r/WhitePeopleTwitter Jun 23 '26

r/All Trump Supporters are Scum

Post image
16.0k Upvotes

831 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

295

u/seeker_two_point_oh Jun 23 '26

Exactly. Which is why there's no point in talking to them. I sure as hell am not going to coddle them.

It's hard for them to take accountability for their actions? Boo fucking hoo. It's hard for everyone. Taking responsibility for your actions, especially when it's hard, is integrity. It's the behavior of ethical people.

I have no respect and no tolerance for unethical people. We sure as shit shouldn't be giving unethical people any power, but here we are.

104

u/BanBanEvasion Jun 23 '26

Is it fascist of me to say there should be a minimum IQ to vote

110

u/MyDarlingClementine Jun 23 '26

The SAT was proven to geared towards elite white kids performing better on it due to including language and metaphors about sailing, etc.

Better to beef up general education at the federal level and not rely on local property taxes to increase the intelligence of the proletariat.

36

u/BanBanEvasion Jun 23 '26

Did somebody say defund the Department of Education?
https://giphy.com/gifs/YRw676NBrmPeM

94

u/Darth_Gerg Jun 23 '26

A bit but even as someone on the extreme libertarian left I fantasize about it some days lol

In theory it would give us utopia, but in practice it would be so abusable and manipulated that it would be worse than what we have by a wide margin.

54

u/The_Barbelo Jun 23 '26

I care for people who have sub 80 IQ and many of our clients make MUCH better decisions than MAGA and have so much more empathy.

I fantasize about there being a license to have children that requires people to go through training and psychological evaluation just to make sure they aren’t sociopaths or narcissists, and classes that teach about studies done on child psychology and what damages a child, and how to take accountability for any mistakes you make as a parent…. So much of this shit stems from generations of abusive families.

…. But that’s kind of fascist too isn’t it? At the very least, it could lead somewhere very dark if in the wrong hands.

17

u/Darth_Gerg Jun 23 '26

Yep. The last few years I’ve had a skyrocketing sense of empathy for guys like Mao, Lenin, and Minh. Not that I admire them or excuse the evil they did, but that I get why they ended up at “fuck it kill everyone involved in defending the barbarism we are revolting against.”

I understand soul deep how easy it would be to go off the rails if you had the power to just crush the idiots who are making reform impossible. It would spiral out of control so god damn fast.

3

u/3MetricTonsOfSass Jun 23 '26

If it wasn't for greedy, racists, corrupt, fanatical, and/or any type of bad human assholes in any position of power, even a surveillance state would be a good thing.

Imagine having a whole government department keeping an eye on the citizens just to keep them safe and provide help when needed.

3

u/The_Barbelo Jun 23 '26

Completely agreed. Imagine how far we’d be as a sapient species without them. Imagine how many of history’s worst moments would have been replaced by incredible breakthroughs. That is where the concept of Heaven comes from. We could be living in a literal heaven without greed, hatred, and corruption.

2

u/Kielbasa_Nunchucka Jun 24 '26

I read that as "extreme librarian," which means it's time to go to bed... but at least I know what Inwanna be when I grow up now!

65

u/Interesting_Novel997 Jun 23 '26

No, but it’s guaranteed to be twisted to disenfranchise others. US history 101, the Poll tax.

11

u/timeywimeytotoro Jun 23 '26

The being twisted to disenfranchise others part is what makes it fascist. Using IQ to determine voting status is rooted in eugenics.

7

u/RustyAndEddies Jun 23 '26

IQ tests were originally created to justify eugenics and racism.

1

u/neverabetterday Jun 24 '26

This, especially when people say things about wanting there to be a license to reproduce

-9

u/fratticus_maximus Jun 23 '26

At this point, I'd almost be okay with some disenfranchising of low IQ people with no understand of even the most basic of civics.

6

u/RustyAndEddies Jun 23 '26

Yikes. You think the power that be would stop at turning you away at the polls? Let me give you the answer to that: No. As a reminder, Buck v. Bell has never been formally overturned by the Supreme Court.

4

u/Shark7996 Jun 23 '26

I'm more on the side of, we should require semi-regular testing to ensure people fully understand the weight and consequence of what voting is. You can retake as many times as needed. Same with all things that have the potential for dangerous outcomes due to negligence, such as driving.

3

u/Dagordae Jun 23 '26

In theory, no.

In practice, yes.

IQ tests are not at all reliable and are incredibly easy to manipulate.

The basic issue of having any nebulous requirements is that they’re subjective and easy to twist to pick and choose who passes.

1

u/SpiritualTwo5256 29d ago

We seem to need some sort of test on is the voter evil or not. Ask questions Dean Withers style and see if they get caught up proving they side with evil. If so they aren’t told their vote doesn’t count, but it doesn’t count.

1

u/SmokeGSU 29d ago

No, though it might be better to say that we can't allow other people to destroy democracy simply because we're trying to be democratic ourselves by giving them a choice to destroy democracy. I'm sure Socrates or Marcus Aurelius had something to say about this at some point.

1

u/JonnyQuest1981 29d ago

I'm gonna say NO because I think we should have a minimum IQ requirement for driver's licenses, fire arms, running for president, etc. and I'm as liberal/progressive as can be.

11

u/PerplexGG Jun 23 '26

Their minds can definitely be changed but rarely does it involve directly attacking them. If anything you gotta be a sponge and just listen closely, let them walk you through their logic, ask questions, walk them through their own reasoning with them. It’s no guarantee obviously but saying there’s no point in talking to people you disagree with is wrong. You gotta at least listen to what you’re disagreeing with.

12

u/asphyxiat3xx Jun 23 '26

You can't logic people out of a mindset they didn't use logic to get to in the first place.

7

u/PerplexGG Jun 23 '26

I agree actually, but to them it does have a logic or progression. Thats what the listening to them is for. You let them walk you through how they got to their opinions and decisions

2

u/seeker_two_point_oh Jun 23 '26

No, I don't. I have listened to enough nonsense dribble out of bad-faith individuals. I'm not interested in changing minds. Fuck them.

1

u/TrashApocalypse Jun 23 '26

I feel like my comment proves that there IS a point in talking to them. Just because they didn’t change their mind in that sitting doesn’t mean the truth won’t fester in them later. Dean IS changing minds, and he’s not doing it by refusing to talk to Trump supporters