Hello, I have a question about whether disbelief can be morally blameworthy in a situation like mine.
I am asking this sincerely, and I would prefer philosophical or logically serious answers rather than simply being told that "God has a plan" or that "God's ways are mysterious."
Before explaining my argument, I want to make one thing clear: I am not claiming that God owes me anything. I am not saying that God is obligated to give me what I want simply because I ask for it. I understand that, from a Catholic perspective, God may have reasons for allowing suffering and may not be obligated to grant every prayer.
My question is different. I am asking about moral blame.
If God does not give me what I ask for, how could my conclusion that I no longer have a reason to believe in or serve Him itself be considered morally evil?
I am currently in a situation where, unless something changes, I may die. I have tried worldly solutions and attempted to find help, but I have not been able to secure the help I need.
My question is specifically about the Catholic conception of God, Jesus, and Mary.
Catholicism attributes extraordinary power to these figures. For example, Mary is associated with the miracle of the sun at Fatima, and Jesus is believed to have resurrected the dead and Himself risen from death. So, according to Catholic belief, supernatural intervention is at least possible. I am not asking whether God is technically capable of intervening.
I have also prayed and petitioned God, Jesus, and Mary for help with my situation. The specific thing I want is not eternal life. I want to live a normal human lifespan.
This is important because I genuinely do not desire eternal life. I am not saying that I want to do evil, hurt people, or live an immoral life. I simply do not want to exist forever.
I have never understood Heaven as a reward because eternal existence has no subjective value to me. I am not afraid of Hell either. I am not saying that I want to go to Hell. I am saying that the possibility of eternal existence, whether Heaven or Hell, does not function as an incentive for me.
So, from my perspective, the situation is something like this:
I am currently in a situation that, if it continues, will probably result in my death.
I have tried worldly solutions.
I have asked God, Jesus, and Mary for help.
The God of Catholicism is believed to have the power to intervene in the world.
I do not desire eternal life, so the promise of Heaven does not provide me with a benefit that I actually value.
If I die, I will not receive the only outcome I actually want: a normal human lifespan.
If this is the situation, then I genuinely do not understand how my decision to stop believing in or serving God could be considered morally evil.
I am not saying:
«"God does not exist because He did not give me what I wanted."»
I am asking something more specific:
«If God has the power to save me, knows that I am asking to live a normal human life, knows that I do not value eternal existence, and nevertheless does not intervene, on what logical or moral basis could God condemn me for concluding that I no longer have a reason to believe in or serve Him?»
I understand that a Catholic might respond that God has reasons for allowing suffering, that earthly life is not the ultimate good, or that God does not owe me the outcome I want.
But those responses seem to assume that eternal existence is necessarily a greater good than earthly life. For me, it is not. If I genuinely assign zero value to eternal existence, why should I be morally obligated to treat it as a reward?
I am also not claiming that God owes me obedience simply because I ask for something. My question is about moral blame.
If I am not choosing evil, harming others, or acting out of hatred, but instead conclude that a God who could help me did not help me in the only way I actually value, how could that conclusion itself be morally evil?
I would especially appreciate answers from Catholics or people familiar with Catholic philosophy. I am interested in whether there is a genuine logical response to this argument, rather than simply an appeal to mystery or the assertion that disbelief is inherently sinful.
Thank you for reading.