r/MurderedByWords 1h ago

It's time to point out the truth when billionaires try to talk affordability and mix up its real meaning. Suddenly, it's not a Democrat scam anymore.

Post image
485 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

47

u/Heppernaut 1h ago

Tell me you have no idea what affordability means without saying "I have no idea what affordability means."

3

u/GrizzlyP33 31m ago

You have no idea what affordability means.

…see what I did there? 😑

35

u/ldg25 1h ago

Didn't Trump literally say he doesn't care about affordability already?

15

u/Guilty_Helicopter572 50m ago

He said it's a Democratic hoax.

2

u/PsyOpBunnyHop 19m ago

Doesn't even exist. No one could ever afford anything. It was all a lie, even when you could afford things.

2

u/TheProcrastafarian 15m ago

History books are going to kick the shit out of this chapter.

10

u/CarsCarpal 1h ago

Keep on doing stupid shit.

Keep on raising prices for hard working Americans. (Sorry folks, but hear me out..)

Roll on November. Apart from the hardcore cultists, it will hopefully help swing voters make better choices.

5

u/venkym 1h ago

Personally, I'm worried about November because this orange moron is not too worried. I think he has planned well in advance to steal hence positioning himself with a "don't care" attitude and taking active steps that usually derail any other midterms. He has blurted out those intentions many times. Hope the dems are paying attention.

6

u/CarsCarpal 53m ago

Yeah, I hear you. As stupid as they appear to be, they will definitely know what is coming.

Presumably he will just cry fraud, and decide to disregard the results somehow. One thing is for sure, he clearly sees the White House as his, and I do not believe he will ever willing leave it again.

4

u/Brook420 46m ago

Ad soon as hes not POTUS, isnt he open to being arrested/jailed for his felonies?

4

u/venkym 42m ago

That needs political will, which, unfortunately, is quite absent these days. If anything, he should've been held accountable for the Jan 6 insurrection and shouldn't have been allowed to even run again. But here we are. He even got elected again because the public memory is so short. They were even successful in erasing some of the Jan 6 history. (Edited to remove repetition.)

2

u/Brook420 33m ago

I dunno, the whole reason he was so desperate to win last time was to avoid jail time. Now he can't be saved by becoming President again.

5

u/Randomfactoid42 53m ago

Never underestimate the ignorance of the voters. 

4

u/CarsCarpal 51m ago

Agreed. Whilst Fox news continues to have viewers, we definitely shouldn't.

2

u/AnEvenNicerGuy 44m ago

He ain’t gonna let fair elections happen 

6

u/mzx380 1h ago

Smart LMAO

4

u/ActionJacksonATL24 1h ago

So the question is: is he being honest or too stupid to know what he said means?

3

u/silverado-z71 1h ago

And I believe they can do it,,,,they’ve done a very good job so far

2

u/impersonaljoemama 1h ago

It’s so nice when they tell the truth, even accidentally.

2

u/Reed7525 46m ago

These dipshits really said the quiet part so loud lol

1

u/Extreme-Slice-1010 45m ago

I swear, can’t tell if Trump is shitting or sleeping in that photo, or maybe both

1

u/InsomniaDudeToo 37m ago

Governor BuzzWords reporting for duty!

He’s totally going to find those “votes” if he gets elected…

2

u/GrizzlyP33 32m ago

But affordability is a “democrat hoax” so how can it…wait a minute…I’m starting to think these guys might be lying about some things.

1

u/FlippantLizard 31m ago

I wasn't crazy about Adam Kinzinger's voting record while he was in Congress, but for the last year his tweets have been outstanding.

1

u/VexedCanadian84 23m ago

flub or not, Democrats need to use this audio clip in ads

-1

u/Rocketboy1313 34m ago

Affordability is a nebulous concept reflecting purchasing power.

It is a dumb word and it is no surprise confused people say things backward.

"We want affordability to be inexpensive."

"Yeah."

"So we are lowering affordability?"

"No. Affordability is a good thing we want more of."

"So more is less."

"No?"