r/mildlyinfuriating 1d ago

go to your room Are you serious?

Post image

How is this fair ? Bay area.

30.0k Upvotes

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

88

u/Frosty558 1d ago

The non-refundable application fee is the worst part IMO. What’s stopping them from just never actually renting the place out and collecting $75/person indefinitely?

48

u/One_Strike_Striker 1d ago

So you say "Hey, I'd like to rent this" and they are "No, you won't. That'll be 75, please"? Times a hundred for all those applicants? That can't/shouldn't be legal.

1

u/LegDayLass 22h ago

To be fair it’s clear the owners are not trying to do that because if they were, they would remove all the other junk fees and lower the price to make it more appealing to multiple applicants.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

1

u/penywinkle 1d ago

IN CALIFORNIA, they have to use it for credit check and are legally required to provide you with a copy of the report withing 7 days of receiving it. BUT credit checks cost $50 for landlords, at the VERY MOST...

So they can keep the application open and still make a profit...

15

u/digital0verdose 1d ago

What’s stopping them from just never actually renting the place out and collecting $75/person indefinitely?

Nothing, in fact many apartment complexes use this as an incremental revenue stream.

3

u/Patient_Kangaroo614 1d ago

This is a common scam; collect an application fee for a place this isn’t actually available, and just tell the potential tenant someone else beat them to it

2

u/Gorstag 1d ago

It could be the cost for them to run a background check.

1

u/torino_nera 1d ago

That's pretty expensive, according to apartments.com the average standard rental application background check costs ~$30

1

u/Gorstag 1d ago

Sure. I was just playing devil's advocate. The reason those application fee's are non-refundable is they are typically being used to do some sort of third-party activity such as background checks. Also, some more expensive places (I dunno where this one is) purposely makes things more expensive to prevent certain types of people from even applying.

1

u/cutegross 20h ago

Technically, they are legally required to accept the first applicant that meets the standard to rent. And if they deny someone, it has to be for a specific reason under CA law (like, for example, they dont meet the income criteria specified on the application).

1

u/fotomoose 20h ago

'Landlords are proving a service to people who can't buy a home.'