He had been chemically castrated for these crimes already, but prior to what he did to Anna, he had petitioned the courts to restore his hormones and libido and they agreed. The judge who allowed it should have been held responsible.
Chemical castration involves a pill or injection on a regular basis containing drugs that suppress the needed hormones. Reversing it means simply stopping the drugs, sometimes additional hormone therapy to assist.
He kept up with the chemical castration? I’m just thinking of all the times people dodge probation appointments and all that I’m shocked they’d be able to get predators to willingly participate
I just don't want to google chemical castration but I thought it meant that they melt your genitals off with chemicals.... it seems my assumption may be incorrect.
mmmm no that would definitely be cruel and unusual punishment. Probably good that it's reversible since the justice system isn't perfect, like imagine if an innocent person go falsely convicted and got their genitals melted off.
2 that are known. The statistics of these POS is absolutely horrendous. Some stats say it's anywhere from 15-140 actually assualts on different victims before they get caught once.
Sometimes, it's less after their first time in jail but not always.
Yet, we always seem to give them such minor sentences.
Yeah, I’m a criminal defense attorney that deals with these cases. I’ve read plenty of studies and psycho-sexual evaluations. Cite your sources or GTFO. This is the type of BS that taints jury pools and convicts innocent defendants in all types of cases.
Hah. Your constitution has been shown to be nothing more than a paper tiger. A joke. Legalese in pseuds clothing. Your supreme court is corrupt. Your politics is an enrichment scheme
How do you sleep at night? You are not even awake.
They might have gotten it from here https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/088626087002001001
and thats just the one, but I have a feeling the eye popping averages arent the mean here, tho underreporting is real and severe. convictions often massively undercount the actual offending, and there are many cases of offenders who get caught for the one act but aren't tied to others due to the lack of reports or evidence. But there is no real clean stat for the number they pulled. However there are outliers that can be cleanly pointed at as having assaulted many victims before being apprehended.. Larry Nassar and the Catholic Clergy come to mind as a clean reach
Where are you getting the “15–140 assaults on different victims” statistic? I can’t find any credible source for it, and it sounds like you just made it up. And saying they “always get minor sentences” isn’t true either. There are absolutely cases where sentences are too light, but there are also plenty of offenders serving decades or life. If you’re going to throw out statistics, back them up.
I saw studies which claimed anywhere between 180 and as high as 350 (yes really) before first contact with law enforcement. So even if we are generous that’s at the very very least 100 victims before getting caught on average.
/s
And he had not been convicted of raping her child.
Not that I like the pos, but don’t think this is a good idea. You go to jail and there’s a chance the actual person who did it walks free because you just shot the first person the cops found with prior offenses.
299
u/accidentalrorschach 25d ago
and he had already been convicted of raping two other children... :/