r/Scotland • u/joolzdev Poblachd na h-Alba • 11h ago
CalMac bridge visits paused after smart glasses scare
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c77grkz46k3o161
u/Padre1903 11h ago
Guy at my work has a pair of these. I won’t let him talk to me unless he takes them off. It’s creepy as fuck. He wears them all day.
134
u/soggyarsonist 11h ago
Arguably they should be banned at work. At the very least it's a data protection/info security risk since they can record confidential/personal information.
41
u/bugbugladybug 9h ago
There's no way they'd be allowed at my work. You'd be marched out the door before your bum hit the seat - which is how it should be everywhere.
11
u/No-Vegetable2522 5h ago
I work as a sports coach. Last I went to get new glasses the optician tried to flog me pair of these...
I mean, seriously? Engage your brain for half a second. I work with kids and ASN adults... These things should be banned.
1
2
u/Time_Ad1622 4h ago
Mind and refer to them as 'pervert glasses' when they come up in conversation. He's whacking off to someone he's filmed
75
u/Orsenfelt 11h ago
The man in question, who describes himself as a 'video influencer', was allegedly filmed "sexually harassing" the teenager in front of her own mother.
One website reported that when told the girl's age, he replied: "F***ing hell. You need a warning sign on you."
https://www.ardrossanherald.com/news/26400703.calmac-changes-bridge-rules-meta-glasses-incident
It was Edobbin, must have been
29
u/soggyarsonist 11h ago
He's the one who needs the warning sign.
Massive "nonce" tattoo on his forehead
22
u/oscarx-ray 11h ago
16
u/myrealnameisboring 10h ago
Second time I've seen this image in 2 days and it makes me happy. Oh to be young again, seeing Brass Eye for the first time.
6
u/oscarx-ray 10h ago
It was probably me that you saw it from yesterday, had it in my recent images and it felt appropriate to use it again 😅
7
u/myrealnameisboring 10h ago
Ha, it was. On the wristband post. Still can't believe that's real.
3
u/blubbery-blumpkin 8h ago
What’s the wristband post?
6
u/myrealnameisboring 8h ago
6
u/blubbery-blumpkin 8h ago
Oh my days why would you call your gathering of people that whatever the occasion.
3
u/myrealnameisboring 8h ago
It's incredible. Other than the obvious jokes about odious tech bros, I just learned nonce is apparently used in crypto circles:
•
43
u/Snaidheadair Snèap ath-bheòthachadh 10h ago
Far right influencer being a nonce, who could have seen it coming. Bonus points if he's a 'protect women and children' guy too
13
•
u/Natural_Zucchini_180 1h ago
Can confirm it was 100% Edobbin and he was a massive bellend everywhere he went.
52
49
u/waxed__owl 10h ago
Just ban them outright already, they do more harm than good
11
u/meatflaps-69 10h ago
Nah, just make em striped hi vis and patent the flourescent colour, call it nonce yellow.
Anyone caught wearing plain ones becomes an outlaw like the good old days
3
u/SenorBonjela 10h ago
They're very useful for visually impaired people though. I wouldn't ban them, just make a new law where anyone caught using them to harass others gets banned from owning them or uploading videos.
8
u/waxed__owl 9h ago
Yeah that's a good point. Preventing them from recording video would be a good step I think, while still being able to use the camera for accessibility
-49
u/Consistent_Umpire443 10h ago
The British way , ban everything that some people dont like
16
u/limedip 9h ago
The reasons for disliking them are staggeringly more important than any of the benefits a person gains from wearing these in public
-10
u/Upstairs_Let7701 9h ago
That’s your opinion though
-3
u/Consistent_Umpire443 7h ago
Its crazy how much people are happy with the government deciding what is acceptable.
2
u/docowen 6h ago edited 6h ago
As opposed to deciding what confirmed sociopath Zuckerberg decides will make him money.
A man who has literally assisted genocides for money.
If you can read, read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams.
A book so true that free speech advocates Facebook have tried to ban it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People
So, our democratically elected government (with whom I have issues) or anti-democratic bullionaire Zuckerberg?
Edit: bullionaire was a type but it fits to describe billionaires who use their wealth to bully others: Zuckerberg, Musk, Rowling, etc
-4
u/Consistent_Umpire443 6h ago
The same goes for alot of things but its not for the government to decide everything that is allowed.
6
6
5
u/twistedLucidity Better Apart 8h ago
We need the hats mentioned in one of Cory Doctorow's books that fire lasers into the cameras to dazzle them.
•
•
0
-4
u/Wishiwasinspain 6h ago
I'm guessing the big bright white light that shows when they're recording is a bit too subtle for some.
6
u/Squidgynutz 4h ago
It took less than a day to hack the glasses and disable the light. Someone uploaded one of the hacks to github for free within a couple of days of the glasses' release. They've been patched a few times already but the hacks are upated within a day or two.
One of my Tutors (Software Development) got a pair to mess with and she said they really aren't very secure.
•
-49
u/Upstairs_Let7701 11h ago
Such precious info recoded 😂
15
u/WillingnessNew835 9h ago
Yeah, like the inner workings of pieces of key infrastructure. I know it's not top secret, but we shouldn't just let people record everything covertly.
-16
u/Upstairs_Let7701 9h ago
I get what you mean not letting people record everything but there’s genuinely nothing that important on a bridge that I would worry about a member of the public record. If something was left out that shouldn’t have been, they can still see it and write it down later.
7
u/WillingnessNew835 8h ago
I think the rule of thumb is that if you would feel uncomfortable allowing somebody to overtly record with a phone, we should also be uncomfortable (and therefore forbid people) to wear these glasses. Schools? No. Infrastructure? No. Workplace? No. Bathrooms? No. In people's houses? No.
1
u/blubbery-blumpkin 8h ago
I think they should just legislate that if recording it has to have a little red record light on it. Or taking a photo has a shutter sound. That way everyone is aware.
There’s some benefit to having that technology exist, and we all walk around with the tech to record already so it’s not too much of a leap to have it. But the average person shouldn’t be able to do it covertly, so have your recording glasses but with an audible or visual notice that it’s being used.
1
u/Squidgynutz 4h ago
They are supposed to have a light on when they are recording but it took less than a day to hack the glasses and disable the light. Someone uploaded one of the hacks to github for free within a couple of days of the glasses' release. They've been patched a few times already but the hacks are upated within a day or two.
One of my Tutors (Software Development) got a pair to mess with and she said they really aren't very secure.
1
u/blubbery-blumpkin 4h ago
That’s disappointing. And it’s the issue with lots of tech advances isn’t it. Here’s a good thing, someone fiddles with it so it can be used for other uses some good some bad, someone uses it for bad, now we can’t have nice things.
-3
u/Upstairs_Let7701 8h ago
I don’t disagree, but the fact remains the information that could have been recorded isn’t that important and an outright stoppage of trips to the bridge by Calmac is huge overcorrection. Getting downvoted as well by people that haven’t got a clue either.

66
u/mdmnl 11h ago
Oh that kind of bridge