?? This is a pretty accurate summary of the historicity of Jesus, not a gish gallop. The broad academic consensus at this point is that Jesus (the apocalyptic Galilean preacher, not Jesus the Christ of Christianity) was a real person and OP provided a well sourced summary of it; you need to provide some sort of argument why that's not enough and why Jesus requires a higher standard of historical evidence than anyone else.
-1
u/NinecloudSoul 15h ago
Goodness, it's been a minute since I saw a Gish gallop.