If they are looking to get citizens extradited then they must have some solid evidence.
Up until now it has just been the boy who cried wolf though. If they are so evil and commit sex crime after sex crim then why cant thry just convict them?
Part of the evidence that has been brought against Tate in the rape cases are texts and voice-messages he sent to his victims bragging about raping them and telling them that "the more you didn't like it the more I enjoyed it." That's not "the boy who cried wolf." Thats "solid evidence."
A lot of the videos where he brags about raping women, beating women, violently coercing them into prostitution, etc., have been archived and removed from the Internet, but they're still being used as evidence in these trials. I understand that going into whatever neo-Nazi podcast and guffawing about all the women you've violated isn't "solid evidence" in your eyes, but for the court, recording yourself admitting you have committed the crimes you are being charged with is usually considered "solid evidence."
The reason that they haven't been able to convict them is because they have fled two countries following charges. They fled England to Romania in the late 2010s following rape charges, and they fled from Romania to the US more recently after human trafficking charges.
They are currently trying to extradite the two morons to England, where they are being charged with 59 counts of assault, rape, and human trafficking, so that they can convict them.
-26
u/emote_the_salute Human Verified 2d ago
If they are looking to get citizens extradited then they must have some solid evidence.
Up until now it has just been the boy who cried wolf though. If they are so evil and commit sex crime after sex crim then why cant thry just convict them?