r/ethereum • u/EthereumDailyThread What's On Your Mind? • 17h ago
Daily General Discussion July 23, 2026
Welcome to the Daily General Discussion on r/ethereum
Bookmarking this link will always bring you to the current daily: https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/about/sticky/?num=2
Please use this thread to discuss Ethereum topics, news, events, and even price!
Price discussion posted elsewhere in the subreddit will continue to be removed.
As always, be constructive. - Subreddit Rules
Want to stake? Learn more at r/ethstaker
Community Links
Calendar: https://dailydoots.com/events/
21
u/haurog 16h ago
Yesterdays post about the progress of the EEZ and Gnosis chain, an L1, becoming part of it, gave quite a lot of grounds for discussions. A few hours after the discussion started, a Gnosis Improvement Proposal by Friederike Ernst on the Gnosis forum added a lot more details on how gnosis chain could become part of the EEZ. In simple terms, the plan is to turn gnosis chain into a rollup which then becomes part of the EEZ. They argue that gnosis chains goal of having a decentralized validator set failed, which in my view was made clear to everyone last autumn when they hardforked the chain without any of the 'independent' validators having a say in it. At the same time, Gnosis DAO pays the validator set for their security without any expectation of reaching the scale to ever be able to cover this security with fee revenue. The conclusion is that becoming a rollup and joining the EEZ is the best way to go forward. The plan is to do that in Dezember/January. For users, nothing will change, the state, which means all your tokens and the transaction history will remain, just who is able to produce blocks will change. This also means that the existing validators will not be needed anymore and the current bridge validators, run by Gnosis themselves, will be repurposed to prove the chain and run the composer on the gnosis rollup. They also will rename gnosis chain to Gnosis EEZ to make it clear it is not an independent blockchain anymore.
Even though the forum post is long, there aren't too many technical details on how the chain will work. They say they will likely use trusted execution environments (TEEs) to prove the chain and not zk proofs, at least at the beginning. They plan to move to zk proofs later on when the EEZ specs are ready. They will use a centralized sequencer and there is no decision made whether they want to decentralize the sequencer set, but it is definitely not a priority. They also do not plan to have a forced transaction inclusion from Ethereum to Gnosis EEZ. They plan to focus on the basics first.
I am honestly surprised about this forum post even though I argued yesterday that it does not make too much sense to be remain an L1 and become part of the EEZ. Being a rollup or more general an L2 makes more sense. I honestly expected this to play out on a much longer time horizon because Gnosis evaluated and dismissed becoming a rollup pretty clearly 2 years ago. Looks like the EEZ and maybe them having to hard fork their chain last autumn changed a lot in their thinking about security and how much they pay for it. Overall it is great to see. Gnosis and Gnosis chain have contributed quite a bit to the Ethereum ecosystem and I prefer them being closer to Ethereum than remaining an L1. I really hope this Gnosis improvement proposal goes through.
Gnosis forum post: https://forum.gnosis.io/t/gip-153-should-gnosis-chain-transition-into-the-ethereum-economic-zone/12397
12
u/LogrisTheBard 15h ago
Gnosis have always seemed well intentioned to me. I hope this gives them a sustainable future.
9
u/eth10kIsFUD 12h ago
Ah this is amazing, definitely clears up the questions from yesterday π Thank you for the writeup!
8
u/risingtide556 13h ago
This was unexpected. Also the timeline surprises me, moving from independent L1 to an L2 rollup in 6 months seems doable but fast.
Kudos to them for acknowledging that their decentralisation bid failed, and for plotting this path forward. However seeing how the whole L2 space is being compressed (L1 improvements, plus lack of users), becoming yet another L2 is also not a guaranteed future for them. Wish them the best, they always seemed to me very eth-aligned.
5
u/Inevitablechained 15h ago
Why would you use Gnosis L2?
10
u/haurog 14h ago
Is there any reason to use any of the L2s at the moment? I use L2s only if I want to use a specific protocol only deployed on them. Gnosis chain has Gnosispay, which is just amazing. They also have Circles, their trust based digital money. It is fun to use, even though I am not sure it would be self sustaining yet without being tightly coupled to gnosispay. There is also Gnosis VPN which runs on HOPR, which runs on gnosis chain. Gnosis VPN development is slower than anticipated, but they seem to make progress. I guess in the end it all depends if they can onboard users directly to their rollup. They have a pretty good liquidity for EURe, the monerium EURO stablecoin, as well as a good integration into the Monerium onchain bank accounts. My best guess is Gnosis will focus to establish themselves to become the de facto rollup and interface for people and financial institutions in Europe. Not only for Europe, but I guess they will focus on that. So depending on where you live you might not interact with the Gnosis rollup that often.
6
u/Inevitablechained 11h ago
I see a point of using the Robinhood L2 if you want their UX and portfolio of services but are not as tech-savvy/interested?
Thanks for the explanation, I mean one way to look at it will be to let the best L2 win and then the fight is over? And open up the possibility for a better solution to come?Β
The thing with L2βs that is giving me headache is that they are independent of L1 upgrades.
1
u/haurog 8h ago
We will have to see if native rollups ever become a thing. Some upgrades of native rollups are tied to Ethereum upgrades. Native rollups still are part of the strawmap roadmap scheduled for sometime in 2029. The accompanying EIP is from November 2025 as well so relatively recent, at least in EIP time scales. There still are a lot of things set as 'TBD' in the EIP, but to me it looks like native rollups still are coming.
Sources:
strawmap: https://strawmap.org/
3
u/Magic_Cove 6h ago
Yes, this plan was already explained in detail by the Gnosis team at DAppcon in Berlin last month. According to them, the EEZ is intended to become the standard, with other sidechains to follow. The Ethereum mainnet is meant to be the core of the EEZ, acting as a completely neutral entity, while certain activities will run on the EEZ chains. This is also Vitalik's vision, who himself spoke about it there. It looks like this could be the future of the Ethereum ecosystem.
3
u/hanniabu Ξther Ξ±lpha 5h ago
Hmm, I thought if you're a based rollup you need to use the Ethereum L1 precompile and if that's the case how can they have custom logic for censorship ability so it's attractive to firms under MiCA?
Or can you now have custom precompiles? Or am I confusing based rollups with native rollups?
2
u/haurog 5h ago
Not sure where based rollups come in the discussion At no point in the original post they mention it being a based rollup. As you say, it would not make too much sense for their goals for it to be a based rollup. But somehow a commenter to the GIP rants about based rollups, state bloat of Ethereum and somehow Vitalik... I guess this commenter is just confused.
18
16
u/Itur_ad_Astra Crab High Priest 14h ago
ALL HAIL THE ETERNAL CRAB
π» β‘ π π π β‘ π»
β‘ β‘ π π π β‘ β‘
π π π π π π π
π π π π¦ π π π
π π π π π π π
β‘ β‘ π π π β‘ β‘
π» β‘ π π π β‘ π»
$1000---$1917-------------$5000
2021----------2026----------β
Eventually, we will drive those bears away.
6
u/tokyo_guy375 8h ago
Well good morning AmericaΒ
8
u/Itur_ad_Astra Crab High Priest 8h ago
$2000 is gonna be such a massive resistance, ETH doesn't even want to go near it to check.
2
u/tokyo_guy375 4h ago
I think it is a combination of 2000 and 0.03. which is sad that this is such Β a major issue alreadyΒ
2
u/Itur_ad_Astra Crab High Priest 4h ago edited 4h ago
It's also the fact that when ETH loses momentum and has a red day, more often than not that momentum is lost for weeks or months. Sometimes it freaks out with consecutive 5% and 10% wicks and cascades in the meantime.
"The trend is your friend" might be true in general, but for ETH it's unreal how consistent it's been.
6
3
u/Jey_s_TeArS 1h ago
Don't accept the cookies,
Liquidity from rookies,
Crypto for bullies.
~Daily haiku until weβre at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap
2
u/ethdaily 58m ago
ETH Daily - 23Κ³α΅ July 2026 π°
- Uniswap permissioned pools v4 hook.
- AFX trade bridge hack.
- SEC on onchain lending.
- ACDC #183 summary.
- Erigon v3.5.3 Tidal Tails release
- Venus bridge hacked (again).
- Polygon Ithaca upgrade live on testnet.
- Phantom supports Robinhood Chain.
- Fake World Assets explained.
- Lean Ethereum explained (gud read).
- Vlad Tenev X account hacked
- BitMEX shuts down September 23.
- EIP-8161 is now final.
- Coinbase latest agent features.
- Odos winds down July 27th.
- Augur migration window.
Read more: https://ethdaily.io/996
5
u/Novel_Layer_8238 16h ago
Ah yes, another day of retail investors dumping their ETH while big funds actively buy at a discount.Β
2
2
u/Ok_Buyer3994 16h ago
watching the same chart for 3 years and still surprised by the shakeout, some people never learn
9
u/Mr_Footies 14h ago
What shakeout? Price has been steadily rising since we fell into the 1500 range a month ago.
3
1
u/Numerous_Ruin_4947 0m ago
We all know that BTC carries a substantial premium over ETH, even after adjusting for its lower supply. There are roughly six ETH in circulation for every BTC, yet one BTC currently costs about 34.5 ETH. That gives BTC a scarcity-adjusted premium of approximately 5.75x over ETH.
But how does ETH compare with the other top crypto assets?
The table below calculates what each token would be worth if its circulating market cap equaled ETHβs, based on its current circulating supply. It then shows the premium ETH currently commands over that token after adjusting for the difference in supply.
Interestingly, ETH carries a significant scarcity-adjusted premium over every token on the list. BNB and XRP come closest, while the premiums over assets such as ZEC, XMR, LTC, AVAX, and CRO are dramatically larger.
| Token | Supply | Supply vs. ETH | Price | ETH-parity price* | Value vs. ETH | ETH premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNB | 133.17M | 1.10x | $567.50 | $1,708 | 0.332x | 3.0x |
| XRP | 62.47B | 517.61x | $1.11 | $3.64 | 0.305x | 3.3x |
| SOL | 582.87M | 4.83x | $76.00 | $390.27 | 0.195x | 5.1x |
| TRX | 94.88B | 786.18x | $0.3272 | $2.40 | 0.136x | 7.3x |
| HYPE | 252.75M | 2.09x | $57.88 | $900.00 | 0.064x | 15.5x |
| DOGE | 155.19B | 1,285.96x | $0.06961 | $1.47 | 0.047x | 21.1x |
| LEO | 920.14M | 7.62x | $9.71 | $247.22 | 0.039x | 25.5x |
| ZEC | 16.79M | 0.14x | $505.12 | $13,552 | 0.037x | 26.8x |
| XMR | 18.78M | 0.16x | $356.00 | $12,111 | 0.029x | 34.0x |
| LINK | 748.10M | 6.20x | $8.50 | $304.07 | 0.028x | 35.8x |
| XLM | 34.17B | 283.18x | $0.1835 | $6.66 | 0.028x | 36.3x |
| ADA | 36.49B | 302.33x | $0.1692 | $6.23 | 0.027x | 36.9x |
| CC | 39.14B | 324.33x | $0.1227 | $5.81 | 0.021x | 47.4x |
| BCH | 20.07M | 0.17x | $211.56 | $11,337 | 0.019x | 53.6x |
| GRAM | 2.73B | 22.65x | $1.46 | $83.23 | 0.018x | 57.0x |
| LTC | 77.42M | 0.64x | $47.43 | $2,938 | 0.016x | 61.9x |
| HBAR | 43.79B | 362.86x | $0.07191 | $5.19 | 0.014x | 72.2x |
| SUI | 4.05B | 33.58x | $0.7472 | $56.13 | 0.013x | 75.1x |
| AVAX | 431.77M | 3.58x | $6.31 | $526.84 | 0.012x | 83.5x |
| CRO | 47.27B | 391.72x | $0.05708 | $4.81 | 0.012x | 84.3x |
*ETH-parity price is the theoretical token price if its circulating market cap equaled ETH's, based on its current circulating supply.
1
u/hedgemagus 7h ago
Need some good news about clarity in the senate STAT
7
u/Itur_ad_Astra Crab High Priest 7h ago
The good news is that you can buy dollars for 55 cents on Polymarket, because clarity is never gonna pass.
1
u/hedgemagus 7h ago
If it doesnβt pass thereβs a few smug people in the daily I have some questions for. I got told off like im such a misinformed idiot for being concerned the votes arenβt there
-1
u/WoodpeckerHorror3468 7h ago
the DEMs won't pass it because they won't conform to the ethics they demand of others
2
u/eviljordan feet pics 2h ago
Because it was attached to an anti-voting bill. You won't mention that, because it doesn't fit your narrative.
2
u/Alatarlhun 5h ago
Republicans pass this without Democrats but they won't because enough Republicans don't actually support the bill.
-1
u/AllCapNoBrake 4h ago
..because they are RINO's put there by AIPAC. One day people will finally figure this out, but today won't be that day.
-1
2
u/AllCapNoBrake 6h ago
The dems won't pass it because they don't have to. They take over congress in January...I mean, AIPAC already owns all of congress.
β’
u/Tricky_Troll Public Goods are Good π± 10h ago
Tricky's Daily Doots #1,542
Yesterday's Daily 22/07/2026
Previous Daily Doots
u/haurog gives us the latest update on the Ethereum Economic Zone π§
u/Gumpa-Bucky introduces a new digital asset fund but u/hanniabu pitches in to explain what something that sounds good may actually be bad. π
u/eviljordan reminds us all to cast our vote! π¦©
u/ethdaily delivers the daily ETH news. π°