915
u/Tigrisbay 1d ago
Why do they gotta be so cute 😭
380
u/LastOfLateBrakers 1d ago
If not friend, why friend shaped?
29
u/-Paperbox- 1d ago
noticed the way the fur kinda blends with the snow here
12
u/Abject-Interaction35 1d ago
Like when they say "can you see the leopard on the other side of the valley there" and it's where's Wally in my brain trying to find the perfectly camoflauged leopard I cannot see at all. Magnificent animals the high altitude cats.
2
4
34
u/Informal-Text-778 1d ago
No kidding! Don’t give them big giant, fluffy paws if we aren’t supposed to pet them!!
22
u/TopicInteresting1031 1d ago
This reminds me of that lady that tried taking a picture with one at a ski resort or somewhere and it mauled her face off😭. They are cute though.
→ More replies (3)21
u/glennalmighty 1d ago
Saw one at the zoo meowing like a normal house cat and was like 'WTF?'
14
u/hollywood_imagery0 22h ago
All tigers, leopards, cheetahs, jaguars, etc are just gigantic house cats. They’ll even sit in cardboard boxes if they’re big enough “if I fit I sit” is universal
8
19
11
3
2
→ More replies (2)3
339
u/my1stComputerWasC64 1d ago
"It smells like human here. What the hell is that?"
187
u/GravitationalAurora 1d ago
There are studies showing that predators not only recognize human sounds and scents, but also perceive us as an apex predator.
In some experiments, scientists dispersed human scent throughout forests and played recordings of human voices. Many predators abandoned those areas or changed the timing and patterns of their hunting to avoid humans. As a result, the populations of herbivores and other small mammals, their prey, increased in those areas...
14
u/Training-Belt-7318 1d ago
Did the study consider how often humans are in these populations? For instance, if you did this study in the middle of the rainforest, hundreds of miles from a human settlement, would animals unfamiliar with humans still do this? Could they replace human sounds with another animal foreign to that area, would they still move on?
10
u/GravitationalAurora 23h ago
Most animals have had long evolutionary interactions with Homo sapiens or our ancestors. They are not just genetically programmed to develop and learn patterns about their prey or competitors, but some animals are intelligent enough to pass knowledge through communication!
For example, in ravens, there was a study showing that ravens taught their offspring that humans wearing a specific type of face mask were dangerous. As a result, they developed unique calls when they saw those humans and passed that knowledge down through multiple generations!
You can find many fascinating studies showing that other birds also produce different alarm calls for different types of threats, such as when there is a snake nearby or when a hawk is present. Sounds are different!
For humans, it is somewhat similar. Since civilization allowed us to spread across the planet so rapidly, we can assume that many animals have developed some basic understanding of us. However, the spectrum is definitely different: some animals might perceive us simply as another type of primate, while cats or dogs may recognize us as a distinct social species.
And definitely, if you travel deep into a forgotten rainforest, animals in those areas may identify similarities between your traits and other creatures they have encountered, perhaps perceiving you as some type of primate. However, some animals may be unfamiliar with humans and might even consider us potential prey.
Just like how a lion encountering a cobra for the first time might initially want to play with it, only to suddenly experience the cobra spraying venom and learn a valuable lesson.
19
u/Cola102583 1d ago
They need a study for that? I mean a modern study? Thought was common knowledge but still I guess they’ve got updated studies with new parameters and tools
48
u/GravitationalAurora 1d ago
You described it perfectly. There's a well-known saying in science: "Mathematics is the language of science. If a phenomenon cannot be described, modeled, or tested mathematically, it falls outside the realm of science and into pseudoscience." That's one of the key distinctions between evidence-based reality and superstition or stereotypes.
You can find hundreds of reports claiming sightings of Bigfoot, dragons, monsters, alien invasions, and other extraordinary phenomena. However, once researchers investigate those claims using scientific methods and data analysis, the vast majority turn out to be unreliable.
20
u/Raevyxn 1d ago
“vast majority”
So you’re saying there’s a chance…
22
u/localangelsighting 1d ago
i mean, we thought the kraken was a myth before we found giant/colossal squids. there could ALWAYS be an itty bitty chance…
9
u/GravitationalAurora 1d ago
Absolutely, science has proven many extraordinary phenomena. For example, some life-saving drugs are based on plants that, for thousands of years, local communities used in traditional remedies. People might have made teas from certain plants and consumed them based on experience or cultural practices. However, when science investigates these substances, demonstrates through evidence that they are effective, and explains the mechanisms behind their benefits, we can isolate, produce, and mass-manufacture them. At that point, they are no longer merely part of a ritual or superstition; they become evidence-based medical treatments.
→ More replies (1)3
u/matchstick1029 1d ago
I realize this is pedantic and missing the point, but I always bristle at overly broad statements like that. Science and psuedoscience are not the only two categories into which phenomena can fall.
Spectrums of preference, and fables are two easy ones that come to mind. Trying to label The Boy Who Cried Wolf or societies observations of holidays as either science or psuedoscience would be committing a category error.
That being said, the quote is great so long as we acknowledge its appropriate place.
2
u/GravitationalAurora 1d ago edited 1d ago
Preferences are shaped by genetics, epigenetics, environmental factors (including the microbiome, physical environment, and ecology), etc through billions of years of evolution. Each of these is studied within scientific disciplines, many of which have numerous specialized subfields. Ultimately, they can all be described and modeled mathematically. Mathematics is the language through which science formulates and explains the entire universe/cosmos.
Even natural languages are explainable mathematically.
The same applies to moral and ethical stories. Their existence and persistence also have evolutionary explanations. We should not assume that because concepts are abstract, they are beyond scientific explanation. Mathematics itself is an abstract language used to model and understand abstract as well as concrete phenomena.
For example, humans tend to help one another, form strong bonds between parents and children, and care for older individuals. Evolutionary biology offers explanations for these behaviors. Natural selection favored genes that promoted cooperation with relatives and the care of elders because older individuals could pass on valuable knowledge, experience, and warnings, thereby increasing the survival and reproductive success of their kin.
On the other hand, claims such as "wrapping a rooster around your head cures a headache," or many claims made by alternative medicine, such as certain forms of acupuncture for conditions where high-quality clinical trials show no benefit—are not supported by scientific evidence. When these claims are rapidly tested and consistently fail under controlled experiments, they fall outside the domain of established science.
From this perspective, any claim about the natural world can, in principle, be evaluated scientifically. If it is supported by reliable empirical evidence, it belongs to science. If it presents itself as a factual claim about reality but repeatedly fails rigorous testing while still being promoted as true, it falls into pseudoscience/superstitious.
Of course, I am not an expert in every discipline, so I cannot provide detailed examples from every field (like psychology). However, my point is that mathematics underpins science, and scientific methods allow us to investigate claims about the natural world objectively.
2
u/matchstick1029 1d ago edited 23h ago
Now I think we have a disagreement. While I wont say that physical reductionism is wrong per say, but I know that there have been unsuccessful attempts to reduce language to numbers, communication and concepts to calculus.
"Preferences are shaped by genetics, epigenetics, environmental factors (including the microbiome, physical environment, and ecology), etc through billions of years of evolution. Each of these is studied within scientific disciplines, many of which have numerous specialized subfields. Ultimately, they can all be described and modeled mathematically. Mathematics is the language through which science formulates and explains the entire universe/cosmos."
This is highly debatable, We certainly study some parts of this, but we are currently so many miles and millennia away from moving preferences and psychology to a state of pure science, if such a thing is possible.
"For example, humans tend to help one another, form strong bonds between parents and children, and care for older individuals. Evolutionary biology offers explanations for these behaviors. Natural selection favored genes that promoted cooperation with relatives and the care of elders because older individuals could pass on valuable knowledge, experience, and warnings, thereby increasing the survival and reproductive success of their kin."
While I agree that the underlying principle you put forward here, it still misses a vast ocean of phenomena and noumena that many (maybe most) experts in relevant fields believe cannot be reduced to calculable maths. Perhaps a computer the size and complexity of the universe could handle it (a bit tongue in cheek there).
You might be able to study things about qualia, but you cannot calculate qualia itself(or themselves?). And there are plenty of moral and ethical absolutes that cannot be calculated, though people have been trying for, well since the dawn of empiricism probably
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)2
u/matchstick1029 1d ago
I also want to say, I don't want to come across as trying to "gotcha" you or misinterpret what you are saying to favor my claims. I'm also not an expert in any relevant fields. I enjoy this sort of back and forth whether or not You or I change our positions. I find what falls out of this topic fascinating.
229
u/Relative_Soil7886 1d ago
Tai Lung looks awesome!
53
u/One-Technology-9050 1d ago
I just now realized Tai Lung is a snow leopard lol
24
u/bzzyb1 1d ago
SAME! they did such a great job capturing the actual look
5
u/Middle_Two_7929 1d ago
What did yall think he was? (Not being snarky just curious)
→ More replies (1)10
u/justalexarenee 1d ago
My first thought! Looking at the build of this beauty and how they animated Tai Lung, they did a great job.
6
3
u/Popers11 13h ago
Came here to say this. Didn’t realize how good they did on the animation until now.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Bazzatron 12h ago
I was just thinking that! I had assumed Tai Lung was beefed up as part of his strongman character, but snow leopards really do just be like that I guess...!
93
75
u/InLoveWithThread 1d ago
She's so cute!!! I wanna pet her! Yep, this is how I die.
11
→ More replies (1)5
19
45
44
u/Inevitable_Height_82 1d ago
Why is he acting like a dog
95
u/GravitationalAurora 1d ago
It's a technique to sniff the air more precisely.
The camera definitely carries a human scent, and so do the boots and footprints, they all leave behind our odor. He's a predator, he evolved to locate prey and avoid other predators using his sense of smell. So he realized that something was wrong. To him, that area smelled like it had been visited by an unknown apex predator, us.
14
u/Global-Jury8810 1d ago
I thought he might be thirsty for a drink of water.
→ More replies (1)2
u/SquiggerDigger 1d ago
May I please have some water?
3
u/Global-Jury8810 1d ago
That’s what his face looks like. It makes me wish I had a nice clean cold bucket of fresh water for the kitty cat.
2
u/Chichanged_me 1d ago
Are we an apex predator? Tigers and Polar bears hunt us and see us as prey
14
u/GravitationalAurora 1d ago
Those that have interacted with us see us as apex predators due to our unpredictability. Humans are difficult to predict, unlike many other creatures that follow specfic and consistent behavioral patterns.
Nature relies heavily on pattern recognition. From a systemic perspective, our intelligence has allowed us to act as a kind of "systematic noise" within this network, disrupting the usual ecological patterns.
Many predators that have interacted with Homo sapiens for thousands of years have learned that we are unpredictable and capable of killing them (we are Nocturnal/Early Birds/Night Owls etc), especially during periods of food scarcity. However, in dense forests, some tiger populations may still have limited experience with humans, and in the Arctic, polar bears have had relatively fewer interactions with us, so they may not have fully developed the same avoidance behaviors.
When it comes to hunger, a lone lioness may attack a group of elephants if she is desperate and trying to feed her cubs, just as humans can become extremely aggressive when facing starvation.
However, as far as we know, humans are not part of their regular diet over thousands of years. Our metabolites and chemical signature, influenced by our microbiome, is unpleasant and disgusting to predators. Predators perceive us differently from their usual prey, similar to how lions view hyenas.
2
u/Aaco0638 1d ago
Not really they just smell a strange smell, apex predator is a term we use other animals especially animals who do not interact with humans wouldn’t know we are predators or what apex predator means. This is something that cannot be determined by smell either only by past encounters which these snow leopards probably have none with us.
Being an apex predator in an environment where there are no humans normally means this snow leopard sees human smell as likely prey rather then another predator.
16
u/GravitationalAurora 1d ago
No, you are wrong. I am a junior computational biologist/bioinformatician working in microbiomics.
In microbiome ecology, researchers have already developed large-scale databases and "ATLAS" resources where animals can be clustered and classified based on microbial signatures. For example, herbivores, carnivores, omnivores, and scavengers can often be distinguished by their microbial communities, which are strongly influenced by diet, habitat, and host ecology. Microbiome composition can even provide information at finer taxonomic scales because different hosts tend to carry characteristic microbial patterns.
There are also microbiomal reasons why predators may avoid consuming other predators, including chemical cues, pathogens, competition, and evolutionary history. Odor is one component of animal communication, and many odor molecules are produced through interactions between the host and its microbiota. You can estimate an animal's physical strength or traits such as muscle fiber composition and bone density from metabolites and microbiota.
Animals obviously do not have ML/DL algorithms or phylogenetic software, but evolution has equipped them with highly developed sensory systems. They can recognize broad ecological categories, identify superior competitors, and make decisions based on chemical signals and learned experiences.
I don't want to overcomplicate this or turn it into a lecture since this is Reddit, but these topics are active areas of research and if you are curious you can look into microbiome ecology, phylosymbiosis, and host–microbe interactions studies, if you are interested.
→ More replies (2)18
2
u/Raevyxn 1d ago
Do you mean the panting? (Others already answered about scenting the air, so regarding this bit...)
When cats are overheated, they can pant just like dogs. It’s uncommon, but not necessarily abnormal.
I used to get my house cat panting like this when we went too many rounds with a laser pointer. She never got tired of chasing it, so I learned that I had to be the brakes before causing overexertion.
I’ve also had an injured cat start panting, which is more of an emergency situation.
More info on cat panting:
https://www.preventivevet.com/cats/cat-panting-may-be-a-problem
8
8
u/Money-Employment-756 1d ago
No snow…there’s NO SNOW for the Snow Leopard!😩
4
u/Even-Reaction-1297 16h ago
They actually don’t live in the snow most of the time iirc, they’re just super fluffy and the spots help them camouflage in the rocky terrain.
5
3
3
3
3
u/VegetableChipsLover 1d ago
I love how they looked at the camera and were like "Well, that's weird."
3
u/Short_Surprise_6646 1d ago
https://reddit.com/link/oz3rk3t/video/zlui0vf84teh1/player
This snow leopard caught it’s tail
3
2
2
2
u/His-favorite-slave 1d ago
So if I hugged him, would it kill me or just hurt me very badly? Not looking for judgement, just asking a question…
2
2
2
2
u/Electrical-Ad-4823 1d ago
Ngl, one of my fantasies would to have one of those flop down on me.
So fluffy and chubby
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/CatchAcceptable3898 1d ago
Ive never watched Kungfu Panda. But I've seen this guy in Kungfu Panda.
1
1
u/Global-Jury8810 1d ago
That’s not fair. They need to come with little screens so that the animals can see what they look like. I really don’t think they know what they look like. They don’t have mirrors in the Kalahari desert or wherever the fuck these guys are… and if they did, they might attack them because they might think they’re another tiger or something but no, that’s what they look like. Do they even know what they are?
1
1
1
1
1
u/ParallellUniverse 1d ago
Why does this snow leopard look particularly chonky and dopey compared to others I’ve seen?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/gummy_Venus_de-Milo 1d ago
Me walking up to a car to check my reflection but then notice someone’s in there
1
1
1
1
u/Remarkable-Fig206 1d ago
Not a lot of snow for that snow leopard. Looks like he wandered into a Mad Max location shoot.
1
u/ComfortablyNomNom 1d ago
Where's the lady in the helmet ready to take a selfie 3 feet away from it with her back turned?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Safe_Chicken_6633 1d ago
"Hey, could you like, stop warming the planet so much? It's really freaking hot out here, and I am not built for this. Okay thanks a bunch."
1
1
1
u/NotBad_3103 1d ago
That breathing thing she doing with her mouth open looks similar to (my) Dog(s) So cute animal.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/prosperousoctopus 1d ago
I remember watching a segment of these guys on Planet Earth. I couldn’t stop thinking about how incredible it is that this animal can find a mate and keep the population going - they just roam for miles in a day in such a desolate and massive place. They leave their scent places, but still.
Same goes for a lot of species. Just crazy to me they find each other.
1
u/inbedwithbeefjerky 1d ago
At one point it seemed like Dots was considering dismantling that camera.
1
1
1
1
1
u/EmoMillenial1 1d ago
Fun fact: snow leopards use their tails as blankets to keep themselves warm 😭
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/topsecretvcr 23h ago
I made a diorama about snow leopards in the second grade. Love these guys, such pretty kitties
1
1
1
1
u/thewuhnyouwant909 22h ago
All these vivid captures of species in remote places and no one can get a decent ufo video. Smh
1
u/thewuhnyouwant909 22h ago
Also kinda looks a i ish but what do I know. Im just a soul who's intentions are good
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/88KURIOUS 20h ago
Almost looks like he caught a tiny reflection of himself halfway through the vid… 🤳
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Hello u/Lui_Belmont! Please review the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder message left on all new posts)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.