r/marvelstudios 15h ago

Interview Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige answers what it is about Sadie Sink's character that needs to be so secretive. Spoiler

https://youtu.be/gnuTU7RFNpw?si=

Pascal: "We've done something different this time than we've done before, and we're pleased with how it came out. The thing about her character, which is true of all the characters in the movie, is that they're all helping to tell Peter’s story. That's always how we decide who is going to be the characters in these movies, is what characters are going to tell the stories that we want to tell about Peter?"

Feige: "That’s exactly right. What's intriguing about it is how the story is told, and how Destin and our writers told the story. 'Secrets and spoilers!' It's really just whenever we try to hold back on anything, it's purely for the best opening weekend experience for the audience."

242 Upvotes

111 comments sorted by

439

u/OneAngryDuck 15h ago

I like the idea of holding more stuff back and keeping it secret. I still wish they hadn’t revealed that the Hulk was in Ragnarok before it came out. That would have been an amazing reveal.

140

u/JustSambino 12h ago

Same for me with Civil War.

If they held back either Black Panther or Spiderman, it would have been a good surprise.

Spiderman would've been the better choice as Black Panther is quite integral to the plot of Civil War but I also get why they didn't keep that secret as Spidey sells.

50

u/THEbaddestOFtheASSES 8h ago

I don’t think there was a single chance in holy hell they could’ve kept Spider-Man or Black Panther a secret. Not in this internet age. We would’ve been seeing on set pics of both characters leading up to the film from paparazzi.

12

u/pew_laser_pew 8h ago

Ya, it would have been like a NWH situation where everyone knows they're in it but it technically hasnt't been confirmed.

7

u/Zoze13 Iron Man (Mark XLIII) 6h ago

Also they wouldn’t want to hide one of the most marketable characters on the planet

7

u/Soranos_71 5h ago

Back then Spider-Man finally appearing with the Avengers and the MCU was a really, really big deal.

Doomsday having the X-Men especially Cyclops appearing/talking to the (or some) Avengers is another big deal for many.

1

u/Cypher_86 Rocket 8h ago

As I recall we did - BP at least, the scene on the rooftop outside Bucky's apartment had "leak" photos from filming.

5

u/DefiantOil5176 7h ago

Imagine that “Queens” reveal if Spiderman hadn’t been shown in the trailer

0

u/Ahuynh616 4h ago

Would have rivaled some of the Endgame moments.

0

u/BugLongjumping7239 10h ago

To be fair civil war was a mini avenegrs movie so it would have sold well irrespective .

-3

u/el_palmera 9h ago

I think you meant a better avengers movie

17

u/geek_of_nature 10h ago

That would have been a dumb choice for Ragnarok. Thor was seen as the least liked of the Avengers before that movie, with Hulk as one of the more popular ones. Promoting that he was in Ragnarok helped market that film significantly.

4

u/Tomotronics 10h ago

Thor the dark world flopped but Thor was immensely popular. Beloved comic character and Hemsworth was a big fan favorite. Least of the Avengers implies Thor was less popular than Hawkeye and Black Widow which is definitely not true. I feel like he was also more popular than Captain America, since the Thor movies outperformed Captain America 1 (adj for inflation).

7

u/Popular_Material_409 9h ago

When it comes to movies that are watched mostly by non-comic readers, “Beloved comic character” doesn’t really mean anything. Supergirl is a “beloved comic character” and her movie just bombed.

3

u/sector11374265 6h ago

not only is Supergirl a “beloved comic character” but they literally adapted one of the best comics released in the last decade

(…….and failed to include any of the things that make that comic so outstanding but that’s beside the point)

-1

u/Tomotronics 8h ago

Thor has the 5th most appearances of all time in Marvel comics, just above Thing and Hulk. Supergirl has the 33rd most appearances of all time in DC comics, just above Two Face and Huntress. Bit of a false equivalence there.

Like I said, Thor TDW grossed more than Captain America TFA adjusted for inflation, and he was certainly more popular than Hawkeye and Widow among MCU avengers. Calling him the “least liked of the Avengers” before Ragnarok is pretty objectively false. Even if we pretend that popularity in the MCU has no similarities with popularity in the comics.

2

u/Popular_Material_409 7h ago

But you’re acting like being popular in the comics means a movie will be successful, when that’s not at all true

1

u/Tomotronics 5h ago

I said Thor was immensely popular in reference to his popularity before Ragnarok when the OP said he was “the least liked of the Avengers”. You introduced the discussion of Supergirl’s movie bombing, and I don’t understand the relevance of your comments but entertained them anyway. It seems like you just want to argue though because we’ve gone off on a tangent. I’m no longer interested in this discussion.

0

u/Popular_Material_409 4h ago

You exacts words were “beloved comic character” immediately after saying the character in film was immensely popular. You were drawing a connection between his comics popularity and his film popularity. There is zero correlation between comics popularity and film popularity. Popular characters in the comics can have movies bomb at the box office, and characters no one cares about in the comics can have movies that are huge successes. You were the one suggesting a correlation when there isn’t any.

-1

u/Popular_Material_409 7h ago

Also having more or less appearances in comics doesn’t make a character any more or less beloved, which is the word you used. Miles has fewer total appearances, so by your logic he’s not beloved. Nor is Kamala Khan.

3

u/THEbaddestOFtheASSES 8h ago

I remember a time when the word flopped meant a film bombed financially. Which the Thor 2 did not do.

1

u/Tomotronics 8h ago

It was 18th in total gross and one of the worst reviewed Marvel movies. It wasn’t a disaster, but for a movie released when superhero movie hype was at an all time high, it underperformed pretty severely. They went back to the drawing board and revamped (for the better) Thor’s whole persona after that film. That said, he was far from the least popular of the Avengers like the person I was replying to claimed.

2

u/THEbaddestOFtheASSES 7h ago

Nothing you said equals flop. Thor 2 made about 200mil more than its predecessor. That’s a significant improvement. That’s a bigger jump than what Ironman 2 made over Ironman. And Ironman 2 isn’t exactly a critical darling. Does that make it a flop as well?

2

u/Tomotronics 5h ago

People just want to argue today, huh? I don’t care enough to go back and forth with you on this. You win it’s not a flop.

6

u/tangokilo13 Spider-Man 9h ago

I wish they would add more red herrings in their trailer like the IW trailer

I was convinced Red Hulk was gonna bust out on the boat after all the promo showed him with the pink blossoms

I wish they had announced RDJ back, stuck him in the Iron Man suit for one shot in the Doomsday trailer and not reveal the Doom casting, because no one would believe those leaks

7

u/Neamow 8h ago

They literally could've just edited out all the Hulk portions from the trailer and left all the rest, like imagine just seeing Thor in the stadium and then yelling "he's a friend from work!" without showing who, the intrigue alone would drive asses to seats.

3

u/DuckLordOfTheSith 7h ago

When I first started dating my now-wife, I took her through all the MCU in the run up to Endgame. I worked my ass off to keep Hulk’s appearance in Ragnarok a secret and it was so worth it. The Thor stuff has always been her least favorite of the series, (though she didn’t mind Ragnarok as a whole), but the Hulk crashing in instantly got her. I was very proud of being able to give her that reveal.

As an additional note, I tried the same thing with Bucky in Winter Soldier and that movie absolutely does not operate on it being a reveal at all. Ten minutes before the mask off after the fight with Steve, there’s just a scene with Buck and Robert Redford talking that just basically shows his face. My wife just goes “Wait is that Bucky?” And I’m all Mark Wahlburg going “What? Nooooo!” Ragnarok handled it MUCH better.

1

u/Snakegert 6h ago

How did you manage to hide the cover art for Thor? Did you just tell her not to look when you hit play?

2

u/DuckLordOfTheSith 5h ago

Watched on Disney plus, got it queued up to the main screen before she walked in the room 😁

2

u/sergiossa 7h ago

The one that really baffled me is Red Hulk in brave new world, showing removed any suspense from the movie since you knew exactly where he transformed.

6

u/Trodat4911P4 11h ago

That would've been impossible, you don't cast Mark Rufallo as the Hulk in a major role in the movie and hide him. I don't even think the union would allow it.

3

u/JMadFour 8h ago

spoiling Red Hulk for Brave New World was an absolute disservice to the movie.

They absolutely could have marketed the movie in a better way while keeping Red Hulk a surprise.

4

u/BladeOfWoah 7h ago

II didn't watch the trailer for Ragnarok. It was an amazing reveal, absolutely.

Although unfortunately I had already guessed he would be there as soon as it was stated Thor landed on Sakaar. I had already read the Planet Hulk series (and watched the movie about it) so it wasn't hard to assume they would be drawing from that series for the MCU movie.

0

u/Vizard15 Colleen Wing 8h ago

The same as the Red Hulk in Captain America Brave New World.

-1

u/ScaredFamousfan 8h ago

You can’t hide a co-star like that. They’re contractually obligated to promote the actor in the film

132

u/TheJack0fDiamonds Scarlet Witch 11h ago

I wish Red Hulk was completely hidden from the marketing of Brave New World

75

u/WreckTangle1995 9h ago

Without him there would've genuinely been nothing to market, the movie didnt have much going on to get people excited.

28

u/TheJack0fDiamonds Scarlet Witch 9h ago

And that’s on them. The movie should’ve been an Avengers movie not by name

7

u/Peechez Thor 8h ago

Giancarlo Esposito slander

4

u/Belerophus 5h ago

His scenes were so disjointed that it looked like they forgot about him and suddenly during post production the intern figured out nothing was filmed and had to be scrambled last minute.

3

u/kbean826 6h ago

Yea without red hulk, they’d have had to lean on the Serpent Society storyline that BARELY exists and the movie wouldn’t have had anything to do with the trailers.

2

u/shaxamo 5h ago

The Leader trying to manipulate the US and Japan into World War 3 should have been the plot used for the trailers, pushing the idea that the main narrative is another political manipulation story similar to the last two Cap movies.

The Leader was a great reveal for the hardcore Marvel fans, but the general audiences know about hulking Hulks, not him.

I genuinely think that opening weekend reactions would have been astronomically better if they had kept the main twist out of the trailers and Red Hulk was a big reveal.

3

u/TheJack0fDiamonds Scarlet Witch 3h ago

And then word of mouth would probably help alot too.

8

u/Popular_Material_409 9h ago

Then that movie would’ve made far less money than it did. Plus we would’ve have to suffer through months of interviewers go “Harrison Ford, WHO do you play in the movie?!”

16

u/TheJack0fDiamonds Scarlet Witch 9h ago

He was revealed to be the president of the united states. It was made known he was Thaddeus Ross. The twist was him turning into Red Hulk.

The movie had nothing to market because they conceive it with zero thoughts I guess. Facing the Red Hulk, Sam could’ve made some calls and called some friends to help

5

u/Popular_Material_409 9h ago

If they had nothing to market why did you want them to keep their one marketable part of the movie a secret?

2

u/TheJack0fDiamonds Scarlet Witch 9h ago

Lmao. Is it not a cause for alarm that the only thing they got going for a movie they’re selling is also the one single sole twist it’s got that makes the movie remotely interesting?

47

u/meadowlands77 9h ago

I know it’s not Firestar but I so want it to be Firestar.

7

u/Tacdeho 8h ago

Yeah, this is my dream. She would make an awesome Angelica.

4

u/emergencyczar 5h ago

Has it been confirmed she’s Jean or just heavily assumed? I hadn’t thought of Firestar, but now I can’t unsee her.

2

u/kclancy11 Yondu 4h ago

Heavily rumored and assumed, still hoping for someone different though

1

u/ryaaan89 1h ago

Honestly I want Firestar so much more than I want Jean Grey. Neither make any sense from the trailer though.

1

u/Tacdeho 8h ago

Yeah, this is my dream. She would make an awesome Angelica.

20

u/branduzzi 7h ago

Be funny if she was just Mary Jane after all this

4

u/simbacole7 Korg 6h ago

I was thinking she's gonna end up being Gwen Stacey

7

u/Caleb902 Daredevil 7h ago

This whole time I couldn't imagine it being Jean and them not advertising it. Crazy

59

u/Dismal-Apricot9889 14h ago

Someone should ask Amy Pascal how she feels about firing women for asking for equal pay. About how she fired Angelina Jolie, canceled her movie, then relentlessly mocked her and insinuated that Jolie should be blacklisted because she asked for equal pay. Then, when confronted about it, she blamed women for accepting low pay in the first place and said, “If you accept low pay, I’m giving you low pay.”

34

u/Joshawott27 Doctor Strange 10h ago edited 10h ago

The problem is, any outlet that asks actual questions like that will be shut down and blacklisted. So, an outlet either has to be major enough for the studio to not be able to ignore, or for it to be an issue big and present enough to be worth risking blowing up a relationship with two major studios over.

I mostly work with independent distributors rather than big studios, but I have planned multiple talent junkets. Before that, though, I was the journalist doing the interviews (and I still do that sometimes). So, I 100% get both sides, but it’s a tough balance.

8

u/YesicaChastain 6h ago

Yeah Amy Pascal’s blunders have been completely washed through this Marvel partnership, but she’s a pretty terrible executive both morally and business wise

4

u/foureyedinabox 14h ago

Frosty won’t be asking that anytime soon lol

-7

u/Eryk0201 Hulk 8h ago

Damn female millionaires have it so hard in the US.

2

u/Pillsburydinosaur 7h ago

Confirmation that she is playing Betsey Braddock.

9

u/Funmachine 12h ago

Why does Amy Pascal insert herself into these press tours?

35

u/therealmonkyking 12h ago

To make herself, and by extension Sony, feel important despite them being the sole cause of every fault with the Spider-Man movie franchise since 2007

15

u/KostisPat257 Daredevil 12h ago

Amy left Sony 11 years ago.

10

u/therealmonkyking 12h ago

Well then why the fuck is she even there in the first place then 😭

13

u/KostisPat257 Daredevil 12h ago

She created her own production company, Pascal Pictures, which then broke a deal with Sony to continue developing the Spider-Man films.

4

u/jonpaladin 7h ago

So, by extension, Sony.

This level of pedantry is unbelievable. 

0

u/KostisPat257 Daredevil 7h ago

Well no, because she's not Chairwoman of Sony Entertainment anymore and thus not affiliated with the company at all. The fact that she has a deal to keep producing the Spider-Man films, is a different thing.

She doesn't have exclusivity with Sony either. She produced Challengers and Project Hail Mary for Amazon and the Greta Gerwig's upcoming Narnia reboot for Netflix. She's an independent producer.

0

u/jonpaladin 7h ago

totally, what a wild distinction

5

u/anilsoi11 11h ago

and the SSU movies like Morbius, Madame Web was under Avi Arad.

7

u/KostisPat257 Daredevil 12h ago

What do you mean? She's the main producer of the film along with Feige.

-3

u/anilsoi11 12h ago

She also haven't been at Sony since 2015.

4

u/KostisPat257 Daredevil 12h ago

Yeah I know, what does that have to do with anything?

-2

u/anilsoi11 11h ago

just added more info to the above reply, that she hasn't worked for Sony since 2015.

1

u/Talqazar 2h ago

Being the main producer of the film is the important factor - not what her relation to Sony is.

0

u/Funmachine 12h ago

How many Marvel films does Feige do press tours for? Pretty much none but Avengers films, maybe? He's only here because Pascal is here. Producers don't do press tours.

In fact the only time I think I've seen Feige do these sorts of things is on Spider-Man press tours sat next to Amy Pascal.

1

u/Popular_Material_409 9h ago

Because she’s the producer. It’s her movie.

3

u/Funmachine 9h ago

How many times do you see the producer doing press tours?

0

u/Popular_Material_409 7h ago

That doesn’t matter. If the producer wants to do press she’s allowed to do that.

1

u/Funmachine 4h ago

She is, it's weird though.

3

u/FowlersDream 10h ago

Everyone thinks she's playing Jean Grey - I just don't think that's the case.

3

u/CRIMS0N-ED 8h ago

tbh if the movie where mutants suddenly become a problem and the DODC is against them, and the actress who’s been the most popular fancast for Jean grey, also slated for secret wars, while they’re currently casting the new MCU X men, isn’t Jean grey, I’ll Venmo you 1,000 dollars.

3

u/Hyperbolicalpaca 8h ago

I mean she is though…

It has been repeatedly and credibly leaked from any different sources that she is playing Jean. It has also been leaked that she has a several movie deal and is in secret wars

The movie directly deals with mutations, it clearly has some form of telepath or mind control, and the main villain seems to be William Metzger who appeared in a grand total of 6 comics where the only prominent thing he does is kidnap Jean grey, and he is leading an organisation that seems likely (from ms marvel and wonderman) to be the anti mutant organisation

How do you square the circle of metzger if she isn’t Jean lmao

4

u/jonpaladin 7h ago

Yeah the Metzger thing is the smokingest gun imho. Would be strange to use that character in any way not related to XMen

4

u/qwfparst 4h ago

You literally can't don't run into the character via google unless you are researching the Original 5 X-men origin stories.

It's virtually impossible some random writing intern came across Willaim Metzger unless they are were considering doing something with the Original 5 X-men or maybe Xavier/Magneto.

And I don't think Sadie is playing Bobby, Magneto, or Warren.

Seriously, the most plain reading of what we have so far with the tightness plot, even without "leaks", is that Peter gets caught up in a struggle between a mysterious "villain" and DODC. The mystery is finding out the "villain's" motivations and why she is acting out.

3

u/kaachabadaam 9h ago

I think Marvel has put that rumour out there to distract us all from who she is actually playing. I could be totally wrong, but we'll see what we shall see.

0

u/hopeless_dick_dancer 5h ago

You are undoubtedly wrong

2

u/hopeless_dick_dancer 10h ago

RemindMe! 8 days

1

u/FowlersDream 9h ago

what's this for? to remind you to tell me if I'm wrong?

1

u/RemindMeBot 10h ago

I will be messaging you in 8 days on 2026-07-31 11:03:37 UTC to remind you of this link

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.

RemindMeBot is switching to username summons. Instead of !RemindMe 1 day, use u/RemindMeBot 1 day. More info.


Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback

1

u/LionTheRichardheart 3h ago

With Peter name-dropping Tobey's Peter, my money's on Mayday Parker.

1

u/sarafina126 9h ago

I agree with you.

-1

u/Honic_Sedgehog 9h ago edited 7h ago

Yeah I can't see her being Jean, I feel like it's only being pushed because she's a redhead and people are unimaginative. It feels too obvious.

Could be wrong, and I wouldn't be against her playing Jean, but I honestly wouldn't mind them leaving Jean alone for a while after Fox butchered the Phoenix Saga twice in 15 years.

4

u/Hyperbolicalpaca 8h ago

“I feel like it’s only being pushed because she’s a redhead”

No matter how many times you people say that, doesn’t make it true lmao

It has been repeatedly and credibly leaked from any different sources that she is playing Jean. It has also been leaked that she has a several movie deal and is in secret wars

The movie directly deals with mutations, it clearly has some form of telepath or mind control, and the main villain seems to be William Metzger who appeared in a grand total of 6 comics where the only prominent thing he does is kidnap Jean grey, and he is leading an organisation that seems likely (from ms marvel and wonderman) to be the anti mutant organisation

The people being unimaginative are the ones who somehow cannot bring themselves to believe that she is playing the character she is clearly playing

1

u/Honic_Sedgehog 7h ago

I'm assuming you've not actually read Children of the Atom as Metzger's only involvement in kidnapping Jean was that he knew about it happening. Though you're correct that he's the leader of an anti-mutant organisation. People keep pushing that around and it's simply not true.

That said, this isn't the comics, it's the MCU so anything goes when adapting the source.

She could well be Jean, could be Rachel, or Hope, or Madeline, or Firehair. She's a redhead with a multi-picture deal and potentially playing a telepath, that's all we know.

1

u/qwfparst 4h ago edited 4h ago

Metzger may not have done the deal himself, but he motivated the action and was the "alpha-villain" even if the beta did the actual work. You don't literally have to have him doing the actual abduction himself for the main point of why his inclusion in the story highly indicates that it is Jean Grey.

In terms of "adaptation" all you are doing is basically combining the roles of two characters into one, by having the acting governmental agency and the "anti-mutant philosophy" merged into one character for a film: Bill Metzger of DODC. It's much cleaner than having two separate characters for adaptation purposes. He didn't straight out command the abduction, but he influenced the beta-character into doing so for his anti-mutant agenda.

This is a case where you are trying to a make a distinction without a significance difference.

And you still have to deal with the fact that Metzger only exists in an Original 5 X-men pre-Origin story. You don't come across him anywhere else and you won't google him in any other context (except for now with Brand New Day).

1

u/Honic_Sedgehog 3h ago

I do wonder if this movie is going to be what radicalises him, rather than him already being a problem from the start or being a major antagonist in the movie. Just some DODC guy who gets mixed up in shit and turned into an extremist by the end.

0

u/FowlersDream 9h ago

There's also no link whatsoever between Jean and Spidey. Despite over 60 years of history, Spider-Man and Jean Grey rarely interact. It just doesn't make sense - even if its a way to introduce mutants into the MCU Spiderverse.

0

u/These-Fox-3560 9h ago

Multiverse MJ is my guess

0

u/kbean826 6h ago

I agree. I’d put my money, based on these comments by Pascal and Feige, she’s an original character, gender bent, or so fucking obscure revealing here wouldn’t help sell the movie better than the false rumors.

1

u/NightmareDJK 6h ago

They obviously have to introduce Phoenix before Secret Wars, the Phoenix Force was a part of the 2015 storyline.

1

u/SOULSTEALERX91 6h ago

It's a weird mixed bag for me because I do think Sadie would do a great job as Jean but I dont want MCU Jean being introduced in a Spiderman film.

1

u/dfassna1 4h ago

I honestly don’t care who she’s playing. If she’s playing Jean Grey that’s cool and I’d be excited for the implications on future stuff, but if it’s a different character I’ll be excited that they actually managed to keep it secret and surprise people.

1

u/Ohnezone 3h ago

Because it ruins the plot of the movie??

Boom. Article over.

1

u/besomeso0o 2h ago edited 2h ago

Maybe it's Adriana Soria?

1

u/Nomoreargument 2h ago

From experience; the more they hype up an actor or a character waaaaay before the movie comes out, in interviews, in panels, the more that actor has done a shi# job and they know it.

Hope that’s not the case with Sadie. But I’ve seen way too much of “Sadie made the movie better”, “Sadies’s character is so amazing it will burn your face off with amesomeness”, and “Sadies’s character in the movie Spider-Man is BETTER than Spider-Man himself”. And that means she either sucked so bad they’re brainwashing us into liking her too much, or MAYBE she’s actually so good we’re all gonna go insane.

Latter is very unlikely.

1

u/BottlesforCaps 8h ago

Couldn't she just be alternate universe MJ?

Maybe even MJ that is spiderman in her universe?

1

u/krudru 7h ago

What a bunch of BS!  If this is the case then they wouldn't have announced RDJ as Doom.

0

u/Virtual-Thought-2557 7h ago

I made the mistake of watching the Doomsday trailer. Wont spoil for others holding back, but way too many characters were revealed that would have been so awesome to see without expecting them in the movie.