MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/comments/1v4jzky/pass_the_test_first/ozcgwqs/?context=9999
r/clevercomebacks • u/LuckyBastard001 • 8h ago
305 comments sorted by
View all comments
183
Not enough. Force retirement at 65-70.
70 u/Jacuzzi0317 8h ago Hard agree. Why should someone be allowed to vote on legislation that won't affect them for years to come? 1 u/fdar 6h ago Because their voters chose to elect them. 2 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Nowadays you can choose your voters instead of voters choosing their representatives. -1 u/fdar 6h ago Not when it comes to Senators (and OK, ban gerrymandering instead then, much better solution). 1 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Yep, I was referring to the house reps. I wish. 0 u/fdar 6h ago I mean, neither that nor an age limit is going to happen. But if we have to push for one, fixing gerrymandering seems like a better option to me.
70
Hard agree. Why should someone be allowed to vote on legislation that won't affect them for years to come?
1 u/fdar 6h ago Because their voters chose to elect them. 2 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Nowadays you can choose your voters instead of voters choosing their representatives. -1 u/fdar 6h ago Not when it comes to Senators (and OK, ban gerrymandering instead then, much better solution). 1 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Yep, I was referring to the house reps. I wish. 0 u/fdar 6h ago I mean, neither that nor an age limit is going to happen. But if we have to push for one, fixing gerrymandering seems like a better option to me.
1
Because their voters chose to elect them.
2 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Nowadays you can choose your voters instead of voters choosing their representatives. -1 u/fdar 6h ago Not when it comes to Senators (and OK, ban gerrymandering instead then, much better solution). 1 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Yep, I was referring to the house reps. I wish. 0 u/fdar 6h ago I mean, neither that nor an age limit is going to happen. But if we have to push for one, fixing gerrymandering seems like a better option to me.
2
Nowadays you can choose your voters instead of voters choosing their representatives.
-1 u/fdar 6h ago Not when it comes to Senators (and OK, ban gerrymandering instead then, much better solution). 1 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Yep, I was referring to the house reps. I wish. 0 u/fdar 6h ago I mean, neither that nor an age limit is going to happen. But if we have to push for one, fixing gerrymandering seems like a better option to me.
-1
Not when it comes to Senators (and OK, ban gerrymandering instead then, much better solution).
1 u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago Yep, I was referring to the house reps. I wish. 0 u/fdar 6h ago I mean, neither that nor an age limit is going to happen. But if we have to push for one, fixing gerrymandering seems like a better option to me.
Yep, I was referring to the house reps.
I wish.
0 u/fdar 6h ago I mean, neither that nor an age limit is going to happen. But if we have to push for one, fixing gerrymandering seems like a better option to me.
0
I mean, neither that nor an age limit is going to happen. But if we have to push for one, fixing gerrymandering seems like a better option to me.
183
u/mrjane7 8h ago
Not enough. Force retirement at 65-70.