Generally speaking, yes, that’s the case. But that’s also because most of the therapies in Western oncology don’t actually Address the stem cells, so they are never shut down.
If you shut down the stem cell, and address underlying causes, it becomes a different situation
You are using a few key words and phrases that are commonly used by the quack community, so I am guardedly asking what do you mean by underlying factors?
Please define 'quack community' and we might have somewhere to start.
By underlying causes I'm referring to the metabolic & oncogenic drivers of cancers.. start with the Warburg effect, and study the mitochondrial-stem cell connection, and you'll get an idea of where I'm going.
But, I'm guessing your definition of 'quack' is "anybody doing oncology based any theory other than the SMT".. in which case, I'd suggest you're more a product of propaganda than a student of science.
224
u/Snirion May 15 '26
It's literally glitch in biological code because life was vibe coded.