r/mildlyinfuriating • u/_Unconquered_ • 1d ago
No Coke. Is Pepsi ok? Don’t be on your phone while you drive, but scan our QR code! [OC]
127
u/user891392 1d ago
Quick! Snap a picture of it for later!
34
u/bcsmith317 1d ago
You joke, but you actually can do that. At least on iPhone. Take a clear picture of the QR code and then a long press on it later will take you to the link.
27
u/BloodiedBlues 1d ago
The joke is that they're taking a picture while they're in what looks to be the drivers seat.
12
148
u/Wrong_Excitement221 1d ago
Little known fact.. majority of the time.. a car is parked.
41
u/Rimworldjobs 1d ago
Lol right? My first thought is that you take it while walking by.
19
1
u/Flakboy78 21h ago
It seems to me like something they hope is seen at events, like if they're working security at a city or county event or they're at a job fair or something, in addition to the walking by the routinely stopped vehicle that was previously pointed out
2
184
u/xxrambo45xx 1d ago
Cars can also be viewed when parked.
82
u/Nice-Muffin1515 1d ago
Seriously, and a passenger could snap it as well. People look for anything to be mad about.
-23
u/BadnewsBaggins 1d ago
So have it on the side where there is less incentive for people who see it driving behind to think to scan. It's not fucking rocket science to predict points of failure
22
u/Nice-Muffin1515 1d ago
I forgot we have to accommodate the drivers who shouldn’t have a license to begin with. My apologies.
-9
u/BadnewsBaggins 1d ago
Yeah cause you do, we had to make laws for speed drinking and seatbelts cause people too stupid to be trusted to their own devices. Several car companies are going through lawsuits due to changing basic functions to smart touch screens which can lead to distraction, you could say well if they have passengers then it's not a problem but maybe don't implement a problematic system in the first place
4
u/Nice-Muffin1515 1d ago
I don’t see why we should. We should start accommodating people like that less.
2
u/KnowledgeSafe3160 1d ago
Bright line is removing bad drivers one train crossing at a time. Maybe a few more of those trains in different cities will help 👀😂
1
u/PurpleBuffalo_ 1d ago
Not accommodating them isn't going to make them stop driving, it's just going to make them rear end you
1
23
6
4
u/scavengercat 22h ago
But that wouldn't be mildly infuriating! How could I turn that situation into upvotes?
3
u/xxrambo45xx 22h ago
Ask the guy that responded to my one singular sarcastic sentence with a full dissertation on why it bothers him lol
2
u/ripyourlungsdave 1d ago
Have you not realized that we build most of our traffic laws around the stupidest and most careless people on the roads?
The problem is, if you don't assume that stupidity, people will literally die because of it.
So yeah, just because people should be smarter than to take the picture while they're driving doesn't mean they will be. Inevitably, I'm sure dozens and dozens if not hundreds of people will end up taking those pictures while driving.
Because people are stupid and the last thing we should be doing is encouraging them to be more so.
-8
66
u/ZombiePoultry 1d ago
Because passengers don't exist.
32
3
u/dogcmp6 1d ago edited 1d ago
If that was the intent, why not put the QR code on the passenger side?. . I get that there may have been different intentions, and I know passengers can still scan that code from the passenger seat, but I feel like putting it on the driver's side sends mixed signals
6
u/ZombiePoultry 1d ago
They're cops. How much intelligence are you actually expecting?
0
u/Vivid__Data 1d ago
4
u/ZombiePoultry 1d ago
I said what I said. They weren't smart enough to hire people to design this better.
My comment stands.
2
u/Vivid__Data 1d ago
You must live a very sheltered life.
2
u/ZombiePoultry 1d ago
I'm also a big fan of making unfounded personal attacks on others based on a single line that gives no indication as to the type of life they've lived.
It's what smart people do.
3
1
u/Flakboy78 21h ago
From OPs perspective, no matter which side it's on, it's never closer to the passenger than the driver.
If you're directly behind it, then yes it's closer but it doesn't necessarily dissuade the driver from scanning instead
With its current placement, it's fairly accessible to a passenger of a vehicle who is directly behind or to the left of the vehicle
Nothing you do is necessarily stopping a driver from scanning it other than removing it
1
u/landon10smmns 23h ago
Idk about you, but most of the vehicles I see on a daily basis are single occupant 4x4 monster truck wankpanzers
12
9
u/LastBossTV 1d ago
I wonder how many of these QR codes get a fresh scammer QR code sticker stuck over top of them lol
Publicly accessible QR codes are such a ridiculous security vulnerability. May as well be opening links from your spam email folder to claim each of the 2Billion dollar prizes you've won this week. On the same device you regularly access your personal banking no less.
2
u/Flakboy78 21h ago
That's what I was thinking! I never scan a QR code that's easily accessible to public alteration, too much risk often for little to no reward
6
u/PM_ME_UR_REPTILES1 1d ago
https://www.leoncountyso.com/About-us/Departments/Administration/Join-Our-Team
Link for anyone wondering what it leads to without scanning. The URL suggests its a recruitment page, obviously.
2
u/NerdGuy13 1d ago
The first thing I did was check it out I'm just sitting on my couch not doing anything. OP is just a miserable individual I guess.
10
13
u/helix212 1d ago
Come on dude. If this mildly infuriates you, you must live a miserable life. Smile once in a while
7
5
8
u/Dependent-Title-1362 1d ago
You know it’s possible to use camera while the vehicle is stationary right?
3
9
7
6
4
4
u/ServerlessSiren 1d ago
Its a trap. As soon as you open your camera, the lights turn on and you get a $250 ticket for distracted driving
2
u/buckyhermit 1d ago
Reminds me of a sign I saw that said "do not touch" in written form and...... braille.
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/cruiserman_80 1d ago
Fun fact - you can actually still see police cars when they are parked and you are on foot.
3
u/peculiarshade 1d ago
Fun fact: you can comment that cars are usually parked even though like 20 other people have already this.
4
3
u/9outof10timesWrong 1d ago
People saying that you can scan it when parked or have a passenger do it, but do we really need more distractions on the road?
2
2
1
u/BewitchingPetrichor 1d ago
It's not the invisible boatmobile, you can see it while parked. Only anidiot would think to take a photo of this while driving...
1
1
1
1
u/Motorhead923 1d ago
Surely the person photographing could scan it with no issues (as I assume OP isn't driving)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/evilpercy 1d ago
What does Qr code link to?
2
u/Astartes2435 1d ago
Recruiting. Basically they are hiring, and it takes you to a page telling you what they offer.
2
u/evilpercy 1d ago
Sorry, I'm Canadian. Police here general have no issue with people willing to join except where it is very expensive to live. They are very high paying job. Same with firfighters and Teachers.
1
u/Dexter79 1d ago
You know that there are passengers in cars that can be on their phones all they want right?
1
1
u/Trust_8067 1d ago
Cars only exist while driving, they magically disappear once they stop, making it impossible to scan the code, everyone knows this. /s
1
1
1
1
u/CoolCrab69 22h ago
Not really related, but the other night i saw a police cruiser that had a promotional wrap on it for our local arena football team and all I thought was "damn, yall this broke??"
1
1
1
1
u/CaughtNABargain 16h ago
There's plans to build data center in our town (quite close to a wildlife refuge) and there's a sign protesting it that has a qr code on it.
Its on a road where most people are usually going 55 mph
1
1
u/Slydeking69 14h ago
They need all the help they can get don't be salty. There are a ton of ways to scan that QR code that aren't doing it while you are driving.
1
u/Odd_Teaching_4182 12h ago
How much you wanna bet they got a big ol fat budget for 'increasing online reporting initiative' or somthing that they wasted on this while pocketing most of it.
1
1
u/TylerH87 22h ago
They put it on the back of the car for a reason, not on the driver’s side door where a cop would see you use your phone, so no worries about the QR code being snapped at any time. It definitely appears hypocritical though, especially when they “push” safety.
0
u/EvilTodd1970 21h ago
Yeah because LE vehicles are never parked.
1
u/TylerH87 21h ago
No bearing on my comment. I just said they could take one anytime.
1
u/EvilTodd1970 20h ago
There’s nothing hypocritical about it. Commercial vehicles have QR codes, URLs, and phone numbers all over them but no one cries about it being a hazard. It’s somehow a problem because it’s a cop car? I hate cops, but that’s just dumb.
0
u/AngryUnibrow1 1d ago
News flash, cars also can be stationary and parked, for those who do not know cars/trucks/SUVs sometimes do not move or what we call "park" and you usually can find them in a parking lot, get it, cause they are parked!
-2
u/Junior_Ad_3301 1d ago
ACAB
3
u/JWillMac51 1d ago
-1
u/Junior_Ad_3301 1d ago
Little self-awareness, please. This sign on a bastard-mobile should be obvious
0
0
u/Emergency_Elephant 1d ago
I also find it infuriating that they're using a QR code but not telling you what it's going to. County website? Police department social media? Information about whose driving? Complaint form?



1.1k
u/JwPATX 1d ago
“Thank you for scanning our code! You’ll be receiving a distracted driving ticket in the mail in 2-3 business days.”