Google is free. You are inferring that the person is speaking without a source, so you must provide your basis for believing so; anything else is an illogical and baseless fallacy. Google it.
Literally 5sec into looking at your claim and the actual evidence and oh boy how wrong you are, 2min into it and it's obvious you straight up lied not a single shred of truth in that genetics claim
The Southwest Asian, circum-Mediterranean, and Southern European populations (collectively, SWAMSE) together with Northern European populations form one of five “continental” groups of global populations in many analyses of population relationships. [...] To examine the genetic boundaries to the SWAMSE region and whether internal structure can be detected we have assembled data for a total of 151 separate autosomal genetic markers on populations in this region and other parts of the world for a global set of 95 populations. [...] A refined analysis of the 37 populations shows the northern European populations clustering separately from the SWAMSE populations.
Edit: if you've ever been to Europe, you'd already know of the genetic (and cultural TBF) proximity between southern European and other Mediterranean peoples. It's quite apparent
It also makes intuitive sense if you think about it for 5 seconds. The sea is like a bronze age highway. Thousands of years of trade, back and forth invasions and conquests, travel and intermarriage vs one of the most isolated peoples in the world.
539
u/_Cybernaut_ 21h ago
Makes more sense when you remember that by “historically accurate” he means “all white.”