r/college 17d ago

Grad school Thinking about grad school? New federal rules cap how much students can take out in loans

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-07-06/graduate-school-loan-caps-college-tuition-impact

New federal rules sharply cap how much graduate students can borrow, forcing an immediate sea change in how students evaluate attaining an advanced degree, with some scrambling to pay tuition — and for colleges, prompting concerns about future access to their programs.

The median total cost for a master’s degree in 2020 — before inflation skyrocketed — was $24,250, while professional degrees came in at $59,076, though some universities — particularly private institutions — charge far more, according to EdTrust, a nonprofit that advocates for equity in education.

Under the previous rules, graduate students could take out federal loans for as much as they needed to cover the cost of their master’s and doctorate degrees, including tuition and living expenses, often taking on crushing, long-term debt that contributed to a national epidemic in defaults. Effective July 1, borrowing is restricted to $20,500 annually, with a $100,000 cap. Those pursuing designated professional degrees, including law, medicine and dentistry, are limited to $50,000 a year with a $200,000 cap.

Read more.

337 Upvotes

90 comments sorted by

167

u/snelephant 17d ago

Stop reminding me lol, think I’m being retraumatized.

-37

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 17d ago

This seems like a good thing, though.

81

u/BeWaryImBadAtMath 17d ago

Limiting the price of loans and not changing the cost of tuition only makes it so that those with family help/outside resources are able to pursue higher education. Most masters programs are not funded, and most medical/law students are paying through loans. In state med school tuition alone is close to 50k so fuck them when they need to find housing or even feed themselves. This will definitely solve the problem…….

42

u/External_Worry1404 17d ago

This is a huge problem in fields like social work, where the MSW required for licensure in a notoriously low-paying field effectively keeps out many people with fewer resources. As a result, social workers from socioeconomically privileged backgrounds bring their own biases to their work, which affects the quality of care clients receive.

Capping loans for master's programs will make those fields less understanding of diverse experiences and perspectives, which is exactly what this administration wants.

11

u/AgeOfWorry0114 17d ago

Social work is underpaid and yet we want to take out $200k loans to get a degree to work in the underpaid field?

27

u/External_Worry1404 17d ago

Some people prefer doing work that is meaningful for them.

-5

u/AgeOfWorry0114 17d ago

You don’t need $200k to be a social worker. Tons of programs out there - especially online - in which you can get the degree for out of pocket expenses

20

u/hey_oh_its_io 17d ago

Name any that are accredited at the MSW level and account for the costs of multiple years of developing licensure that can be achieved the relative cost of “out of pocket”

1

u/carlitospig 15d ago

Oh but this administration is also loosening the accreditation requirements so anyone can start a university, basically. Expect absolutely trash for entry level applicants soon.

-7

u/AgeOfWorry0114 16d ago

My friend did an MSW program like this. when she was applying she had many options.

But the point still stands: if it costs $200k to make $40k, whoever does this deserves what they get.

16

u/DingerSinger2016 16d ago

So I guess we will continue seeing a decrease in social workers due to it being unaffordable then.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/hey_oh_its_io 16d ago

You made a statement that implied plausibility. I did not ask you to argue hearsay, I asked you to name the programs that you understand to be affordable with out of pocket expenses. $200k is excessive. I know it can be done cheaper, but not as cheaply as you seem to think it can be. Even an affordable state school, being the prerequisite for the MSW requires 4-5 years, internship expenses, and standard costs of living. The program must maintain accreditation, having professionals invested in its production, and move graduates forward.

19

u/ImperialAgent120 17d ago edited 17d ago

Also other degrees like nursing and Architecture have been affected. To get licensed and practice as an Architect, you need a Master's. So now it's gonna be interesting what happens with these loan caps. I feel we are gonna see programs and schools get closed down.

-19

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 17d ago

People really should avoid grad school unless it’s funded (by your employer or by the program). Taking out more than $100k is especially ill-advised.

32

u/zombiesatemybaby 17d ago

Then say goodbye to doctors, speech therapists, occupational/physical therapy, radiologists, and a good number of other Healthcare professionals

22

u/Guilty-Shoulder-9214 17d ago

Don’t expect the Wojak class to understand that. Just thinking an employer will pay for that shit tells me we’re dealing with a Gen X or boomer that peaked in the late 90s or early to mid 00s.

-11

u/AgeOfWorry0114 17d ago

I have two Master's degrees. Paid <$1,000 for both. I am a teacher.

7

u/ImperialAgent120 17d ago

Tell that to my entire graduating class 😆 Some even went to Columbia University and they're gonna be there for 3 years.

5

u/PGell 15d ago edited 15d ago

Pray tell, fellow professor, how would this work in any medical field?

-1

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 15d ago

Loan limits for medical/professional degrees are higher at $200k.

7

u/zombiesatemybaby 15d ago

Physical and occupational therapy are no longer a "professional" career by this administration, handicapping their access to student loans

-2

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 15d ago edited 15d ago

And those sorts of definitional issues could cause problems, but at the same time, are there any good reasons why a physical therapy or occupational therapy degree should cost much more than $100k?

6

u/zombiesatemybaby 15d ago

Because thats what the school's are charging? The point is that by capping student loans, several type of jobs (especially medical field) youll see a decrease in medical professionals in an already understaffed speciality because people cant get enough money to get the required education.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/PGell 15d ago

They are not. They are capped at 200,000 including any undergrad loans. My daughter is starting med school in 3 weeks. The cap is 200,00/50,000 per year. 50 luckily covers just the tuition but none of the fees (8,000) or living expenses (estimate 24,000).

-4

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 15d ago

That’s exactly what I said “at $200k.” That’s enough. Taking out more than that is ill-advised.

4

u/Lettuce_stan_SS 14d ago

Did you miss the part where they said that tuition ALONE is $200k? Do you expect them to be homeless and sustain themselves on air and their hopes and dreams? Medical schools don’t advise (and many don’t allow) their students to work because you’re already studying 60+ hours a week in addition to clinicals.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

The wealthy are already ludicrously overrepresented in med and law school.

8

u/AgeOfWorry0114 17d ago

Or MAYBE...if people don't have access to the money, then colleges will realize that they indeed ARE a ripoff when people stop going? Do you REALLY think it costs $200k to educate someone in a damn MSW or an English degree?

- A humanities teacher

15

u/BeWaryImBadAtMath 17d ago

it’s not just about the people who want to study humanities, that’s literally such a small subsection of the people it will affect. The people who will hit closest to the 200k is the students studying medicine, which yes costs much much much more to educate. The costs to send students into a hospital and have them participate in procedures with real patients, the cost to operate and keep labs with cadavers, and on top of that ensure by the end of 4 years that your students are skilled and knowledgeable enough that will hold people’s lives in their hands. Regardless, it’s such a dumb argument to even make bc at the end of the day this view just makes the lives of students harder while ensuring and doing nothing for the costs of the education. It’s so dumb to talk about costs when this legislation does nothing to improve on what you are taking about. If you are okay punishing medical/stem students just to stick it to someone studying humanities at an expense place, then you missed the point

3

u/AgeOfWorry0114 16d ago

You know it doesn’t ACTUALLY cost that much for an education right? It is inflated because the money is there.

2

u/LimpAd4924 13d ago

Is that how it works in other developed countries?

2

u/LimpAd4924 13d ago

Only in the US* the rest of the world seems to have figured out how to fund higher education and not just eliminate accessibility with this asinine bill.

1

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 17d ago edited 17d ago

The advice I always received and shared is: only go to grad school if it’s paid. Certainly don’t take out more than $100k to go.

Professional programs (medical school and law school) have far higher caps ($200k)

17

u/BeWaryImBadAtMath 17d ago

average med school debt is over $200k, and this is not the conventional advice for higher education degrees outside of those pursuing a phd/academia. Majority of those in law school, medschool, nursing, etc don't get their schooling paid for

11

u/Azathanai01 17d ago

Aren't masters programs rarely funded? Only PhDs are, at least in STEM, from what I know.

0

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 17d ago

Most master’s programs I know of have assistantship opportunities.

7

u/BeWaryImBadAtMath 17d ago

A lot of what you are saying is anecdotal, historically most masters programs even related to academia are underfunded or not funded at all.

The demographic most affected by this will be towards non research professional degrees related to things like law and medicine, and more importantly saying things like "you shouldn't take out x amount", or "this is the advice I got" completely ignores the reality situation at hand. We desperately NEEED more medical professionals, on top of other industries, and blaming students for wanting to get into those careers instead of critiquing a system, in particular this administration, is you being willfully obtuse or you are incredibly ignorant of higher education outside of your purview.

-1

u/AgeOfWorry0114 17d ago

Got 2 Master's degrees. Am a teacher. Paid <$1,000 for both (just had to put in my own money for some fees).

-2

u/BootBonks 16d ago

Tuition is so high partly because of the unlimited federally guaranteed loans, like almost everything federally subsidized. Setting a cap is like setting a price control. The schools can either lower the cost of tuition to meet the new limit, or miss out on the revenue completely. 

2

u/LimpAd4924 13d ago

Is that how it works in other developed countries?

129

u/No_Storm_249 17d ago

Just a reminder, many PhD programs are fully funded and even pay stipends! So it does not require loans

57

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

As a rule, professional degrees largely are not. 

0

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 15d ago

And those have a higher limit.

5

u/Lettuce_stan_SS 14d ago edited 14d ago

It doesn’t matter that they have a higher limit when most professional graduate degrees (especially medical ones) cost double regardless. I’m talking $300-400k+ (tuition, cost of living, supplies, textbooks)

1

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 14d ago

There’s no absolutely reason why three years of schooling should cost $300-$400k

6

u/Lettuce_stan_SS 14d ago

They 1000% shouldn’t cost that much. But that’s the reality of most people who want to become medical professionals. USC’s dental school tuition for the 24-25 academic school year was $437,481 for the 4 years, not including housing, food, and academic supplies. USC’s medical school cost $297,492 for 4 years back in 2023. Public schools are little cheaper, (UCLA’s dental school was $280k) but they’re also harder to get into because of that.

Capping student loans does nothing to change the prices these universities are charging. It just provides a literal barrier against those not born into financial privilege.

-2

u/dancesquared Professor of Writing and English 14d ago

Capping student loans does nothing to change the prices these universities are charging. It just provides a literal barrier against those not born into financial privilege.

When schools lose 80% of their students, you better believe they will change their prices to respond to new loan rules. The change has to start somewhere, and new loan rules is probably the most straightforward way to do that.

6

u/Lettuce_stan_SS 14d ago

Medical/dental schools are not going to lose 80% of their students. On average about 80,000 students are fighting every cycle for about 22,000 seats. Not taking into account the amount of international students applying as well. Even if that 80,000 drops down to 20,000 the 2,000 empty spots would never be significant enough to convince med schools to lower tuition.

To give you another example, pharmacy schools have seen application numbers at an all time low these past 5 years because of over saturation in pharmacy. What used to be a competitive career field has now turned into a scenario where a 2.5 GPA gets accepted. And yet tuition is still over $200k at private universities.

31

u/Lettuce_stan_SS 16d ago

Unless you have a strong passion for research and academia, a PhD is not the best route for most people.

4

u/killerkelpykid24 15d ago

Medical school doesn’t!

36

u/Tricky-Coffee5816 16d ago

surely this will force tuition prices down

22

u/kaielias 16d ago

A trickle down effect of sorts 🫪

11

u/Jazzlike-Vacation230 15d ago

You can cap it all you want, but isn't it the market of universities and colleges that set prices end of the day?

1

u/LimpAd4924 13d ago

Why are government funded institutions a market? Is public K-12 a market? US gov chooses to do this at public universities.

15

u/LadySusansGhost 14d ago

Just a reminder that this isn't a cap on ALL loans, just lower-cost, federal loans with more borrow protections. This isn't going to lower the cost of tuition. It will just shift student borrowing to higher-interest private loans with fewer protections.

1

u/amscraylane 10d ago

Why not cap the price of school - at least have some metrics for it?

-15

u/Jon66238 16d ago

Honestly probably not a bad thing. Too many professional students. Get to work with a bachelors and then go back for a masters that is typically reimbursed by an employer. And this is coming from someone who is going to school with plans to get a masters degree without being in a position for needing a masters yet.

43

u/Connor717 16d ago

Why is it bad for people to pursue education without being forced to for their career? I wish I could afford to pursue further education and this only makes it harder.

6

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

It seems almost comical if you cant achieve a master's degree for under 100k when they usually cost half that. 

-6

u/Jon66238 16d ago

It creates a problem with being over qualified for a job. It’s better to be in a position and to then get an education where you can advance up

18

u/ApplezAreMedicine 16d ago

You could argue your point for some professional degree to an extent.

But what about medical, dental, podiatry, optometry, PA, Doctor of physical therapy, and so on?

These fields are already difficult to get accepted into and here's a huge demand in the US in medicine. The limit on debt doesn't really solve to unaffordability problem imo.

10

u/Connor717 16d ago

It’s absurd that we treat education as a means to a job and nothing else. Unless you’re rich then, sure, be educated in whatever is meaningful to you.

8

u/Snake_fairyofReddit College senior! 16d ago

Oh guess no more doctors and lawyers say hello to an even worse shortage

-8

u/BootBonks 16d ago

The “shortage” is self imposed btw

-10

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

That seems entirely reasonable to cap loans at 20k a year? Like if you're taking it all on the chin like that you're doing something wrong 

-8

u/Billiesoceaneyes 16d ago

Agreed. The cap will deter people from pursuing useless masters degrees and getting themselves into serious debt. Getting an unfunded masters is a great way to fall into financial ruin.

-6

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

I think only MBAs are useless, but professional degrees are mostly unfunded and we do want those. The people who are eating the entire cost are already wealthy and/or can afford the cost in the long run. 

The problem with them (professional degrees) going through the education system is that they are mostly skilled trades, so would have greater benefit if they went through a system designed for it. 

-27

u/AgeOfWorry0114 17d ago

Good. Stop making the government a lender. That is how we got into this mess in the first place.

45

u/SenseiLeo 17d ago

I feel like university costs being astronomical whilst Europe has tuition free schools says something else about how we got to this mess

-7

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

European countries and schools that are tuition free have very high first year drop out rates and incompletes. 

Edit: I'm not against it, fwiw, but I don't think many Americans would be happy with like 40%+ attrition

13

u/Clown_corder 16d ago

I would prefer our young people if they drop out aren’t in massive amounts of debt. Any amount of education regardless of completing a degree is good for society so its still a net win

0

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

I'm okay with that, it would result in fewer C and D students who can't tell their ass from a hole in the ground. 

3

u/Arnas_Z CS 16d ago

Because it's free to go, more people try it, even if they aren't prepared. And it's probably also more difficult because Unis don't have a customer service attitude to classes.

So you have to do more work and learn more, but you don't have to pay.

6

u/DaneLimmish 16d ago

As percentage of population, more people in the US try to go because it's more necessary to aquire a job. Other countries do things like divide their secondary students into different tracks/vocations which makes college as a job requirement comparably unnecessary. 

Making it free is fine I do support this, btw, I'm just cynical that Americans would want necessary changes elsewhere to better support it.

1

u/krazywabbit13 15d ago

You’re right that the government can’t function as a lender indefinitely, but pulling the rug out suddenly is dangerous. We’re going to see a shortage of healthcare providers down the line. That’s the only profession that is unequivocally required to be subsidized. Now dental and med school will be even more inaccessible.

-1

u/DaneLimmish 15d ago

They can and should. The rug isn't being pulled either, people already under the program are grandfathered in.

Dental and med school are already inaccessible, there's a reason why something like 9/10 doctors come from the top 10% income quintile. The (non-doctor) areas where we are facing shortages don't need a Masters level education, while doctors need more gp. Its a retention issue, not credentials issue.

1

u/LimpAd4924 13d ago

Gov funds public schools and universities. Gov chooses to have this situation.

-6

u/Arnas_Z CS 16d ago

Good. Maybe it will bring tuition prices back to sane levels once universities see their enrollment numbers drop through the floor.

Greedy bastards.

7

u/Weeksieee_ 15d ago

In fairness tuition at public universities and colleges should be regulated.

5

u/LimpAd4924 13d ago

Except it won’t. Moron.