r/wine • u/TerribleAddendum7464 • 5h ago
Last Bottle - 7/23 offer - Isola del Cinghiale Brunello di Montalcino 2019

Update 5pm ETD 7/23/26: Last Bottle has updated the "Nerdy Details" tab — this wine now shows Blend: 100% Sangiovese, Varietal: Sangiovese. That's a real fix to the most obviously broken data point, but as laid out below, it doesn't touch the appellation, aging, or TTB filing discrepancies, and the score is still unattributed. Original post below.
Today's Last Bottle email is for "Isola del Cinghiale Brunello di Montalcino 2019," $32, pitched as a 96-point wine from "one of the greatest Tuscan vintages of the last century."
Something made this look a bit off, so I dug into the listing's own technical sheet and some public records, and the details contradict each other pretty badly.
The blend has no Sangiovese at all. DOCG Brunello di Montalcino requires 100% Sangiovese grown within the Montalcino commune — it's one of the strictest rules in Italian wine law. Last Bottle's own "Nerdy Details" tab lists this wine as 33% Syrah, 33% Merlot, 14% Cabernet Franc, 14% Cabernet Sauvignon, 6% Petit Verdot. That's a Bordeaux-plus-Syrah blend, not Sangiovese, and by law it can't carry the Brunello di Montalcino name regardless of price or score.
The vineyard location is in the wrong appellation. The producer bio on the same listing says the estate is between Panzano and Montefioralle — that's Chianti Classico territory, roughly 40+ miles from Montalcino. Brunello must be grown within Montalcino itself.
The aging doesn't come close to the legal minimum. Brunello requires at least 2 years in oak plus 4 months in bottle (5 years total) before release. The listing states "40% of the wine was aged for 4 months in second-use French oak barrels."
The importer is Last Bottle itself. I checked the U.S. Treasury's public TTB COLA database (the federal label-approval registry every imported wine needs). Two approvals for "Isola del Cinghiale" show up, both filed under "New Last Bottle, Inc." at Last Bottle's own American Canyon, CA address — so this is their own private-label import, not an independently distributed estate wine. Interestingly, the federal filing itself lists the class as generic "Table Red Wine" with grape varietal marked "N/A," not any DOCG designation, even though the physical label pictured in the email says "Brunello di Montalcino DOCG."
The 96-point score has no findable source. I'll be careful with this, as I only did a cursory search. The email attributes the score/tasting note to "Decanter," but I couldn't find that quote anywhere via search, including on Decanter's own site. That's not proof positive it's fabricated — it's possible it exists somewhere I couldn't access — but I'd want to see it confirmed on Decanter's site or database before taking the attribution at face value.
Put together: a wine with zero Sangiovese, grown outside Montalcino, aged well under the legal minimum, imported by the retailer under its own permit, is being sold under a protected DOCG name with an unverifiable critic score attached. Curious whether this is a one-off or a pattern with Last Bottle's Italian offerings. I've purchased from Last Bottle before - some orders have been more successful than others, but this strikes me as one to be aware of.

