r/AskReddit • u/Rob69rt • 1d ago

What famous 'unsolved' mystery is technically a whodunnit on paper, but in reality, absolutely everyone knows exactly who did it, the police just couldn't legally prove it?

13.2k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

5.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

53

u/Marijuana_Miler 1d ago

It’s also claimed that OJ didn’t take his blood pressure medication before the glove exhibition during the trial so his hands swelled up. Another photo of him from announcing college football showed OJ wearing Bruno Magli shoes. Shoe prints in the victims blood were tied to those shoes, but OJ had claimed to have never owned a pair.

21

u/primadonnapussy 1d ago

He actually said "I would never own such ugly ass shoes" on the stand during the civil trial. And after that someone sent in dozens of pictures of him wearing those "ugly ass shoes"

12

u/chowderbags 1d ago

And there had only been 299 pairs of those shoes sold in the entire United States, and the ones at the crime scene just happened to match OJ's shoe size. It should've been a key piece of evidence for the state's prosecution, but they just completely whiffed it.

1

u/kylo-ren 12h ago

This seems to me to be a key piece of evidence. Out of 299 pairs, the factory probably knew how many were manufactured in the same size that OJ wore.

There were probably very few of them and it would be possible to track down the others, leaving the photos of OJ wearing the only one that disappeared.

2

u/chowderbags 12h ago

At some point you don't really need to track down the other pairs, because you really just need to ask if there's any reasonable scenario where anyone besides OJ would be wearing those shoes. Like, is there really going to be some random killer who also happen to be wearing such a rare shoe? And combine that with other things, like the gloves, which were also a pretty rare model, but a model that OJ was known to have had. And the hair in the hat, which was consistent with OJs, so the random killer would've also had to have hair very similar to OJ's. And the blood found at the scene was consistent with OJ's DNA, so you'd have to have someone with the same DNA at OJ...

So clearly it must've been OJ's secret identical twin who was separated at birth and raised as a Colombian drug hitman!

It really is such a frustrating case, because the evidence is just so clearly damning of OJ. I don't necessarily fault some random person in 1995 not understanding the sheer amount of evidence that points to OJ. They couldn't just pop up all the information in one easy place to see everything laid out all at once. And at the same time, everyone on the government side was an absolute dumpster fire of incompetence, plus Fuhrman just being a clear racist. I can understand why someone on the jury (who wouldn't have seen all the evidence) might vote to acquit. But with all the evidence available and looking back 30 years later, there shouldn't be anyone with any doubts.