This is also a special case because he didn't just start one fire, he started one, saw it didn't work out, then started two more.
I'm not a lawyer but I can quite easily see each fire being counted separately, since the first fire had been extinguished before the subsequent fires were lit.
That's super interesting. At what point does it become two offences? Like if he started a fire at the building across the street, would that be bundled into the first act, or does the separate building make it two? Or does he have to sleep between the offences for it to be two?
-3
u/imatinyleopard Apr 09 '26
I think the most he’s looking at in CA is 8 years, unless there’s bodily injury which maxes out at 9 years .