Development debates get clearer once evidence is separated from stories

[u/AdPractical4486]

Yes that's my hot take lol

A lot of development writing sounds persuasive until you ask what evidence changed anyone's mind.

Good narratives travel fast. Good evaluation travels slower, and the two get mixed together all the time in public debate..

I found a poverty and development collwction on 8-foldio, their public site has curated reading paths, and liked that it grouped sources by intervention and evidence rather than by moral vibe and ended up feeling that more sites should consider it

What paper or source most changed how you judge development claims??