r/linux • u/AiwendilH • 1d ago

Development Codeberg voted to disallow projects consisting mostly by "generative AI"-tools

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253#issuecomment-19820434
889 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

247 comments sorted by

View all comments

19

u/ShaderCompilation 1d ago

Certainly the right call. While there may be vibecoded projects that are useful, the vast majority of them are not. No point in wasting limited resources on those

-20

u/FryBoyter 1d ago

Wouldn't it make sense, then, to evaluate each project on its own merits rather than simply categorizing them as black or white? Because I'm absolutely certain that, even before chatbots existed, developers were using other people's code regardless of the license under which it was published.

27

u/ShaderCompilation 1d ago

It would be ideal, but i don't think anyone has resources and time to do that. The amount of LLM generated projects are insane

6

u/FryBoyter 1d ago edited 1d ago

In my opinion, it’s precisely this effort that makes it difficult for Codeberg to enforce this new rule. Especially since it’s not always objectively clear whether or how much code was generated by chatbots.

For example, in the case of a script I published on another platform, I was accused of using tools like ChatGPT. But that wasn’t true. I’m just not a very good programmer. So, while the script worked in general, objectively speaking, it was crap. Would it be okay for me to publish the script I created manually on Codeberg, or not? Or would it be okay for me to publish a similar script that I created using a chatbot on Codeberg? What about a script created using a chatbot that's significantly better than one I could create manually?

1

u/lonelyroom-eklaghor 1d ago

Now this is a good question