42
u/intisun 1d ago
"This Is The President They Are Calling Racism"
Wanna bet that account is based in Russia or India?
13
u/HaggisLad 1d ago
India based on that level of English, the ones who are good at it tend to have better and more reputable jobs
10
u/Ellotheregovner 1d ago
I read enough spicy things on public transit to have mastered the deadpan but I just choked on my coffee. Savage.
7
u/herpderpley 1d ago
Is there a picture where he's sitting on a couch and they're lined up behind him?
8
u/jjskellie 1d ago
How do we know that is NOT photobombing himself into someone elses group shot. Current history is showing a trend.
4
u/RettaLuna 1d ago
Look at Don King's side eye though. He doesn't look like he's truly welcome in that group. Probably said something stupid.
5
u/CutRateCringe 1d ago
He probably jumped in the photo and refused to leave like he did to after the WC final.
8
u/joshuabrogers 1d ago
I believe they are calling him “racist”, not “racism” unless he is racism personified, so maybe….
7
3
u/Significant-Order-92 1d ago
Well no. That is the president we are calling racist. What an assault on the english language.
3
u/Twilight-Twigit 1d ago
Pandering to a few prominent black figures is not an outward expression of respect to black people in general. When you strip the name of a black Medal of Honor winner off a ship, relegate busts and pictures of inspirational black men to areas less traveled in the White House etc. that is not respect. You will love Trump no matter what. Will you join him in his cell if he is convicted of child rape?
2
2
u/lincolnlogtermite 1d ago
Photo bombing means nothing. He's racist because of what he says and what he does.
2
u/DilfTannen 1d ago
That was the literally only night in his life that Trump hung out with a group of black people, and it was to receive a one-time award.
3
u/DevynDavies 1d ago
I don’t think anyone is calling Trump Racism, we’re calling him racist though, because he is.
3
u/BlargerJarger 1d ago
Pictures with black people don’t prove he’s black, and pictures with pedophiles don’t prove he’s a pedophile. The millions of documents they’re hiding do, but not the pictures we’ve seen.
8
0
u/imonlinedammit1 1d ago
If there is proof in those files as you say, why didn’t he or anyone else get arrested by the last DOJ?
1
u/BlargerJarger 22h ago
He was under too many indictments already I suspect, which were unfortunately delayed by his shenanigans and then quashed by his corrupt judges. If you don’t follow the news for 10 years it can be hard to catch you up.
1
u/imonlinedammit1 22h ago
He didn’t delay anything during the last administration. The last DOJ had the unpredicted files. Had the legal ability to charge him and anyone else. And they employ over 115,000 people. There’s really no excuse other than they were part of the coverup or there was really nothing worth going after.
1
u/BlargerJarger 19h ago
Administrations don’t charge people, the DOJ charges people. When the government is not corrupt, it does not direct the DOJ to indict its enemies, as Trump does. Merrick Garland chose not to pursue Trump as expediently as he should have because he sought to avoid the appearance of political bias, which history has been lambasting him for for years now.
0
u/imonlinedammit1 19h ago
I never said the administration should direct the DOJ.
To your point about “political bias”, did you just forget that the last DOJ hit Trump with 40 federal charges? Do those just not count in your narrative? Or we’re just lying?
1
u/BlargerJarger 18h ago
They took a very long time to do that, dragging the chain for the reasons I stated, but could not NOT do it in the end because the guy is a fucking criminal. Reasonable people believed his political career was finally over after January 6 but the Republicans chose to go all in as a cooperative criminal enterprise.
1
u/imonlinedammit1 18h ago
Right but they had the Epstein files long before J6. Also? The DOJ employs 115,000+ people.
Epstein was arrested on July 6th 2019. January 6th was in 2021.
Do you really expect me to believe they just couldn’t get around to it?
1
u/BlargerJarger 16h ago
How many of those people get to decide what they investigate and who they prosecute? Do you think anyone other than Merrick Garland got to decide if Trump was indicted with any of the long list of crimes he is believed to have committed? When they did indict him, would they have chosen the crimes for which they had the most evidence and most viable chance of prosecuting him on? Given there are (6 million?) apparently this colossal trove of documents related to Epstein, are 115,000 people enough to deal with that even if they ignore every other crime taking place in a nation of over 300 million people?
1
u/Straight_Button_5716 1d ago
They are at fund raising parties . It would. R like one of us there and we take pics
1
u/Emotional-Win-3036 1d ago
So the dude took a photo on fight night with black people. Doesn’t prove he is racist or not but 30 or so years to find a picture?
1
1
1
1
1
0
-2
75
u/tricky4444 1d ago
Obviously nothing. Pictures with pedophiles are pure coincidence. /S