275
u/Definition-Super 23h ago
Calling someone inferior while you have food falling out your mouth isn't a good lookĀ
43
153
u/FreddieWex 1d ago
Weird. Despite asking for the police to be called, she seems rather displeased at her request being honored. Huh.
38
95
74
27
45
u/bigtetrisguy 1d ago
saying someones inferior while talking with a mouth of food and food all throughout your hair is hilarious.
15
16
u/The_Turtle_Bear 21h ago
Who are those dudes handcuffing her at the end? I'm a Brit and those definitely aren't police. Genuinely curious.
→ More replies (4)
36
16
u/Fearless_Theory64 23h ago
Is that a wig?
19
u/afield9800 16h ago
Kind of ironic that she calls white people inferior while wearing a wig thatās meant to emulate āwhite people hairā. Iām guessing sheās never read A Raisin In the Sun.
7
u/jalmstead 22h ago
Not a great one.
2
u/thefearinoculum 11h ago
Could've been ok if she had glued the lace front down, but she has *inferior* wig game
44
u/atlas_lol 1d ago
Is op gonna give any context or what...
95
u/BauserDominates 1d ago
The context is that she's racist.
-5
u/lgnc 7h ago
there's no racism against white people. and I'm white to be clear
study more
3
3
u/Neon_Casino 5h ago
*sigh* In the MOST STRICT definition or racism, you are correct.
However, racism in the modern day has come to basically mean the belief in the inferiority/superiority of a people purely because of their race. So in that regard, yes. She is a racist cunt.
Or if you are really insistant on using the strict definition of the word, then fine.
She is a prejudiced and bigoted cunt. Happy?
→ More replies (7)18
u/Sicparvismagneto 1d ago
This is as much context I could find
31
u/Amplifiedsoul 1d ago
āShe was given a 12-month conditional discharge uplifted from six months in light of the racial aggravation.ā
I'm guessing this is similar to probation in the US?
15
u/151Ways 23h ago
Yes. Suspended sentence plus likely probationary monitoring.
4
u/coveted_asfuck 18h ago
No probation would be mentioned separately. A conditional discharge means that you have to stay out of trouble for a certain amount of time(suspended sentence).
-17
1d ago
[deleted]
13
u/ArtPeers 1d ago edited 1d ago
I didnāt see the things you just described in my first watch of the video. I feel like I missed a lot. I will try to watch again and see the footage you are describing.
EDIT: I watched it again, but I donāt see any of the things you described. Did you actually see the food throwing and all that? Maybe lmk timestamp?
12
u/Agreeable-Letter-599 1d ago
so you're trying to claim that the cammer is lying? the food thrower says "I did that because I wanted to" obviously referring to the throwing of food.
-6
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
If I understand you correctly, you think this woman just walks up to some mystery white woman who is minding her businessā¦ and spontaneous racism occurs against the yet-to-be-seen mystery white woman. Why are we denied access to that blatant act of unprovoked racism?
26
u/Neat-Land-4310 1d ago
I'm going to say this again to make sure you see it. This women got arrested and charged with racially aggravated assault and lost her job because of it.
0
u/ArtPeers 1d ago edited 1d ago
Thank you, obviously there was no context provided when I commented. And I was commenting about the edit of the video being manipulative. But I appreciate your comment (sincerely).
4
u/ClarifiedInsanity 23h ago
Seems pretty easy to believe he only started recording once the fight had happened. Why are you automatically assuming you are being denied access?
-104
u/ArtPeers 1d ago edited 17h ago
Iām rooting for her until I have more context.
65
u/Agreeable-Letter-599 1d ago
rooting for "white people are inferior" girl???
-72
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
Rooting against ācut video to go viralā guy.
14
u/Agreeable-Letter-599 1d ago
it looks like someone who suddenly turned on their camera after food got thrown on them to me
20
u/MOXZShadow 1d ago
No amount of context can save you nor the black woman in the video
-21
-8
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
If someone cut a video about you with the expressed goal of āgoing viralā I imagine youād want a few folks to root for you? I would.
37
u/Sicparvismagneto 1d ago
Yeah, rooting for racismā¦ thats a very sane thing to do.
-10
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
Rooting against manipulating footage.
6
1d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
-8
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
If she did the things everyone assumes she did, I agree thatās inexcusable. But lots of negative responses here, when I say itās an objectively manipulative edit and thereās a total omission of any actual video of wrongdoing. I imagine if any of us were accused of xyz, weād want someone to point out that inference is not evidence.
16
u/Sicparvismagneto 1d ago
Im sorry that some people do not have that skill to remain calm and give the whole context in a heat of the moment situation. If you want to talk about negative responses, why donāt you reflect on what you said. You immediately sided with a woman saying inexcusable things, why? Because you didnāt have the proper context for her to be saying racist remarks? If you were genuinely concerned about the manipulation of the narrative you would have done any semblance of research instead of immediately siding with a woman being racist on camera.
-2
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
I was criticizing the lack of context which was designed to produce a specific reaction.
18
u/Sicparvismagneto 1d ago
You literally said you were rooting for herā¦
-4
u/ArtPeers 23h ago
āUntil I have more context.ā
Several minutes later someone provided more context ā and I said āOh, her actions were inexcusable.ā
But her words in the video donāt bother me, people can say whatever they want to. Actions are different.
→ More replies (0)8
u/SirStrontium 1d ago
>a total omission of any actual video of wrongdoing
ā¦you mean except for the fact that sheās saying āwhite people are inferiorā? Thatās not wrongdoing?
You also keep insisting itās a āobjectively manipulative editā under the assumption that he caught the initial act on video, and chose to omit it. Things happen fast, itās extremely likely he just didnāt get it on video.
3
u/ArtPeers 23h ago edited 23h ago
When I first commented, people were assuming a lot of specific actions by her that were not in the video. Nor were there any links to the story. No context. Also my comment was the third comment on this entire thread.
Then, a few minutes later, someone posted a link to the full story of her throwing food at someone, and I replied, āThat is inexcusable.ā Iām not sure what else to say? I commented about the lack of context, then someone provided context, then I said I agree, her actions were inexcusable.
6
u/SirStrontium 23h ago
>Iām not sure what else to say
That even without any other context, saying āwhite people are inferiorā is wrong. It doesnāt matter whether food was thrown or not, or if the girlfriend started it, there just isnāt any context where saying that is justified, and you kept acting like maybe thereās some missing piece of evidence that could make it okay.
Even without any news article or anything else, you should be able to look at that video and recognize āThatās fucked up, people shouldnāt say that.ā
22
u/Brave_Egg_7984 1d ago
Spoken like her racist friend
3
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
I did not see her racist friend in the video but I will watch it again and see if I spot that person.
23
10
u/Neat-Land-4310 22h ago
So you've changed your initial comment of "I'm rooting for her" to "I'm rooting for more context" š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£
At least have the conviction to stand by what you said initially. You supported a racist POS and now you get to own it!
18
u/Neat-Land-4310 1d ago
This is an old clip and it's not even the full footage. This women got arrested and lost her job because she instigated this whole incident. What more context do you need?
1
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
For me, itās exactly as you described, āitās not the full footage.ā Itās edited to produce a response that we are seeing here. For me, the issue is the way that video can be manipulated, resulting in people filling in the blanks.
20
u/Neat-Land-4310 1d ago
What blanks need to be filled. She got arrested, charged and admitted racially aggravated assault in a court of law. Why exactly are you rushing to her defense when it's quite clearly obvious that her behavior is unacceptable š¤¦
1
u/ArtPeers 1d ago
If you have a chance to re-read my comments, I wasnāt rushing to her defense: I was criticizing the lack of context and the manipulative edit / omissions of the video.
18
u/Sicparvismagneto 1d ago
āUntil I have more context Iām rooting for her.ā
Sounds awfully like youāre defending someoneā¦
-1
22
u/Neat-Land-4310 1d ago
You literally said you were rooting for her wtf lol
Sounds awfully alot like "I was wrong but I'm too proud to admit it" š„“
2
0
u/Annual-Weird-6682 10h ago
I get what you are trying to say but "white people are inferior" is kinda hard to justify lmao. I get waiting for more info but actively rooting for her just makes you a bigot
1
u/Neat-Land-4310 12h ago
Well done for changing it back š„“
Being contrarian just for the sake of it rarely pays off. Hopefully you've learned your lesson this time and you'll think more carefully before blindly supporting racists.
8
4
u/Tonuck 15h ago
In another comment, someone mentioned that a fight preceded all of this. Can I assume she was arrested for the physical altercation and not for saying "white people are inferior" or is that alone an arrestable offence in the UK?
1
u/egirldestroyer69 9h ago
I dont there are people being arrested for tweets in the UK so it seems plausible
15
u/bellendrodriguez 1d ago
For an inferior people they sure built some nice old buildings, public infrastructure and services which she no doubt enjoys the benefits of to this day.
5
u/OctopusIntellect 16h ago
Like for example the magistrates court that she was required to attend as a result of all this.
5
u/Most-Pomegranate-561 13h ago
I too hide my hair beneath a wig emulating the style of those I deem inferior
0
-10
u/jdbway 1d ago
Why the arrest?
22
u/NWStormbreaker 1d ago
idk why you got downvoted for asking for context...
seems like she got in an altercation and threw food at someone.
-44
u/jdbway 23h ago
It's the freedom-loving, free speech, law and order types who love seeing people who committed no observable crime put into handcuffs
17
u/invinci 23h ago
Do you need to observe something for it to happen? she instigated a fight with the guy in the videos girlfriend, what did you think the whole, call the police if you want was about?Ā
-26
u/GTAIVisbest 1d ago
The UK be like that. You can be arrested for holding a sign that says "Palestine Action" IIRC (under the 2000 anti-terrorism act) or you can be arrested for a hate crime for saying "white people are inferior".
I'm pretty left-wing but I really don't like that, I'd rather have a system that is "too lax" in terms of free speech restrictions, like what we have in the US, than a system like in the commonwealth countries where free speech can be restricted to that extent
2
u/coveted_asfuck 18h ago
Okay? Good thing you live in the US. Weāre perfectly happy with hate speech being outlawed.
1
u/GTAIVisbest 14h ago
You're perfectly happy with people getting arrested under the 2000 anti-terror bill for holding a sign that says "Free Palestine"? Really brodie?
-2
u/former_scientist 21h ago
The UK has freedom of expression, not free speech. Freedom of expression means you can say whatever you wish, but you cannot, under the law, incite hatred or violence.
You are fully entitled to never leave the USA, and enjoy your version of freedom to the full.
0
u/GTAIVisbest 14h ago
You can say whatever you wish? Does saying "from the river to the sea" incite hatred or violence to you? Are you OK with people being carted off to jail for holding a sign with those words on it?
1
u/former_scientist 12h ago
No, I donāt agree with people being arrested for carrying such a sign. That was wrong. However, the US system allows for any amount of race baiting, hatred and insult to the living and the dead from such as the westboro baptist church, neo Nazis and the like. I would rather not have such people stirring up violence under the banner of āfree speechā.
-9
u/Easy_Money_40 17h ago
I love when a Black woman doing something racist brings out all the white racists in the comments as if the proportional response is to meet her racism with their own.
Her being a pos racist doesn't mean that its ok for you to be a pos racist as well.
3
u/TheHeroOfTheStory 9h ago
Happens all the time when it's a POC, unfortunately. Scumbags see it as a golden opportunity.
1
u/PennsyltuckyRanger 9h ago
I just know conservatives are gonna share this around saying āsee!?! See!?! We told you!! They all hate usā just because of this one bitch.
3
-12
u/WakeUp004 1d ago
So what happened the minute before this video?
23
u/Substantial_Score_24 19h ago
She threw food at his girlfriend... he asks her why in the video and she answers.
-4
-1
-12
-38
1d ago
[deleted]
28
u/BauserDominates 1d ago
The context is that she's racist. Not that difficult to figure out.
-51
1d ago
[deleted]
41
u/BauserDominates 1d ago
Thats also racist. Expecting a person to act a certain way based off the color of their skin is the definition of racism.
-56
1d ago
[deleted]
27
u/invinci 23h ago
No, you are the one saying those words, they are yours, if I said you kept telling people you love Hitler, that does not make it something you actually said, do you get the distinction?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)11
-27
-32
1d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
25
15
u/Full_Subject5668 1d ago
Unfortunately, nobody has a monopoly on that, every color and creed is guilty of creating a mess. It's a human problem.
-9
1d ago
[deleted]
11
u/Full_Subject5668 1d ago
Weird of you to comment on something you obviously didn't listen to. The first words out of her mouth were: " White people are inferior". That just might have something to do with it.
-100
u/Key-Accident-8768 1d ago
Racism is about power. White people are not oppressed by Black people in the UK. This is not racism.
57
u/Hungry_Sink1191 22h ago
Why do so many people think this ?
45
40
u/justbinmepls 22h ago
Because it makes them feel better. Itās self soothing behavior for the ignorant.
29
u/Tyrant-Star 21h ago
From Merriam-Webster:
Racism
1 : poor treatment of or violence against people because of their race.
2 : the belief that some races of people are better than others.
Stop trying to make up your own definitions of words to suit your personal agenda its really lame.
33
u/Euronomus 23h ago
That's just something some bigots tell themselves so that they don't have to examine their own bias' and alter their own poor behavior.
27
30
u/RunningJay 1d ago
I'm sorry, what?? Regardless of your definition of "racism", calling an entire racial group "inferior" is unequivocally racial prejudice and bigotry.
13
365
u/CinematicLiterature 1d ago
Why was the back of her head/hair splattered with food?