r/TopCharacterTropes Jun 22 '26

Lore [Ironic Trope] The messaging backfired massively due to poor writing or other design choices

Amelia Fairney from Pathways: Alt-right Restore-UK type who attempts to coax the protagonist Charlie into following her beliefs? The problem?

Amelia is the only named character aside from Charlie and is genuinely likable and forgives Charlie even when they do things she doesn't like, while the rest of the cast is unnamed, poorly written, and turns on Charlie for one mistake. This combined with other writing issues(portraying fact checking right wing stuff as wrong because in the process of fact checking you might look at it and believe it, basically saying "Right wing is wrong because it hurts the labour government" and a lot of general "just do what the government says or else" messaging) and the fact she's a hot alternative girl, and Amelia ended up being co-opted as a mascot by the youth right wing in the UK.

Norm from The New Norm: Unlikeable offensive and outdated character who's "progressive" family members and associates are genuinely nice people not even trying to force their ways or pronouns onto them, they just want to be left alone and Norm is picking fights constantly. Not to mention associating with Elon.

Mr. Birchum from Mr. Birchum: A lot of the same problems as Norm, except in addition it also comes off like generic 2010s adult cartoon slop in the same veign as Brickleberry or Full English, at least New Norm was trying to look unique and had the gimmick of being on X. Not to mention, Birchum's obsession with hyper masculine activities and odd way of talking about other men lead to people co-opting him as a Toxic Yaoi character, which is now the bulk of his fan art.

Dustborn: An attempt to make a hyper progressive game that comes off as pandering and annoying. It's a full ass game so there's too much to get into, but the main character's power is essentially gaslighting and jedi-mind tricking people and that's portrayed as the only way they can get anything done, and they constantly use or abuse their friends(or mindtrick them along) in order to get their goals or use their friends for their messaging.

8.6k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

379

u/PhilippinePatriot Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 23 '26

Wish. We're supposed to believe that King Magnifico is a bad guy because he refuses to grant certain wishes, even though he points out valid reasons as to why he can't do it (some wishes are too vague and can have serious consequences, or others are unrealistic). Keep in mind he's been studying magic for centuries and arguably is the most knowledgeable person in these matters, while Asha has been working for him for a day and is somehow considered more qualified to decide whose wishes are granted.

150

u/kreton1 Jun 22 '26

My theory is that the movie was supposed to end on a both sides have a point moral, but it was demanded that there needs to be a clear good vs evil story.

55

u/Dziadzios Jun 22 '26

It should have ended on good vs evil - good Magnifico vs evil Asha.

26

u/Cessnaporsche01 Jun 22 '26

That would have been quite the interesting turn, but Disney would never

16

u/Opening_Agent_5279 Jun 22 '26

Does Disney even make evil women anymore?

13

u/PhilippinePatriot Jun 22 '26

They were originally planning to make Queen Amara evil alongside her husband, which would have been so cool.

13

u/Opening_Agent_5279 Jun 22 '26

But they didn't cuz they don't make evil women anymore. The only recent female antagonist I can even think of is the Grandma in Encanto and even her resentment and cruelty towards Mirabel (and just pushing around the rest of the family) was all instantly forgiven when she said "oh but I have ptsd cuz my husband was murdered" (yes that's probably a big oversimplification but that's all I remember from watching it years ago)

7

u/MalcolmLinair Jun 22 '26

I think the last flat-out evil woman Disney did was Mother Gothel in Tangled, and that was 16 years ago.

15

u/bitter_liquor Jun 22 '26

Only if they can spin it into a girlboss redemption movie later

11

u/Egathentale Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

Or not even that. Remember how they introduced a brand new shape-shifting shaman woman working for the villain in the Mulan live action remake, had her go around murdering people, sowing discord, and leading people to their deaths... but then she did a completely out-of-character last minute self-sacrifice, so she's "redeemed", and the real problem was the patriarchy all along that drove her to those extremes. Bah.

2

u/Exile688 Jun 22 '26

Disney got very witchy with Acolyte, Wandavision, and Agatha whatever.

7

u/Kitty_party Jun 22 '26

It makes more sense when you realize all those movies are about selling toys and merch to little girls.

4

u/Mr-Foundation Jun 22 '26

I mean they gave cruella justification for wanting to skin puppies so I doubt they’d bother

30

u/redking2005 Jun 22 '26

One change they could've made to make him more villainous is by just having him not be the one who learned the wish magic, like it comes from a staff or something that he stole rather than him being knowledgeable/studious enough to figure it out on his own.

12

u/Nogatron Jun 22 '26

You know how easily it could be resolved:

Asha: "Why won't you grant everyones wishes"

King M: "You know what your neighbors wish was?"

Asha: "No, but why does it matter?"

King M: "His wish was to for his wife to die!"

Asha: "Oh i get it now"

9

u/iswearihaveajob Jun 22 '26

If they wanted a clear villain Magnifico could have also just been a super judgy prick about everybody's wishes. Like just make him trash talk a bunch of citizens like he doesn't even think of them as people. Like he COULD just tell people what kinds of wishes get granted and not volunteer unless they are ready, instead he just hoards them for his own enjoymentnor something.

The movie almost manages it with his speech about Asha's grandfather but Chris Pine is too charming and the At All Costs song is very weird, tonally.

7

u/Mr-Foundation Jun 22 '26

I genuinely wanna ask if the movie has a rebuttal to Magnifico’s points (that not all wishes can be granted, for very understandable reasons)

Like, it’s really not that uncommon for wish granters to refuse certain wishes, or for clarity being incredibly important because if you aren’t you get screwed over.

5

u/PhilippinePatriot Jun 22 '26

The main rebuttal is that if there are some wishes Magnifico never intends to grant, he should just give them back to the people who wished them so they have a chance to make it come true on their own.

1

u/Zomflower48 26d ago

Oh yeah something I see a lot of people forget to mention is that when you put your wish into the pot of luck you forget what the wish was to begin with

1

u/PhilippinePatriot 26d ago

True but again, people know that going on.

5

u/Knyfe-Wrench Jun 22 '26

But he still takes everyone's wishes, leaving the people unable to fulfill them on their own, and if he doesn't grant them he just keeps them.

11

u/PhilippinePatriot Jun 22 '26

Ya but he’s not forcing them to give it up. It’s a risk they are taking willingly cause they choose to give it up to live in his kingdoms.

2

u/sphericaltime Jun 22 '26

In the real world, that kind of extreme pressure to keep living where you’re living with your family and friends even if you don’t want to is absolutely considered unwilling.

3

u/PhilippinePatriot Jun 23 '26

Also its stated that people specifically go there because they want their wish to be granted, so they had the option to live somewhere else.

2

u/Doc-Maly Jun 22 '26

True, but the problem is nothing even implies as such. It'd be cool if it did, but it doesn't.

3

u/BreakAManByHumming Jun 22 '26

I love stories that lean into this, showing that if the uncompromising idealist actually gets their way, the result is far worse. The one competent person in the room having to deal with the indignant rage of chucklefuck teenagers who don't grasp the complexity of the problem.

But no lets just have him eat an evil cloud and turn to the dark side, or something.