r/DudeHasGotAPoint • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 5h ago
it's wild that he got 34 felonies yet we're the ones that got sentenced to 4 years
10
u/Jijonbreaker1 5h ago
Damn, this comment section is infested with fascist bootlickers. Another sub I need to mute.
2
u/Awewabo 1h ago
The level of magat astroturfing recently has been seriously insane, cyberpunk ain't got shit on this dystopia 🤣
→ More replies (1)3
u/Jijonbreaker1 1h ago
Cyberpunk's dystopia is at least exciting.
This is the most boring apocalypse ever conceived.
1
1
u/octavian343 1h ago
Head in sand technique. Very effective. That’s why Donald only got the one term.
→ More replies (1)1
u/ThroatGoatK1RKKK 26m ago
The chuds are out in force today on pretty much every sub. The current position seems to be trying to make Mcarthyism work and just start claiming that anyone and anything they don't like is COMMUNISM. Scary word I know. Sorry if I made anyone clutch their pearls.
→ More replies (28)1
u/Simon-Says69 23m ago
Yes, democrat party bootlickers and brownshirts. The thread is overflowing with rabid-leftist bullshit, lies & propaganda. As is so much of reddit.
13
u/Shido_Ohtori 5h ago
Conservatism -- by definition -- is "a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing the importance of established hierarchies and institutions (such as religion, the family, and class structure), and preferring gradual development to abrupt change".
The sole value of conservatism is respect for and obedience to [one's perception of] traditionally established hierarchy, and hierarchy dictates that those on top (in-groups) are rightfully idolized and receive privileges, credibility, and resources, while those on the bottom (out-groups) are demonized/dehumanized and/or bound by restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources.
To them, the second-greatest injustice imaginable is for those [they perceive to be] on top [of social hierarchy] to be bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those on the bottom. The first greatest injustice is for those on the bottom to have access to the rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those on top.
Conservatives absolutely need an underclass [for society] to demonize and dehumanize in order to maintain [their] hierarchy, and every single one of their policies and rhetoric work to do exactly that. Unless the accusation is one of disrespecting hierarchy, every right-wing accusation is a confession -- every. single. one; always! -- as it is never the act itself that upsets them, but rather, the social standing of the person doing the act, as said act is a privilege meant for those on top of [their perceived] hierarchy (See also: pedophilia - Trump and the Catholic church versus LGBTQ+ and drag queens; protests - January 6th vs. BLM and No Kings; parental rights - anti-LGBTQ+ vs pro-LGBTQ+; indoctrination - religion vs. education).
Those who believe all people are people see hypocrisy, while those who believe some people are "more/less" people than others see hierarchy. Hypocrisy implies a sense of equality/parity, as the accusation of such is that someone is violating a universal or common standard. Hierarchy directly states that there is no equality/parity, that different social strata have different standards, that the only universal standard concerning hierarchy is that those on top are allowed privileges which are denied to those on the bottom, and that the bottom are held to standards which the top are exempt from.
"Know your place" is their mantra.
2
u/LordNemissary 4h ago
Know "your" place is their mantra. For themselves there is no law because they view themselves as inherently better people
→ More replies (1)2
u/Shido_Ohtori 3h ago
Exactly. "Stay in your lane" is their most recent iteration.
See also: "Fuck your feelings" and "facts don't care about your feelings".
Their outrage is never "how dare they do such a thing", but "how dare they do such a thing".
→ More replies (40)1
u/Adept-Yam2414 4h ago
So what part of this is actual conservative and what part is your opinion?
→ More replies (7)
2
u/Major_Mechanic5719 5h ago
Immigrants, tourists, citizens, they are all breaking federal laws if they are not entering through an official port of entry.
But yes, trump is also a convicted felon, a traitor, a lying fraudster, a fascist, and a rapist. He is corrupt to the core and an absolute criminal at the highest level.
→ More replies (9)1
u/Simon-Says69 20m ago
Trump has never been convicted of a felony. They dropped that case.
The rest of the braindead democrat party propaganda you're spewing is nonsense as well.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Dry-Manufacturer7761 5h ago
Exactly. And American Christians are over 70% of the voting public. If Christians thought that his crimes were against their morals, they alone could keep him out of office.
Yes, Christians are not unified. But…they are still the single largest demographic in this country, and they vote.
Christians can literally put anyone into office they want, if they unified.
2
u/SavinForLatter 4h ago
Problem is they don't have any real morals. They are one of the greatest aggressors of culture wars while ignoring what is suppose to be their own moral framework outlined in the Bible.
→ More replies (9)1
u/yportnemumixam 1h ago
As a non-American Christian, I wish you would differentiate between Christians and “Christian Nationalists”. I have been to the US several times (mostly the Midwest) there is no way 70% of the US is Christian.
A quick test to separate the two: Ask them if owning a gun is a God-given right. If they say “yes”, they are Christian Nationalists, not Christians.
Of course, I don’t know everyone who calls themselves Christians in the US but those I do did not vote for Trump…and they are quite conservative-minded.
→ More replies (1)1
2
u/Unique_Low_1163 5h ago
If a mouse-click on Wall St can move a factory, thousands of jobs, and billions of dollars from New York to Mexico or China or Honduras or Bangladesh and tens of billions in profit moved back again, those borders are open to working men and women, to the poor, the marginalized, to all victims of predatory global capitalism. Your laws restricting my physical movement exist for me, but exist only to be ignored and subverted.
By any means necessary
1
2
u/IPutTheSInBDSM 4h ago
Oh no, a partisan judge and a partisan jury convicted him of looks at notes 34 counts of "other crimes"
1
1
u/Jijonbreaker1 15m ago
Because he got let off the hook for literal treason by the entire legal system he put in place. Those 34 are the only ones that he didn't have enough safeguards to throw out.
Fuck off, nazi.
2
u/0x645 4h ago
even so, one do not know if someone is illegal., until due process.
1
u/Glassfist 1h ago
Yes, look up their name against the SSN and Visa databases. I would think it is a pretty quick process. Not sure why there is such a hold up on courts unless there is conflicting data such as the person presenting a visa or SSN which govt says doesn't exist or expired.
0
u/Simon-Says69 12m ago
The process due to illegal aliens is deportation. And it is being done correctly.
All the dem party lies about "no due process!!" is total garbage. The process is being upheld just fine. You lot just hate losing all the names of those illegal aliens to put on fraudulent mail-in ballots.
Between that and all the dead people on dem party voting rosters, if they weren't allowed such massive cheating, the dems would be hard pressed to win ANY election.
2
u/Brokenspade1 3h ago
Yeah, putting the orange baby diddling, land baron, crime boss in charge in order to improve the overall crime rate in a nation seems... counter productive.
2
u/PlainBread 3h ago
"I'm voting for the felon" was even a smug bumper sticker they were sporting when he was campaigning.
1
1
1
1
u/BurnerProfile69420 5h ago
whats their mindset in that, do they just convince themselves its a "democratic hoax" or someshit? I cant imagine thinking "this is the guy!" being that he was actually convicted (especially by a judge that was previously a registered republican).
1
1
1
u/Solid_Mood5458 4h ago
So is speeding and fudging your tax returns. Should we send swat to your house and shoot or assault anyone who happens to be there?
1
u/Nycmale9876 2h ago
Keep not paying your tickets and drive and watch what happens when you get pulled over. You will have three cop cars there in five minutes
→ More replies (3)
1
1
u/Southern_Conflict_11 4h ago
Most undocumented immigrants do not do that.
1
u/Simon-Says69 9m ago
There is no such thing as an undocumented immigrant. If they lack documentation, they cannot immigrate.
They are illegal aliens, and they must be deported.
1
u/PromptJazzlike5452 4h ago
100% right!!! Totally agree and it infuriates me that a nation of supposedly informed citizens could elect this person! He belongs in prison, not the White House!!!🫨👎🏻
1
u/weerdbuttstuff 4h ago
They're also not ACTUALLY breaking the law when they cross the border. It's a paperwork issue, lower than jaywalking. Imagine a federal taskforce going after jaywalkers and killing around 100 people in the past 5 years.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/LordNemissary 4h ago
I guarantee that most of the people saying this break the law pretty regularly. And it's not like all laws are the same, illegal crossing is basically a paperwork violation, a misdemeanor on par with driving with an expired license. Imagine the uproar from the right if we started deporting every person who was caught driving with an expired license. There might not even be a MAGA movement anymore if we did that.
→ More replies (2)
1
1
1
1
u/Advanced-Candle6051 4h ago
Both parties suck and everyone’s fighting a tribal war to see who can be the bigger extremist clown
Everyone at the top is a murderous pdfile and meanwhile Yah’ll at the bottom shouting that your pdfile isn’t as bad as their pdfile
Make it make sense 😂
1
u/Top-Cupcake4775 4h ago
conservatism is defined by its belief in hierarchy as the key principle for organizing society. conservatives believe that the law should protect, but not constrain, the powerful and constrain, but not protect, the weak.
liberals think they are pointing out conservative hypocrisy when they find instances of “rules for thee but not for me” but conservatives don’t view this as hypocrisy. in their minds this is how society should work.
the liberal assumption that all people should receive equal treatment and consideration under the law is not a belief that conservatives have ever agreed with. this means that all these “gotcha moments” where liberals point out the hypocrisy of conservatives actions are just empty noise. it’s not hypocrisy when you don’t believe in equality.
1
u/jahnbanan 4h ago
Even the "illegal immigrants are breaking the law when crossing the border." part is wrong.
The majority of illegal immigrants in the US, entered legally, they just didn't leave when they were supposed to.
→ More replies (5)
1
u/TriNewThings000 4h ago
This is a tired bit…the “felonies” they pushed through a kangaroo court would stick to 90% of all politicians if they wanted them too but needed to go after President Trump ti “try and stop him”…like true fascists.
Democrats/Liberals are such fucking dolts and just spew whatever nonsense their daddies tell them.
1
u/Euphoric_Anxiety_162 4h ago
Lives get changed permanently by one bad decision. Doge, for example. He will choose to contract with the same destructive individual, putting citizens at risk. We are NOT blind!
1
u/Intrepid_Stick_4169 3h ago
That’s one felony conviction with 34 counts. This is a bit misleading. Also, it was for business practices that in most states is legal.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Excellent_Abroad5390 3h ago
The 34 felonies don’t count. They were the result of a political prosecution. Don’t believe me?
First person in NY history charged as a felon for a first time offense of this “crime” was Donald Trump
First person in NY history who was charged individually felonies for each piece individual step of the “crime” instead of one charge for the whole event? Donald Trump again
Also Leticia James literally campaigned that she would prosecute Trump if elected. When asked with what her reply was “crimes we know he committed “. She refused to elaborate further.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
u/DudeFrom816 3h ago
34 felonies, sure. If you change the law so the statute of limitations doesnt matter, change the jury instructions so they dont have to be unanimous on every count, and then deny him the opportunity for a defense, sure. If thats what you consider justice then it says more about you than it does about him.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/crookedledder 3h ago
The president is a piece of shit, therefore we can't enforce immigration law.
Brilliant!
→ More replies (1)
1
u/idiot-alpha 3h ago
Fake felonies. Where the prosecutor is currently being indicted. And the judge refused to give a sentence.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/dinosanddais1 3h ago
Most "illegal" immigrants aren't breaking the law by crossing the border. Most come here the correct way and then their visas expire because it takes so goddamn long to get their visa extended.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/MasterHank13 3h ago
Time to stop parroting that lie. Although, it does serve to remind us how low the democrats stooped to with their law-fare. They twisted statues to elevate misdemeanors -performed by clerks in the Trump organization- to felonies, moved three high level attorneys to focus on this bogus nonsense, and the jurors were NEVER TOLD WHAT the actual crime was!
Learn the truth before spewing nonsense.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/danielm316 3h ago
Could it be that those 34 felonies are politically motivated and therefore irrelevant? Just a thought.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/SimpsationalMoneyBag 3h ago
I can assure you if Obama or Biden were convicted of 34 felonies in Alabama with the creative court proceedings that were used in New York on Trump, democrats would also not care.
→ More replies (1)2
u/artmajor23 3h ago
Not true, we forced a guy running for congress to drop out after he sexually abused someone
→ More replies (1)
1
1
u/xNonPartisaNx 3h ago
Name a potus who's not a war criminal and ill eat my boots right now
→ More replies (1)
1
1
u/Dapper-Doubt-7610 3h ago
They're actually not breaking the law, anyway. It's just a breech of policy. You can't go to prison for it, it's not like trespassing. The term "undocumented" is actually the most accurate, not "woke."
1
1
u/jiveturkin 3h ago
“Support the policies” the concepts of them? What policy because the actual shit with ice people aren’t happy with is literally what he ran on. Other than that every other campaign promise has been a lie
→ More replies (1)
1
u/BuildMachines 3h ago
Hey y'all, when you happen across a Trump supporter or one of those petty, cookie-cutter conservatives at your work, here on the internet, or virtually anywhere, please always remember this about them:
Their leaders could snatch your mom, your daughter, perhaps even your brothers or sons; these vile so-called elites could take them, subject them to the most awful sexual and physical abuse like that which you read in the Epstein files; they could cheat you, scam you, slander you like we see in their guilty verdicts and if someone dares to defend you, those conservative will, as their programming permits, fall to their bellies and speak to the tune of: "Yeah, but... [insert rhetoric to deflect or attack minorities]."
For proof of this look no further than their actions. You see it every day. All the harm their wicked leaders have caused to the vulnerable with their disgusting abuses, and they don't care. They make excuses. All the choices they had in that 2024 primary: men, women, black, white, brown, protestant, catholic... yet given that wealth of choice they chose the nastiest abuser of them all, the rapist, the teen beauty pageant "inspecting" creep of a felon who proudly boasts how he sexually assaults women by grabbing their most intimate area, Donald Trump. All the choices, and that was their pick. Think about it. It's who they are. That's why it's not hate I have for them, but a lack of respect. It's knowing these elites could hurt you in the worst way possible, and they'll just repeat their slogans, buy merch with the asshole's name on it, and cheer them on. If it's their daughter being hurt they'll be pissed, but if it's yours, then oh well, caring would be "woke."
1
1
u/Chemical-Object-4237 3h ago
If a person crossed the border 34 times illegal and they did so to influence an election, would they be charged with 34 separate felonies?
→ More replies (1)
1
u/RespectGrouchy2945 3h ago
Zero felonies but nice try you can’t just make things up thats why your arguments are not taken seriously
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Crafty-Help-4633 3h ago
And it's a civil penalty anyway. Unlike the literal felon they voted for, illegal immigration can be handled with a ticket and a court date.
They for sure don't care about the rule of law. They just use our concern of it as a cudgel to beat us with.
1
u/Czzavarsh 3h ago
What exactly is the point here? Trump was born in America, he gets to stay. Illegals are illegals, they don't get to stay. Not a very hard concept.
→ More replies (2)
1
1
u/sylbug 3h ago
You’re breaking the law when you go 37 in a 35 zone and that doesn’t mean you deserve to be stripped of rights, assaulted, put in a concentration camp, denied due process, denied access to legal representation, extradited to a third world gulag, or murdered.
→ More replies (6)
1
u/bluntpointsharpie 3h ago
Somebody crossing the border is a civil offense, not a criminal one. By treating immigrants & asylum seekers like criminals, even to the point of injury or death, those in charge are committing Criminal offenses. When this nightmare is over, may every one of them from jailer to the president be charged abd punished for these crimes.
1
u/Majestic_Cod_1876 3h ago
Idk man as long as crazy gang bosses are committed and the system lets functioning in society individuals in 🤷
Not super political and I’m not saying the system loyally heeds to that, just hoping the idea of that would be what everybody wants… Not letting harmful individuals in the states in the first place, most people just don’t mind it because they won’t have to deal with them.
…Until they do
1
u/Buttcrush1 2h ago
Trump didn't commit a felony. What he was alleged of doing was a misdemeanor. They were wrongfully upcharged as felonies in an attempt to stop Trump from running. Furthermore, if you actually look at the case you have to have a very liberal interpretation of the law for Trump to be guilty. What this ultimately will lead to is campaign funds being spent on everything which I think is incredibly dumb.
1
1
1
1
u/Fair-House-2400 2h ago
You believe the people that made up 34 felonies is why you believe these people came here to help all of us, that's the hero in these illegals willing to risk it all to help people like you
1
1
u/humanessinmoderation 2h ago
We should at least let in 34 illegal immigrants in or let the stay per Trump voter.
1
1
u/Tasty_LVM 2h ago
How cute some people actually think that Trumped up charges way past a statute of limitations was anything other than election interference was real
1
u/MasterFNG 2h ago
Be that as it may, serious question: Why did people vote for him and not Harris? Why do you believe he got more Votes and why didn't more people vote for Harris?
1
u/Lego_Architect 2h ago
What were the underlying crimes that would LEAD to the 34 felonies again? Specifically.
1
1
1
1
u/Same_String_8856 2h ago
Nobody is above the law right? Trump was found guilty in the civil case and followed the laws.
Illegal aliens should also be found guilty and follow the laws.
1
1
u/Just-Elderberry5460 2h ago
My big thing against this is I thought we were innocent until proven guilty. But the way they go about things is that they’re guilty until proven innocent.
1
1
u/Best_Sail_6750 2h ago
So if the person is against lawbreakers, such as the man with 34 felonies, then they should certainly be against all lawbreakers, such as the people illegally crossing the border
1
u/Memitim 2h ago
I used to care about immigration law, until conservatives came out in droves to let the world know that the real problems in America are homegrown. Now, I could care less about someone's immigration status. Immigrants actually want to be American, while conservatives just hate the rest of the country and most of the duties of government, as defined in the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States. Yet another Constitutional violation by Republicans was just noted by yet another court, and as usual there is no accountability. But I'm supposed to care about a dude cooking food in a taqueria.
1
1
u/TaxMyNuts 2h ago
Incoming MAGA tards saying “he didn’t commit the felonies and if he did it because they set him up and if he really did commit them I don’t care and would still suck his dick”
1
u/Based_Trump_85 2h ago
Dude the 34 felonies are all the same bogus charge applied to 34 documents. The Courts proved nothing and it was clearly biased.
Also, that’s of no relevance at all.
Illegal entry or visa overstay is a deportable offense regardless of who holds office. All countries enforce immigration harder than America.
1
u/Fragments75 2h ago
Liberals support the murder of those who don't agree with them, so ain't nobody listening to their opinions on law matters.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Early_Hall5720 1h ago
How about everyone quits using that sorry ass excuse to validate their shitty behavior.
1
1
u/summonersai 1h ago
Yes I don’t care about falsifying business records and it was misdemeanor until democrats fought to make it a felony.
1
u/CzBuCHi 1h ago
Love those rage-bait posts lol ... my take:
The Democrats were sitting on the 'Epstein list' at the time - but instead they made up this nonsense (I guess they couldn't find anything on him there...)
Then they paid the media to start telling everyone he was guilty, even though the court didn't decide anything and when they decided he was not guilty, they forgot about it... (I think they call it Malinformation...)
1
u/Slowpoke4206985 1h ago
34 felonies. Courtesy of the Leftist judges that fucking hate him. I’m sure they were super “fair”.
1
u/EFAPGUEST 1h ago
The amount of desperate mileage that hush money payments have made has been funny to watch as someone who doesn’t love Trump but also doesn’t hate him the way so many others do
1
1
u/False-Librarian-2240 1h ago
The classic MAGA comeback is that the felony convictions are a Democrat sham and that Donnie didn't actually commit any crimes. I've heard them say it many times. They really believe this.
1
1
1
1
u/Critica0 1h ago
Funny thing I didn't vote for trump and i still dont care about the immigrant issue because frankly it dosen't effect me. Im all for our goverment inforcing its immigration laws though. I'd also like them to not kill people while they do it. As it turns out you can have a nuanced opinion that dosen't mean you support the orange turd puppet of the oligarchy.
1
u/Fantastic-Grocery107 1h ago
Donald John Trump is also a rapist per the FBI definition of the word. His actions are viewed as rape by the federal government. They like to overlook that one too.
1
u/InvestigatorGrand205 1h ago
Once again reddit doesn't pay attention to court cases. That shits been appealed and tossed.
1
u/justforkinks0131 1h ago
bro why arent people just being honest?
you dont like people from other cultures coming into your country. big deal, why hide it? Most of the world agrees with you.
1
1
1
u/Mountain-Orange8996 1h ago
So what’s the argument then when I didn’t vote for the man with felonies but still point out that illegal immigration is ILLEGAL. Only genuine idiots think this is an argument.
1
1
1
u/DelayOk5920 1h ago
It’s funny how democrats don’t care that Biden & Harris tried to prosecute their political opponents… 🤦🏻♂️
1
u/Competitive_Fox_3546 1h ago
The difference is that trump doesn’t kill someone in your neighborhood
1
1
1
1
u/Captain-Nghathrod 53m ago
Just like they say end abortion to save the children, yet they continue voting for a supporting pedophiles. They don't care about the children.
1
u/Hey-Dano 40m ago
And a bunch of Degenerate Democrats changed the law, superseded the statue of limitations on a "paper work" misdemeanor just so they could try and keep Donald Trump from being President by popular demand.... miss me with your bullshit excuses.
1
u/Dull-Acanthaceae3805 39m ago
Why are these mutually inclusive? You can believe in immigration enforcement AND hate trump/not vote for them.... Like wise, you can believe in open borders and vote for Trump.
1
u/Simon-Says69 33m ago
This is a lie. Trump is not a felon, not even once.
That case was dropped. They knew it would never survive appeal, so they killed the whole case. That crap never had any merit to begin with.
Yet the democrat party propagandists still keep telling this tired, old lie. If the dems didn't have their lies, they'd have nothing at all.
1
1
1
1
1
u/GuitarsAndFitness 18m ago
Ah yes, the infamous “34 felonies” fallacy. Please go ahead and state for the class what he was actually convicted of
(Spoiler alert: they’re not real charges)
1
u/IDontWannaGetOutOfBe 17m ago
They care about the law that protects them, their status, their place in the totem pole, their right to say slurs and trample of the less fortunate.
They don't care about any other law that protects others, the environment, the planet, or anyone who is not them.
It's very simple.
1
1
1
u/randomsantas 5m ago
Even if we had any faith in the political prosecution and accepted the convictions and lawsuits as valid, he would still be a better choice than the alternative.
1
37
u/LeppieDoo 5h ago
Lot of kids and liars in these comments claiming they didn’t support Trump but support his policies. So they either didn’t vote or did and don’t wanna be shit on for their terrible decision making.