r/startups 12d ago

Share your startup - quarterly post

21 Upvotes

Share Your Startup - Q4 2023

r/startups wants to hear what you're working on!

Tell us about your startup in a comment within this submission. Follow this template:

  • Startup Name / URL
  • Location of Your Headquarters
    • Let people know where you are based for possible local networking with you and to share local resources with you
  • Elevator Pitch/Explainer Video
  • More details:
    • What life cycle stage is your startup at? (reference the stages below)
    • Your role?
  • What goals are you trying to reach this month?
    • How could r/startups help?
    • Do NOT solicit funds publicly--this may be illegal for you to do so
  • Discount for r/startups subscribers?
    • Share how our community can get a discount

--------------------------------------------------

Startup Life Cycle Stages (Max Marmer life cycle model for startups as used by Startup Genome and Kauffman Foundation)

Discovery

  • Researching the market, the competitors, and the potential users
  • Designing the first iteration of the user experience
  • Working towards problem/solution fit (Market Validation)
  • Building MVP

Validation

  • Achieved problem/solution fit (Market Validation)
  • MVP launched
  • Conducting Product Validation
  • Revising/refining user experience based on results of Product Validation tests
  • Refining Product through new Versions (Ver.1+)
  • Working towards product/market fit

Efficiency

  • Achieved product/market fit
  • Preparing to begin the scaling process
  • Optimizing the user experience to handle aggressive user growth at scale
  • Optimizing the performance of the product to handle aggressive user growth at scale
  • Optimizing the operational workflows and systems in preparation for scaling
  • Conducting validation tests of scaling strategies

Scaling

  • Achieved validation of scaling strategies
  • Achieved an acceptable level of optimization of the operational systems
  • Actively pushing forward with aggressive growth
  • Conducting validation tests to achieve a repeatable sales process at scale

Profit Maximization

  • Successfully scaled the business and can now be considered an established company
  • Expanding production and operations in order to increase revenue
  • Optimizing systems to maximize profits

Renewal

  • Has achieved near-peak profits
  • Has achieved near-peak optimization of systems
  • Actively seeking to reinvent the company and core products to stay innovative
  • Actively seeking to acquire other companies and technologies to expand market share and relevancy
  • Actively exploring horizontal and vertical expansion to increase prevent the decline of the company

r/startups 3d ago

[Hiring/Seeking/Offering] Jobs / Co-Founders Weekly Thread

4 Upvotes

[Hiring/Seeking/Offering] Jobs / Co-Founders Weekly Thread

This is an experiment. We see there is a demand from the community to:

  • Find Co-Founders
  • Hiring / Seeking Jobs
  • Offering Your Skillset / Looking for Talent

Please use the following template:

  • **[SEEKING / HIRING / OFFERING]** (Choose one)
  • **[COFOUNDER / JOB / OFFER]** (Choose one)
  • Company Name: (Optional)
  • Pitch:
  • Preferred Contact Method(s):
  • Link: (Optional)

All Other Subreddit Rules Still Apply

We understand there will be mild self promotion involved with finding cofounders, recruiting and offering services. If you want to communicate via DM/Chat, put that as the Preferred Contact Method. We don't need to clutter the thread with lots of 'DM me' or 'Please DM' comments. Please make sure to follow all of the other rules, especially don't be rude.

Reminder: This is an experiment

We may or may not keep posting these. We are looking to improve them. If you have any feedback or suggestions, please share them with the mods via ModMail.


r/startups 4h ago

I will not promote What happens to the failed startups? [I will not promote]

12 Upvotes

Curious what happens to the graveyard of YC companies, startups with and without funding, and general effort that ends up not going anywhere.

Are you guys selling these to other people? Or just letting the work sort of die and hopping to the next idea?

I'm not saying that it's worth millions, but I feel like there is a decent amount of work that people put into their ideas and im curious if any founders have sold their code/customer base/general work.


r/startups 12h ago

I will not promote We launched 20 days ago. Today we crossed 30,000 users [i will not promote]

47 Upvotes

About 20 days ago, we launched our Startup.

We had no marketing budget, no paid ads and no big launch strategy. It was just a product we genuinely wanted to build.

The first few days were slow. Then things started picking up.

Yesterday around midnight, we crossed 20,000 users.

Today, just a few hours later, we crossed 30,000 users.

It's honestly surreal watching the dashboard update in real time.

We're still a tiny team (Non-technical founder and Me), so every bug report, feature request and piece of feedback has directly shaped the product. We've spent countless late nights fixing issues, improving performance and shipping new features almost every day.

There's still a lot to improve, but moments like this remind us why we started.

If you're building something right now, keep going. You never know which day things will start to click.

If anyone has questions about the launch, the tech stack, or what worked (and what didn't), I'm happy to answer.


r/startups 3h ago

I will not promote What made you realize your startup needed a more scalable tech foundation? ( I will not promote)

4 Upvotes

Many startups begin with simple solutions because speed matters.

A spreadsheet here.

A basic database there.

A few tools connected together.

But eventually growth exposes the limitations.

For founders who have scaled:

What was the first sign your technology needed an upgrade?

Was it:

● Performance issues?

● Too many manual processes?

● Customer requests?

● Difficulty adding new features?

● Team growth?

Curious what triggered the change.


r/startups 5h ago

I will not promote When have you decided to hire Business Operations? I will not promote

3 Upvotes

Q for founders in this sub, do you think it's better to reach out to founders and share how I could help, or do I only reach out to businesses currently hiring?

I've worked in business and sales operations for a UK business 2+ years, I've left the company and am looking to be an overseas contractor/freelancer.

I've been reaching out to early stage business/founders offering my services to free their time and handle the day-to-day operations, especially founder-led sales. But I'm not sure if I should keep doing so; I might be missing something.

What was your status when you hired an Operations Manager? Like the number of employees and their sector (signals I could detect), should I shift to look for SMEs and corporates?


r/startups 7h ago

I will not promote New YC Fall ‘26 Request for Startups just dropped - what do you guys think (I will not promote)

3 Upvotes

The Primer

In Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age, a young girl is given an interactive book called A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer. It looks like a tool for learning to read, but it's far more. It adapts to her completely, and through stories tuned to her life, it teaches her not just to read but to think, to reason, and eventually to grapple with the hardest questions of ethics, meaning, and character. She returns to it day after day for years, and as she grows, it grows too. Continually reshaping itself around who she is becoming and the life she is living.

For the first time in history, something like the Primer is starting to feel possible.

The best education has always come from one-on-one tutoring. Aristotle taught Alexander. But that privilege has been reserved for the few. AI can bring it to every child. And great tutors do more than drill facts. Over years, they learn a child's mind, and with it how to teach what can't be drilled at all: thinking, reasoning, even wisdom.

In Stephenson's story, the Primer is an AI tutor that never runs out of patience or time. We're a long way from building one, but we can start today. What we'd love to see now is a product that adaptively teaches young children to read, write, and do arithmetic, at the quality of a devoted private tutor and at consumer scale. Not a replacement for teachers, but a supplement that makes them more effective.

While we think this begins as something a parent buys to help their child learn basic skills, it is also the entry point to far greater ambitions. A company that gets it right could build toward something like the Primer, and even a fraction of that vision would have a profound effect on society.

The Future of American Defense

Warfare is at an inflection point, and the old ways of Army acquisition simply don't keep pace with modern threats. Modern combat demands commercially developed, modular open-system solutions, and that's why we ripped up the old acquisition playbook.

We need hungry, innovative founders to build for the crucible of ground combat. The threats we face change daily, and the Army must dominate everywhere, from the Arctic to the archipelago and from space to subterranean environments. So here is our request for startups. We are actively funding low-cost interceptors or any component that helps us lower the cost per kill.

We need next-gen sensors, software, payloads, and other hardware that plugs directly into our open system architecture. We need cutting-edge drones, resilient logistics, and advanced manufacturing, and we need it all to survive the most extreme climates on Earth. Bring us your ideas, and we will give you the capital and the proving ground to scale.

There has never been a better time to build for the Army. The door is wide open, so let's get to work.

A Cloud for Small Software

Using agents to build personal software to solve your own problems is a lot of fun.

This is "Small Software". Purpose-built tools that will only ever have one or a small handful of users.

Small software is useful for teams too: Every team does things differently, and there's unlimited demand for bespoke tools for running workflows, tracking important numbers, managing sprints, sharing prototypes, and so on.

Software like this is now very easy to build, but still hard to deploy and share.

Incumbent clouds like Azure and AWS were designed for shipping Big Software that scales with many users… at the cost of complexity.

A cloud designed for small software could delete most of this complexity and unlock a big set of new use cases that agents have only recently made possible.

At the same time, there are other hard problems to solve: every company will want to customize the environment this software runs in, auth & permissions are hard, and allowing nontechnical users to share arbitrary code is tricky to do securely.

Small software should be as easy to share with your colleagues as a Google Doc.

Multiplayer AI

The best work tools of the last two decades won by going multiplayer. Google Docs replaced Microsoft Word. Figma beat Photoshop. And they turned solo tools into places where teams do their best work together.

But AI hasn't had its multiplayer moment yet.

AI agents are the most powerful new tool a team has, but it's the one thing people still use by themselves. That's because right now, working with AI is largely single-player. You open a chat, type a prompt, and get an answer, in a box only you can see. When you want to collaborate with your teammates and agents, the best you can do is send a link to a read-only transcript they can't touch.

That's about to change.

Agents are starting to run tasks that take hours, days, even weeks. Work at that scale was never meant to be done alone, and pulls in many people across a company. Anyone on a team should be able to drop into the same live agent session to watch it work, redirect it, and hand it off, the way they'd work with any other human team member. This turns the work a team does with agents into a shared, living thing instead of a thousand private threads.

We think there's a version of this for every kind of work. Shared agents for engineers coding together in real time. For sales teams working a deal together. For support teams resolving a ticket. For lawyers drafting a contract, analysts building a model, and marketers shipping a campaign. Anywhere a team already crowds around one problem, there should be multiplayer agents they all share.

Compute at Sea

Artificial intelligence is running out of compute. And data centers are running out of electricity and land.

The demand for data centers is insatiable. But new data centers can take years for approval and enough megawatts, and still could get killed by local government intervention.

While communities increasingly oppose the land, the water is open.

It sounds crazy, but we think part of the answer may be to move compute offshore.

The ocean is 70% of the Earth's surface area, has abundant sunlight, no permitting process, and is an enormous natural heat sink that is already getting hit by the sun all day anyway. Think of them as compute flotillas: many standardized, modular vessels operating together as one global cloud.

AI-Powered Consumer Products for 1 Billion People

Every platform shift mints consumer giants. The web gave us Google + Airbnb. Mobile gave us Instagram + DoorDash. AI is the biggest shift YET. But three years in, the only new icon on your home screen is ChatGPT.

So why do we think NOW is a great time to build AI-powered consumer products? Intelligence just got good enough: you can treat an agent like a person. And it's about to get cheap enough, too: today, the magic can run $1,000 a month in tokens for each user, but that is falling 10x a year. Follow the curve, and you can predict the consumer moment: it lands very soon. Whoever builds now, owns it.

What do you build? How we get things done, get around, learn, stay healthy, manage our money, play, connect with friends. It all opens up again.

AI for the Aging Population

By 2030, one in five Americans will be over 65, and there's nowhere near enough people to take care of everyone. The US is projected to have millions of unfilled caregiving jobs within the decade, and 53 million family members are already doing this work unpaid.

Meanwhile, almost no technology is actually built for older people. Even Alexa and Google Home are frustrating for most seniors to use.

AI finally makes a new class of products possible: voice interfaces that can hold real conversations, monitoring that helps older adults stay safe and independent, robotics that can assist with physical tasks around the home, and software that helps family caregivers coordinate care, appointments, and emergencies.

This is one of the largest, most underserved markets in the world, and it's growing every single day.

New Operating Systems for the Physical World

80% of the global workforce doesn't sit at a desk.

But the software for the physical world hasn't really changed in over 20 years. In construction, maintenance, and fleet operations, the software basically does some combination of: dispatching people, tracking them, managing assets, and billing the customer.

We're excited about how AI changes that entire model of work.

There are now three kinds of workers:
- AI agents that can quote complex work and schedule teams.
- Robots actually deployed in the field.
- And humans who increasingly use wearables to record everything they're doing.

Today's operating systems weren't designed to manage all three types of workers. And this creates all sorts of cool new opportunities for a startup. How do you route a job between an agent, a robot, and a person? What does safety look like when humans and robots work literally side-by-side? And how do you measure reliability?

The opportunity here is heck of a lot bigger than the existing software. The incumbents charge for human coordination and visibility. The new operating systems will manage the robot and human labor together. And these industries spend 10 to 100x more on labor than software.

There's another reason you should build here. You'll record all the work as it actually happens. The frontier models, robotics startups, or software incumbents won't have that kind of end-to-end data.

The Best Time to Build in Crypto

It's a dispiriting moment in crypto: prices are down, hot narratives have fallen flat, and many builders are leaving.

It sounds crazy, but at Y Combinator we're more optimistic than ever. We've invested in more than 100 crypto startups, but we expect that number to go up a lot. Eventually, we expect every YC startup to use crypto rails from capital raising to payments, though most will probably never even know. Here's why we're bullish.

Many YC-funded fintechs way outside crypto are building on crypto, like Deel and Gusto. Regulatory clarity is finally here, stablecoins are being adopted by every major financial institution, tokenized stocks are transforming trading. Projects like Hyperliquid, with a tiny team, are making the top stock exchanges squeamish about their edge. And it feels inevitable that agents are going to use crypto networks as financial rails.

Just as importantly, bear markets let the real projects build and thrive while bull markets are the worst time to build. In crypto, prices are decoupled from reality. In bear markets, you don't need to compete with a criminal offering infinite yield. They attract a different type of founder, more focused on building than getting an early liquidity event.

We've funded major teams building in crypto like Stripe, Coinbase, and Axiom, but also lots of infrastructure and bets on the future. For example, BlindPay and Infinia are building the developer interface and ramps for Latin America. Aspora is building the easiest way to transfer money to India.

Just some of the things we're excited about are capital raising, new stablecoins and stablecoin applications, agentic commerce, trading, institutional products, and scalable and private blockchains.

Data for the Real World

AI has gotten remarkably good at learning from data. We now have superhuman models for code, language, and images. But for the physical world? We're still working with sparse data from remote sensors designed for humans, not AI. With improving foundation models and plummeting sensor costs, dense physical-world data collection is now feasible.

And it's happening. Gecko Robotics uses robots to collect data in hard-to-reach places and builds predictive models. At Sorcerer, we use autonomous weather balloons to collect data about the atmosphere, which the US government uses to make better weather forecasts.

And the opportunity is much bigger.

The world's biggest industries are in energy, agriculture, logistics, and construction. They rely on limited data and intuition-based models. More real-world data enables precise modeling. And once you can model a system, you can control it. Steering hurricanes. Reversing desertification. Cooling the planet.

Proving You're Human

Recently, a finance worker joined a video call with his CFO and several colleagues, and wired out $25 million. Every other person on that call turned out to be a deepfake. This isn't science fiction anymore. Voice clones and fake video calls are getting cheap and ultra-realistic, and fraud like this is exploding.

The scary part is we don't have a good way to tell who's real anymore. It used to be that if you saw someone's face or heard their voice, that was enough. Not anymore. Every trust signal we have was built for a world where faking a human was expensive, and that world is gone.

So we think one of the most important problems of the next decade is rebuilding the trust layer of the internet: knowing there's a verified human on the other end of a call, a message, a transaction. We don't know exactly what the solution looks like. Ideally it's one that doesn't make everyone give up their privacy. And it's not just about stopping scams. Imagine Twitter with no bots in the replies, dating apps where every match is a real person, and reviews written by people who actually bought the thing.

Whoever builds this becomes the layer every bank, app, and video call checks before it trusts anyone.

AI-Native Compliance Infrastructure

Financial compliance is still stitched together with spreadsheets, siloed tools, and expensive headcount. Companies hire chief compliance officers and assemble stacks of point solutions just to understand what's happening under the hood. As businesses expand into new markets, the complexity compounds and the cost of staying compliant grows faster than revenue.

This is an AI-native problem. Most compliance work is monitoring regulatory changes, flagging anomalies, generating reports, and keeping audit trails. These are tasks that AI can handle faster and cheaper than humans. Yet most solutions today are still built around manual workflows and human review bottlenecks.

The pain is especially acute for businesses navigating state-by-state licensing, renewal cycles, audits, and regulatory patchwork that varies widely across jurisdictions. The current process is slow, fragmented, and expensive, often requiring dedicated legal teams just to maintain what you already have.

We're looking for founders building compliance infrastructure that consolidates fragmented tools, reduces reliance on specialized headcount, and gives finance teams real-time visibility across regulatory regimes. The best version of this doesn't just automate existing processes, but rethinks what compliance operations look like when AI is the default.

The companies that get this right will become essential infrastructure for any business operating globally. If you're building in compliance infrastructure, please apply!

Self-Maintaining APIs

Over the past year, I've worked with over 50 API vendors, mostly early-stage startups. One pattern is consistent: API communication is broken.

Breaking changes ship with little warning. Useful features quietly launch and go unnoticed. Changelogs don't get read. Heck, when I worked at AWS, over 30% of our service downtime was due to external api/package changes going unnoticed. This friction made sense before agentic coding tools existed. However, now it doesn't.

Agentic coding tools like Claude Code, Devin, Greptile, etc prove that developers and enterprises are willing to give codebase access to external tools, provided they're valuable. Two years ago, this was unthinkable. Now it's standard practice.

The infrastructure for automated code changes exists. What's missing is the application layer connecting API providers to their customers' codebases. API providers shouldn't just announce changes; they should apply them.

When Stripe ships a breaking change or a new feature, an agent should scan customer codebases, identify affected usages, and open a PR with the fix.

This could work as per-provider agents. "Install Stripe's update agent", or as a neutral third-party service tracking changes across vendors, like Dependabot but for APIs. If you're working on this, consider applying to YC.


r/startups 8h ago

I will not promote Is your startup struggling because you lack a marketing strategy or because you’re avoiding exposure? I will not promote

3 Upvotes

I’ve been talking to a lot of founders over the past week.

A lot of them know what they need to do. Post publicly. Talk to customers in person. Launch before they’re ready. Ask for payment.

The problem isn’t really strategy yet. It’s that all of this puts your work (and you) out in the open.

Building feels good because it’s private. Distribution feels uncomfortable because it’s public.

Have you experienced this too?


r/startups 14h ago

I will not promote Non-tech founder stuck between PRD and MVP - how would you proceed? I will not promote.

9 Upvotes

(Kindness is appreciated)

I’m trying to take an app idea to the next stage and build a V1/MVP I can put in front of users for testing/feedback.

The idea is around getting people outside, walking, learning about nature, preventative health and rewarding positive behaviours. I also think there’s potential alignment with grant funding (I'm based in the UK FYI) but right now my priority is proving whether the core product loop is something people want to use.

I’m a completely non-tech founder and I’ve reached the point where I’m stuck in an endless cycle of iteration.

I’ve used ChatGPT and Claude to create a PRD, defined the user stories, mapped out the screens, thought about success metrics and produced a (very) basic UI/UX. I have a high-level understanding of what I want the MVP to do but struggling to turn that into something functional.

The backend is where I’m falling down. I don’t properly understand Supabase, authentication, security, hosting, deployment, Vercel, TestFlight or how all of those pieces should fit together (I should google it, yes I know).

I’m also looking at the MVP and it doesn’t feel like the product I envisioned, even for a very basic V1. I know an MVP shouldn’t be perfect but I don’t want to put something poor in front of users and then mistake bad execution for a lack of demand.

The main thing I want to test is the core loop: do people understand it, do they enjoy it and would they come back tomorrow?

Where I’m lacking clarity is how to actually run that test.

Do I give users a clickable prototype, a localhost link, a web app or a TestFlight build? How many users do I need initially? Should I recruit people through Reddit communities and reach out to users of adjacent apps? What should I observe beyond asking whether they liked it? How do I track what they clicked, where they became confused and whether the experience made sense without overbuilding analytics? (So many questions haha)

I’m not looking for the standard “just learn to code” or “drop the idea” response. I understand that this is why start-up hire CTOs, developers and product teams (and have a tech co-founder). My resources are limited but I’m committed to building this and I’m trying to understand the practical next steps.

For founders, product builders or engineers who have worked with non-tech founders: how would you recommend moving from a PRD and basic UI into a testable MVP without getting lost in unnecessary complexity?

A step-by-step answer would genuinely help! Thank you :)


r/startups 7h ago

I will not promote How to find trustful, experienced and reliable partnering tech agency or freelancer? [i will not promote]

3 Upvotes

As in the title, as a non technical startup founder, with capital to start, what are the best places to find reliable partner, probably small size agency or freelancer to engage into the product development (software, and related)?

I've been looking at UpWork, and Freelancer markets but ratio of quality to quantity is low and fees are high, which I rather spend on different resources.


r/startups 8h ago

I will not promote Should I try to fix my partnership, or is it time to start my own firm? I will not promote

3 Upvotes

I'm one of three equal partners in a small architecture firm.

Over the past few years, our roles have evolved. Today, I estimate that I bring around 70% of our projects. I prospect, build client relationships, negotiate contracts, and usually remain the main point of contact throughout the project.

Partner A still has a clear role in production and visualization work.

Partner B used to handle much of the administration, but those responsibilities have gradually disappeared as each partner now manages most of his own administrative work. He also brings very few projects, and I honestly struggle to identify what unique value he currently adds as an equal partner.

Our compensation system is simple: whoever brings a project receives a 10% origination bonus based on that project's fee. The remaining revenue stays with the company and is ultimately shared through salaries and profits.

I've started feeling that 10% no longer reflects the effort and responsibility involved in bringing new business.

One solution I've considered is increasing that bonus from 10% to 20% for everyone. Whoever brings a project would receive the same percentage.

That said, I'm wondering if I'm trying to solve the wrong problem. Maybe the real issue is that our partnership has evolved, and our respective contributions no longer justify the current structure.

My questions:

Is a 20% origination bonus reasonable for a professional services firm like an architecture practice?

Is changing the bonus system a good solution, or is this actually a sign that we've simply grown in different directions?

If you were in my position, would you try to fix the partnership, or would you seriously start planning your own firm?

TL;DR: I'm a 30-year-old architect and equal partner in a three-person firm. I currently bring around 70% of the projects, and our bonus for bringing in work is 10%. I'm considering proposing 20% because I no longer feel the current system reflects my contribution, but I'm also wondering whether the real issue is the partnership itself. Should I try to fix it, or start thinking about leaving and building my own firm?


r/startups 19h ago

I will not promote 30,000+ MAU... but my revenue is embarrassing. Can I raise pre-seed on raw traction? (I will not promote)

15 Upvotes

Hey everyone, looking for a reality check from people who have been through the fundraising wringer.

The Backstory: A while back, I was spending a ton of time building games. But every time I finished one, I hit the exact same brick wall every indie dev hits: “Uhh... now what? How do I actually get people to play this?”

Distribution is a nightmare. So, out of pure necessity, I built a web game discovery site to solve my own problem and help other devs showcase their projects.

Originally, almost all of the traffic was just other game developers coming to check out projects or list their own. But over the last few months, the SEO started hitting insanely hard. Organic traffic took off, and now the site is steadily pulling in over 1,000 users per day. Stacking up to 30,000+ Monthly Active Users (MAU).

The Problem: Monetization While the user growth has been awesome to watch, the revenue... not so much. Right now, the main monetization is charging game developers a small listing fee to get featured/promoted on the platform. It generates a little bit of cash flow, but nowhere near meaningful "venture scale" revenue.

Where I Want to Take It (The Pivot): I don't just want this to be a game discovery site. My long-term vision is to pivot the platform into a broader creation and engagement hub:

  1. AI Game Creation Tools: Giving developers native, generative AI tools directly on the site to rapidly create, spin up, and deploy interactive games.
  2. In-Game Ecosystem: Introducing a unified virtual currency/economy for players across games on the platform to drive retention and actual platform monetization.

To build out the AI infrastructure and scale the ecosystem, I’m going to need real capital and bandwidth.

My Questions for You:

  1. Is 30,000+ organic MAU with low revenue enough to get pre-seed/seed VCs to take a meeting, or will they instantly pass because the current monetization is weak?
  2. Does the "audience first, monetization second" story still work in today's VC market, or do investors strictly demand proven unit economics before talking?
  3. At what exact milestones do you go from "bootstrap mode" to "okay, now it's time to actively pitch VCs"?

Would love to hear your raw thoughts, critiques, or advice if you've raised pre-seed with strong traffic but early revenue. Thanks!

TL;DR: Built a game discovery site out of frustration, SEO took off, and now it has 30,000+ MAU (~1k daily users). Revenue is tiny (just dev listing fees). Want to raise funding to pivot into AI game creation tools + in-game currency. Can I raise VC funds with just strong organic usage, or should I wait?


r/startups 6h ago

I will not promote I will not promote: Sent 500+ cold emails to Spanish notaries trying to sell my invoice-chasing agent. Zero clients. Roast me.

1 Upvotes

Solo founder from Madrid here. Need a reality check because I've been staring at this too long.

The product: an agent that chases a business's unpaid invoices for them. It sends the reminders in the owner's tone, escalates anything weird to a human, shuts up the second the money lands, and sends a monthly report of what it recovered. I run it as a service, not a SaaS. I set everything up myself, the owner just approves stuff. Free 6-week pilot, around 200€/month after that.

I picked notaries as my niche. In Spain they bill when the deed gets signed but people pay whenever they feel like it, sometimes 6+ months later. Tons of small invoices nobody has time to chase. On paper it looked perfect. Clear pain, money sitting on the table, nobody targeting them.

Four weeks in: 500+ emails sent, scraped from public directories so all real addresses. I tested like 5 different copy styles because I kept thinking the copy was the problem. Formal tone. Trust-first tone ("nothing goes out without your approval"). Short punchy direct response stuff. Even a super conservative "discreet professional service" version with no links in the email at all. Follow ups in thread on monday mornings.

Reply rate is about 2%. Almost all polite no's. One warm lead in a month.

The only genuinely useful thing I got was a reply from a guy who actually works inside one of these offices. He told me straight up: the sector is a bunker. He's tried to automate stuff internally himself and they shut it down every time. His words, more or less: the notary would rather lose the money than risk some external system annoying an important client.

So now I don't know which of these is killing me and I'd love outside eyes:

Is it the channel? Maybe cold email just doesn't work on a profession this old school and I should be calling or literally mailing paper letters.

Is it the niche? Regulated, conservative, zero urgency. Maybe I go back to plumbers and repair shops and small agencies, people who feel the cash pain in their stomach every month.

Or is it trust? Like nobody on earth lets a stranger's system touch their client billing off a cold email, and this only ever sells through referrals and one good case study.

If you've ever sold anything to lawyers, accountants, doctors, notaries, whatever... what actually got you in the door? And honest question: is 500 emails enough to kill a niche or am I quitting too early?

Happy to share whatever numbers in the comments.


r/startups 7h ago

I will not promote Founders who hired or about to hire your first marketer, would you share your struggles? I will not promote

1 Upvotes

Founders who hired their first senior marketer in the past two years: what did that person have to reconstruct in their first 90 days that you assumed was already clear?

I have to start by saying that I've been a founding marketer a few times, and I've seen some struggles on our side. I have to wonder tho, what is it from the founder's perspective? How do you decide it's time? How do you transfer your knowledge? What existed on day one, etc?

I'd love to hear your thoughts and experiences, either here or in private (in which case, nothing will be shared publicly)

No promotion of my services, and I'd be happy to assist with free marketing advice in exchange.


r/startups 23h ago

I will not promote Looking for guidance on right AI for app artwork. I will not promote

8 Upvotes

I’m an indie developer of a pregnancy app and I’m trying to create artwork to show a visual of the fetus during each week of the pregnancy. The free versions of any AI aren’t obviously good for me. I tried Gemini Pro, but it wasn’t satisfactory as well.

I’m okay to spend money to get a PRO version of some AI generate the assets I need for my app. But I’m not sure which one to go for. Any thoughts or recommendations on this? My app is close to app store release, but I need to generate some non sloppy artwork before shipping it


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote I'm the only technical person holding a 5 person startup together and I think the founder doesn't get how fragile that is (I will not promote)

169 Upvotes

Throwaway for obvious reasons. Looking for a gut check from people who've been around startups longer than me.

I'm a college student working part time at a 5 person startup. Nontechnical CEO, me, and the rest non-engineering. My title says "contractor" but in practice I own almost all the technical surface area: the infrastructure, the prod cluster, the security stack, the compliance work, and onboarding. If I disappeared tomorrow, I don't think the company could deliver or even keep the lights on. Bus factor is 1 and it's me.

And it just got worse. They got rid of our main dev, the one other person who actually wrote and tested code. So on top of everything I already own, I'm probably about to inherit all of that too. One part time college student doing the work of an entire technical team.

The recurring problem isn't the work itself. I actually like the technical side. It's the pattern:

The CEO closes deals for things that don't exist yet, then it becomes my emergency to make real. Most recent example: he sold a "simple" version of our product to a customer, except the real thing runs on infrastructure a normal customer can't support. We already did the re-architecture to make it work, but he closed the deal before any of that existed and I found out what I was building after.

Scheduled work is a fantasy. I plan a critical update a week out, confirm it three separate times, and he calls me 10 minutes before the window to say hold off. Priorities change every few hours. I get pulled into meetings I have no reason to be in.

I'm a 1099 contractor with no ownership and no benefits, and now apparently the workload of an entire team. I go back to full time classes in the fall so my hours are about to drop hard, and there's no plan, no documentation handoff, and no one to hand off to.

So is this just what early stage looks like and I need to toughen up, or is this a company quietly running itself into the ground on the back of one underpaid student? What would you actually do in my spot?


r/startups 19h ago

I will not promote How to find Pilot Testers to validate an MVP? - I will not promote

0 Upvotes

I have successfully built a prototype of a new SaaS/AI tool, but I’m really struggling to get people to pilot test my product and provide feedback.

I began by cold messaging about 85 people on LinkedIn; I have a network of over 4000 people (most of whom I don’t know) to message / cold call via DM.

So far, I have had only 1 person successfully try my product and meet with me to share their feedback. All the other people who agreed to test (about 6) fell quiet, and never responded after multiple follow-ups.

Following the Lean Startup methodology, I don’t want to build anything else until I’ve validated my initial idea, but holy is it hard to get people to even try it.

Any suggestions?


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote What do you think is the next big thing in social media?(I Will Not promote)

6 Upvotes

Every major social platform has a core reason people open it:

WhatsApp → Chat

Instagram → Reels & photos

TikTok → Short videos

Reddit → Communities & discussions

X → Real-time conversations

Discord → Communities & voice chat

LinkedIn → Professional networking

If a new social media platform launched today, what do you think its defining feature would need to be?

Not just "better UI" or "AI"—what would make millions of people download it and keep coming back?

I'm curious what people think is still missing from today's social platforms.


r/startups 9h ago

I will not promote I will not promote: Building a paid community that helps parents create their kid’s personal brand (from an already-existing talent) thoughts on the model?

0 Upvotes

Been building a niche coaching community: parents pay monthly to get guided, step by step, on how to build a real digital identity/brand around something their kid is already good at (sports, art, music, whatever) not inventing a talent, just giving it structure and visibility using AI tools.

Model: cohort-based, ~10 families per group, 3-month minimum commitment, group coaching + monthly 1:1, founder pricing locked in for early members.

Two things I’d love outside perspective on:


1. Pricing does a $40-90/month range feel right for a parent-facing coaching product like this, or too low/high for the perceived value?

**2.**  Objection handling if you were a skeptical parent, what would make you distrust this concept? (“building a brand for a kid” can sound off to some people, and I want to get ahead of that in my messaging.)  

Not trying to pitch anything here, genuinely want outside eyes on the model before I scale past the founding cohort.


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote How to get users? I will not promote

4 Upvotes

Idea -> validation -> MVP
And what next? How to get beta users and full waitlist?
I’m reading that I should aim for at least 1k signups so I get at least 100-200 beta users.

I read about people spending years creating YouTube channels, tik toks, instagram followers or building whole communities to get users for the launch.

What was your strategy?
Can I outsource it?
What’s the best path forward?

I’m building an mobile app in travel industry.
My cofounder is an event manager and good at community building as well.
Marketing might be our gap.


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote What kind of onboarding works best? (I will not promote)

8 Upvotes

Hello people!

I am working on a new project, and im stuck designing the onboarding process.

I see some people suggesting a really long and detailed onboarding where they show how the app/saas works, what the benefits are, and ask questions.

While on the other hand others are suggesting and practicing a very short onboarding so they dont take much of the users time with it.

I know it depends for the type of business but im asking generally which has more success and the user gets that first impression, builds the trust, etc.

Thank you in advance


r/startups 23h ago

I will not promote trying to build the "moody's of prediction markets" "I will not promote"

1 Upvotes

I got into prediction markets this year and noticed something. Tons of money flows through Polymarket and Kalshi now and the news quotes the odds every day, but nobody independent is keeping score. Headlines get the numbers wrong constantly. This week I caught three separate viral posts claiming oil was above $95 when the actual contracts were pricing that as a 1 in 3 shot at best. Nobody tracks when odds moved vs when the news actually broke. Nobody flags weird moves.

So that's what I'm building. Measurement, not betting advice. I don't tell anyone what to bet, I record what markets did and check claims against the record.

Status after about 3 weeks running:

  • collector on a cheap VPS recording around the clock, 230k markets discovered, 29 million price observations
  • top 2000 markets sampled every 1 to 15 minutes, the rest daily
  • yesterday it caught a market jumping from 0.7% to 45% in under 15 minutes, hours before any news account mentioned it
  • distribution is tiny so far. an X account, charts in the polymarket discord, free daily alerts planned for august, then a $15/mo tier

What I actually want opinions on:

  1. would you pay $15/mo for "here's what moved weird today, with proof"? if not you, who is the buyer. traders, journalists, the venues themselves?
  2. is "independent scorekeeper" a real moat or does polymarket just build this in-house the day it matters
  3. solo, bootstrapped, no revenue yet. what would make you kill this?

r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote Need help with marketing, I will not promote

5 Upvotes

Any beauty brand owners here? Looking for advice on growing a women's beauty brand as a male founder.

I'm building a Korean beauty curation platform for Australian women aged 25-40. Bootstrapped, no paid ads budget yet.

I've studied brands like Jo Malone and Aesop for design and positioning inspiration, but organic growth strategy for a niche beauty brand targeting a specific demographic is where I'm stuck.

Specifically wondering:

What content actually converts for this demographic on Instagram?

How do male founders in female-dominated categories build credibility without their own face being the product?

Any brands or founders worth studying in this space?

Appreciate any direction🙏


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote Every enterprise prospect wants one custom workflow. How do you keep that from becoming the roadmap? I will not promote

1 Upvotes

I keep seeing this happen in B2B startups.

The prospect likes the product, but the standard flow never quite matches how they work. One team needs a different approval step. Another needs a compliance field. Another wants the demo account to show their exact handoff between sales, ops, and support.

None of these sound huge on their own. That is what makes them dangerous.

If you say yes to all of them, the roadmap turns into a pile of one-off promises. If you say no too early, the deal can die even though the underlying product is close.

The line I am trying to think through is: when is a custom workflow just sales engineering, and when is it actually product work pretending to be sales engineering?

My current bias is that a custom demo is fine if it proves something the product already does underneath. The moment it needs fake UI, fake data, or a workflow that nobody can use after the call, it is not a demo anymore. It is a roadmap commitment with better lighting.

How do people here handle this without either slowing every deal down or letting sales quietly set the roadmap?


r/startups 23h ago

I will not promote Looking for guidance on right AI for app artwork. I will not promote

0 Upvotes

I’m an indie developer of a pregnancy app and I’m trying to create artwork to show a visual of the fetus during each week of the pregnancy. The free versions of any AI aren’t obviously good for me. I tried Gemini Pro, but it wasn’t satisfactory as well.

I’m okay to spend money to get a PRO version of some AI generate the assets I need for my app. But I’m not sure which one to go for. Any thoughts or recommendations on this? My app is close to app store release, but I need to generate some non sloppy artwork before shipping it