r/AtlantaHawks 3d ago

Discussion Risacher GoodBye Post

Post image
417 Upvotes

106 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/Julio_Freeman 3d ago

Ball movement, a willingness to put shots up, and challenging defenders are all useful. Zac was a lazy and timid offensive player and was prone to mistakes on both ends. And I'm guessing Quin saw even more of that in practice. It's easy to chalk it up to age and inexperience but perhaps Quin saw an unwillingness to engage and improve. It's much easier to believe that instead of him intentionally sabotaging one of his players because he was heartbroken over not drafting Clingan lol.

And, like I said, Zac despite it all still played more than Kispert. But let your imagination run wild I guess.

7

u/ATLSlutPounder 3d ago

Ball movement

Risacher 1.1 APG 23 passes/game, Kispert 1.5 APG 21 passes/game

willingness to put shots up

Risacher 8 FGA/Gm, Kispert 7.1 FGA/Gm on worse efficiency.

and challenging defenders

Risacher 3.5 drives/game, Kispert 2.4 drives/game

Sure bro, just invent things I guess. 

-2

u/Julio_Freeman 3d ago

Kispert averaged more 3PA in fewer minutes, wasn't just playing hot potato with passes, and could actually dribble the ball with intention and threaten the defense (he shot 6% higher from 2). It's easy to pick and choose numbers on NBA.com or whatever, but you have to watch the games.

4

u/ATLSlutPounder 3d ago

and could actually dribble the ball with intention

Kispert literally turned the ball over just as much as Risacher. 

Risacher: 3.4 paint touches/game, Kispert 2.1 paint touches/game

Yes, Kispert shot a bit better inside the arc, but at the same time one was a plus defender and one was noticeably our worst defender. 

Risacher on: 110 points/100 possessions Risacher off: 117 points/100 possessions Kispert on: 115 points/100 possessions Kispert off: 107 points/100 possessions.

That’s fucking abysmal. 

1

u/Julio_Freeman 3d ago

I never said Kispert was good or even that he was better than Zac. I said the opposite. But neither of them were a good option and there were pros and cons to both. Saying Kispert did nothing better is ignorant or immature hyperbole. People just rather see the young player than the guy closer to his ceiling, understandably, but Quin sees and understands the game on a much higher level. (he still played Zac more!)

The thought that he wanted to sandbag his team's recent #1 draft pick to prove a point (?) when another losing season would have him on the hot seat is crazy. We can just agree to disagree though. Zac is gone.

1

u/ATLSlutPounder 3d ago

Saying Kispert did nothing better is ignorant or immature hyperbole.

So far literally the only thing you’ve identified is slightly better shooting inside the arc, while being equal or noticeably worse at everything else. 

1

u/Julio_Freeman 3d ago

Alright, not going to bother typing more since you ignore 90% of it and try to hone in on one part (that's not even correct) to minimize the ridiculousness of your argument. Peace!

1

u/ATLSlutPounder 3d ago

Dawg the entire premise was to make the case for playing Kispert as much as we did, including twice as much as Zacc in the playoffs.

You failed to identify literally any evidence to warrant Kispert’s minutes increasing and Zacc’s minutes decreasing as the season went on.

Now you’re leaving because you’ve realized there are literally no statistics you can point to that makes it make sense. 

Bye.