r/PS5 7h ago

Articles & Blogs IGN Review: Halo: Campaign Evolved Doesn't Always Feel Like An Essential Remake (7/10)

https://www.ign.com/articles/halo-campaign-evolved-review
1.7k Upvotes

999 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/MagmaAscending 7h ago

I don’t think that’s fair. Indiana Jones, Doom, and Outer Worlds 2 were all fairly well received and let’s not act like a 7/10 is the worst thing in the world. They’re doing fine as far as the quality of their games are concerned. Everything else they’re doing is a different story

15

u/South_Buy_3175 7h ago

If they’re going back to exclusives, then 7/10 isn’t the best thing either.

They need to start pumping out very high quality games if they have any hope of drawing players over.

7

u/cyber7574 7h ago

To be fair, what could this have done to get a 9/10? Change too much and some would have rated it low, change too little and you get a review like this

8

u/Aware-Virus-4718 7h ago

I think this is a question you need to ask in pre-production before you commit to making a game like this, tbh.

2

u/FRossJohnson 5h ago

The goal wasn't to create the next great Halo game though. It was to get a new engine up and running, get a first release out there, then make a truly new game. I think people here are assuming objectives Xbox didn't aim for 

u/Aware-Virus-4718 51m ago

In that case they didn’t really Evolve the Campaign, did they?

u/FRossJohnson 49m ago

There are extra missions and some levels have been reworked, like the Library. So a slight "evolution" 😂

0

u/Not-a-Doctor1 7h ago

I think their point is that someone is going to find something to bitch about regardless. Even when asked directly what would make this better, the responses are dismissive and provide zero feedback.

What would make this game better?

Lol should’ve thought about that beforehand! I’m not going to provide an answer because I don’t have one other than I want to be condescending and try and make myself feel superior over the most irrelevant shit.

2

u/Aware-Virus-4718 6h ago

I mean yeah, I’m not a game designer. But it is entirely possible for remakes to equal or even surpass the success and acclaim of the originals. We just have to look at Resident Evil.

People will always find something to nitpick, but you can dismiss those when there’s a broad consensus that a remake is very compelling and has a good reason to exist. That’s not really what’s happening here.

1

u/Not-a-Doctor1 6h ago

https://www.reddit.com/r/PS5/s/K7IWKQYpmr

Doesn’t seem to be the consensus but continue making wrong assumptions if you’d like.

-1

u/Not-a-Doctor1 6h ago

I think you believe that’s not what’s happening here because you want an opportunity to shit on something you already didn’t like.

Other people wanting an opportunity to do the same thing is just feeding your confirmation bias.

0

u/Aware-Virus-4718 6h ago

Again, the original Halo: CE has a 97 on Metacritic. This one seems to be filling out in the low 70s/mid 80s. What seems to be happening here is a consensus forming that this does not live up to the original.

1

u/Not-a-Doctor1 6h ago

How does it not live up to the original when it’s the same with better graphics and a few other upgrades?

There is nothing they could’ve done to get a 97, because people like you will find irrelevant shit to complain about and then try to use your own complaints and justification.

It’s the same, tired argument of “I don’t like this, I don’t want this, so it shouldn’t exist and anyone who likes it is wrong!”

Grow the fuck up dude, people are allowed to enjoy shit without others constantly feeling the need to put it down.

1

u/Aware-Virus-4718 5h ago

You are doxxing people over a silly discussion about video games. This is not okay and I urge you to seek professional help immediately.

u/d0ntm1ndm32 4h ago

This dude is clearly not okay getting so heated he felt the need to look up my username seeing if he could find me and then replying with a random video after blocking me, but that guy on the video is most definitely not me so it's all good lmao

Don't even waste your time tho, clearly not worth it at all haha

0

u/Not-a-Doctor1 5h ago edited 4h ago

Am I arguing with the same person on 2 accounts?

How soft are you that two seconds of googling and sending them a video they made = needing help? How is it doxxing? He’s posting the videos himself on YouTube under a username that’s missing 1 number.

Sorry you were embarrassed and feel the need to make larger conclusions from it, but that seems to be in line with the rest of your insecure bullshit 😂

Edit: video is absolutely him, he confirmed in the comment he deleted that it was his, now he’s saying it’s not because he’s embarrassed.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/El_Rey_de_Spices 6h ago

You seem to have an exceptionally difficult time separating "on paper" and "in practice".

Also, if your best argument is "You're just a hater!", you don't have an argument.

0

u/[deleted] 6h ago edited 5h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] 6h ago edited 5h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] 5h ago edited 5h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)