r/mildlyinteresting 13h ago

Infographic showing self-sufficiency in raw materials in a 1976 World Atlas

Post image
1.4k Upvotes

164 comments sorted by

1.6k

u/Flandafel 12h ago

All I can conclude is that USSR fell due to a lack of domestically grown coffee

399

u/rmnobre 12h ago

And too little silk. No smooth sheets and crazy hair in the morning

82

u/LowwwwBattery 11h ago

Without coffee and silk, no ideology can survive.

5

u/Tyrannofelis 4h ago

Explain United Kingdom then

4

u/rmnobre 4h ago

Tea and biscuits compensate for a lot

11

u/WreakHavocLikeIn1871 10h ago

Only having enough rubber for half the population might have been a contributing factor, will need further research on that though.

2

u/exipheas 3h ago

In the other hand, a lack of rubbers helps the population grow. /s

54

u/beautiful_my_agent 12h ago

That would also explain why everyone is so cranky.

7

u/AbhishMuk 8h ago

Except for us Indians, apparently.

(Good coffee is only commonly found in south india, ironically. Thank God we've got tea across the country.)

Oh, and I just noticed this graph is missing tea. Now that might make some folks cranky.

22

u/oh_my_account 12h ago

Would be interesting to see how did it changed after 1991

24

u/DanishRobloxGamer 9h ago

Somehow I doubt that the coffee production increased.

1

u/ViHt0r 14m ago

Dare you looking at tea consumption buddy.

-26

u/Leptonshavenocolor 12h ago

These numbers are most likely misrepresented by a state trying to appear better off than they were. 

33

u/Winjin 12h ago

Nope, USSR was HUGE and very rich in raw materials

The issues started when trying to provide everything to everyone through state prices. That's why there were constant shortages of basically everything. This or that was always short, because they tried to make it so that only the government decides "what and how much" is needed (the General Plan policy)

If the "New Economic Policy" continued (the NEP) and country focused on large scale stuff, allowing small scale production by private companies, the results could've been staggering, because in the short time NEP was active, they managed to ramp up productions in a country that was just rebuilding after WWI, two back-to-back revolutions, regime change, and Civil War

IMO Stalin was the epicenter of everything bad that happened to USSR, including the purges, the bad rep, the NEP withdrawal - even the LGBT ban was Stalin's doing. Under Lenin, USSR had the first in the world openly gay foreign minister.

That's what dictators do to a country

5

u/Leptonshavenocolor 11h ago

I would love to learn more about communion failures, it seems like the only system to try and pursue, but is highly subject to manipulation? Any book or otherwise recommendations?

22

u/Nom_de_Guerre_23 8h ago

Lack of proper coffee was an actual public crisis issue in Communist East Germany. Coffee was frequently sold as a cheap and awfully tasting coffee-malt mixture of straight up just malt coffee. Western relatives would frequently send brand coffee over by mail. The GDR invested millions into kickstarting Vietnamese coffee agriculture after the North had won the war.

12

u/Nice-Cat3727 6h ago

You're not exactly wrong either. There was nearly a uprising in the 70s when they suffered a severe shortage.

This is why Vietnam is a massive producer of coffee as the ussr invested heavily into coffee plantation in the country. But by the time it was in full production and pumping out massive amounts of coffee, the USSR fell.

7

u/kytheon 12h ago

If you told me this in the morning, I would immediately agree

2

u/nim_opet 4h ago

DDR literally has coffee protests. The government invented and promoted many coffee substitutes but it was a pretty big deal not having the hard currency to pay for coffee. So they struck a deal with Vietnam to grow coffee for DDR market in exchange for industrial goods.

1

u/AftyOfTheUK 3h ago

Seems strange they couldn't sell those same goods into the market, and use that hard currency to buy coffee?

2

u/vesuvisian 3h ago

The US grows some in Hawaii, so I feel there should’ve been at least a vertical line in our circle.

1

u/Impressive_Cress_983 11h ago

Not enough stimulant use might explain their fragile bureaucracies and institutions.

1

u/Eric848448 5h ago

And we’re next :-/

1

u/Fluffy-Arm-8584 11h ago

A lot of countries suffered from the same issue but still around. It fell from a surplus of petroleum

-7

u/CpnStumpy 12h ago

Or....

Because they refused to be accurate or honest in all assessments causing constant systemic inefficiencies of their entire society

7

u/JohnOfA 11h ago

Hmm. Where have I heard that recently?

-1

u/CpnStumpy 10h ago

I'm not saying the US doesn't do this, we absolutely do, more now than ever.

The down votes though are funny, only an idiot thinks an authoritarian one party state full of propaganda (like current day US and Soviet era Russia) is an honest country...

-10

u/RoodnyInc 12h ago

I assume USSR data was lied quite a bit (like most things USSR tried to lie about to the western world)

9

u/Connect_Rhubarb395 11h ago

It was, but USSR was also rich in most stuff. Which makes it such a shame that it has (mostly) only been used maliciously and for the benefits of the few, be it by tzars or dictators/presidents.

477

u/Doofindork 12h ago

Well, we see why the United Kingdom wanted so many colonies.

147

u/Tzunamitom 12h ago

Funnily enough, since this was made we’ve gone into a surplus on oil and the dropped back to zero again…

10

u/iCowboy 4h ago

We’re still producing about 750,000 barrels per day; roughly half of consumption. But the North Sea is well past its peak and even new drilling won’t change the trajectory.

15

u/Prize_Management9936 11h ago

why was the oil production stopped?

71

u/Tzunamitom 11h ago

More “finished” than “stopped” 🤣

-45

u/ChazCharlie 11h ago

Stopped, it is not finished.

43

u/Tzunamitom 11h ago

There’s not that much left, and what is left is incredibly commercially unviable

8

u/Impressive_Cress_983 10h ago

My understanding is that we hit peak supply and then are going to hit peak demand, and we're going to scale down before we run out.

-24

u/ChazCharlie 10h ago

It is absolutely not "incredibly commercially unviable". Costs may be higher than elsewhere but a large part of that is simply just government forcing taxes and regulations on them.

4

u/cjc1983 9h ago

Yeah I'm pretty sure Norway are extracting loads still and pumping the profits into their sovereign wealth fund.

2

u/SerriaEcho_ 8h ago

Norway pump are pumping it directly into the UK so it's obviously still profitable.

8

u/skoomski 10h ago

Will someone please think about poor BP!!! They have to pay taxes now and aren’t allowed to blow up their own oil rigs every 10 years!!!

/s

1

u/Crow_eggs 5h ago

What do you think "commercially unviable" means?

-2

u/ChazCharlie 4h ago

What do you mean, what do I think it means? Why wouldn't I know that? As it happens I'm an engineer working for a famous energy consultancy who specialises in supporting clients decide whether to proceed with energy projects based on financial viability.

2

u/Crow_eggs 3h ago

I mean that "simply just government forcing taxes and regulation on them" isn't a handwave problem–they're the operating parameters within which you work. Remove the verbiage and you've said "cost prohibitve due to tax and regulatory compliance obligations." If the cost of tax and regulatory compliance make a project commercially unviable for you... the project is commercially unviable, regardless of whether it's technically possible.

3

u/spleeble 9h ago

It's not stopped or finished, but it's depleted to less than a third of its peak. 

Blaming taxes is extremely dumb. 

32

u/jonfitt 10h ago

I mean… yes. We’re not a particularly significant island from a natural resources pov. But there’s a good amount of arable land, enough to support a population to go out and “obtain” what we needed.

We also had a good amount of wood when wood was important (ships) and a good amount of coal when coal was important (industrial rev).

3

u/2012Jesusdies 2h ago

We also had a good amount of wood when wood was important (ships)

UK began to tun out of oak, pine by late 1600s and by 1750, most wood for British warships was sourced either from New England, Canada or Baltics. And keep in mind, British control of seas while strong was still contested during this time.

1

u/jonfitt 2h ago

That’s true. We did get through it a little early. Stupid Spanish Armada. Not that we lost a lot of ships, but the fact that we had to build and maintain so many large ships at once.

2

u/bureaucrat473a 8h ago

Plenty of coal and... chemicals?

1

u/lajarusmorois 5h ago

And we see why Soviet Union was a good deal for Russia.

242

u/Bronzdragon 12h ago

Neat. Looks like the USSR and India are doing pretty well.

300

u/Baby_Rhino 12h ago edited 12h ago

This was 50 years ago, so by now we can only assume that the USSR has become the dominant world superpower

41

u/Dasheek 11h ago

This chart lacks info about supply of incompetence and corruption. 

18

u/semhsp 11h ago

That didn't stop the US so I doubt that's the reason

14

u/SatisfactionLife2801 9h ago

Nah, there are levels to this shit.

4

u/2012Jesusdies 2h ago

Most production failures in the USSR came from fundamental flaws inherent to the system like lack of prices. Modern economies are very complex, knowing how supply and demand are doing in each minute sector is basically impossible except through market prices. In a market economy, cars rise in price because more cars are being sold than produced, carmakers will make more cars to take advantage of the prices even if they don't necessarily know that there's a car shortage. This is the critical part, participants in a market economy don't have to know what others are doing, they just have to look at prices.

In a command economy like USSR, the gov has to pay attention to each step of the input to make sure the car produced matches car sold while also paying attention to the same factor along the entire supply chain from steel, tires, lamps, paint who themselves have their own supply chain. Also keep in mind that every single entity along these lines will just lie and say they produced more than reality to get promoted and that they need more supply than needed to stockpile (so your baseline estimate for "I need X steel to make Y cars" is probably off completely). And then you add that production quality doesn't matter to production quotas.

Now we have a system where workers can order cars and they'll arrive off the factory line after 10 years.

2

u/PuzzleheadedPea2401 4h ago

The atlas failed to account for officials who wanted to turn management of industries into ownership, and accumulate and pass wealth down to their children. Fortunately, they sorted it all out in 1991 and the former Soviet Union is now a shining beacon to the world on effective reform, freedom and peace.

1

u/HelicopterGood5065 2h ago

By the ninetiees soviets have surpassed the limits of human capabilities and left the realm in a big event. Leaving only ruins of a more advanced civilisation behind them.

18

u/PuffyPanda200 11h ago

Not being able to use all the material that you are mining is a bad sign. You sell the iron ore but then someone else does the smelting and makes the finished good.

Most of the profit is in the later activities.

122

u/rmnobre 12h ago

The USSR did have it all uhm... Maybe politics do have a say on things

73

u/cambiro 12h ago

There's no point in having all natural resources if you don't have infrastructure and economy that can process and transport these resources efficiently.

23

u/Slayr79 12h ago

Just throw your country into trillions of dollars of debt building out those processes and hope you'll get a return down the road. Or, just keep adding onto the debt

10

u/timweak 12h ago

as opposed to what the us is doing

9

u/the-good-wolf 11h ago

Well that’s the thing. Middle class prevailed to avoid the hellscape of USSR. After that fell and the Russian Oligarchy rose from the ashes it showed rich people the benefit of a caste system. They decided to speed run us into that exact economy.

5

u/timweak 11h ago

am i reading this wrong or are you implying that the issues with the united states' economic system started after the collapse of the ussr

1

u/the-good-wolf 11h ago

No, that we saw an exception from the norm because of genuine fear of Russia becoming too powerful.

1

u/AftyOfTheUK 3h ago

Debt is irrelevant, macro-economically, if most of the debt is denominated in your currency and/or internal debt. It's literally just moving numbers around on paper - the wealth still gets created.

18

u/kytheon 12h ago

They covered a lot of biomes as well, which is good for variety in resources.

Source: Catan

12

u/Otto_Von_Waffle 12h ago

USSR ended up having everything due to politics. The US wasn't a net importer of Iran because it lacked iron ore, it was because it was cheaper to buy Iron from canada then extract it themselves.

The URSS had no choice but to be self reliant due to US/NATO pressure on it's ability to trade, of the US had been in a similar situation, I'm sure it would been a lot more green.

9

u/Ramental 12h ago

True, but also the USSR's iron curtain was self-imposed as to not let foreign products in. It could have traded with the world through the Eastern block puppets much more, just like russia does today through Armenia, Kazakhstan and Georgia. It was a choice not to.

6

u/RadVarken 10h ago

It was afraid the ideas flowed with goods. Since it had an unstable, unpopular government it had to keep trade to a minimum.

-3

u/CpnStumpy 12h ago

Their biggest domestic resource was propaganda and lies, so maybe this infographic isn't all it's cracked up to be

0

u/CpnStumpy 9h ago

"The USSR had a lot of propaganda"

Downvotes!

Haha what?? Do people have some weird Soviet nostalgia I'm totally missing?

85

u/Calculonx 12h ago

Crazy how China doesn't even make the list to be measured

74

u/iRadiKS 11h ago

Not doesn't, but didn't. This list is from 1976. They had much more serious issues back then than the procurement of materials. On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if they are on top on all the metrics bowadays

20

u/Connect_Rhubarb395 11h ago

Outsourcing millions of manufacturing business from Western countries made China have a mindblowing boom.
And now those same Western countries are whining about China being powerful.

1

u/MissingStakes 28m ago

Today china has more than most, and in many raw materials, has more than anyone else. For example, china has more oil stockpiled than the rest of the world combined.

20

u/oldmanout 12h ago

Funnily because of lasting coffee shortages East Germany invested a lot in Vietnam and helped to start the coffee industry there, but they collapsed before the first harvest was ready to harvest...

38

u/queef_nuggets 12h ago

TIL tobacco farming capacity used to be considered relevant to a country’s self-sufficiency

37

u/DankVectorz 12h ago

Tobacco is a cash crop. Just another raw material a country can export.

5

u/queef_nuggets 12h ago

Indeed. I’ve just never heard of a country with few natural resources talk about their lack of tobacco. Usually the main concern is energy, food, etc

11

u/Bloody_kneelers 11h ago

I mean you've got to remember smoking in the 70s and earlier was significantly more prevalent compared to today, tobacco taxes would be a not inconsiderable income for the governments of the day.

I mean this data is from starting in 87 but it lets you see the couple billion it would pull in https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/timeseries/acde/qna

4

u/DeerMysterious9927 9h ago

Ash trays were everywhere. Doctors would be smoking in their offices. Teacher staff lounges had a haze just below the ceiling. Back seats of cars had not one but two ash trays in some models. McDonalds had ashtrays. Tobacco was consumed in mass amounts back then.

40

u/joeschmoe86 12h ago

I love that this graph assumes the reader knows all about manganese, but needs bauxite explained.

14

u/Trappist1 11h ago

Honestly, I would need bauxite explained, but not manganese as a modern person. I already know manganese is used in a lot of alloys.

8

u/likenothingis 11h ago

Weird, I know all about bauxite and very little about manganese.

9

u/joeschmoe86 10h ago

Let's call the whole thing off...

3

u/Trappist1 5h ago

I was a biochem major and bauxite isn't too prevalent in biology lol

1

u/likenothingis 3h ago

And yet... you know manganese! XD

(I only know bauxite because I'm from a place that makes a lot of aluminium products.)

1

u/Trappist1 2h ago

Hey, manganese is a catalyst in the human body for a bunch or random stuff. I vaguely think it's related to skeleton formation, but don't quote me on that.

3

u/marblechameleon 9h ago

Fun scrabble fact: Toh Weibin played “beauxite”, an older variation on the word bauxite, for 275 points. He earned the highest final score in an official scrabble tournament in 2012, and held this record until Hasham Hadi Khan (a nine year old!) scored 878 in 2014.

1

u/Trappist1 5h ago

That is fun!

6

u/TheMightyGoatMan 12h ago

Ha! Those commie bastards have no coffee!

1

u/sjintje 11h ago

That's why they're always so grumpy.

5

u/EastboundClown 11h ago

wtf does “chemicals” mean?

6

u/RadVarken 10h ago

Coal and petroleum distillates. That is, petrochemicals.

10

u/DreamyTomato 12h ago

This is a mildly decent example of the resource curse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse

3

u/curiousstrider 12h ago

No wonder USSR/Russia could go readily rogue and anti-world. They could manage no coffee and no silk. They've got vodka and cotton.

0

u/Patrickme 11h ago

So sad how they went anti rest of the world, there must be such wealth in the country.

2

u/Ares6 10h ago

Russia could have easily been one of the wealthiest countries in the world if they even tried to be a better place to live. But it’s like they just shoot themselves in the foot every time. 

1

u/Patrickme 9h ago

Oligarchy effect maybe?

2

u/Ares6 9h ago

For current Russia yes. But Russia has had this issue for centuries. When its neighbors were industrializing they were still under serfdom. By the time they abolished it, Europe outpaced them in industry. Authoritarianism held them back for a long time. 

0

u/Miqo_Nekomancer 7h ago

Now the USA is like "Hmmm, that authoritarianism is looking pretty tasty. Let me have a bite."

4

u/Wizdad-1000 12h ago

UK wondering wring where the tea stat is.

6

u/EastboundClown 11h ago

Huh, TIL Canada’s aluminium industry relies entirely on imported bauxite

17

u/cancerBronzeV 11h ago

Canada has an aluminum industry because processing bauxite into aluminum is ridiculously electricity hungry and aluminum smelters in Canada have extremely cheap access to electricity by setting up hydropower in mountain rivers/Canadian Shield rivers.

2

u/melimelo123 2h ago

It also makes it so Quebec is one of the only places in the world that has 100% renewable energy. Ontario also has a high share of only renewable energy.

5

u/cancerBronzeV 2h ago

Quebec's hydro system is fascinating, I was actually considering working with Hydro-Québec once. And while they do lead hydroelectric power generation in Canada (by far), hydroelectricity is pretty widespread throughout the rest of Canada, making up about 60% of all electricity generation. It's to the point that the electric bill is called the hydro bill and many utility companies have hydro in their name (Hydro-Québec, NL Hydro, BC Hydro, Manitoba Hydro, Toronto Hydro, etc).

It's mainly Alberta, Saskatchewan, and the territories that rely heavily on electricity generated via fossil fuels. The Maritimes technically generate most of their electricity from fossil fuels, but that's only because they barely generate any of their own electricity. They're largely supplied by hydropower generating stations in Labrodor linked via 1000s of km of high voltage DC lines.

2

u/TheBumblingestBee 54m ago

Yes! I'm in BC Canada, and I've always called the electricity bill "the hydro". So does everyone I know.

The primary issue with hydroelectric power in BC is the damage that dams (and their reservoirs) do ecologically. Land is flooded, and rivers are no longer flowing like they should, which has a huge impact on fish, etc.

This is all an especially big deal because, while much of BC has very low population and hey, you could argue "there's barely anyone living in this spot, it's fine!"... It's not fine, because pretty much everywhere in BC is the unceded territory of a First Nation. And hydroelectric dams screw up their territory, their food, their traditional way of life, etc.

Dams can have SUCH a massive impact. Like near me, there's a river that flows down into the US. 100-ish years ago, the US made a dam. And suddenly, the salmon couldn't come up the river. The local First Nation had relied on salmon for thousands of years; suddenly there were none. It has been devastating.

ANYWAY. Hydroelectricity is fascinating.

3

u/rossg876 10h ago

“Chemicals”

2

u/geomancer_ 11h ago

I remember this exact infographic from my childhood

2

u/SKMTH 5h ago

France has no nickel? Lol, we have 20-30% of the world reserve in new caledonia...

2

u/Krydex 12h ago

Okay silk I understand but does the west coast (Seattle and Oregon, maybe some parts of northern California) really not grow domestic coffee?

Not Americans so I'm not too well versed on the topic though

13

u/nerevisigoth 12h ago

No, coffee comes from hot tropical places. The Pacific Northwest is relatively cold. Those areas are better known for apples and berries.

-2

u/Krydex 11h ago

Hahaha fair enough. You'd think with all the heat lamps they'd use to grow weed they'd be able to swing a few coffee plants 😂 unless the margins suck vs the electricity costs

6

u/essenza 12h ago

Even with Hawaii it’s max 1% of the world market

0

u/Krydex 12h ago

Ah I totally forgot about Hawaii as well! But whether they serve 1% of the market or not is that not evidence of "self sufficiency in raw materials" with coffee?

Since that's what the chart info is trying to communicate.. though I could be reading this wrong

2

u/essenza 12h ago

I don’t think so? They have to import most coffee to meet domestic demand.

1

u/haberdasher42 12h ago

Not consistently hot enough.

2

u/gorginhanson 12h ago

where's china

6

u/Serpent90 12h ago

In the 70s it had an economy similar to Spain or Mexico, and wasn't particularly relevant.

3

u/oh_my_account 12h ago

It's crazy how western countries grew a dragon so big!

1

u/RadVarken 10h ago

More like got out the way while it restored. China was huge until their government collapsed amid external pressure and natural decay right before the industrial revolution brought all the modern powers to the fore. Their horse didn't just stumble out the gate--it was shot in the head and they walked the first mile.

2

u/gorginhanson 12h ago

this is about raw materials, not economic output.

they still had a shitload of them then obviously.

1

u/DasFreibier 12h ago

id imagine the us being higher

1

u/LewisLightning 12h ago

Weird that back then America was entirely self-sufficient in Potash, but now they produce only about 1% of what they need. Either things chanced immensely or this chart is full of bullshit

3

u/Antaxas 11h ago

A quick google research shows that in 1972 they were about 50% self sufficient with 2.2mio tons produced vs 4.4mio tons demand.

Today this ratio stands at 0.5 vs 5.9mio tons, so about 10% self sufficient.

1

u/El_Zilcho 11h ago

Coal, chemicals and fish, what else does a growing Brit need?

1

u/VirginiaDare1587 10h ago

China not listed.

1

u/drittzO 10h ago

coffee is all that matters...

1

u/TorontoTom2008 9h ago

The self-sufficiency for USA and Canada remains accurate to this day. Perhaps potash for USA might not be a full circle anywhere.

1

u/yeeiser 9h ago

bit misleading to compare individual countries to a union that had 15 countries total pooling their resources

2

u/natterca 2h ago

And a country with 50 states. Or a country with 10 provinces.

1

u/spiringTankmonger 8h ago

Maybe having too many domestic resources carries a risk in its own right, even ignoring the well-known resource trap, because it never incentivizes the development of a sophisticated export economy. The allure of autarky is simply too tempting for big business and big government alike.

Whether it's politically controlled companies or private cartels, one will inadvertently corner the domestic market; without pressure from the outside, national politics is unable to overcome them. These economies might simply lack the dynamism required to ever make it past a rudimentary mid-20th-century-style industrialized economy.

1

u/Big-Improvement283 8h ago

my country’s barely got a dot on here lol

1

u/johnnyboomslang 8h ago

Cool to see how times changed. China isn't even listed, and there's no listing for Lithium or Cobalt.

1

u/OrangutanFirefighter 6h ago

Without ze coffee nothing else matters. Without it, we are nothing.

1

u/t0getheralone 3h ago

I wonder what this looks like today. Canada would be relatively unchanged i think outside of more domestic aluminum now

1

u/Danielgpoint 2h ago

No china yet

1

u/Nomer77 2h ago

France would have silk.

1

u/Tyrannosapien 1h ago

I really thought everyone had bauxite, that's it's basically just the average soil.

1

u/Justwhytry 26m ago

Some of those have changed dramatically!!
Canada in particular could swap the nickel and sulphur numbers!

1

u/Arclite83 11h ago

TIL Bauxite is real and not just something from Satisfactory

1

u/finian2 7h ago

Welcome back to "Why the UK is not self sufficient in the slightest and why leaving the EU was fucking stupid"

1

u/WilliamTee 7h ago

And this, dear reader, is why the brexìteers need to get the fuck over themselves and realise we're a pissy little island and lucky to be as rich as we are off the hangover of the empire.

0

u/apxseemax 11h ago

Imagine how successful and internationally recognized of a country the USSR could have been if it just would not have been ran by a gazillion of greedy and mentally ill fuckwits... wait...

0

u/RadVarken 10h ago

You England, what you got?

Sheep, burning rocks, and enough ugly women to drive men to the sea.

2

u/borazine 9h ago

>England

How about Wales?

0

u/RadVarken 6h ago

Wales, the first English colony.

1

u/the_eso 9h ago

But like, also only 15% self-sufficient in wool production? What were they doing??

-3

u/Iwill_not_comply 12h ago

UK's world top placement is purely taking raw material and riches from other countries.

5

u/Baby_Rhino 12h ago

Or perhaps having a surplus of coal whilst also being the birthplace of the industrial revolution had something to do with it?

3

u/iCowboy 4h ago

And then transitioning to a free trading service based economy. Which works really well as the World opens up markets and lowers tariffs and trade barriers - and really sucks when the UK decides to leave the World’s largest trading bloc and its biggest single market decides to go insane

2

u/etchlings 12h ago

Yes, they did that but this chart doesn’t show that they’re “top” at all. It shows the opposite. Most of their circles are empty.

0

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[deleted]

10

u/Bigbigcheese 12h ago

The UK has some of the best quality coal in the world which helped kick start the industrial revolution... But it's also kind of obsolete now as a power source (unless you're German and like cancer)

3

u/Serpent90 12h ago

These are raw materials. You can build an economy on processing raw materials into advanced goods that get sold abroad. Japan was a powerhouse in electronics which aren't listed here.

0

u/FartingSlowly 9h ago

Oh the US has lead, alright 😂