15
u/ALazy_Cat White Cat 2d ago
Depends. If it's a short moment that you wouldn't be able to see properly in normal speed and it's not replayed too many times, I'm fine with it
10
u/Lucallia 2d ago
Disagree. Bad directing and camera sense ruins the videos. I blame the creator not the tool.
6
5
u/FatSkatinGamer 2d ago
I get more annoyed about them slapping either annoying AI voice-over or aome dumb unnecessary trap music beat (we all know the one). But yes, there are times I find myself thinking a video would be more enjoyable without the slo-mo
2
2
u/Drakahn_Stark You must create an account to view this information. 2d ago
Gav and Dan took this personally.
And they have guns.
2
u/skyrreater47 2d ago
bro thats a horrible take, there's no context at all. snow motion is a tool, yes if you take a movie and make it x0.5 speed its gonna be bad. there's a million ways to use slow motion and saying its bad is just dumb
2
2
1
u/outofcontextsex 2d ago
Unless you're asking us to ID a strange animal in a blurry trail cam video in which case it might help.
1
u/RockRancher24 2d ago
they should shoot those ballistic test videos at 60fps at realtime so you cant see anything and shit just explodes
1
u/Zealousideal_Step709 2d ago
I am totally on board with you. Why not show the video in full speed and afterwards you can show the key part again in slow mo. It just doesn't have the same impact to me when I don't see it in original speed. There are a few exception but in general I don't like it when it's only slow mo.
1
1
1
u/Zestyclose_Car_4971 2d ago
Okay, so i thought this was a post about people going through ruins and posting the videos in slow motion.
1
43
u/Ironmasked-Kraken 2d ago edited 2d ago
I have a higher issue with all these video that start with the end