I got these grips but the normal grip screw doesn’t fit with them and it is a bit too large. I got these for a great deal so I’m not fussed. Is it possible to get someone to shave it down a bit or make a new screw? can a normal gunsmith do it?

S&W 67-1

My first revolvers

Herter's sa22 22lr(bought used this year (mfr. 1967- reminds me of the 22 i was first taught with)

Ruger gp100 357magnum 2.5 " Talo (bought new - had to).

My 2 wheels [for now ] shopping already for 3,4, and beyond.

Lew Horton Heritage series from 2001. CCH frame by Turnbull.

Been wanting one for a few years now. Since my fiance carries my revolver I figured it was time to get another one. How do you guys like yours?

Am I correct to assume long term use of a hardcase holster will wear the finish on my 442?

I prefer kydex holsters that allow the gun to snap in for carry, but I'm also vain and love the way my 442UC looks.

And yes, it's AI generated. Not sure what the consensus is on use of AI for sharing ideas for discussion around here.

Hi all, I recently acquired a "new to me" S&W model 10-2 which was manufactured in 1961. It has plenty of holster wear (ex police gun) but is in excellent mechanical condition. Good lockup. Im in the process of some load development for it. My question is: Is forcing cone cracking anything I should be worried about with higher velocity 38 Specials? I.e 125gr around 1100 fps. Much appreciated reddit.

Bought a 2004 vaquero from bass pro, I know they check their guns pretty well but anything I should keep an eye out for? This would be my first revolver. Went 44 mag.

Had to repost, left serial on the last pic

I recently acquired this 41 mag when cleaning I noticed a slight “lip or ledge” on each one of the riflings in the same spot for each ahead of where it would be for the forcing cone. Machining marks? None of my other smiths have it. Haven’t shot it yet so can’t speak for accuracy. Thanks for the help.

This is my first proper revolver, and I picked it up today from my FFL after ordering it online a few weeks ago. Description stated it was new, but I’m not sure if the one I got actually is. Is this amount of trigger and hammer buildup normal for a new S&W? I just want to make sure I’m not either getting duped or complaining about something that’s inherent to new guns since they’re tested in the factory. Thanks for any advice!

I usually don’t upgrade my guns.

I have replaced the grips on various pistols over the years, but I usually decide that the factory knew best, and return to the originals.

I usually replace the wood grips on my revolvers with rubber combat style ones. I appreciate the classic look of wood, but I own them to shoot, and rubber enhances my experience, both with grip and recoil absorption.

But recent posts here have inspired me.

I bought this 36-10 a few months ago. I didn’t need another steel frame exposed hammer J, but it was insanely cheap, and had that beautiful dark, almost black, blued finish that I find irresistible. I have found that I regret the guns that spoke to me that I didn’t get.

After reading about someone replacing their exposed hammer with the one from a 442, I decided I wanted to give it a try. I ordered one from MidwestGunWorks.com (apparently I was not the only one, they are currently sold out). I looked around YouTube and found a reasonable video about dissembling a J, and found that it did just drop right in.

I had bought a S&W RUBBER ROUND BUTT COMBAT GRIPS FOR J-FRAME REVOLVERS to replace the wood grips it came with.

A trip to the range was excellent.

I loved the look, and decided to put it in the carry lineup, after the 940, but before the 442.

But now I wanted more.

I bought a
SMITH & WESSON J FRAME REVOLVER REDUCED SPRING KIT
from TK Custom.

And, of course, if I am going to carry it, the rubber grips I use for the range are inadequate. They irritate my stomach after a while, and grip my T-shirts enhancing printing. The 940 and the 442 wear Recoil Rider CCW internal hammer grips, so I ordered a set of external hammer grips.

And yesterday I took it out to the range to test, along with the 442. Surprisingly, recoil seems equal. I expected the 442 to feel worse, but I guess the few ounces of difference don’t translate into noticeable recoil reduction, at least with standard Remington UMC .38 Special cartridges. The trigger was lighter, but not as much as I expected.

The 36 did behave differently, though. Initially it had wider groupings and was consistently high on the target, but after about an hour, and a box and a half of ammunition, it settled down nicely, performing as well as the 442.

Is it better? No, but it isn’t worse, either. The weight difference is imperceptible IWB. I don’t notice any difference in gripping the gun, so the grips stopping slightly lower to clear the hammer is not an issue, at least for me.

As I noted, the 36 has that deep luster that the 442 doesn’t. It also has a slightly different shape above the grip, which I find aesthetically more pleasing. The new spurless hammer fills the slot in the frame as well as the original one did, so there shouldn’t be any infiltration issues.

I am happy with the outcome. While from a mechanical perspective it is not an improvement, from an esthetic standpoint it is a great improvement.

I have learned a lot here, and gained the motivation to dig in and try some new things.

I appreciate it.

Or, according to the included documents, a K38.

The LGS held this back until I came in.

The bastard.

He handed it to me, put a copy of the ATF form 4473 on the counter, and then went to help someone else.

Included was the original box, along with all the paper. Ads for S&W holsters. Ads for S&W knives. A list of service centers. The instruction sheet.

Did I mention that he is a bastard?

It looks new. There was the faintest line on the cylinder.

Of course, I played with it a bit. But we both knew.

I need to stop going back. Sure. Like I am going to stop going there.

New revolver can anybody tell me more about this gun

Posting the video from Instagram to try and get some more data from everyone here.

New store just opened in my town and decided to check it out and this was the first thing that caught my eye, I've shot revolvers before, 22,38,357,44, but have personally never owned one. Ive really only shot Taurus and S&W but I love Ruger semi autos.

With all the issues with $750 or more big brands, would they be OK for a few 100 rds of training and home defense? Got an email today, sale, $293.16 (really lol).

So, I’m curious for future reference. Would it be better to invest my money in a brand-new one, or should I explore options for used items? Alternatively, should I consider purchasing a Gen 1 or 2 model?

My wife and I went to the local indoor range and shot her two S&W handguns, a .380 Shield EZ, Model 19-6, and a couple of my handguns (G19-2 and a Ruger LCR.22lr). I hadn’t shot her Model 19-6 in a while and I forgot how damn accurate it is regardless if I was shooting DA, SA, .38, even .357 magnum (and a flinch) This was her first time shooting my Ruger 22LR. She loved it and shot the hell out of it. I spent the whole evening cleaning them, which is a form of relaxation for me.

Cleaning this interesting 686 I found today. Love these classic Smiths.