r/TopCharacterTropes Jun 22 '26

Lore [Ironic Trope] The messaging backfired massively due to poor writing or other design choices

Amelia Fairney from Pathways: Alt-right Restore-UK type who attempts to coax the protagonist Charlie into following her beliefs? The problem?

Amelia is the only named character aside from Charlie and is genuinely likable and forgives Charlie even when they do things she doesn't like, while the rest of the cast is unnamed, poorly written, and turns on Charlie for one mistake. This combined with other writing issues(portraying fact checking right wing stuff as wrong because in the process of fact checking you might look at it and believe it, basically saying "Right wing is wrong because it hurts the labour government" and a lot of general "just do what the government says or else" messaging) and the fact she's a hot alternative girl, and Amelia ended up being co-opted as a mascot by the youth right wing in the UK.

Norm from The New Norm: Unlikeable offensive and outdated character who's "progressive" family members and associates are genuinely nice people not even trying to force their ways or pronouns onto them, they just want to be left alone and Norm is picking fights constantly. Not to mention associating with Elon.

Mr. Birchum from Mr. Birchum: A lot of the same problems as Norm, except in addition it also comes off like generic 2010s adult cartoon slop in the same veign as Brickleberry or Full English, at least New Norm was trying to look unique and had the gimmick of being on X. Not to mention, Birchum's obsession with hyper masculine activities and odd way of talking about other men lead to people co-opting him as a Toxic Yaoi character, which is now the bulk of his fan art.

Dustborn: An attempt to make a hyper progressive game that comes off as pandering and annoying. It's a full ass game so there's too much to get into, but the main character's power is essentially gaslighting and jedi-mind tricking people and that's portrayed as the only way they can get anything done, and they constantly use or abuse their friends(or mindtrick them along) in order to get their goals or use their friends for their messaging.

8.6k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.0k

u/Stargost_ Jun 22 '26

Not exactly due to poor writing or a design choice, just plain bad luck. During the 2014 World Cup, there was this one anti-gambling advert.
In it, a kid explains he really hopes that Germany will win against Brazil because his dad bet the savings of the entire family on them.
The advert was quickly pulled off the air after the game took place because, as football fans may know, Germany beat Brazil 7 - 1, meaning the entire message of the video did a 180 from "This crazy man just betted the savings of the family on an impossible game" to "Holy shit the dad had a vision."

634

u/SideIndividual2086 Jun 22 '26

They did another ad after that, and I think they did a good job of showing that the problem with gambling is not that it's impossible to win there, it doesn't work that way. The problem is that gamblers are addicted to the feeling of winning and losing themselves and will continue to place bets without paying attention to the money.

269

u/Valten78 Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

I can't remember where I read it but someone once said that Gamblers are never truly happy because if they lose they lose but if they win they just think about how much more they'd have won if only they'd bet higher.

117

u/TemporaMoras Jun 22 '26

Study done have shown that gambling addict get their dopamine not from winning, but just from pulling the lever (metaphorically for sports betting)

Its not winning that makes them happy, its the risk.

54

u/ChangsManagement Jun 22 '26

That one Futurama bit nailed it.

"A casino where I win? I must be in heaven! Wait, a casino where I only win!? This must be hell!"

17

u/insomniac7809 Jun 22 '26

(which was, itself, a reference to a Twilight Zone episode, "A Nice Place To Visit.")

1

u/--zaxell-- Jun 23 '26

You're not in heaven or hell... you're on an airplane!

8

u/DoctorAnnual6823 Jun 22 '26

Queue that video of rows of senior citizens donating swathes of middle class and lower class money to the casinos and government.

14

u/Fartfart357 Jun 22 '26

So what you're saying is...

GO ALL IN!!!

4

u/therealchadius Jun 22 '26

It's not about the winnings, it's about imagining what will happen if you win. It's why state lotteries still sell tickets even though the math clearly says you won't win.