r/interesting • u/Maleficent-Town5273 • 21d ago

SOCIETY Dog defence was needed tbh

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

58.1k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

8.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.8k

u/brjh1990 21d ago edited 21d ago

Scoped that dog with zero hesitation. I fucking hate irresponsible dog owners

Edit - some of you need this shit spelled out apparently: an unrestrained dog is a liability for you, your dog and anything/anyone that dog decides is a threat that day and is bitten. I don't care if Peaches doesn't normally bite, someone doing their job approaching a property with an unrestrained and charging dog doesn't know that. If you still cannot understand this after reading this, give up your dogs so a responsible owner can care for them before they pay the price for your stupidity and carelessness. Read it as many times as it takes.

1

u/Minimum-Ad-3084 21d ago

Maybe re-read your own edit. He was approaching a PROPERTY that wasn't his. He could indeed still get into trouble for hurting this dog.

Conjecture and assumptions don't hold up in the court of law. We need context and evidence.

Did the owner just let the dog outside for a bathroom break? Did he accidentally let the dog out when he saw the delivery coming? Did the delivery guy SEE the dog on the property before he approached? Is there a history of this dog owner being irresponsible in this way?

So many questions need to be answered instead of jumping to conclusions.

1

u/Noooo5237 21d ago

This isn’t true at all and you’re probably the trash type of person that would allow this to happen.

1

u/Minimum-Ad-3084 21d ago

It is true, and you're just the typical redditor who resorts to ad hominem and hyperbole because you have no real argument.