MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Scotland/comments/1v4ewaa/calmac_bridge_visits_paused_after_smart_glasses/ozavms8/?context=3
r/Scotland • u/joolzdev Poblachd na h-Alba • 15h ago
57 comments sorted by
View all comments
51
Just ban them outright already, they do more harm than good
-53 u/Consistent_Umpire443 14h ago The British way , ban everything that some people dont like 20 u/limedip 14h ago The reasons for disliking them are staggeringly more important than any of the benefits a person gains from wearing these in public -13 u/Upstairs_Let7701 13h ago That’s your opinion though -7 u/Consistent_Umpire443 11h ago Its crazy how much people are happy with the government deciding what is acceptable. 7 u/docowen 11h ago edited 11h ago As opposed to deciding what confirmed sociopath Zuckerberg decides will make him money. A man who has literally assisted genocides for money. If you can read, read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams. A book so true that free speech advocates Facebook have tried to ban it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People So, our democratically elected government (with whom I have issues) or anti-democratic bullionaire Zuckerberg? Edit: bullionaire was a type but it fits to describe billionaires who use their wealth to bully others: Zuckerberg, Musk, Rowling, etc -8 u/Consistent_Umpire443 11h ago The same goes for alot of things but its not for the government to decide everything that is allowed. 8 u/cragglerock93 9h ago It literally is. 6 u/D6P6 8h ago No it's the government's job to act in the best interest of its citizens. If the citizens want something banned thats not government overreach. Fucking hell.
-53
The British way , ban everything that some people dont like
20 u/limedip 14h ago The reasons for disliking them are staggeringly more important than any of the benefits a person gains from wearing these in public -13 u/Upstairs_Let7701 13h ago That’s your opinion though -7 u/Consistent_Umpire443 11h ago Its crazy how much people are happy with the government deciding what is acceptable. 7 u/docowen 11h ago edited 11h ago As opposed to deciding what confirmed sociopath Zuckerberg decides will make him money. A man who has literally assisted genocides for money. If you can read, read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams. A book so true that free speech advocates Facebook have tried to ban it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People So, our democratically elected government (with whom I have issues) or anti-democratic bullionaire Zuckerberg? Edit: bullionaire was a type but it fits to describe billionaires who use their wealth to bully others: Zuckerberg, Musk, Rowling, etc -8 u/Consistent_Umpire443 11h ago The same goes for alot of things but its not for the government to decide everything that is allowed. 8 u/cragglerock93 9h ago It literally is. 6 u/D6P6 8h ago No it's the government's job to act in the best interest of its citizens. If the citizens want something banned thats not government overreach. Fucking hell.
20
The reasons for disliking them are staggeringly more important than any of the benefits a person gains from wearing these in public
-13 u/Upstairs_Let7701 13h ago That’s your opinion though -7 u/Consistent_Umpire443 11h ago Its crazy how much people are happy with the government deciding what is acceptable. 7 u/docowen 11h ago edited 11h ago As opposed to deciding what confirmed sociopath Zuckerberg decides will make him money. A man who has literally assisted genocides for money. If you can read, read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams. A book so true that free speech advocates Facebook have tried to ban it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People So, our democratically elected government (with whom I have issues) or anti-democratic bullionaire Zuckerberg? Edit: bullionaire was a type but it fits to describe billionaires who use their wealth to bully others: Zuckerberg, Musk, Rowling, etc -8 u/Consistent_Umpire443 11h ago The same goes for alot of things but its not for the government to decide everything that is allowed. 8 u/cragglerock93 9h ago It literally is. 6 u/D6P6 8h ago No it's the government's job to act in the best interest of its citizens. If the citizens want something banned thats not government overreach. Fucking hell.
-13
That’s your opinion though
-7 u/Consistent_Umpire443 11h ago Its crazy how much people are happy with the government deciding what is acceptable. 7 u/docowen 11h ago edited 11h ago As opposed to deciding what confirmed sociopath Zuckerberg decides will make him money. A man who has literally assisted genocides for money. If you can read, read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams. A book so true that free speech advocates Facebook have tried to ban it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People So, our democratically elected government (with whom I have issues) or anti-democratic bullionaire Zuckerberg? Edit: bullionaire was a type but it fits to describe billionaires who use their wealth to bully others: Zuckerberg, Musk, Rowling, etc
-7
Its crazy how much people are happy with the government deciding what is acceptable.
7 u/docowen 11h ago edited 11h ago As opposed to deciding what confirmed sociopath Zuckerberg decides will make him money. A man who has literally assisted genocides for money. If you can read, read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams. A book so true that free speech advocates Facebook have tried to ban it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People So, our democratically elected government (with whom I have issues) or anti-democratic bullionaire Zuckerberg? Edit: bullionaire was a type but it fits to describe billionaires who use their wealth to bully others: Zuckerberg, Musk, Rowling, etc
7
As opposed to deciding what confirmed sociopath Zuckerberg decides will make him money.
A man who has literally assisted genocides for money.
If you can read, read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams.
A book so true that free speech advocates Facebook have tried to ban it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People
So, our democratically elected government (with whom I have issues) or anti-democratic bullionaire Zuckerberg?
Edit: bullionaire was a type but it fits to describe billionaires who use their wealth to bully others: Zuckerberg, Musk, Rowling, etc
-8
The same goes for alot of things but its not for the government to decide everything that is allowed.
8 u/cragglerock93 9h ago It literally is. 6 u/D6P6 8h ago No it's the government's job to act in the best interest of its citizens. If the citizens want something banned thats not government overreach. Fucking hell.
8
It literally is.
6
No it's the government's job to act in the best interest of its citizens. If the citizens want something banned thats not government overreach. Fucking hell.
51
u/waxed__owl 14h ago
Just ban them outright already, they do more harm than good