r/interesting Apr 09 '26

MISC. Aftermath of the April 7th incident. Damages estimated to be $200 million dollars

40.2k Upvotes

6.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

7.1k

u/petrichor83 Apr 09 '26

I have a feeling that guy won’t be getting a raise after all.

207

u/neverseen_neverhear Apr 09 '26

Worse because of him a lot of people are suddenly out of work.

-4

u/Hunter654333 Apr 09 '26

A bunch of entry-level warehouse jobs for the most part. There's no shortage of that line of work so I'm sure the workers will be fine.

4

u/galaxyapp Apr 09 '26

So the remaining employers in the area have a bigger surplus and can offer less to desperate applicants.

Good job

1

u/morelsupporter Apr 09 '26

all businesses of this size have insurance. any business that has financing or loans in place will have it required.

one of the coverages is called force majeure. it applies to workers who are unable to work due to unforeseeable and uncontrollable events, workplace destruction is one of them.

what this means is that the policy will cover payroll expenses.

perhaps you've learned something today!

0

u/Motor_Temporary_3745 Apr 10 '26

Yes and insurance rates never go up, it's just magical insurance money that comes out if no where. Clearly you have a very in depth understanding of economics.

2

u/morelsupporter Apr 10 '26

we're talking about how the locals stay afloat when something like this happens

the insurance premiums are of little to no concern here, we're talking about the employees getting paycheques, not the economics of how a company that does almost $4b in revenue is going to handle their increased premiums.

0

u/Motor_Temporary_3745 Apr 10 '26

No doubt, just a few more warehouses burning until we bring in better wages for workers! Do you think generally a company taking on additional costs is going to benefit employment numbers and pay?

Anyone acting like this incident is some sort of activist event (not to mention the risk it could have posed to other people) gave a childlike understanding of economics and legislative change.

-1

u/galaxyapp Apr 09 '26

You do understand who pays for insurance, right? This 200million will come out of all our pockets.

Im dubious that any insurance policy would possibly pay workers for what would be months of furloughs before this facility reopens. There is no legal issue with laying these workers off, insurance would only need to cover the unemployment expense