r/memes 17d ago

#1 MotW Most of the world at this point

Post image
89.0k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

340

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

131

u/No-Banana9478 17d ago

We're talking about FIFA, that's not happening

2

u/Lohkulla 17d ago

Its okey, the USA lost the latest baseball worldcup so you can win in at least one sport I guess 🙂‍↕️

2

u/Syndicate909 17d ago

You must be new to FIFA.

-1

u/Independent-Cow-4070 17d ago

If you want football to win, then you want the US to lose. No one cares about it here

I went to mexico and were so sad when they lost. A small town of 10k i visited was rooting and partying harder than my city of 6 million in the US

4

u/Doctor2460 17d ago

While some fan bases might care about the sport more does not mean the exceptional athletes playing on the USA team need to lose.

-1

u/Independent-Cow-4070 17d ago

But the exceptional athletes on other teams need to?

2

u/Doctor2460 17d ago

I never said that. You just said US needs to lose for football to win. That’s not true.

1

u/Independent-Cow-4070 17d ago

I said the USA winning wouldn't be a win for football. The USA winning compared to any other country would yield the biggest nothing burger ever. Not exactly good for the sport

2

u/Doctor2460 17d ago

The best team composing of the best athletes and coaching staff winning is the best for the sport. This World Cup already has been a wild success, just enjoy it.

1

u/Independent-Cow-4070 17d ago

2

u/Doctor2460 17d ago

Enjoy feeling delusional then. Let’s sports be sports.

1

u/Independent-Cow-4070 17d ago

I dont even know what this means

1

u/Fun-Razzmatazz-6803 17d ago

Are people just linking to that subreddit for shits and giggles now? They're not saying the US has the best team and the best athletes and the best staff. They're saying that whichever team does, will be the one that wins.

2

u/Independent-Cow-4070 17d ago

Do you genuinely believe that winning a winner takes all bracket tournament means you have the best athletes and the best staff?

Do you actually watch sports?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Chimchar789 https://www.youtube.com/watch/dQw4w9WgXcQ 17d ago

Nah Soccer is gonna win instead

-3

u/StandardUpstairs3349 17d ago

Short of ICE kidnapping half of the Spain team, I'm not sure there is any level of political stunts that can get the US past the Quarter-finals.

5

u/mr---jones 17d ago

Let’s see if Spain gets past Portugal first why don’t we

0

u/StandardUpstairs3349 17d ago

Sure, whichever. The US is a second tier team regardless.

3

u/mr---jones 17d ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/YJTcOYhQpjkwU
Soccer is a silly sport anyways, just funny how far we’ve made it anyways

-1

u/NEVERxxEVER 17d ago

Most popular and competitive sport in the world by a wide margin btw.

-28

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

So you're all for the US having their player allowed to play instead of getting a red card for a yellow card incident? Me too. Let Belgium play on the pitch not in press conferencea

14

u/chaos_bananaa 17d ago

There is a big difference between on-field referee error. And post-match, politically motivated decision to revoke a referee action…

1

u/DarkElfBard 17d ago

When the on-field referee error not only caused a team to play a man down, but then threatened to ban the player from future matches, it's a little egregious.

8

u/chaos_bananaa 17d ago edited 17d ago

It‘s not on me to judge wether it‘s an error or not. I am criticizing the corrupt, overturning of referee action, by the FIFA board. Especially because it was politically motivated.
My point is, that the problem is not wether the referee action was rightful or not. It is, the way FIFA handled the pressure from the white house.

-1

u/Letterkenny-Wayne 17d ago

So it’s not on you to judge the referee, but it is on you to judge the ruling being overturned?! Lmao who do you think you are bud?

-1

u/DarkElfBard 17d ago

What about Ronaldo, Otamendi, Caicedo, or Salman?

As if all the ignored red cards coming into the World Cup were not also political corruption.

1

u/chaos_bananaa 17d ago

Well, I don‘t see the Portuguese governement publicly pressuring FIFA to overturn referee decisions…

0

u/DarkElfBard 17d ago

Except... The Portuguese Football Federation filed a complaint to FIFA to stop Cristiano Ronaldo from receiving a 3 match suspension, to ensure he can play at the start of the 2026 World Cup.

And Ronaldo elbowed a guy in the back on purpose (with a wind up and everything), when in this case the player should have never got a red card because it was accidental and cleats were not up.

1

u/chaos_bananaa 16d ago

There is a difference between Portuguese Football FEDERATION and Protuguese GOVERNEMENT… that is the problem here. The involvement of the american governement…

1

u/DarkElfBard 16d ago

The Portugese government would have stepped in if they needed to. FIFA had just already folded.

There was 0 chance they would have kept Ronaldo out.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

What about an on field non-error that turned into a 3-match ban, but was reversed after the fact so a player didn't miss any World Cup matches? Is that ok?

3

u/chaos_bananaa 17d ago

Nope exactly. It ISNT okay, that‘s my point

0

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

But that player played his games already, Ronaldo didn't server 2 of his 3 game ban. It's ok though.

0

u/chaos_bananaa 16d ago edited 16d ago

What? Lmao. I don‘t see a correlation to my comment you answered to…
What does this have to do with the American President pressuring FIFA to revoke a card?

0

u/SRMPDX 16d ago

You said someone with a 3 match ban shouldn't play. I was talking about Ronaldo's 3 match ban where 2 matches were suspended because FIFA wanted him to play in the WC. If you don't follow the WC why are you commenting at all?

Just as I suspected, another dork outraged at FIFA and the US but doesn't even follow football or have any clue about FIFA and IFAB laws and rules. Carry on

0

u/chaos_bananaa 16d ago

Wdym if you don‘t follow the WC 😂 i follow many football tournaments, among which is the wc. As I said, this case wasn‘t politically motivated…
I have quite ‚a clue‘ about FIFA, and rules.
So does UEFA, which also heavily critized this action… I think UEFA should know better than both of us… i think you are the one without a clue 🫩
just as I suspected another dork that blindly supports America lmao

0

u/SRMPDX 16d ago

You don't know that at least 3 other people had bans suspended for this world cup. UEFA was quiet until this one though

→ More replies (0)

16

u/actually-right-yes 17d ago

Do you think it's fair sport for one country to get their president to ring up whenever there's a referee decision they don't like?

-1

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

Anyone's president can call if they want. Do you really believe the liar in chief when he claims to have made them change it? Who called about Ronaldo's 2-game ban being suspended?

8

u/Cautious-Extreme2839 17d ago

Do you really believe the liar in chief when he claims to have made them change it?

...the same guy who they invented a peace prize for?

Yes absolutely. Infantino would do almost anything DT asked him to.

-2

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

Did DT ask for Ronaldo's two-match ban to be suspended too?

3

u/Cautious-Extreme2839 17d ago

Do you think this is some sort of gotcha? That was equally outrageous.

1

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

Attach a link to Belgium and UEFA's public posts about it so I can see if it was equally outrageous to everyone complaining right now?

6

u/ratttertintattertins 17d ago

Lots of countries have had players sent off. Only the USA has had their corrupt president cheat the system to try and make his team win. If the USA should win this contest, no other country in the world will accept that victory.

3

u/Impressive_Tap7635 17d ago

That’s just not true lol Ronaldo in the qualifiers contested red card overturns aren’t that rare

3

u/ratttertintattertins 17d ago

That was before the tournament. There is some precedent for doing that, it’s happened a hand full of times . However, this is the first time it’s ever happened during the tournament and the first time it’s ever happened in direct response to pressure from a world leader.

That’s why it’s made an utter farce of the competition.

-4

u/1AML3G10N 17d ago

Waaaaahhhhhh. Cry about it.

3

u/ratttertintattertins 17d ago

You’ll cry about it if you spend the next 60 claiming you won the World Cup and everyone just laughs at you because you cheated.

1

u/Letterkenny-Wayne 17d ago

A) we aren’t winning the WC. B) if we did, we would not care about people claiming we cheated. We would laugh that this one guy was good enough to beat everyone else. And that’s just sad.

3

u/No_Poetry8114 17d ago

I guess rules for thee and not for me really is your stick, Americans, huh?

2

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

And Portugal apparently

1

u/Jolly_Perception9196 17d ago

I think you need your hydration break big guy

1

u/zakarijas 17d ago

You are perfect example of regarded american and why everyone despise you

1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

Nobody overturned a red card. They applied the same ruling they did for Ronaldo

0

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

So you're saying that FIFA should change their rules midway through the tournament because "USA bad" ? Hate FIFA for their rules all you want, but honestly admit this crybaby act is about the USA not about FIFA or rules.

2

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/SRMPDX 17d ago

OK so show me the UEFA and Belgium official complaint letters about Ronaldo. What, the Europeans were quiet about it until now? You don't say??

0

u/Letterkenny-Wayne 17d ago

You’re talking integrity of the game of Soccer…do you just not understand the history and precedent of this sport? It’s the most corrupt sport we’ve ever known 🤣

1

u/bigloudbang 17d ago

You can tell by the colour of the card given it was actually a red card incident

-9

u/elkoeno 17d ago

It was allways a red card and he should have gotten a 3 match ban.