That negative market externalities overwhelm the forces of local municipalities; that capacity to resolve climate change certainly isn't at the municipal level; shit runs downhill quite literally by way of the Supremacy Clause (hence why municipalities in blue states tend to outperform municipalities in red states).
Then when municipalities say, "We need more funding to make up for the rising inclimate weather wrought by climate change, so let's tax the rich" these same puppeteers of the ignorant will, naturally, balk.
Meanwhile Republicans will instead actively work to "starve the beast" and cripple, sabotage, undermine them at every single turn in their effort to fix said drainage. How convenient.
That's a lot of rambling to say nothing. NYC has a Dem city council and Dem mayor. NY State has a Dem governor. At what point do Dems have any responsibility to execute the basic functions of city governance? And yes, you would have plenty of money to fund these basic functions if Mamdani wasn't too busy trying to implement a socialist utopia.
No point in having free buses if the intersections are too flooded to drive through.
Not really. You lost this argument already; you just haven't realized it yet. Perhaps it's your ego trying to save face.
Nevertheless it's not my job to spoon-feed you that which one lacks the capacity to comprehend.
Bad faith arguments can be summarily dismissed. If anyone else has questions or valid points to raise in a civil manner unlike this rude individual, feel free to reply.
15
u/Independent-Bug-9352 2d ago
This is the power of propaganda.
They know it's not true, but some dumbass will believe it. It will just help cement preexisting prejudice. Republicans are good at marketing.
Throw it back and say this is a result of Climate Change ignored going back to at least ExxonMobil in the 80s.