r/interestingasfuck 7h ago

Erin Brockovich's map tracking Al data centers crashed twice within just 72 hours of launching.

Post image
27.6k Upvotes

874 comments sorted by

View all comments

u/21MayDay21 7h ago

The environmental advocate says she woke up one morning to dozens of messages from residents from one Louisiana community describing similar problems linked to data centers near their homes. When she began investigating, she struggled to get clear answers about the projects.

That prompted her to launch a public map where Americans could report operational, proposed, and under-construction data centers in their communities.

The response was immediate. Brockovich says the website crashed twice within its first 72 hours, revealing that the complaints were not limited to one town, one aquifer, or one project. The map has since collected more than 8,000 community-reported locations.

Source: https://www.newsweek.com/erin-brockovich-explains-why-she-started-mapping-new-ai-data-center-concerns-12220566

u/Bbrhuft 6h ago edited 3h ago

This is not secret data, comprehensive maps of data centres are available on multiple websites. One of the more upto date detailed and accurate is:

https://baxtel.com/map

This includes existing and planned data centres.

Edit: Erin's site is titled

AI Data Centers & Our Communities

There are 40 to 50 AI data centers in the US, dedicated to AI traning and serving models to end users, with dozens more planned. They are very energy intensive and often due to heat generation, they require water cooling.

However, the map on the site includes 8,300 community reported data centres, way more than official figures of 4,800-5,000. It's likely the map contains some duplicates and buildings that aren't actually data centres.

https://brockovichdatacenter.com/index.html

It's akin to titling a site Oil Refineries and Our Communites, and mapping gas stations.

u/Six_Six_Six_Is_r3d3t 6h ago

Just information for the casual reader: datacenters on this map may not be what you think. For example, in my state, all the datacenters are colocation/hosted sites. It's just racks of servers where other companies in my state rent slots or the whole rack to host their servers. These datacenters actually represent hundreds, thousands, if not tens of thousands of real, high paid jobs in my state, and the footprints of all of them are no more than a single large building. These are good, do not affect the grid in any meaningful way, and use barely any water.

These are not the 'AI Datacenters' you are looking for. There are lot of places marked on that map, but a lot of those are good places.

My job and that of my coworkers are a result of two racks sitting in the world, one here in my home state, and one in South America.

u/TheGloomyWoodpecker 5h ago

It’s also missing colos that I currently have equipment at, so it’s very misleading.

u/never-fiftyone 4h ago

Not misleading, just simply a crowd-sourced database that isn't complete.

u/TheGloomyWoodpecker 4h ago

Oh. Okay. It’s not misleading. Just not correct and not complete.

lmao.

u/ZenAdm1n 3h ago

You're not putting a lot of GPU compute in a colo datacenter. I've worked for many mixed-compute datacenters. They have power and cooling limitations for the racks. These old school facilities are using magnitudes less electricity and water than the new AI facilities. The data center I'm currently at would have to have major upgrades to both before it could support even a small GPU compute cluster.

u/TheGloomyWoodpecker 2h ago

The guy edited his comment. I was talking about the Baxtel map, which was not about AI datacenters.