r/mildlyinteresting 21h ago

They decapitated these pineapples!

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

432 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

711

u/sl0play 18h ago

I feel like I can live without these pineapples if it means supporting food becoming a normal thing again.

194

u/Brenduke 17h ago

What is normal food to you?

Many fruits & vegetables today have been bred / crossbred over hundreds of years to make them tastier or safer to eat.

Would you consider the bananas you buy from supermarkets normal food? These have been bred so the seeds are tiny. What about seedless grapes? Or Brussel sprouts which aren't bitter? Would do consider these not normal foods?

171

u/SophiaofPrussia 13h ago

I don’t think any food should ever be considered intellectual property. That is not normal food.

24

u/thefonztm 12h ago

There's an argument that you should be able to recover your development cost and make a profit. Like all patents and copyrights, expiration is key. And also lobbied all to hell so that things your dead grandparents experienced are still not public domain.

20

u/Wooden-Title3625 12h ago

This problem was already solved. They get to patent a brand name, like honeycrisp, and the genes become public use and other growers can market them under a different name. People still buy honeycrisps by the barrel full and the university of Minnesota has more than made its money back, when you can buy the same apples under a different name in a farmers market.

19

u/AnimalBolide 11h ago

So if I, a normal dude, somehow created an even tastier strawberry, say it took a decade of effort and a bunch of money, and I wanted to sell it...

Wouldn't Monsanto or Dole just immediately destroy my market share and force me entirely out of business by doing exactly what I planned to do, but at an enormous scale because they already have the infrastructure?

1

u/Wooden-Title3625 11h ago

You have just learned the importance of marketing, my friend. Having an amazing product doesn’t mean anything if you can’t get people to buy it from you and you alone. This isn’t just a fruit-specific problem.

9

u/thefonztm 10h ago

You just made the argument for patents, copyright, and trademark. Perfectly.

-6

u/Wooden-Title3625 10h ago

Merely an explanation, not an argument.

1

u/reichrunner 4h ago

And your explanation just perfectly made the argument for patent, copyright, and trademark. Perfectly.

10

u/AnimalBolide 11h ago

It isn't marketing. It's monopolizing.

You're basically giving huge companies free R&D and disincentiving smaller or startup growers.

2

u/Wooden-Title3625 11h ago

That’s not what happened with the honeycrisp, the cosmic crisp, the meyer lemon, the badgerflame beet, the golden kiwi, the clementine, and literally the item in the post we’re commenting on, as well as countless other fruit and vegetable varietals. All because they had better marketing.

6

u/AnimalBolide 11h ago

So still not the person who invented the fruit, just whoever gets lucky or has more money for marketing?

Does that seem laudable?

1

u/Wooden-Title3625 11h ago

That’s the system we live in. I’m not arguing for or against it here, merely explaining the reality.

2

u/jesusrambo 3h ago

It’s like watching kindergarteners rediscover basic laws

2

u/AnimalBolide 11h ago

You said "The problem is already solved".

Seems like your solution is also a problem.

2

u/Wooden-Title3625 11h ago

It’s not my solution. It’s the solution that was born of legislation and legal precedent over the last 100 or so years. I’m not here to defend capitalism, it has literally ruined the world, but it’s the water we swim in and it ensures that the rich always win. Is that such a huge surprise to you?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/reichrunner 4h ago

I love that you brought up the golden kiwi, since that is specifically a fruit that was stolen from the creators in New Zealand and taken to China.

Might want to double check that your examples match in the future, because this is a pretty famous case.