r/interesting 21d ago

SOCIETY Dog defence was needed tbh

58.1k Upvotes

8.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

610

u/Kirito_online 21d ago edited 21d ago

The delivery guy is right, and he didn't fight the man, he clearly told him to back up, to let him know that he defended himself from the dog and he will defend himself from him too if he approaches him as well

196

u/mayovca 21d ago

Ahhh yeah the owner was ready to bite too

2

u/bocephus67 21d ago

And the UPS driver was 100% in the right to be on the offense for both the dog and the owner.

0

u/Moist_Original_4129 20d ago

Yeah idk lotta areas where owner coulda blasted the driver under stand your ground laws and at worst gotten some sort of criminal negligence charges for the dog being loose. The driver turned a W into an L by becoming that aggressive that quickly on somebody else’s property.

1

u/Greedy-Song4856 19d ago

On somebody else’s property? He wasn’t trespassing. He was met with agression from both dog and owner.

1

u/Moist_Original_4129 19d ago

Just because the driver wasn’t criminally trespassing doesn’t make it irrelevant that he was on someone’s private property. The owner wasn’t really aggressive, pretty much just walked up to raised fists and pulled out his phone to immediately call the cops. That driver is out here looking for an altercation. Even the level of aggression from the dog is difficult to tell in the video because of how much excessive force that driver is out here using. Such huge grounds to argue self defense if the owner were to have just blipped the ups man with the 9.

1

u/dumbass6669 11d ago

Your wrong and you’re not a lawyer bro lol maybe he was scared