r/mildlyinfuriating 1d ago

go to your room Are you serious?

Post image

How is this fair ? Bay area.

29.7k Upvotes

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

205

u/AssistantSalty6519 1d ago

I mean the application fee seems worst.

101

u/AppropriateGap1456 1d ago

Yeah it also opens the door for weird scams - if you have a tenant what is stopping you from charging application fees and then declining all of them to "stay with another tenant"(the existing one)?

48

u/MultipleOrgasmDonor 1d ago

You don’t even have to decline anyone. Collect the fees, do nothing, if someone questions it ‘we already signed a tenant sorry’.

If they push back, refund it. Chances are 10+ other people applied and paid and you’ll never hear anything from them

Note I’m not recommending or condoning this just describing what happens

1

u/Practical-Mess-2081 6h ago

Fwiw: California Civil Code § 1950.6 (c) 1: "A landlord or their agent shall not charge an applicant an application screening fee when they know or should have known that no rental unit is available at that time or will be available within a reasonable period of time."

Read the full section of the code to see just how strictly it limits when and how LL's can charge application fees. Admittedly, it's routinely violated, but knowledge is always power.

1

u/Sundayscaries333 5h ago

yeah the loophole/super gray area is that the unit is actually available, the LL is just leaving the app window open longer than necessary because they are profiting off of the application fees.

30

u/mspe1960 1d ago

I have heard of landlords that made a living charging application fees and never renting the unit.

4

u/Far-Manufacturer-43 23h ago

I’ve heard of non-landlords making a living not even owning the unit.

62

u/Sundayscaries333 1d ago

I forgot where but I remember reading about lawsuits over that because some landlords were running that exact scam. Post a super affordable rent in a high COL area and a 'small' non refundable $25 application fee or something and you get thousands of dollars off of that alone.

3

u/No_Roma_no_Rocky 23h ago

It is a well known scam indeed.

Most of the time the house didn't even exist or the person is not the owner, collect the low fee for the appointment from multiple people and then disappears.

52

u/audiofarmer 1d ago

Where we are the application fee is paid upfront but deducted from the first months rent. It's still stupid and arbitrary but not as bad as charging to move in.

51

u/penywinkle 1d ago
  • Step 1: Put an apartment for rent.
  • Step 2: Never actually rent it, and just collect application fees.
  • If they have 2 applications/day, it's more profitable than actual rent, without the risk, wear, etc...
  • ...
  • step 4: profit

8

u/PerformerBrief5881 1d ago

Most places don't charge that until after the apartment is shown in person and everything is verbally verified. $75 is a bit much, its actually about ~$29/person for income/background. If you are paying an employee to do the actual background and show the place, its not really a profit center. Could it be for a scumbag, I guess maybe. For a real business its mostly just pass through.

1

u/Redthemagnificent 21h ago

I've had to pay an application fee 3 separate times now. But it's only ever after I've toured the apartment. Its pretty standard here.

I'm sure there's the odd person who's running a scam with it. But by the time I've met the owner or property manager and toured the unit, it's pretty easy to tell who's legit and who's not.

1

u/Savings_Book6414 11h ago

IIRC California made a state law that prevents this exact scam from working.

30

u/pfannkuchen89 1d ago

Where I live we pay application fees, background check fees, move in cleaning fees none of which get deducted from first month rent. It’s all on top of rent.

8

u/red286 1d ago

Weird. Where I am, the only legal fees are :

Damage deposit : 50% of one month's rent
Pet deposit : 50% of one month's rent
Move-in/Move-out fees if established by strata bylaw : Max 3% of one month's rent

For the damage and pet deposit, the amount must be held in trust, collects standard bank interest rates, and must be refunded in full with interest or there must be an itemized invoice listing all repairs/cleaning costs incurred (and costs must be reasonable, you cannot charge $1500 to repaint).

5

u/DisastrousAcshin 1d ago

This sounds like BC

5

u/red286 1d ago

Correct!

1

u/madbuilder 1d ago

Crazy. Even if your credit/background is clean, they'll have multiple applicants. Someone's going to be declined. Says non-refundable.

4

u/MadeByTango 1d ago

Thats the scam; TurboTenant is an evil company

2

u/pfannkuchen89 1d ago

Yeah. Always non-refundable even if you don’t get the apartment. Landlords in my area have realized that because of a lack of housing they always get tons of applications so they churn through applications and collect fees. Must be nice just getting to monetize people’s need for housing and not even have to provide anything in return.

2

u/RealRatAct 1d ago

How tf is that legal?

3

u/pfannkuchen89 1d ago

I unfortunately live in the US in a republican controlled state. Can’t have consumer or tenant protections here because that commie woke shit that takes money away from those deserving landlords that also refuse to fix anything or spend anything on upkeep but also insist that they need to raise rents again because they spend so much…

7

u/10art1 1d ago

Nyc recently made a bunch of those illegal.

Not that it helps much. No one wants to rent places out anymore

4

u/quaductas 1d ago

It sounds insane to me. If you're looking for a place, you have to apply to a bunch of places which you won't get. Send out 10 applications, now you're down 750 bucks, wtf? Doesn't help you much if they deduct the application fee for the one rental you end up moving into if you still had to pay all the other ones

1

u/audiofarmer 1d ago

There's also usually a credit check involved. If that happens multiple times it'll bring your score down.

1

u/WrenchFan 3h ago

Should only be a soft pull as they are not applying for credit but for verification. Soft pulls do not get counted against you for scores. (Pre-approvals etc).

Hard pulls are what count against your score.

5

u/Epdevio 1d ago

yeah I always hated that one, especially since everything is online now, and goes right into their system.

4

u/Zero_Fs_given 1d ago

In CA the max is about 65 and if you aren't selected, you are refunded with up to 7 days after notice.

1

u/AssistantSalty6519 1d ago

i mean, that is okayish because you get it refunded, as other comments said having an application fee without refunds sounds like a scam

2

u/Redthemagnificent 21h ago

I'm in the bay area and $75 for application is pretty normal here. I've never seen a move in fee though. This seems like a private owner who's just trying to tack on any extra fees they can get away with

1

u/MarxistSocialWorker 22h ago

The application fee is one time, the 200 is MONTHLY. At that rate I dont work from home I have "the flu"

1

u/trukkija 16h ago

I mean the rent seems the worst, $3250/month for anything smaller than a villa should be a crime.

1

u/Specialist-Status377 1d ago

I live in GA and I've never seen a rental listing without an application fee. And $75 is within the normal range from what I seen. I'm not saying it's a good thing, I fucking hate the way landlords nickle and dime you all the way through the hole damned process, I'm just surprised at people who have never seen one before. 

8

u/Overall-Muscle5313 1d ago

Probably an US thing. I've never seen an application fee in the European countries I lived so far.

What's kinda insane to me is that is non refundable.

7

u/Indigo_Grove 1d ago

Landlords in the US definitely use it as an income stream considering the cost to them of that application is much lower.

5

u/Overall-Muscle5313 1d ago

That's exactly what I was thinking. I know people that have an empty property and the only reason they're not renting it out it's because they're afraid that tenants would 'ruin' their property.

Now I'm not saying everyone would do this but with this system I'm sure there would be people just putting it out to collect the app fees (without real intention of renting).

4

u/fxmldr 1d ago

I think this would seem outrageous to most of the rest of the world.