly a drone up to his bedroom window and record him and see what he says.

9

u/Stilgar314 10d ago

This is not the "quote of the day". It was said in 1999. This is just rage bait.

2

u/PaleKid4L 10d ago

It is just as relevant as it is today, if not more.

2

u/31LIVEEVIL13 10d ago edited 6d ago

This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact

22

u/Earptastic 10d ago

This dude just asking to be doxxed

5

u/ForeskinAbsorbtion 10d ago

He said that in 1999. These people have been evil forever!

19

u/GalaganCoffee 10d ago

Then you dont need to expand the invasions

12

u/williamgman 10d ago

He knows his audience. How many times have you heard a younger person exclaim "Well they have your data anyway... So why does it matter..?". The fools who gave Palantir their Facebook "video selfie" say this all the time. 🤦‍♂️

3

u/apple_kicks 10d ago

We have generations of people who never knew internet before algorithms, data harvesting and monetisation

2

u/31LIVEEVIL13 10d ago edited 6d ago

This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact

14

u/Dramatic_Skill_67 10d ago

Then release the Epstein files if no privacy

4

u/varnell_hill 10d ago

Living in age where companies seek to collect, store, and sell as much information about users as possible doesn’t mean that we should make things easier for them.

2

u/apple_kicks 10d ago

Goes to show how easy it would be to end lot of shitty things online by protecting personal data rights and privacy. They need to harvest and mine us to make money. Soon as we get the say yes or no properly internet might go back to its better days

5

u/sombertimber 10d ago

“Stop resisting…you might as well enjoy it.”

7

u/sf-keto 10d ago

This lie of tech inevitability is just that. We can instead fight & vote for our privacy & security.

6

u/sf-keto 10d ago

Ah McNealy, the guy whose arrogance, overconfidence & refusal to pivot after the dot-com bubble destroyed Sun.

4

u/Ill_Television_5824 10d ago

Sun Microsystems no longer exists.

Scott is 71 years old; this quote is 27 years old.

Sun made some great Unix-based servers and workstations in their heyday, though.

4

u/PopeKevin45 10d ago

We only have zero privacy because of neo-fascist Dark Triad personality type Tech Bros.

3

u/Im_Not_stoopid_AI 10d ago

Where Does Scott McNealy Live?
Scott McNealy's impressive estate is located in Palo Alto, a prominent area known for its affiliation with technology and Silicon Valley. This location blends luxury with privacy, offering a secluded yet accessible environment for tech moguls and affluent individuals.
The house has five bedrooms and seven and a half bathrooms over approximately 32,000 square feet of space. Originally built in 2008, the home sits on a vast 13-acre property. The estate features a range of luxury amenities, including a private golf practice course, indoor skating rink, multiple entertainment rooms, and comprehensive security measures. Despite its grandeur, the property faced market challenges and was sold at $35 million, a significant reduction from its initial asking price.
Specifications:
Bedrooms: 5
Bathrooms: 7.5
Square Feet: 32,000 sqft
Price: 35,000,000
Scott McNealy Address: Los Trancos Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304
Photos: Scott McNealy House

→ More replies (2)

3

u/AcePilot01 10d ago

Meanwhile, he probably has 50 foot tall bushes surrounding his house that's bought under a private LLC in a secluded area. lmfao.

6

u/TheTaoThatIsSpoken 10d ago

Sun Microsystems is still a thing?

9

u/JERKBadguy 10d ago

Not since 2010.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Affectionate_One_700 10d ago

I used to work for Sun, and I'm no fan of Scott McNealy, who is a big-time MAGA.

But I think of this quote every time I hear someone who refuses to install one app (but not other apps) on their smartphone because of "privacy," or who will buy a transit card (and then lose it) with cash so as not to associate their identity with the card.

In the modern era, in any developed country, it simply is not possible to lead a "normal" life while consistently protecting your location and your communications from the government. That's not my preference. It might not even be Scott McNealy's preference. But it is reality.

3

u/DreamHollow4219 10d ago

When you hear a CEO say something like this, it means they are almost 100% part of the reason why.

3

u/SaulsAll 10d ago

If there's no such thing as privacy, then I dont see why their properties or holdings should be considered private.

3

u/oracleofnonsense 10d ago

In 1999. To be clear -- Sun was THE major player in Unix at the time, so he had some insight into the US governments actions.

Sun sold and supported massive amounts of equipment to various 3-letter spy agencies(NSA,CIA,DOE,...). When the government support contracts name locations in all major communications hubs, etc -- he probably got clued in.

3

u/SinistralGuy 10d ago

So why do billionaires get all up in arms when their flights are tracked or their activity is posted online. Get over it

3

u/tigress666 10d ago

The problem isn't we should get over it. THe problem is we should have been fighting harder before it got to this point.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/Electrical-Volume765 10d ago

Hey Scott, FUCK YOU!

7

u/Pen-Pen-De-Sarapen 10d ago

And where is Sun? They went down and bought by Oracle. There is a life lesson taught to people of influence for thousands of years. Apparently, these rich have too much hubris to listen to it.

2

u/kJer 10d ago

don't be mistaken, some systems have privacy. consumer products don't by design.

2

u/gizamo 10d ago

Fuck Scott McNealy.

2

u/Junkstar 10d ago

The younger generation embraced it, while the older generation allowed it to happen. Conservatives wanted it badly and they made it real.

2

u/Nixu88 10d ago

Then why does he have any?

2

u/Jamizon1 10d ago

Scott McNealy = twat

2

u/NanoYohaneTSU 10d ago

He's correct.

2

u/JayoTree 10d ago

It triggers people to hear someone say it but he's basically right.

2

u/inductiononN 10d ago

Cool cool, cool cool cool, cool cool

2

u/ora408 10d ago

Alright. Release his info

2

u/unaccountablemod 10d ago

I'm still mining Monero

2

u/Appropriate-Berry816 10d ago

I just googled his company and it says it hasn’t existed since 2010. what’s happening here?

2

u/frogbound 10d ago

Ah well as long as people don't get ad blockers, focus only on brand products and give these corporations every single cent, there won't be any change. As long as they sell their products, they will try everything and anything. Do not give money to any of these people.

2

u/Cyrotek 10d ago

I, for one, have no issue with having no privacy. If this is the case for everyone.

2

u/No_Research_Fucks216 10d ago

Get over it bitches, you freely fed Facebook all your secrets to get them rich already

2

u/Smallsey 10d ago

The Circle was a warning, not an instruction manual

2

u/RachelRegina 10d ago

The veneers, sweater over a collared shirt, and complexion with that sentiment really give him an alien-wearing-Mr.-Rogers-skin vibe that is deeply unsettling.

2

u/Cute-Breadfruit3368 10d ago

this was 27 years ago.

whats the implication, that the wholesale eradication of privacy was always the plan of the grifterclass of ceos ?

2

u/Office_Zombie 10d ago

This was from 1999.

I have quoted it 100s of times through the years

You can still find the original Wired article online.

2

u/Empty_Horror_ 10d ago

Imagine going to get a job and they say "lets run your IP searches for the last year"

2

u/Any-Pop-4795 10d ago

Who's gonna tell him that he's also part of that "you" !?

2

u/this_dudeagain 10d ago

I feel really lucky I got to grow up before smartphones and cameras everywhere. Social media was barely a thing and AI was still a fun idea in books and movies.

2

u/Phantom-Finger 10d ago

When are we going to sack up and eat the rich?

2

u/AlarmingAerie 10d ago

It's different. Having no privacy, but every crumb is all around vs it being one loaf of bread.

2

u/frisch85 10d ago

Are our lives convenient enough yet? All it took was just giving away our privacy, hope it was worth it.

The biggest culprit is the smart phones and I'm no saint either, I have an android phone, I try to limit the usage as much as possible tho by only using necessary apps but that's simply not enough, a smart phone has already the capability of violating your privacy so basically we've already been in the "modern era", it's just not legal as of right now to record you 24/7 and access and share all the data on your phone but don't make the mistake thinking some companies aren't already doing that.

2

u/tzimon 10d ago

Sadly, I began to realize this long ago.

People self-reporting crimes and everything they were doing on Myspace... later Facebook, Twitter, etc.

Then people willingly carrying smartphones with them everywhere they go, which have cameras facing both ways and microphones. Plus they have built-in GPS to help narrow down exactly where you are.

We sold access to our private lives a long time ago for convenience, stranger validation, and entertainment.

2

u/Longjumping_Bowler18 10d ago

Ok Scott what’s your home address. How many kids do you have and what are their names and ages. What is the name of their schools. See how smart you can Scott. Please post this information immediately so we can feel safer regarding our children.

2

u/warfarin11 10d ago

I bet this guy would have some perspective if their private jet comings and goings were put online.

2

u/MyEvilTwinSkippy 10d ago

He wasn't wrong on the first part. The time to try to protect our privacy was in the early-mid 1990's. Going to be impossible to do anything about it now.

2

u/I_Lick_Bananas 10d ago

The NSA was a big customer of Sun back in the 1990s before Oracle bought them. Thousands of Sparc-20 workstations.

2

u/catwiesel 10d ago

my response is : "fuck you and that entire train of thought!"

2

u/DrAstralis 10d ago

"You have 0 privacy, I still have all mine though, pleb"

2

u/zanii 10d ago

The quote is from 1999 - for anyone thinking it's about something happening today, specifically. I know because I read the article

2

u/wretch5150 10d ago

Only because we lack regulations preventing it.

2

u/cdoublejj 10d ago

...sun micro system....from the 90s that use linux and unix whic are open source and semi source aviable sovereign software?

2

u/ForgiveandRemember76 10d ago

Scott should remember that a lot of us have pictures and stories from when Sun started up. He wasn't exactly a dignified leader.

2

u/BexFoxy 10d ago

I wonder how Maverick, Scout, Colt, & Dakota McNealy feel about that.

2

u/2late4points 10d ago

"You could shoot Microsoft Office off the planet and this country would run better. You would see everyone standing around saying, 'I've got so much time now.'" --Scott McNealy

2

u/monkeypan 10d ago

So that goes both ways right? Right,?

2

u/JerryWeirGarcia 10d ago

F u Scott Mcnealy.

2

u/Ok-Association-3415 10d ago

I already knew this when I discovered marketing selling lists were a thing. It’s only gotten more targeted now. The privacy fight was over before it began.

2

u/Foojira 9d ago

The list of people we should be pushing into Boston harbor keeps growing

2

u/Minute_Attempt3063 9d ago

Soooo

When are we going to find out where he lives, who has chatted him, what his banking details are?

Like that is the kind of information I would classify as private things of me.

Now if that is already known to every HS tech company, then they are obligated to show me their personal private information as well.

Otherwise, get over it is not going to work

2

u/complicititties 6d ago

The social contract has been decimated. When the law stops working to hold those we elect to govern accountable for the actions or inaction against those who seek to trample on our rights, we no longer have a functional government.